If he (who saw the animal) were a Cohein and it (the

Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael Mekhilta Tractate Kaspa 2:33

Curated by The Jewish Mythology Team · Published January 22, 2025

The Mekhilta presents a striking conflict between two obligations. A Kohen — a priest — encounters a lost or struggling animal in a cemetery. Jewish law prohibits a Kohen from entering a cemetery and becoming ritually impure through contact with the dead. But the Torah also commands returning lost property and helping animals in distress.

Which obligation takes priority? The Mekhilta rules: the Kohen does not become impure for the animal. He stays out of the cemetery. The prohibition against priestly impurity overrides the obligation to return lost property.

The Mekhilta then considers a more difficult scenario. What if the Kohen's father says to him: "Go into the cemetery and make yourself impure"? A child is obligated to honor and obey his parents. The command to honor parents is a positive commandment. The prohibition against priestly impurity is a negative commandment. In general, a positive commandment overrides a negative one.

Even so, the Kohen may not obey. The Torah says "and you forbear to help him" — there are times when forbearance is correct. This is one of those times. The Torah's inclusion of a "forbearance" option specifically addresses situations where other commandments conflict with the helping obligation. The Kohen forbears because his priestly status takes precedence. Not even filial obedience can compel him to violate it.

Themes

Torah Death Commandments Truth

Continue Reading

Josephus Jewish Burial Practices and the True Meaning of Immortality Josephus, the first-century Romano-Jewish historian, gives us a fascinating glimpse into just that when describing Jewis... Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael Wearing Tefillin Counts the Same as Studying Torah The Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael derives a striking equivalence from the verse "and as a remembrance between your eyes, so ... Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael Rebbi says — For everything from "You shall not take the Rebbi says: For everything from "You shall not take the name" and down, penitence does atone. From "You shall not take t... Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael Why the Torah States Both the Punishment and the Prohibition for Adultery The Torah's treatment of adultery presents a puzzle that the Mekhilta refuses to ignore. In one verse, the commandment t... Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael But perhaps this, (and not the other) is an exhortation The Torah commands: "You shall not steal." But the Mekhilta asks a question that might surprise anyone who thinks the me... Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael — Three mitzvoth are stated in this context, two ("You viz.: Three mitzvot (commandments)h are stated in this context, two ("You shall not kill" and "You shall not commit adul... Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael But perhaps the first is an exhortation against stealing But perhaps the first is an exhortation against stealing money, and the second an exhortation against stealing souls? Wo... Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael Whence do I derive (the same for) theft and loss The Torah establishes different levels of responsibility for different types of guardians. A hired watcher — someone pai... Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael No, this (that they may not be eaten) may be true of fats The Mekhilta continues its analysis of how the prohibition against eating meat cooked in milk is established in Torah la...