5 min read

The Sea That Refused to Drown the Flood Generation

Rabbi Eliezer sails into dead water and carries a barrel of it to Hadrian. The Nefilim wore the sun like jewelry. The flood came down already boiling.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. A Barrel of Dead Water Carried to Rome
  2. Giants Who Wore the Sun
  3. The Twelve-Month Sentence
  4. Three Views of the Same World

A Barrel of Dead Water Carried to Rome

Two of the most famous sages in Jewish memory were out on the Great Sea when their ship drifted into a patch of water that had gone completely still. No current. No swell. Just glass.

Rabbi Eliezer said they had been brought there for a reason. He and Rabbi Yehoshua filled a barrel with the dead water and carried it back to land, and from there to Rome, into the presence of the emperor Hadrian. The same Hadrian who would later flatten Judea, ban Torah study, and plow salt into the ruins. The rabbis poured the strange water into a bowl. Hadrian poured ordinary water into it. The ordinary water vanished into the still water without a ripple.

Hadrian asked the real question. Rivers pour into the sea every day. The Nile, the Euphrates, the Jordan. Year after year. Why does the sea not climb the beach and swallow the cities? The rabbis answered him. Because God built a sea that drinks without filling. The world has limits because God built limits into the world's appetite. The sea was constrained not by physics but by design. And the still water in the barrel was proof. It was the part of the sea that God had designated as stopped.

Giants Who Wore the Sun

The Nefilim were not merely large. The rabbis said they were so large that they reached up and caught the sun like a piece of jewelry. They wore it the way a man wears a medallion. The sun that illuminated the whole earth hung on a giant's neck like an ornament.

These were the same generation that provoked the flood. They had taken creation and worn it like personal property. The sky was not above them, it was at their chest level. The sun was not beyond their reach. What had been set apart as ordered and distant, they had pulled close and domesticated. The flood was the end of a world that had confused scale. Men who wore the sun had forgotten where the boundary ran between themselves and everything else. The waters came to re-establish the boundary from the outside since the Nefilim had refused to maintain it from the inside.

The Twelve-Month Sentence

The flood lasted twelve months. Not forty days. Forty days was the duration of the rain. But the water stood on the earth for twelve full months, and the generation that drowned waited in it for all of that time.

The rabbis taught that the water was not cold. God had prepared it in the depths before releasing it. The generation that had made the world uninhabitable for everyone who had not stolen, who had not distorted, was now inhabiting a world of boiling water. The punishment carried the shape of the crime. They had made the world hot with their violence. The water arrived already hot.

Twelve months was the length of the sentence for the wicked in Gehenna. The rabbis connected the flood to that calendar deliberately. The generation was being judged and sentenced simultaneously. The water was the court and the punishment. Noah's year in the ark was the year the verdict was executed. When the water receded and Noah's foot touched dry ground, the sentence had been served.

Three Views of the Same World

A dead sea that proves divine order. Giants who held the sun like a pendant. A flood boiled from below before it fell from above. Each of the three passages from Bereshit Rabbah tells a different story about the same basic claim: the world before the flood had pushed past every boundary that creation had set for it, and the flood was the world being returned to its own definitions.

The rabbis were not trying to explain the flood as natural disaster or to reduce it to punishment. They were reading it as the restoration of a geometry that the Nefilim and their generation had broken. The still water in the barrel was the part of the sea that was still keeping its original promise. Everything else had been violated. That water, somehow, had held.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

3 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Bereshit Rabbah 13:9Bereshit Rabbah

We see rivers flowing into the sea, day after day, year after year. Shouldn't the oceans be overflowing? It’s a question that puzzled even ancient rabbis, and it leads us to a fascinating discussion in Bereshit Rabbah, a collection of rabbinic interpretations on the Book of Genesis.

" This verse sets the stage for a story about Rabbi Eliezer and Rabbi Yehoshua, two prominent sages, who apparently took a rather unusual sea voyage.

They’re sailing on the Great Sea, perhaps the Mediterranean, when their ship enters a peculiar patch of water – a place where the water is completely still. Rabbi Eliezer, sensing something unusual, declares, "We came here only for some test!" A test, perhaps, of their understanding of the natural world, or maybe something deeper.

Intrigued, they fill a barrel with this strange, still water. And where do they take it? None other than Rome, to present it to Hadrian himself – the Roman Emperor, may his bones be crushed (a rather colorful expression, I must say!). Hadrian, curious about the nature of seawater, asks them how it is that the sea doesn’t flood the land, considering all the rivers that flow into it.

The rabbis explain that the sea contains water that "absorbs water." This special seawater, they claim, has the ability to swallow up other water without overflowing. Skeptical, Hadrian demands proof. They give him a bowlful, he adds regular water to it, and, lo and behold, it disappears! Now, whether this is a literal description of some unique phenomenon, or a parable about the mysteries of nature, is up for debate. But the story highlights a deep curiosity about the world and a desire to understand its workings.

The Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary) then pivots to two different interpretations of that opening verse from Ecclesiastes. Rabbi Eliezer believes that the streams draw their water from the sea. It's a cycle, he suggests, where the clouds draw water from the sea and then replenish the streams. This idea resonates with our modern understanding of the water cycle, doesn't it?

Rabbi Yehoshua, on the other hand, offers a different perspective. He believes the streams are constantly flowing into the sea. The verse implies the water is always going back to where it came from, but he doesn't suggest the sea is the source.

This leads to a broader discussion of how the earth was watered in the beginning. The text quotes (Genesis 2:6): "A mist would rise from the earth, and water all of the surface of the ground." How exactly did this happen?

Rabbi Yehuda compares it to the Nile, which floods and waters the land. Rabbi Nehemya likens it to the Kavriya Stream, which wells up from the ground. And the Rabbis offer the analogy of the Tavai, a river in Babylon that irrigates its surroundings only once every forty years! The word tavai is related to tohu (emptiness), because the area is desolate between these rare inundations. Imagine that – relying on a river that only floods every forty years!

But then, a shift. According to Rabbi Hanan of Tzippori, in the name of Rabbi Shmuel bar Rabbi Nahman, God reconsidered this method of watering the earth. From then on, the earth would be watered from above, by rain. And why?

Four reasons are given: to prevent powerful people from monopolizing the water supply; to wash away harmful dew; to ensure the highlands receive water just like the lowlands; and, perhaps most importantly, so that everyone would direct their eyes heavenward, in prayer. As (Job 5:11) says, "To raise the lowly on High."

So, what are we left with? A fascinating glimpse into how ancient rabbis grappled with questions of science, nature, and divine providence. They saw the world as a complex and interconnected system, constantly shaped by both natural forces and the will of God. And they understood that even something as seemingly simple as rain could be a reminder to look beyond ourselves, to acknowledge a higher power, and to pray for what we need.

It makes you wonder, doesn't it? What seemingly simple aspects of our world hold deeper lessons waiting to be discovered? And are we, like those ancient rabbis, willing to look heavenward for answers?

Full source
Bereshit Rabbah 26:7Bereshit Rabbah

Ever read something in the Bible that just makes you stop and say, "Wait, what?" I get that feeling every time I stumble upon (Genesis 6:4): "The Nefilim were on the earth in those days. And also afterward, when the sons of God went to the daughters of humans and had children by them. These were the heroes of old, men of renown."

Nefilim? Heroes of old? It sounds like something straight out of a fantasy novel! So, who were these giants, and what does it all mean? to what the ancient rabbis had to say about it, drawing from the rich wellspring of Bereshit Rabbah, a classical collection of rabbinic interpretations on the book of Genesis.

The verse states, "The giants were on the earth in those days." But it doesn't just leave it there. It gives them a whole bunch of names: Eimim, Refa’im, Giborim, Zamzumim, Anakim, Avim, and, of course, Nefilim. It’s like a roll call of legendary figures! Each name, according to the rabbis, hints at something unique about them.

For example, the Eimim. The text explains that just seeing them would inspire fear – eimatan – in people. Makes sense. And the Refa’im? Apparently, seeing them would make your heart go soft – rafeh – like wax. You can almost picture it, can't you?

Then there are the Giborim, which simply means "mighty men." But Rabbi Abba bar Kahana, quoting Rabbi Yoḥanan, takes it to another level. He says that the marrow of the femur of one of these guys measured eighteen cubits! That's one big bone!

The Zamzumim, Rabbi Yosei bar Ḥanina tells us, were intimidating military commanders, always mezumanim – ready – for battle. The Anakim are described in two ways: either they wore so many necklaces – anakim – that it showed off their wealth, or, in a wilder interpretation from Rabbi Aḥa, they were so arrogant that they wore the sun like a necklace, telling it to move aside so the rain could fall on them. Talk about hubris!

And the Avim? They brought annihilation – ava – upon the world and were themselves annihilated. Rabbi Elazar ben Rabbi Shimon even suggests they were as expert in soil as snakes, which in Galilee were called avya.

Finally, the infamous Nefilim. The text says they caused the world to topple – hipilu – and filled it with stillborns – nefalim – because of their immorality. It paints a pretty grim picture.

So, what caused all this? "And also thereafter," the verse continues, "when the children of the great ones consorted with the daughters of man." Rabbi Berekhya offers a rather colorful image: women would go to the marketplace, see a young man they fancied, and then.. well, you can imagine. The result? Children who looked just like their fathers, these "men of renown."

But Rabbi Aḥa has a problem with that "men of renown" bit. He points out that Job says the wicked are "people without name" (Job 30:8). So, how can these giants be both? His answer: they brought desolation – hishimu – to the world, were annihilated – hushamu – from the world, and caused the world to become desolate – yishom. Their "renown" was a legacy of destruction.

Rabbi Levi, quoting Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman, goes even further. He suggests that the names of the descendants of Cain – Irad, Meḥuyael, Metushael, Lemekh – are actually expressions of rebellion. Irad means "I will expel them," Meḥuyael means "I will eradicate them," and Metushael means "I will uproot them." Even Lemekh's name is interpreted as "What do I have to do with you and his offspring?" It's a whole family tree of defiance!

Rabbi Yoḥanan even suggests that the Book of Job exists primarily to detail the deeds of the generation of the Flood. That's how significant their actions were considered. And Rabbi Aḥa, in the name of Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi, equates contention with the generation of the Flood, drawing a parallel between the "men of renown" in Genesis and the "men of renown" involved in Korah's rebellion (Numbers 16:2).

What does all this tell us? It seems that the story of the Nefilim isn't just a fantastical tale of giants and mythical beings. It's a cautionary story about the consequences of unchecked power, moral decay, and rebellion against the divine. It's about a world that has become so corrupt that it ultimately destroys itself.

And perhaps, just perhaps, it's a reminder that even "men of renown" can leave behind a legacy of desolation if their actions are not guided by justice and righteousness. Something to think about, isn't it?

Full source
Bereshit Rabbah 28:9Bereshit Rabbah

Rabbi Yoḥanan, a prominent Jewish sage, offers a fascinating, and perhaps surprising, perspective. He says that the sentence, the punishment, of the generation of the Flood lasted a full twelve months. We know this punishment was severe, the entire world, save for Noah and his ark, was destroyed. But Rabbi Yoḥanan goes on to say something even more striking: this generation, despite their sins, will have a share in the World to Come, olam ha-ba (the World to Come).

That might sound… unexpected. Because in Mishna Sanhedrin (107b) the tradition seems pretty unambiguous that the generation of the Flood will not have a share in the World to Come. So what's going on here?

Some commentators suggest the text might be emended to align with that more common understanding. But let's stick with what Rabbi Yoḥanan says. He paints a vivid picture of what this judgment actually looked like. Each drop of rain that God sent upon them, he explains, was first boiled in Gehenna, a sort of purgatorial fire, and then rained down. Harsh, yes, but perhaps also a purification?

It brings to mind the verse from (Job 6:17), "When scorched, they disappear [nitzmatu]." Rabbi Yoḥanan emphasizes that their scorching was laḥlutanit – absolute. In (Leviticus 25:23), Onkelos translates the word litzmitut, meaning "in perpetuity," as laḥalutin, which shares that root. So, we see this idea of a complete and utter transformation, even in destruction.

(Ecclesiastes 9:6) is also brought into the discussion: "Even their love… even their hatred… even their fury… they have already perished." This verse is interpreted as alluding to the generation of the Flood. "Their love," meaning their love of idol worship; "their hatred," their hatred of God; "their fury," how they infuriated God with their idolatry. And yet, despite all this, Rabbi Yoḥanan implies they might still have a place in the World to Come. The verse concludes, "they have already perished" – meaning they have no share in "anything that takes place under the sun."

Rabbi Abba bar Kahana adds another layer to this complex picture. He grapples with the verse in (Genesis 6:7-8): "As I regret that I made them, but Noah found favor [in God’s eyes]." He highlights the word "but" (venoaḥ in Hebrew), asking why Noah is included amongst the wicked, as if the verse says "and Noah." He suggests that even Noah, the one righteous man spared from the Flood, wasn't inherently "worthy." Instead, he "found favor" in God's eyes.

What does all this mean? It’s a difficult passage, and frankly, a little unsettling. It suggests a complex interplay of justice, mercy, and perhaps even a hint that divine judgment isn't always as simple as we might expect. Perhaps even in the face of utter destruction, there's still room for grace. Perhaps the purification through fire, through Gehenna-tinged raindrops, allowed for something new to emerge.

It leaves us pondering the nature of repentance, the limits of divine wrath, and the enduring possibility of redemption, even for those who seem most lost. It's a challenging thought, isn't it? But maybe, just maybe, that's the point.

Full source