5 min read

Egyptian Scribes Turned the Exodus Into a Purge

Amenophis woke with a goddess still scolding him in the dark. His scribe's cure was to drive two hundred fifty thousand people from Egypt.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. A Goddess in a King's Sleep
  2. Lead Sheets and Desert Fires
  3. Names That Would Not Stay Still
  4. The Priest Who Would Not Swallow It
Egyptian Scribes Turned the Exodus Into a Purge Click for full size

A Goddess in a King's Sleep

Amenophis woke with a goddess still scolding him in the dark. Her temple had been wrecked in war, and the insult clung to the king's breath. A sacred scribe named Phritiphantes offered a cure that sounded like statecraft. Purge Egypt of men carrying pollutions. Clear the land. Quiet the nightmare.

Two hundred fifty thousand diseased people, in the numbers Cheremon sold as memory, were driven out under leaders the fable dared to name with Hebrew names. Moses had been Tisithen. Joseph had been Peteseph. Scribes, the fable said, not a prophet and a vizier. They found three hundred eighty thousand more at Pelusium, men Amenophis had left behind because he would not bring them home. The scribes made a league. They marched on Egypt. Amenophis fled into Ethiopia and left his pregnant wife hiding in caverns.

The son born in those caverns, Messene, grew up and chased the Jews into Syria with two hundred thousand men, then fetched his father back from Ethiopia. The Exodus, rewritten by an Egyptian pen, became a sanitation order with a dream for a warrant.

In Rome, centuries later, Josephus sat with the scroll open and copied the lie only long enough to break its spine. He had not survived war and book-labor to let a nightmare rewrite his people's leaving.

Lead Sheets and Desert Fires

Lysimachus went further into cruelty. Under King Bocchoris, he claimed, leprous and scabby crowds in Egypt grew so thick they starved the land. They fled into temples and begged for food. An oracle demanded purge. Wrap the leprous in sheets of lead, Lysimachus wrote, and let them down into the sea. Drive the rest into desert death.

The abandoned did not die on schedule. Night came on. They kindled fires and lamps and kept watch. They fasted the next night and tried to buy mercy from gods that had already priced them as waste. Then Moses appeared in this version not as the servant of God who faced a sea and a stubborn court, but as a teacher of hostility. Have no kind regards for any man. Give no good counsel. Overturn every temple and altar you meet. The rest commended him with one consent and walked the desert on that advice.

Josephus heard these sentences the way a man hears someone spit on his parents' graves. He had written Jewish antiquity for Greek readers. Now he had to write against poison that traveled faster than careful history. Lead sheets. Desert bones. A Moses redesigned for Egyptian pride. Each image was built to make sympathy for Israel feel unclean.

Names That Would Not Stay Still

Josephus set the fables next to one another on the table until their seams showed. Who advised Amenophis? Cheremon named Phritiphantes. Other pens named other men. How many were expelled? Two hundred fifty thousand in one scroll, different crowds in the next. Which son pursued? Messene in Cheremon. Ramesses in other mouths. Pharaohs slid around like wet stones.

Egyptian writers had reasons that were not archives. Israel had once held power in their land. Israel had left and thrived. Envy does not footnote itself. It invents diseased multitudes. It invents goddess-dreams. It invents Moses as villain so the humiliation can change clothes and look like hygiene.

They would not admit a migration that began outside Egypt. They would not tell the departure as liberation under God. The plot had to make Egypt the surgeon and Israel the infection. Prosperity after departure made the insult sharper. A people that should have vanished in the desert, by the fable's wish, instead built a name.

A history that cannot keep its own cast list is not history. It is theater with sand for a stage.

The Priest Who Would Not Swallow It

Josephus wrote as a priest who had seen Jerusalem burn and still would not let foreign pamphleteers own the departure from Egypt. He had translated sacred books into a tongue Rome could read. That labor made the slanders personal. If the books were true, Cheremon and Lysimachus were not mildly wrong. They were manufacturers of contempt.

He walked the contradictions the way a lawyer walks a jury past a forged seal. Who advised. How many. Which son. Which desert route. Each Egyptian author answered differently because invention multiplies while memory, held in shared books, converges.

The Jewish nation, in his counter-case, left under the hand of God with laws already pointed toward life, not toward a permanent war on temples as Lysimachus claimed. Torah's public demands could be checked in daylight. The lead sheets could not.

Fables travel light. They need only spite and a plausible pharaoh. Josephus made them heavy again by forcing them to carry evidence they did not have. The dream of an angry temple goddess could frighten a room. It could not outrun a people who still read the departure in their own tongue and taught it to children with matzah and questions.

Amenophis could keep his nightmare in Cheremon's scroll. Bocchoris could keep his lead sheets in Lysimachus's cruelty. Israel kept the sea road, the law, and the refusal to be rewritten as an epidemic.

Lie ran. The priest ran faster, with books in both hands.

JosephusExodusManethoLysimachusCheremonApion
← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

3 sources

The texts behind this telling. Some cards carry a translation of the source; others are our own retelling of it, and each card says which. Every card links out to the original.

Against Apion 32:1Against Apion

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.Against Apion, trans. William Whiston · Public Domain

Against Apion turns to Cheremon and the Dreamer.

We’ve already heard from Manetho, an Egyptian priest who spun a rather unflattering version of the Exodus story. Now, the tradition turns to another Egyptian writer, Cheremon (excommunication), who also offers his own… unique… perspective. The historian Josephus, in his work Against Apion, quotes Cheremon directly, and it's a wild ride.

Cheremon, like Manetho, identifies the pharaoh of the Exodus as Amenophis, and his son as Ramesses. So far, so… normal, at least for these accounts. But then things take a sharp turn.

"The goddess Isis appeared to Amenophis in his sleep," Cheremon writes, "and blamed him that her temple had been demolished in the war." But here’s where it gets really interesting.

Apparently, a "sacred scribe" named Phritiphantes advises Amenophis that to stop these troubling visions, he needs to purge Egypt of "men that had pollutions upon them. What exactly does "pollutions" mean? Well, in Cheremon's narrative, it translates to Amenophis rounding up two hundred and fifty thousand "diseased" individuals and kicking them out of the country.

And who are these unfortunate souls led by? None other than Moses and Joseph, cast here as scribes whose names were originally Egyptian – Moses being Tisithen and Joseph Peteseph. According to Cheremon, these two lead the exiles to Pelusium, where they encounter another three hundred and eighty thousand people abandoned by Amenophis (he apparently couldn't be bothered to transport them all). Moses and Joseph then form an alliance with this group and launch an attack on Egypt.

Amenophis, unable to withstand this onslaught, flees to Ethiopia, leaving his pregnant wife behind. She gives birth in secret to a son named Messene. Messene, upon reaching adulthood, pursues the Jews into Syria with an army of two hundred thousand, and then welcomes his father, Amenophis, back from exile.

Think about the implications here. Cheremon is attempting to rewrite Jewish history, painting the Exodus not as a divine liberation, but as the expulsion of diseased people led by rebellious scribes. It's a blatant attempt to discredit the Jewish narrative and portray them as a source of impurity and unrest.

What’s fascinating is how these counter-narratives, however outlandish, persisted. They reveal the anxieties and prejudices of the time. While we might dismiss Cheremon's account as mere propaganda, it's a stark reminder that history is rarely a simple, straightforward story. It's a complex tapestry woven with different perspectives, biases, and agendas. And understanding those different threads is crucial to understanding the bigger picture.

Full source
Against Apion 34:1Against Apion

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.Against Apion, trans. William Whiston · Public Domain

Against Apion turns to The Most Hateful Lie Ever Written About the Jewish People.

Remember, Josephus wrote Against Apion specifically to defend the Jewish people against such slanders, so we’re getting this story secondhand, through his rebuttal. But what a story it is!

Lysimachus, this character assassin, claims that the Jews were once a mass of leprous and scabby people living in Egypt during the reign of King Bocchoris. He says they were so numerous and diseased that they caused a famine. To solve this, Bocchoris supposedly consulted the oracle of [Jupiter] Hammon (that's Zeus-Ammon, the syncretic Greco-Egyptian deity). The oracle, according to Lysimachus, demanded that Egypt be purged of these "impure" people. The leprous ones? Drowned in lead-lined boxes in the sea. The rest? Abandoned in the desert to die.

It gets worse, believe it or not.

These abandoned, supposedly diseased people, according to Lysimachus, didn't just roll over and die. Oh no. They banded together. And here's where the real kicker comes in: Moses appears. The Moses. But not the law-giving, God-fearing leader we know from the Torah. This Moses, as portrayed by Lysimachus, is an evil instigator. He urges them to travel together, showing kindness to no one, always advising others to do the worst, and, get this, to overturn every temple and altar they encounter.

Seriously?

So, this band of supposed lepers, led by an evil Moses, does exactly that. They rampage through the desert, pillaging and burning temples until they arrive in a land they call Judea. They build a city, initially naming it Hierosyla, meaning "robbery of temples," a delightful little detail, don't you think? Eventually, ashamed of the name (according to Lysimachus, anyway), they change it to Hierosolyma – Jerusalem – and call themselves Hierosolymites.

Wow. Just… wow.

Josephus, of course, tears this narrative to shreds. He points out the obvious inconsistencies and the blatant anti-Jewish sentiment fueling the entire story. But it’s important to remember these kinds of narratives existed. They circulated, and they poisoned the well of public opinion.

What’s truly striking is the sheer audacity of Lysimachus’s fabrication. The blatant inversion of Jewish values – kindness, justice, and monotheism – into their opposites. It serves as a stark reminder of how easily narratives can be twisted and weaponized to demonize entire groups of people. And how important it is to be critical of the stories we hear, especially those that seem too good (or in this case, too awful) to be true.

Full source
Against Apion 25:1Against Apion

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.Against Apion, trans. William Whiston · Public Domain

Take the ancient Egyptians and the Israelites, for example. Their story is filled with power struggles, cultural clashes, and some serious finger-pointing.

Josephus, in his work Against Apion, dives headfirst into this complicated relationship. He points out that the Egyptians were the first to hurl accusations at the Israelites. Why? Well, to put it simply, it seems like a mix of resentment and good old-fashioned envy.

You see, some Egyptian writers went out of their way to twist the truth. They wouldn't admit that our ancestors, the Israelites, had migrated to Egypt from elsewhere – which, let's be honest, is a pretty crucial part of the story! Nor would they give an honest account of the Exodus.

Josephus argues that there were a couple of major reasons for this animosity. First, there was the uncomfortable truth that the Israelites had, at one point, held dominion over Egypt. Imagine how that must have stung! And then, after throwing off the yoke, we went on to build a thriving nation back in our own land.

But there's more to it than just politics and economics. A major source of friction, according to Josephus, was religion. He minces no words, arguing that our way of worshipping the Divine far surpassed the Egyptian practices. He writes that their reverence for animals as gods was foolishness. Josephus believed that the difference between our monotheistic belief and their animal worship was as vast as the difference between God and brute beasts. A pretty strong statement!

Josephus suggests that the Egyptians were so set in their ways, so accustomed to their own flawed understanding of the Divine, that they couldn't even consider adopting a more "decent" form of worship – like ours.

And here's where it gets really interesting: Josephus claims that some Egyptians were so consumed by envy that they even contradicted their own historical records! They were so blinded by their prejudices that they couldn't even see the inconsistencies in their own writings. Sound familiar? It seems like historical revisionism isn't a new phenomenon.

So, what's the takeaway here? It's a reminder that ancient conflicts often have deep roots, tangled up in issues of power, religion, and good old-fashioned human emotions like envy and resentment. And sometimes, those emotions can lead people to distort the truth, even to the point of contradicting themselves.

Full source