5 min read

Why Rabbi Akiva Asked Someone to Pray for His Death

Rabbi Akiva died smiling with the Shema on his lips. Before that, he asked Rabbi Shimon bar Yohai to pray for his death. The request meant something specific.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Death Everyone Knows
  2. The Request He Made Before the End
  3. Why He Asked Shimon Specifically
  4. What Emden Was Actually Asking
  5. The Cave After the Request

The Death Everyone Knows

When the Romans raked his flesh with iron combs, Rabbi Akiva ben Joseph did not cry out for mercy. He stretched the word echad, one, across his last breath until his soul departed with it. His students watched and could not understand how he was smiling. He told them he had waited his whole life to love God with his whole soul, even when his soul was being taken from him, and now at last the moment had arrived. The Shema was the last thing his mouth made before silence.

That death is the famous one. The one recorded in Berakhot 61b. The one the tradition has returned to for centuries as the model of martyrdom, of dying with full intention and full peace.

The stranger tradition is quieter and comes from a different direction.

The Request He Made Before the End

In the Mitpachat Sefarim by Rabbi Jacob Emden, printed in 1768, Akiva makes a request that does not appear anywhere in the Talmud. He asks Rabbi Shimon bar Yohai to pray for his death.

This is not despair. Anyone who has read how Akiva died knows that despair was not something he carried. The request is something else: a recognition of where spiritual authority resided at the threshold of death, and an appeal to it from a position of extraordinary dignity.

Why He Asked Shimon Specifically

Rabbi Shimon bar Yohai was Akiva's student, not his equal in years or in legal authority. But Rabbi Shimon was a different kind of figure in the tradition. He was the man who hid in a cave for thirteen years with his son, and when he emerged from the cave the first time, everything he looked at caught fire from the intensity of his gaze. He had to go back in. He stayed another year before he could move through the world without destroying it simply by seeing it. The name attached to the Zohar was his.

When Akiva asked Shimon to pray for his death, he was not asking a student to petition God on his behalf in some ordinary way. He was asking the one person in his circle who had access to levels of spiritual intercession that ordinary prayer could not reach. The prayer Akiva wanted was not a request for God to let death come. It was an act of spiritual intervention at a register only Shimon could operate in.

What Emden Was Actually Asking

The Mitpachat Sefarim is not primarily a narrative text. Rabbi Jacob Emden wrote it as a critical examination of disputed questions of textual transmission and historical attribution. He is asking how teachings move through generations, how a later compilation can carry an earlier sage's authority, what it takes to attribute words to someone across the gap of centuries.

The Akiva-Shimon episode enters Emden's argument as an example of how spiritual power can be transmitted through attribution, through the act of naming a teacher as the source of a teaching. When later authorities invoked Shimon bar Yohai's name in their compilations, they were doing something similar to what Akiva was doing when he called on Shimon at the edge of death: reaching for a spiritual amplifier whose resonance extended beyond the limits of ordinary transmission.

The Cave After the Request

Rabbi Shimon spent his years in hiding not because he was afraid, though the Roman decree against him was real and the danger was not manufactured. He spent them because the cave, with its miraculous spring and its overnight carob tree, was the only environment in which his intensity could develop without damaging the world around it. The Babylonian Talmud in Shabbat records that he and his son emerged the first time and watched a farmer plowing his field and were so disturbed by the sight of someone attending to material things rather than Torah that their gaze scorched the earth. They had to return. They were not ready for the ordinary world.

This is the figure Akiva appealed to. A man so saturated with a particular kind of spiritual force that the world itself could not absorb his attention without burning. When Akiva asked this man to pray for his death, he was asking for a prayer that would carry a weight unlike any ordinary petition. It was Akiva's last act of precision: choosing the right instrument for the moment that required it most.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

4 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Berakhot 61bTalmud Bavli, Berakhot

and the lungs draw all kinds of liquids, the liver becomes angry, the gall bladder injects a drop of gall into the liver and allays anger, the spleen laughs, the maw grinds the food, and the stomach brings sleep, and the nose awakens. If they reversed roles such that the organ which brings on sleep were to awaken, or the organ which awakens were to bring on sleep, the individual would gradually deteriorate.

It was taught: If both bring on sleep or both awaken, the person immediately dies. With regard to one’s inclinations, it was taught in a baraita that Rabbi Yosei HaGelili says: The good inclination rules the righteous, as it is stated: “And my heart is dead within me” (Psalms 109:22); the evil inclination has been completely banished from his heart. The evil inclination rules the wicked, as it is stated: “Transgression speaks to the wicked, there is no fear of God before his eyes” (Psalms 36:2).

Middling people are ruled by both the good and evil inclinations, as it is stated: “Because He stands at the right hand of the needy, to save him from them that rule his soul” (Psalms 109:31). Rabba said: People like us are middling. Abaye, his student and nephew, said to him: If the Master claims that he is merely middling, he does not leave room for any creature to live. If a person like you is middling, what of the rest of us?

And Rava said: The world was created only for the sake of the full-fledged wicked or the full-fledged righteous; others do not live complete lives in either world. Rava said: One should know of himself whether or not he is completely righteous, as if he is not completely righteous, he knows that his life will be a life of suffering. Rav said: The world was created only for the wicked Ahab ben Omri and for Rabbi Ḥanina ben Dosa.

The Gemara explains: For Ahab ben Omri, this world was created, as he has no place in the World-to-Come, and for Rabbi Ḥanina ben Dosa, the World-to-Come was created. We learned in our mishna the explanation of the verse: “And you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and all your soul and all your might” (Deuteronomy 6:5). This was elaborated upon when it was taught in a baraita: Rabbi Eliezer says: If it is stated: “With all your soul,” why does it state: “With all your might”?

Conversely, if it stated: “With all your might,” why does it state: “With all your soul”? Rather, this means that if one’s body is dearer to him than his property, therefore it is stated: “With all your soul”; one must give his soul in sanctification of God. And if one’s money is dearer to him than his body, therefore it is stated: “With all your might”; with all your assets. Rabbi Akiva says: “With all your soul” means: Even if God takes your soul.

The Gemara relates at length how Rabbi Akiva fulfilled these directives. The Sages taught: One time, after the bar Kokheva rebellion, the evil empire of Rome decreed that Israel may not engage in the study and practice of Torah. Pappos ben Yehuda came and found Rabbi Akiva, who was convening assemblies in public and engaging in Torah study. Pappos said to him: Akiva, are you not afraid of the empire?

Rabbi Akiva answered him: I will relate a parable. To what can this be compared? It is like a fox walking along a riverbank when he sees fish gathering and fleeing from place to place. The fox said to them: From what are you fleeing?

They said to him: We are fleeing from the nets that people cast upon us. He said to them: Do you wish to come up onto dry land, and we will reside together just as my ancestors resided with your ancestors? The fish said to him: You are the one of whom they say, he is the cleverest of animals? You are not clever; you are a fool.

If we are afraid in the water, our natural habitat which gives us life, then in a habitat that causes our death, all the more so. The moral is: So too, we Jews, now that we sit and engage in Torah study, about which it is written: “For that is your life, and the length of your days” (Deuteronomy 30:20), we fear the empire to this extent; if we proceed to sit idle from its study, as its abandonment is the habitat that causes our death, all the more so will we fear the empire.

The Sages said: Not a few days passed until they seized Rabbi Akiva and incarcerated him in prison, and seized Pappos ben Yehuda and incarcerated him alongside him. Rabbi Akiva said to him: Pappos, who brought you here? Pappos replied: Happy are you, Rabbi Akiva, for you were arrested on the charge of engaging in Torah study. Woe unto Pappos who was seized on the charge of engaging in idle matters.

The Gemara relates: When they took Rabbi Akiva out to be executed, it was time for the recitation of Shema. And they were raking his flesh with iron combs, and he was reciting Shema, thereby accepting upon himself the yoke of Heaven. His students said to him: Our teacher, even now, as you suffer, you recite Shema? He said to them: All my days I have been troubled by the verse: With all your soul, meaning: Even if God takes your soul.

I said to myself: When will the opportunity be afforded me to fulfill this verse? Now that it has been afforded me, shall I not fulfill it? He prolonged his uttering of the word: One, until his soul left his body as he uttered his final word: One. A voice descended from heaven and said: Happy are you, Rabbi Akiva, that your soul left your body as you uttered: One.

The ministering angels said before the Holy One, Blessed be He: This is Torah and this its reward? As it is stated: “From death, by Your hand, O Lord, from death of the world” (Psalms 17:14); Your hand, God, kills and does not save. God said the end of the verse to the ministering angels: “Whose portion is in this life.” And then a Divine Voice emerged and said: Happy are you, Rabbi Akiva, as you are destined for life in the World-to-Come, as your portion is already in eternal life.

We learned in the mishna that one may not act irreverently opposite the Eastern Gate, which is aligned with the Holy of Holies. Limiting this halakha, Rav Yehuda said that Rav said: They only said this halakha with regard to irreverent behavior from Mount Scopus [Tzofim] and within, and specifically areas from where one can see the Temple. It is also stated: Rabbi Abba, son of Rabbi Ḥiyya bar Abba, said: Rabbi Yoḥanan said the following: They only said this halakha with regard to Mount Scopus and within, when one can see, and when there is no fence obstructing his view, and when the Divine Presence is resting there, i.e., when the Temple is standing.

In this context, the Sages taught: One who defecates in Judea should not defecate when facing east and west, for then he is facing Jerusalem; rather he should do so facing north and south. But in the Galilee which is north of Jerusalem, one should only defecate facing east and west. Rabbi Yosei permits doing so, as Rabbi Yosei was wont to say: They only prohibited doing so when one can see the Temple, where there is no fence, and when the Divine Presence is resting there.

And the Rabbis prohibit doing so. The Gemara argues: But the opinion of the Rabbis, who prohibit this, is identical to that of the first anonymous tanna, who also prohibits doing so. The Gemara replies: The practical difference between them is with regard to the sides, i.e., a place in Judea that is not directly east or west of Jerusalem, or a place in the Galilee that is not directly north of Jerusalem.

According to the first tanna, it is prohibited; according to the Rabbis, it is permitted. It was taught in another baraita: One who defecates in Judea should not defecate when facing east and west; rather, he should only do so facing north and south. And in the Galilee, defecating while facing north and south is prohibited, while east and west is permitted. And Rabbi Yosei permitted doing so, as Rabbi Yosei was wont to say: They only prohibited doing so when one can see the Temple.

Rabbi Yehuda says: When the Temple is standing, it is prohibited, but when the Temple is not standing, it is permitted. The Gemara adds that Rabbi Akiva prohibits defecating anywhere while facing east and west. The Gemara challenges this: Rabbi Akiva’s position is identical to that of the first, anonymous tanna, who also prohibits doing so. The Gemara responds: The practical difference between them is with regard to places outside of Eretz Yisrael, as according to Rabbi Akiva, even outside of Eretz Yisrael, defecating while facing east and west is prohibited.

The Gemara relates that in Rabba’s bathroom, the bricks were placed east and west in order to ensure that he would defecate facing north and south. Abaye went and placed them north and south, to test if Rabba was particular about their direction or if they had simply been placed east and west incidentally. Rabba entered and fixed them. He said: Who is the one that is upsetting me? I hold in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Akiva, who said: It is prohibited everywhere.

Full source
Mitpachat Sefarim 1:20Mitpachat Sefarim

We’ve all been there, especially when delving into ancient texts. Think about Rabbi Akiva, one of the most influential sages in Jewish history, asking Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai, author of the Zohar, to pray for his death. A peculiar request. But maybe… maybe it was about more than just that.

Some suggest that Rabbi Akiva, in his wisdom, was tapping into the immense spiritual power of Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai. That by attributing teachings to him, he could receive them in a purer, more potent form. It’s almost like a spiritual amplifier. The Talmud tells us that Rabbi, often known as Judah the Prince, would sometimes attribute teachings using the plural form, perhaps hinting at this same dynamic of collective wisdom and influence. And as Rabbi Meir states in the Mishnah (the earliest code of rabbinic law), things aren't always as they seem The first reading.

Let's be honest: the world of textual analysis is rarely simple.

Here's where it gets really interesting. It's possible. And I say this with a measure of trepidation, that teachings from later authors might have found their way into earlier compilations. I hadn’t really considered it before, but the more I dig, the more compelling the evidence becomes. This realization… well, it makes my heart pound. It fills me with a sense of anxiety.

Why? Because it raises so many questions. We live in a world where, as the saying goes, "in the multitude of sins, truth is not found in the land." A world where truth feels elusive, where it's hard to know which way to turn. We live in a time where, perhaps, “the appointed time has not come.”

And I know, I know, that there will be those who disagree with me. People who will argue that I'm wrong, not just now, but that my perspective is dwarfed by the generations that came before. And you know what? They might be right! There’s a saying: “They became companions to the snake and its associates, for they spoke the truth and disappeared from the world.” Sometimes, speaking truth comes at a cost.

So, where does that leave us? With a healthy dose of humility, and a continued commitment to seeking truth, even when it’s uncomfortable. Even when it means questioning everything we thought we knew. Because ultimately, that's what this journey is all about: not just accepting what we're told, but engaging with the text, wrestling with its complexities, and finding our own place within its timeless wisdom.

Full source
Shabbat 33bTalmud Bavli, Shabbat

He and his son went and hid in the study hall. Each day his wife would bring them bread and a jug of water, and they would eat. When the decree grew more severe, he said to his son: Women are of light mind; perhaps they will cause her distress and she will reveal us. They went and hid in a cave. A miracle occurred for them, and a carob tree and a spring of water were created for them. They would remove their garments and sit up to their necks in sand. All day long they would study. At the time of prayer they would put on their garments, cover themselves, and pray, and then remove their garments again so that they would not wear out. They stayed in the cave twelve years. Elijah came and stood at the entrance of the cave and said: Who will inform bar Yochai that the emperor has died and his decree is annulled?

They went out and saw people plowing and sowing. They said: They forsake eternal life and occupy themselves with temporal life. Every place upon which they cast their eyes was immediately burned. A heavenly voice went forth and said to them: Have you come out to destroy My world? Return to your cave! They went back and stayed twelve months of the year. They said: The judgment of the wicked in Gehinnom is twelve months. A heavenly voice went forth and said: Go out from your cave! They went out.

Full source
Mitpachat Sefarim 1:18Mitpachat Sefarim

I was recently digging into the Mitpachat Sefarim, a fascinating work in its own right, when I stumbled upon a passage that really got me thinking about this. It's a passage dealing with some discrepancies, and apparent discrepancies, around authorship.

The author, wrestling with historical timelines, specifically the dating of the compilation of the Mishnah, the Sifra, and the Sifrei, references the book Yuchasin. He explains he now understands that Yuchasin's author wasn’t trying to pin down a specific date, but rather speaking more generally about the period, six hundred years after the death of Rabbi Akiva, when these foundational works were compiled. "And that is the truth," he writes, "so there is no need for correction." Case closed. But

He goes on to say that even though Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai might not have literally penned every word, it's "as if" he authored them. Why? Because the core concepts, the seeds of these ideas, originated with him. They were then passed down, refined, and eventually written down by later generations. like this: you might not have invented the recipe for your grandmother's famous cookies, but if she taught you the secrets, if you carry on the tradition, it's almost as if you're co-creating them every time you bake a batch.

He then adds a really insightful point: it's not uncommon for ancient books to be named after individuals who were only "remotely connected" to them. And he’s right! We see this pattern again and again.

What does this tell us?

It speaks to the collaborative nature of tradition. It emphasizes the importance of transmission, the passing down of knowledge from one generation to the next. It also highlights the sometimes blurry line between originator and compiler, between individual genius and collective wisdom.

The Mitpachat Sefarim, in this small but potent passage, gives us permission to see these texts not as static, unchanging monuments, but as living, breathing conversations across time. They are conversations in which we, as readers and interpreters, are also invited to participate.

So, the next time you open an ancient text, remember that you're not just reading the words of a single author. You're engaging with a chorus of voices, a tradition of ideas woven together over centuries. And who knows? Maybe, in your own way, you'll add your own thread to the story.

Full source