Parshat Terumah5 min read

The Tabernacle Metals and the Four Empires Foretold

Gold, silver, bronze, and red-dyed skins in the Tabernacle each pointed to an empire that would one day rise and rule over Israel.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. A List of Materials That Was Also a Prophecy
  2. Gold, Silver, Bronze
  3. The Red Skins
  4. What the Encoding Meant

A List of Materials That Was Also a Prophecy

Every Israelite who wished contributed to the Tabernacle. Gold, silver, bronze, fine linen, goat hair, ram skins dyed red. The text in Exodus presents it as a construction inventory. The rabbis read it as an encrypted timeline. Each material corresponded to a specific empire that would one day hold dominion over Israel. The Tabernacle was not just a place where God would dwell. It was a map of the future, laid out in the desert four centuries before any of these empires had risen.

The rabbis did not read this as coincidence. They read it as the standard method of divine communication with people who need to know what is coming but cannot be given the information directly: encode it in the present, let it wait in the materials of a holy object, and let the interpreters decode it across the generations.

Gold, Silver, Bronze

Gold pointed to Babylon. The great Babylonian empire that would shatter the first Temple, carry the people into exile, and establish the model of diaspora that Jewish history would follow for millennia. Gold is the most precious material, and the tradition reads Babylon as the most shattering of the four empires, not necessarily the most brutal but the most complete in its disruption: the first exile, the first diaspora, the first generation of Jews who could not remember Jerusalem except as a memory passed down from parents.

Silver pointed to Persia and Media. The tradition notes the specific way Persia had used silver against Israel: Haman's offer to deposit ten thousand silver talents into the royal treasury for permission to destroy the Jewish people. The empire that nearly accomplished what Babylon had only partially accomplished, the end of the Jewish people, had done so with silver as the currency of genocide. The silver of the Tabernacle was the silver of Haman's offer, encoded in the construction materials four hundred years before Persia existed.

Bronze pointed to Greece. Not the Greece of philosophers and democracy but the Greece of Antiochus, the Seleucid empire that would invade Jerusalem, desecrate the Temple, and attempt to replace Jewish practice with Hellenistic culture. Bronze is harder than silver, more resistant, more difficult to work with, and the tradition reads the Greek persecution as the most difficult to resist because it came not as simple violence but as cultural seduction. Some Jews wanted to be Greek. That made the empire more dangerous than the ones that had only wanted to destroy.

The Red Skins

The ram skins dyed red pointed to Rome. The tradition is direct about the color: red is the color of Esau, Rome's ancestor, whose descendants would build the empire that destroyed the second Temple, scattered the people a second time, and established a dominion over Israel that would last longer than any of the others. Red is also the color of war and of the spilled blood that Rome required as the cost of its order. The red skins on the Tabernacle were the color of the Roman legions, encoded in the donated materials of the desert sanctuary eight centuries before Rome was founded.

The tradition notes an additional layer: the Tabernacle had been built as atonement for the Golden Calf, as the visible proof of God's forgiveness of Israel's worst sin. The same structure that testified to reconciliation also carried within its materials the full account of everything that would try to destroy the reconciled people. The forgiveness and the suffering were written into the same object. The Tabernacle held both at once.

What the Encoding Meant

The tradition's practice of reading the Tabernacle materials as imperial prophecy was not an exercise in despair. The empires were known in advance. Their arrival would not be a surprise to anyone who could read the materials. And the fact that the empires were known meant that they were also bounded. An empire that appears in a prophetic list has a duration. It belongs to a sequence. It will be succeeded. The gold of Babylon, the silver of Persia, the bronze of Greece, and the red skins of Rome were not the final materials in the list. After the four empires, the tradition held, would come something else, and its materials were not in the Tabernacle because they were not the materials of destruction and domination. They were the materials of what comes after empires.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

3 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Legends of the Jews 3:3Legends of the Jews

It’s a powerful idea, isn't it? That the very things used to worship God could also tell the story of our destiny.

The Ginzberg’s says retelling in Legends of the Jews, each material used in the Tabernacle dedication pointed to a different empire that would, in turn, hold sway over Israel.

First, the gold. This, Remember Nebuchadnezzar and the exile? The golden calf, perhaps, a foreshadowing?

Next, silver. This pointed to the sovereignty of Persia and Media. Intriguingly, we learn that silver was used by them as a tool for destruction against Israel. Think of the story of Esther, and how close the Jewish people came to annihilation, thwarted only by her courage and the grace of God.

Then comes brass. Brass stood for the Greek Empire. Now, the text makes an interesting distinction here. It says that brass is of inferior quality, and that the Greek rule was "less significant" than that of its predecessors. Less significant, perhaps, in its impact on the core of Jewish identity, even amidst the Hellenistic influences and the story of Hanukkah.

Finally, we arrive at the ram's skins, dyed red. These, we are told, indicate the sovereignty of "red Rome." Rome, with its vast empire and its eventual role in the destruction of the Second Temple. The color red, a symbol of power, of blood, and of the long, complex relationship between Rome and the Jewish people.

But here's where the story takes a turn towards hope. Even as God shows Israel the succession of empires that will dominate them, He offers a promise of redemption. "Although you now behold the four nations that will hold sway over you, still shall I send you help out of your bondage…"

And what form will this help take? "Oil for the light," the text continues, "the Mashiach," the Messiah, "who will enlighten the eyes of Israel." And "spices for anointing-oil," because the Messiah will anoint the high priest, so that once again, God may "accept you with your sweet savour."

It's a beautiful image, isn't it? Even amidst the darkness of oppression, there's a flickering light, a promise of ultimate redemption. The objects of the Tabernacle, then, become more than just building materials. They become a evidence of the enduring faith of the Jewish people, and to God’s unwavering promise of a brighter future.

So, the next time you read about the Tabernacle, remember this story. Remember the empires, the struggles, and the enduring hope. Because sometimes, the most profound messages are hidden in the simplest of things.

Full source
Legends of the Jews 3:2Legends of the Jews

It's a story of atonement, of divine presence, and of a relationship between God and the Jewish people that’s been unfolding for millennia.

Think back to the Day of Atonement. Imagine God saying to Moses, "Let them make Me a sanctuary, that I may dwell among them." Why? So that all the nations would witness that God had forgiven Israel for that little. incident. with the Golden Calf.

What was God's prescription for forgiveness? Gold. Yep, the very thing that caused the problem in the first place! As God said, according to Legends of the Jews, "The gold of the Tabernacle shall serve as an expiation for the gold they employed in the construction of the Golden Calf." It's almost poetic, isn't it? Using the instrument of sin as the means of atonement.

It wasn't just about gold. God requested twelve other materials: "silver, brass, and blue, and purple, and scarlet, fine linen, and goats' hair, and rams' skins dyed red, and badgers' skins, and shittim wood, oil for the light, spices for anointing-oil, and for sweet incense, onyx stones and stones to be set in the ephod and in the breastplate." Quite the shopping list!

Now, here’s where it gets really interesting. God doesn't want us to think we're doing Him a favor. the verse says, God says, "But do not suppose that you are giving Me these thirteen objects as gifts, for thirteen deeds did I perform for you in Egypt, which these thirteen objects now repay." It’s like God is saying, "I clothed you, protected you, adorned you… this is just a way of showing gratitude."

The text continues with a beautiful passage, echoing (Ezekiel 16:10-13), "I clothed you with broidered work, and shod you with badgers' skins, and girded you about with fine linen, and I covered you with silk. I decked you also with ornaments, and I put bracelets upon your arms, and chains about your necks. And I put jewels on your foreheads, and earrings in your ears, and a beautiful crown upon your heads." It paints a vivid picture of God's care and provision.

And the best part? It doesn't stop there. "But in the future world, in return for these thirteen offerings to the Tabernacle, you shall receive thirteen gifts from Me." Referencing (Isaiah 4:5-6), God promises a future filled with protection and refuge: "I shall create upon every dwelling place of Mount Zion, and upon her assemblies, a cloud and smoke by day, and the shining of a flaming fire by night, for upon all the glory shall be a defense. And there shall be a tabernacle for a shadow in the daytime from the heat, and for a place of refuge, and for a covert, from storms and from rain."

So, what's the takeaway? God doesn't need our stuff. God wants our hearts. As the text emphasizes, we should "Give your contributions to the sanctuary with a willing heart." It's not about emptying our pockets, but about recognizing that everything we have is a gift from God in the first place, a gift that began with our exodus from Egypt, when we "took their wealth from the Egyptians."

And then comes this profound statement: "But you shall erect a sanctuary to Me not in this world only, but in the future world also. At first the Torah dwelt with Me, but now that it is in your possession, you must let Me dwell among you with the Torah." The Torah, meaning the teachings and law, the very essence of God's wisdom. It suggests that the ultimate sanctuary isn't just a physical structure, but a way of living, a way of integrating God's presence into our daily lives.

So, next time you think about the Tabernacle, remember it's not just about gold and linen and badger skins. It’s about atonement, gratitude, and the enduring promise of God's presence, not just then, but now, and always. It's about creating a sanctuary within ourselves, where the Torah and God's presence can dwell together. Pretty powerful stuff, isn’t it?

Full source
Shemot Rabbah 35:5Shemot Rabbah

It wasn't just about aesthetics or availability. According to Shemot Rabbah, it was a symbolic statement about history, power, and ultimately, redemption.

We read in (Exodus 25:3), "This is the gift that you shall collect from them: Gold and silver and bronze." But the rabbis in Shemot Rabbah 35 see more than just precious metals. They see empires. Gold, they say, represents Babylon, echoing (Daniel 2:32), "That image, its head was of fine gold." Daniel, of course, was interpreting Nebuchadnezzar's dream, where different metals symbolized different kingdoms. Silver? That's Media. Bronze? Greece. But notice something missing: iron.

Why no iron in the Temple or Tabernacle? Iron, (Daniel 2:40) says, "The fourth kingdom will be strong as iron." The Sages are making a direct connection between the destructive force of iron and the legacy of Edom/Rome.

You might be thinking, "Wait a minute! Babylon destroyed the First Temple!" True. But the text emphasizes that Edom, unlike Babylon, didn't just destroy, it sought complete annihilation. As (Psalm 137:7) says, "Who said: Raze it, raze it, to its very foundation!" Even today, remnants of that foundation remain. Thus, iron, and all it represents, is conspicuously absent from the sacred spaces.

But the story doesn't end there. The Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary) envisions a future where all nations bring tribute to the messianic king. Egypt comes first. Initially, the king hesitates. Should he accept gifts from a nation that enslaved Israel for so long? But God reminds him, "They were hosts to My children in Egypt," quoting (Psalm 68:32), "Noblemen will arrive from Egypt; Kush will hasten to extend its hands to God." He accepts their offering.

Kush, seeing this, reasons, "If he accepted from Egypt, who enslaved them, surely he'll accept from us, who didn't!" And so, "Kush will hasten to extend its hands to God." Soon, all the nations follow suit, as (Psalm 68:33) foretells, "Kingdoms of the earth, sing to God!"

Now, what about Edom? They too, try to bring tribute. But God says, "Castigate the beast of the reed," (Psalm 68:31). Here, Edom/Rome is likened to a reed, a connection drawn from the Gemara (Shabbat 56b) which says that when Solomon married Pharaoh's daughter, an angel planted a reed in the sea, which eventually became Rome.

Another interpretation sees Edom as "the boar from the forest" (Psalm 80:14), or "the herd of cavalry horses" (Psalm 68:31), consuming the wealth of nations while claiming lineage from Abraham. They "grovel for pieces of silver" (Psalm 68:31), easily appeased by money, but also scattering Israel from Torah study and from the world.

So, what's the takeaway? This passage from Shemot Rabbah isn't just a history lesson. It's a profound meditation on destruction, redemption, and the enduring impact of our actions. It reminds us that even empires rise and fall, and that ultimately, justice and compassion will prevail. And it challenges us to consider: What "metals" are we building with today? What kind of legacy are we creating?

Full source