Parshat Yitro6 min read

Why Moses Forgot the Torah and Beelzeboul Was Set to Dig Foundations

Ginzberg reads Moses's forty days of forgetting and Solomon's setting of demons to dig the Temple foundation as twin pictures of how labor earns its result.

Written by Maggid · Edited by Arthur Sabintsev ·
Table of Contents
  1. What it means for Moses to forget the Torah for forty days
  2. How Satan's hunt for the Torah set up Moses's structural humility
  3. What it means for Solomon to summon Beelzeboul and Tephros
  4. How the dark forces' murmur and Solomon's insistence share the structural design
  5. How Moses's bestowal and the dark forces' labor share one structural principle
  6. What the two passages leave for the reader to hold

Louis Ginzberg's Legends of the Jews, the early-twentieth-century compilation of midrashic and aggadic narrative, holds two passages on how proper labor produces proper results. One passage tells how Moses studied Torah on Mount Sinai for forty days and forgot everything he learned, until God bestowed the Torah upon him as a gift after his structural humility, with the Torah eventually named the Torat Moshe. The other passage describes how Solomon set Beelzeboul, Tephros the Demon of Ashes, and the thirty-six elements of darkness to the structural labor of digging the foundation for the Temple.

Both passages share one structural claim. The cosmic system requires labor before result. Moses's forty days of forgetting were operational labor that earned the gift of bestowal. The dark forces' labor under Solomon was operational compensation that the cosmic system extracted from them.

What it means for Moses to forget the Torah for forty days

Ginzberg's account of Moses studying Torah opens with the surprising structural picture. Moses devoted himself both night and day to studying the Torah. He still learned nothing. He learned and then forgot. After forty days of this, Moses cried out to God in despair. The midrashic tradition that Ginzberg compiles records this not as personal failure but as the operational structure of Torah acquisition.

God's response was structural. He bestowed the Torah upon Moses. Suddenly Moses understood. He remembered everything. The Ginzberg tradition records the structural sequence as essential. The forty days of failed study were the precondition for the bestowal. Without the failed labor, the gift would not have been the gift. The structural sequence is the operational requirement.

How Satan's hunt for the Torah set up Moses's structural humility

Satan was kept busy elsewhere during the revelation at Sinai. God strategically kept Satan away so that he could not accuse the Israelites of their impending sin with the Golden Calf. When Satan finally asked where the Torah was, God told him, I gave the Torah to Earth. Satan went on the structural hunt. He asked the Earth, the sea, the abyss, even Destruction and Death. From Job 28:24 and 22, no one knew where it was.

Finally Satan returned to God empty-handed. God directed him to Moses. When Satan asked Moses where the Torah was, Moses replied with humility. Who am I, that the Holy One should have given me the Torah? God essentially called Moses out. O Moses, you utter a falsehood. Moses defended himself. Lord of the world, you have in your possession a hidden treasure that daily delights you. Dare I presume to declare it my possession? God, pleased with Moses's humility, declared that the Torah would be named after him.

What it means for Solomon to summon Beelzeboul and Tephros

The structural mechanism was striking. The naming happened because Moses denied possession. The denial of ownership produced the operational naming. The midrash compiles this as the cosmic principle. Possession follows denial of possession. Humility produces the structural elevation that direct claim could not produce. The labor of Torah acquisition is doubled. There is the labor of study that produces forgetting. There is the labor of denial that produces naming.

Ginzberg's account of Solomon and the dark forces takes up the parallel structural labor in a different mode. Solomon did not just possess dominion over demons. He put them to work. Beelzeboul came back claiming he was the last standing from a group that fell from grace. He boasted that he ruled everyone in Tartarus and that he had a son living in the Red Sea who reported on his activities. Tephros, the Demon of Ashes, arrived next.

Seven female spirits arrived after, declaring they were part of the thirty-six elements of darkness. The structural roster of dark forces was gathered. Solomon did not entertain them. He ordered them to dig the foundation for the Temple. The Temple was to be two hundred and fifty cubits long. The structural foundation required substantial labor. Solomon directed the dark forces to provide that labor.

How the dark forces' murmur and Solomon's insistence share the structural design

The dark forces let out a united murmur of protest. A collective groan of disapproval echoing from the depths. Solomon was not having any of it. He insisted they get industrious. The dark forces began the work begrudgingly. The structural picture is striking. The cosmic system put even the dark forces to operational labor that contributed to the Temple's structural foundation.

The midrash compiles this as the structural fact that no force in the cosmic system is exempt from operational labor when called upon by proper authority. The dark forces' contribution to the Temple foundation was extracted compensation rather than voluntary contribution. Solomon's authority was sufficient to extract it. The structural design includes both voluntary and extracted labor.

How Moses's bestowal and the dark forces' labor share one structural principle

The two passages converge on the same structural picture. The cosmic system requires labor before result. Moses's forty days of forgetting was operational labor that earned the bestowal of the Torah. The dark forces' digging was operational labor that produced the Temple foundation. Both kinds of labor were essential. Both produced their proper structural results.

The Ginzberg tradition teaches that the reader's own labor falls within the same structural design. Their forgotten learning may be the operational precondition for a future bestowal. Their reluctant contribution to a larger structure may be the operational compensation that the cosmic system requires. The reader who imagines labor as wasted when it does not produce immediate results misses the structural fact that the cosmic system tracks the labor and assigns the corresponding results.

What the two passages leave for the reader to hold

Ginzberg trusts the reader to feel both modes of structural labor that the midrash documents. The forty days of forgetting that preceded Moses's bestowal. The reluctant digging that produced the Temple foundation. The two passages close with a composite image. A Moses studying for forty days and forgetting everything before receiving the Torah as a bestowed gift. A Beelzeboul, a Tephros, and thirty-six elements of darkness murmuring while digging the foundation of the Temple of two hundred and fifty cubits. A reader, situated within their own modes of structural labor, recognizing that both the productive forgetting and the reluctant contribution have their proper places in the cosmic system the midrash describes.

← All myths