Parshat Bereshit6 min read

Cain Struck Abel and Azazel Was Standing There

Abraham watches the cosmic picture and sees Adam, Eve, the adversary, and then Cain raising his hand. Azazel is behind all of it.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Answer About Evil
  2. The Brothers and What Was Between Them
  3. What Azazel Had Done Before the Field
  4. What Cain Knew When It Was Over
  5. The Question Abraham Had Asked

The Answer About Evil

God answered Abraham's question about evil with a revelation about what lay behind it. Abraham had looked down through the six heavens and seen the whole world. He had looked at the garden and seen Azazel holding the fruit beside Eve. Now God showed him the next frame in the picture, the one that completed the story the garden had started.

"I will tell you what shall be, and how much shall be, in the last days. Look now at everything in the picture."

Abraham looked and saw what lay before him in creation. He saw Adam and Eve. With them, the cunning adversary. And Cain, who acted lawlessly through the adversary's influence. Then the slaughtered Abel, and the grief that followed both of them down every generation.

The Brothers and What Was Between Them

Cain and Abel had not simply grown up differently. The tension between them was not random. What the Apocalypse of Abraham showed Abraham, and what the rabbinic tradition filled in from a different angle, was that the murder was not self-generated. The adversary had been there, had been working on Cain, had been present at the killing in the way that Azazel had been present at the tree.

The rabbis who did not have the Apocalypse's explicit framing arrived at the same place through different reasoning. They asked: what were Cain and Abel actually fighting about? The Torah gives no motive. Cain brought his offering, Abel brought his, God accepted Abel's and not Cain's, and then the text says Cain said something to Abel and they were in a field and Cain rose against his brother.

The rabbis filled the silence with content. One version: they were dividing the world. Cain took the land; Abel took the living creatures. Then Cain said, the land you stand on is mine. Abel said, the clothes on your back are made from what is mine. The argument that had no resolution. Another version: they were fighting about which one of them would marry a particular sister. Another: they were arguing about the location of the Temple that would one day be built. The rabbis generated every possible reading because the text had left every possible reading open.

What Azazel Had Done Before the Field

The Apocalypse of Abraham treats the involvement of the adversary in Cain's act as direct and causal. Cain acted lawlessly through the adversary's influence. This was not a metaphor about general human tendency toward violence. It was a specific claim: the force that had been operating behind the serpent in the garden had continued operating behind Cain in the field.

The pattern was consistent. Azazel at the tree had offered something that appeared to be knowledge. The result was exile and death entering the world. Azazel behind Cain offered something that appeared to be justice for being passed over. The result was the first murder and the first blood crying from the ground.

Abraham, watching from above, was seeing the second act of a story whose first act he had watched in the garden scene. Same force. Same structure. The adversary had not finished after Eden. He had continued immediately into the next generation, into the next family, and accomplished with Cain what he had begun with Eve.

What Cain Knew When It Was Over

After the killing, God asked Cain where his brother was. Cain said: I do not know. Am I my brother's keeper? The tradition read this refusal as compounding the act. The lying was worse than the silence; the rhetorical question was worse than the lie. He knew exactly where Abel was. The voice he heard asking was not asking because it lacked information.

Then Cain was told what the ground had received, and what receiving it had done to the ground. Your brother's blood cries to me from the ground. The earth that had opened its mouth to receive your brother's blood from your hand is now cursed for you. You will be a wanderer and a wanderer on the earth.

Cain said: my punishment is greater than I can bear. Whoever finds me will kill me. God said: no, whoever kills Cain will suffer seven-fold vengeance. He placed a mark on Cain so that no one who met him would kill him.

The mark was protection. The wandering was punishment. Both were true at once. This too was part of what Abraham saw in the picture: that the adversary's success in the field had produced a permanent wanderer, and that even the wanderer had been given something to protect him, that divine restraint had followed immediately on divine punishment and they were not separable.

The Question Abraham Had Asked

The vision was an answer to a question Abraham had asked: why is evil permitted? Why does the adversary operate? Why does the force that was behind the serpent continue to function in the world, generation after generation, killing brothers in fields?

The answer the Apocalypse gives is not the answer of comfort. It is the answer of witness. God showed Abraham the whole sequence: the creation, the garden, the fall, the murder, the tears that followed through every generation. Not to explain why evil was permitted but to confirm that it was seen. That the blood that cried from the ground was not crying into silence. That the adversary's operations were visible from above, that Abraham himself was being shown them from a position of altitude so he would know the scale of what he had agreed to contend with when he walked away from the unclean bird on the heights and completed his sacrifice.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

2 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Apocalypse of Abraham XXIVApocalypse of Abraham

God answered Abraham's question about evil with a revelation about the nations. He was angered at them on account of Abraham's descendants, the people who would be separated after him. "I will tell you what shall be, and how much shall be, in the last days. Look now at everything in the picture."

Abraham looked and saw what lay before him in creation.

He saw Adam and Eve. With them, the cunning Adversary. And Cain, who acted lawlessly through the Adversary's influence. Then the slaughtered Abel, and the destruction brought upon him through the lawless one. The first murder. The first blood spilled on earth. Not merely a crime of jealousy between brothers, but an act driven by the spirit of Azazel, who used human weakness as his instrument.

Abraham's vision widened. He saw Impurity personified, and those who lusted after it, and its pollution, and their jealousy, and the fire of their corruption burning in the lowest parts of the earth.

He saw Theft personified, and those who chased after it, and the arrangement of their retribution at the Great Judgment.

He saw naked men, foreheads pressed against each other in conflict, their disgrace and their passion against one another, and their punishment.

He saw Desire, and in her hand the head of every kind of lawlessness, her scorn and waste assigned to perdition.

The vision was a catalogue of human evil, each sin given a face and a body. Impurity. Theft. Desire. Each one traced back to the moment when Azazel stood behind the tree in Eden and handed the fruit to the first man and woman. From that single act flowed every corruption Abraham now witnessed unfolding through the ages like a scroll of devastation.

Full source
Bereshit Rabbah 22:7Bereshit Rabbah

Bereshit Rabbah turns to What Cain and Abel Were Really Fighting About.

The Torah is concise, leaving us to confront the underlying tensions. And that's where the beauty of Jewish tradition comes in – the rabbis and sages throughout the ages stepped in to fill in the gaps, offering us different interpretations. Bereshit Rabbah, a classic collection of rabbinic interpretations on the Book of Genesis, dives right into this very question.

One explanation offered is strikingly practical. Cain and Abel decided to divide the world. One would take the land, the other the movable property. But, of course, disputes arose. "The land you're standing on is mine!" one might have argued. "No, what you're wearing is mine!" the other retorted. It escalated quickly, ending with the ultimate act of violence. A fight over possessions, a struggle for dominance – a story as old as time itself.

Then, Rabbi Yehoshua of Sikhnin, quoting Rabbi Levi, offers a different perspective. Both Cain and Abel possessed land and movable property. Their quarrel wasn't about earthly possessions, but something far more sacred: the location of the Temple. "The Temple shall be built in my domain!" each brother declared. Bereshit Rabbah connects their argument to the phrase "when they were in the field," linking the "field" to the future site of the Temple in Jerusalem, as the prophet Micah says, "Zion will be plowed like a field" (Micah 3:12). It transforms the story from a petty squabble into a conflict over spiritual destiny.

And the interpretations don't stop there. Yehuda bar Rabbi suggests they were fighting over who would marry "the first Eve." Wait, what does that mean? Remember, according to earlier traditions (Bereshit Rabbah 17:7, 18:4), Adam had a wife before Eve, named Lilith, and perhaps the tradition of the "first Eve" carried on.

But Rabbi Aivu dismisses this, saying the first Eve had already returned to dust. So, what then were they quarreling about?

Rabbi Huna offers a final, fascinating possibility. He suggests that an extra twin sister was born with Abel. Cain wanted to marry her because he was the firstborn, entitled to certain privileges. Abel, however, argued that he should have her because she was born with him. This interpretation introduces the element of forbidden love, of sibling rivalry intertwined with desire, fueling the deadly conflict. Rabbi Huna explains that Cain said, “I will take her, as I am the firstborn,” and Abel countered, “I will take her, as she was born with me.”

What's so powerful about this passage in Bereshit Rabbah is that it doesn't give us one definitive answer. It presents us with a spectrum of possibilities, each offering a different lens through which to understand the complexities of human nature and the origins of violence. It reminds us that the Torah is not just a text to be read, but a text to be wrestled with, interpreted, and brought to life through our own understanding.

So, the next time you read the story of Cain and Abel, consider these different interpretations. Was it a fight over land? A dispute over the Temple's location? A struggle for love and lineage? Maybe, just maybe, it was a little bit of all of those things. And perhaps, in understanding the potential reasons behind their conflict, we can gain a deeper understanding of the conflicts within ourselves and the world around us.

Full source