The Mekhilta interprets the verse "There He made for them statute and judgment" by asking what these two terms — statute and judgment — actually refer to. The first opinion identifies "statute" with Shabbat (the Sabbath) and "judgment" with the honoring of father and mother. These were the first commandments given to Israel at Marah, even before Sinai.

The implications are significant. Of all the commandments God could have chosen to introduce first, He selected Shabbat — the weekly reminder that God created and rested — and honoring parents — the commandment that bridges the divine and the human. These are not the dramatic prohibitions against murder or theft. They are the quiet foundations of a holy society: sacred time and sacred relationships.

Rabbi Elazar Hamodai offers a strikingly different interpretation. He identifies "statute" with the laws against illicit relations, citing (Leviticus 18:30): "Not to do according to the statutes of the abominations that were done before you." In this reading, "statute" does not mean a positive commandment but a boundary — a line drawn against the sexual practices of the nations. "Judgment," meanwhile, refers to civil and criminal law: the laws of ravishment, penalties, and injuries.

The two interpretations paint different pictures of what Israel needed most at Marah. The first says they needed holiness and family. The second says they needed boundaries and justice. Both agree that law came before Sinai — that even in the wilderness, before the Torah was formally given, God was already teaching Israel how to live.