5 min read

When Amalek Threw the Covenant Toward Heaven

Amalek cut the sign of the covenant from the dead and flung it at the sky. The wars over that covenant began long before, with Jacob's sons.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Sign He Aimed at the Sky
  2. The Cloud That Did Not Cover Everyone
  3. The War That Started With Jacob's Sons
  4. The Battle Moses Won With His Hands Up
When Amalek Threw the Covenant Toward Heaven Click for full size

The Sign He Aimed at the Sky

A man bent over a corpse on the desert sand with a knife, cut away the foreskin, stood up, and threw it toward heaven. Here, he called out. Take what You desire.

The man was Amalek. The thing he hurled was the mark of circumcision, the seal Abraham had received from God as the covenant sign between Israel and its Maker. Amalek had been luring men out of the Israelite camp, attacking the stragglers, and then mutilating their bodies with a specific purpose. He was not taking trophies. He was sending a message addressed to heaven.

This is the version the rabbinic tradition preserved in Legends of the Jews, the synthesis Louis Ginzberg assembled between 1909 and 1938 from scattered midrashic sources that had been accumulating for centuries. Where the Torah gives you raiders who attacked the rear of the column, the rabbis give you a theological gesture: a man who understood exactly what the covenant meant and chose to defile it rather than plunder it.

The Cloud That Did Not Cover Everyone

But why were there stragglers to attack? The tradition explains that the divine cloud that traveled with Israel in the wilderness covered and protected the community, but it did not cover everyone. The cloud left exposed those Israelites who had been carrying the contamination of Egyptian idol worship in their hearts. The same men who had not fully broken with the world they left behind found themselves outside the cloud's shelter when Amalek came looking for prey.

This is the detail that makes Amalek's attack something other than military bad luck. He was not randomly ambushing stragglers. He was picking off the people God was already holding at a distance. The attack on the covenant's sign was meant to mock precisely that: the God who had expelled His own people from His protective cloud was, Amalek argued, a God who did not fully commit to His own promises.

The War That Started With Jacob's Sons

The origins of Amalek went back further than the desert. He was a grandson of Esau, born of the union between Esau's son Eliphaz and a concubine. The hatred for Israel ran through that family line the way a fault line runs through bedrock, invisible until it opens under pressure.

Long before Amalek took his knife to the dead at the edge of the Israelite camp, his grandfather's clan had been at war with the descendants of Jacob. The sons of Jacob, the tradition records, fought battle after battle against various Amorite kings who had allied against them when the news of Shechem reached them. City after city mobilized against the sons of Israel. City after city fell. The war was unrelenting, and it was producing exactly the kind of warriors who, in the next generation, would be disciplined enough to follow a column of freed slaves through the desert and wait for the cloud to leave someone behind.

The Battle Moses Won With His Hands Up

When Amalek attacked in the wilderness near Rephidim, Moses told Joshua to choose men and go fight while he stood on the hilltop with his hands raised. The dynamic was strange and the tradition amplified its strangeness. When Moses' hands were raised, Israel prevailed. When his arms tired and dropped, Amalek prevailed. So Aaron and Hur stood on either side of him and held his arms up, one on each side, for the duration of the battle.

The rabbis asked the obvious question: were Moses' arms actually fighting? Could the position of a man's hands on a hill determine the outcome of a battle in the valley below? Their answer was that the raised hands were not a physical cause but a spiritual direction. When Israel looked up and saw Moses' hands raised, they oriented themselves upward, toward the source that could actually help them. When they looked down, they fought alone.

Amalek was eventually defeated that day. Moses built an altar and gave it a name that embedded the unfinished quality of the war into the language. The name meant: a hand against the throne of God. As long as Amalek existed, there was a hand raised against heaven. The covenant and its enemies were both permanent features of the world's moral landscape, and neither one had agreed to resolve itself neatly.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

6 sources

The texts behind this telling. Some cards carry a translation of the source; others are our own retelling of it, and each card says which. Every card links out to the original.

Legends of the Jews 1:120Legends of the Jews

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.The Legends of the Jews by Louis Ginzberg (1909) · Public Domain

The ancient Israelites, fresh out of Egypt, thought they had that… but then Amalek came along.

The story of Amalek is more than just a battle; it's a clash between faith and doubt, between protection and vulnerability. As we read in Legends of the Jews, those who were lured out of the Israelite camp by Amalek met a gruesome end.

It wasn't just the killing that was so shocking. Amalek, a descendant of Esau, took things a step further. He mutilated the corpses, specifically targeting the sign of the covenant – circumcision – and tossing it skyward with cruel taunts: "Here, take what you desire!" It was a direct, blasphemous attack on God Himself.

Why this particular cruelty? Well, it gets to the heart of Amalek's animosity: a deep-seated rejection of the Abrahamic covenant and everything it stood for. Amalek's actions weren't just warfare; they were a symbolic assault on the very foundation of the Israelites' relationship with God.

So, why couldn't God just protect everyone?

Here’s where it gets interesting. The Israelites weren't universally shielded. As long as they stayed within the encampment, a protective cloud enveloped them, as solid a defense as any fortress wall. Legends of the Jews draws on earlier sources to explain that this cloud only sheltered those who were ritually pure. The unclean, those who needed to undergo a mikveh (ritual bath) to purify themselves, had to remain outside its protective embrace. And they became easy prey for Amalek.

Certain groups within the Israelite community were particularly vulnerable. The tribe of Dan, known for their idol worship, didn't receive the cloud's protection. Legends of the Jews cites earlier traditions to make the point that their sins made them susceptible to Amalek's attacks.

What does this tell us? It suggests that divine protection wasn't automatic or unconditional. It depended on the Israelites’ adherence to ritual purity and, perhaps, their faithfulness to God. Amalek's attack, therefore, wasn't just a physical threat; it was a spiritual test, exposing the vulnerabilities within the Israelite community.

The story of Amalek isn't just an ancient battle; it’s a reminder that true protection comes not just from outward defenses, but from inner purity and unwavering faith. How often do we consider the inner "cloud" that protects us, and what we do to maintain it?

Full source
Legends of the Jews, VI. Jacob, A War FrustratedLegends of the Jews

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.Project Gutenberg eBook #1493, The Legends of the Jews, Volume 1 · Public Domain

The story of Jacob's sons, Simon and Levi, and their actions in Shechem is a prime example.

As we know, they took drastic revenge for the rape of their sister Dinah. But as Legends of the Jews (Ginzberg) recounts, the story doesn't end with their victory. After Simon and Levi left the decimated city, two young men who had escaped the carnage emerged from their hiding places in lime pits. Horrified, they cried out, "Behold, this is the evil which the sons of Jacob did who destroyed one of the Canaanite cities, and were not afraid of all the land of Canaan."

They fled to Tappuah, a neighboring city, to spread the alarm. King Jashub of Tappuah, understandably skeptical, sent messengers to verify their claims. The messengers returned with confirmation: Shechem was indeed destroyed, a city of weeping women and devoid of men and livestock, all plundered by Jacob's sons.

Jashub was astounded. Ginzberg tells us that such a feat, two men destroying a large city, was unheard of since the days of Nimrod. He initially decided to wage war against the Hebrews to avenge Shechem, but his advisors wisely cautioned against it. "If two of them laid waste a whole city," they reasoned, "surely if thou goest against them, they all will rise up against us, and destroy us." Sound logic. Instead, they proposed forming a coalition.

So, the seven kings of the Amorites, incensed by the events in Shechem, gathered their armies – ten thousand strong! – and marched against Jacob and his family.

Jacob was terrified. He rebuked Simon and Levi, exclaiming, "Why have you brought such evil upon me? I was at rest, and you provoked the inhabitants of the land against me by your acts." But Judah, ever the fiery one, defended his brothers. "Was it for naught that Simon and Levi killed the inhabitants of Shechem?" he retorted, "Verily, it was because Shechem dishonored our sister, and transgressed the command of our God to Noah and his children.. Surely, our God, who delivered the city of Shechem and its people into their hand, He will also deliver into our hands all the Canaanitish kings who are coming against us."

Judah rallied his brothers, reminding them that God was on their side. Jacob, his eleven sons, and a hundred servants belonging to Isaac prepared for battle against a vastly superior force. They also sent a desperate plea to their grandfather Isaac, residing in Hebron, to intercede with God.

Isaac’s prayer, as recorded in Legends of the Jews, is a powerful one. He beseeched God to "pervert...the counsel of these kings...impress the hearts of their kings and their people with the terror of my sons...Deliver my sons and their servants from them with Thy strong hand and outstretched arm, for power and might are in Thy hands to do all this." Jacob himself also prayed, echoing similar sentiments, as we find in Midrash Rabbah, pleading for God to "impress the hearts of these kings and their people with the terror of my sons."

And here's where the story takes a fascinating turn. God heard their prayers. He instilled fear and terror into the hearts of the Canaanite kings' advisors. When the kings sought counsel on whether to attack, their advisors, now gripped by fear, recounted the Hebrews' past victories and the miracles God had performed for them. "Why do you take delight in your own destruction this day?" they asked.

The kings, swayed by their advisors' newfound fear, abandoned their campaign and retreated, each returning to his own city. The sons of Jacob, remaining vigilant until evening, were relieved to see the enemy's withdrawal and returned home.

But why did this happen? What lesson are we to learn from this near-war? The text suggests that the people of Shechem were particularly wicked. As the narrative states, "The wrath of the Lord descended upon the inhabitants of Shechem to the uttermost on account of their wickedness." According to Ginzberg, they had sought to harm Sarah and Rebekah as they did Dinah, persecuted Abraham, and mistreated strangers. Their actions, it seems, had sealed their fate.

So, what are we left with? A frustrated war, averted not through military might, but through divine intervention and the power of prayer. It’s a potent reminder that even in the face of overwhelming odds, faith and a connection to something larger than ourselves can change the course of events. And perhaps, a cautionary tale about the enduring consequences of our actions, both intended and unintended.

Full source
Legends of the Jews, VI. Jacob, The War With The AmoritesLegends of the Jews

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.Project Gutenberg eBook #1493, The Legends of the Jews, Volume 1 · Public Domain

The familiar telling remembers the immediate aftermath – the vengeance of Simeon and Levi. But what about Jacob and his family? Did they just pack up and leave? Well, according to the Legends of the Jews, as retold by Rabbi Louis Ginzberg, there’s a whole chapter of conflict and conquest that often goes unmentioned.

At first, things were relatively peaceful. Jacob and his household returned to Shechem, settling in and establishing themselves. But this peace didn't last. After seven years, the surrounding Amorite tribes began to feel threatened. "Is it not enough that they have slain all the men of Shechem?" they asked, according to Ginzberg. "Should they be permitted now to take possession of their land, too?" And so, they gathered their forces to make war on the sons of Jacob.

Enter Judah. He becomes the hero of our story, leaping into the fray against the allied kings. The first adversary? Jashub, the king of Tappuah, a warrior seemingly clad in iron and brass from head to toe. Ginzberg paints a vivid picture of Jashub, mounted on his horse, casting spears with deadly accuracy, a formidable foe.

Judah is undeterred. He picks up a stone – a massive one, weighing sixty sela'im (a unit of weight) – and hurls it at Jashub, who was, and this detail is wonderfully specific, one hundred and seventy-seven ells and one-third of an ell away! The stone strikes Jashub's shield, unhorsing him. A fierce duel ensues, shields shatter, and in a moment of quick thinking, Judah wrests Jashub’s own shield from him and uses Jashub’s own sword to cut off his feet, then his head.

The battle doesn't end there, of course. Nine of Jashub's followers appear, ready to avenge their king. Judah, resourceful as ever, uses another well-aimed stone to disable the first attacker, grabs his shield, and defends himself against the remaining eight. It's a whirlwind of action!

Then, help arrives. Levi joins the fight, killing Elon, the king of Gaash, with an arrow. Judah dispatches the remaining eight. Even Jacob himself gets involved, slaying Zerori, the king of Shiloh! The Amorites, faced with this onslaught, lose their nerve and flee. The sons of Jacob pursue, each slaying a thousand men, according to Ginzberg’s retelling.

The story doesn't stop at Shechem. The sons of Jacob push onward to Hazor, where they face an even more severe encounter. Jacob himself takes down Pirathon, the king of Hazor, as well as Pasusi, Laban (king of Aram, no less!), and Shebir. Judah is, again, the first to scale the walls of Hazor, taking on four warriors at once before his brother Naphtali can even offer assistance. Together, Judah and Naphtali stand on the wall, dealing death to the enemy.

The other sons of Jacob follow, and they utterly destroy the Amorite host. They conquer Hazor, killing everyone and taking all the spoils. The next day, they move on to Sartan, and another bloody battle ensues. Sartan is a heavily fortified city, but the sons of Jacob are relentless. Judah, again leading the charge, scales the walls, followed by Gad, Simeon, Levi, Reuben, Dan, Naphtali, and Issachar. They capture the city.

According to Legends of the Jews, the sons of Jacob subdue five more cities in just five days: Tappuah, Arbel, Shiloh, Mahanaim, and Gaash. Finally, on the sixth day, the Amorites, utterly defeated, come to Jacob and his sons unarmed, begging for peace.

And here’s where things take an unexpected turn. The sons of Jacob agree to peace. The Amorites cede Timna and the land of Harariah to them. They also return all the stolen cattle and spoil, with a bonus of two head for every one they took. Jacob and his sons return to their respective areas, and the Amorites, finally, leave them in peace.

What are we to make of this? It's a far cry from the peaceful shepherd image we sometimes have of Jacob and his sons. This is a story of conquest, of military prowess, and of a people establishing their territory by force. They offer us glimpses into a world far removed from our own, a world of tribal conflict, of fierce warriors, and of a people struggling to find their place in a land that was not always welcoming. And, perhaps, it makes us consider the price of peace, and the lengths to which people will go to secure it.

Full source
Pesikta DeRav Kahana 3:11Pesikta de-Rav Kahana

Translation of the source text.Pesikta de Rav Kahana according to an Oxford manuscript, Dov Mandelbaum ed., N.Y. 1987 · CC-BY

"And he smote your tail" (Deuteronomy 25:18), he struck you with a blow of the tail.

This agrees with what Rabbi Hanina bar Shalka, Rabbi Yehoshua of Sikhnin, and Rabbi Levi said in the name of Rabbi Yohanan: What did the house of Amalek do? They would cut off the marks of circumcision of Israel and fling them upward, saying, "You chose this; here is what You chose." Since Israel did not know what the nature of the membrum was, but rather "behold, they put the branch to their nose" (Ezekiel 8:17) [a gesture of contempt directed upward against Heaven]; and once Amalek came, he taught it to them. And from whom did Amalek learn it? From Esau his grandfather, of whom it is written, "Is he not rightly named Jacob [Ya'akov]?" (Genesis 25:26), [reading the name as if] he rubbed his throat and drew out the abusive sneer.

Full source
Midrash Tanchuma Buber, Ki Teitzei 14:1Midrash Tanchuma Buber, Ki Teitzei

Translation of the source text.Midrash Tanchuma (Buber), Public Domain, on Sefaria · CC-BY-SA

"And he cut off the tail among you, all the stragglers behind you" (Deuteronomy 25:18). He struck them with a blow to the tail (zanav), as that which Rabbi Hanina bar Shilqa said: What did the house of Amalek do? They would cut off the circumcisions [of Israel] and fling them upward toward Heaven, and they would say, "Here, take what you chose for yourself!"

Because Israel did not know what the nature of the "branch" (zemorah) was, as it is said, "and behold, they put the branch to their nose" (Ezekiel 8:17), until Amalek came and taught it to them.

From whom did he learn it? From Esau, his grandfather, as it is said, "And he said, 'Is he not rightly named Jacob (ha-khi)?'" (Genesis 27:36), he cleared (hikhekh) his throat and brought out the "branch."

Full source
Midrash Tanchuma, Ki Teitzei 10Midrash Tanchuma

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.Townsend 1989 translation of Midrash Tanhuma, S. Buber Recension · CC-BY

(Deut. 25:18, cont.) And he cut off (rt. znb) all who were lagging behind you. He smote them with a blow to the tail (rt. znb). And this agrees with what R. Hanina bar Shilqa, said, “What did the House of Amalek do to Israel? They cut off their penes and flung them heavenward, as they said, ‘This is what You have chosen, take for Yourself what You have chosen.” As Israel did not know what the nature of spit was, until Amalek came and taught them, as stated (with reference to Ezek. 8:17), “here they were sending the spit in their faces.” From whom did he learn it? From his grandfather Esau, as stated (in Gen. 27:36), “And he said, ‘Is he not (hky) rightly named Jacob?’” He rubbed (rt. hkk) his throat and brought out the spit. (Deut. 25:18), “All who were lagging behind you.” R. Judah, R. Nehemiah, and the masters [differed]. R. Judah said, “They said, ‘If He is master over all of out deeds, we will serve Him; but if not, we will revolt against Him.’” R. Nehemiah said, “They said, ‘If He furnishes us with our food like a king who is living in the province, such that the province lacks nothing at all, we will serve Him; but if not, we will revolt against Him.’” And the masters said, “They said, “’If we have a thought in our hearts and He knows what we are thinking, we will serve Him; but if not, we will revolt against Him.’” R. Berekhyah said in the name of R. Levi, “In their heart they had a thought, and the Holy One, blessed be He, granted them their request.” And what is the evidence? (Ps. 78:18:) “They tested God in their heart by asking food for themselves.” See what [else] is written there (in vs. 29), “So they ate and were very full.” Another interpretation (of Deut. 25:18), “all who were lagging behind you”: R. Judah, R. Nehemiah and the masters [differ]. R. Judah says, “Whoever was overcome was discarded.” R. Nehemiah says, “Whomever the cloud vomited up was discarded.” And the rabbis say, “It was the tribe of Dan that the cloud vomited up, [as] they all served idols, as stated (Deut. 25:18, cont.), ‘when you were tired and weary, and did not fear God.’” [You were] tired from thirst and weary from the road, and you did not fear God. R. Pinhas said in the name of R. Samuel bar Nahman, “It is a transmitted aggada [that] Esau will fall at the hand of the children of Rachel (Joseph and Benjamin), as stated (in Jer. 49:20), ‘Surely the youngest of the flock shall drag them away.’ Why does it call them the youngest of the flock? Because they were the youngest of the tribes.” Hence, Moses said to Joshua (Exod. 17:9), “Choose men for us.” As he was [descended from] Joseph, about whom it is written (Gen. 42:18), “I fear God.” And about Esau, it is written (Deut. 25:18), “and did not fear God.” Youth is written with reference to the one and small is written with reference to the other (i.e., with reference to Esau). Youth is written with reference to the one (in Gen. 37:2), “since he (Joseph) was a youth with the children of Bilhah [and with the children of Zilpah].” And small is written with reference to the other (in Obad. 1:2), “I will surely make you (Edom) smallest among the nations.” The one (Esau) grew up with two who were righteous (i.e., with Isaac and Rebekah) and did not learn from their deeds, while the other grew up with two who were wicked (i.e., Potiphar and Pharaoh) and did not learn from their deeds. The one received the birthright as a result of his good deeds, while the other lost his birthright from his evil deeds. The one supported his brothers, while the other sought to kill his brother. The one fenced himself away from sexual immorality and from the spilling of blood, while the other sullied himself with sexual immorality and the spilling of blood. The one conceded to the revival of the dead, as stated (Gen. 50:24), “God will surely remember you”; while the other denied the revival of the dead, as stated (Gen. 25:32), “Behold, I am going to die.” The one offered his life for his mother’s honor, as stated (Gen. 33:7), “and after, Joseph and Rachel came forward and bowed”; while the other sought to kill his mother, as stated (Amos 1:11), “and he destroyed his uterus.” Therefore, the one (Esau) will fall by the hand of the other (Jospeh). And R. Johanan said, “All of the ministering angels sought to battle with the ministering angel of Esau, but he would not fall by their hand, as he would remove each and every one with a response: To Reuben, he says, ‘You were suspected about your father’s concubine.’ To Simeon and Levi, ‘You also killed [the inhabitants of] Shekhem.’ To the other tribes, ‘You sold your brother and sought to kill him.’ To Judah, ‘You were also suspected about your daughter-in-law, Tamar.’ To Benjamin he said, ‘You were suspected about the concubine in Giveah.’ When the ministering angel of [Joseph] came and battled with him, he immediately fell in front of him, as he had no response to answer him. This is what is written (Obad 1:18), “And the House of Jacob shall be fire, and the House of Joseph flame, and the House of Esau shall be straw.”

Full source