6 min read

Even Solomon Hit a Wall the Red Heifer Would Not Cross

Solomon cracked every riddle and set down his pen before the red heifer. A noblewoman tried matchmaking. Israel refused to believe Aaron could die.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. A Noblewoman Who Thought Matchmaking Was Easy
  2. Solomon Sat with the Red Heifer and Said Nothing
  3. A Nation That Could Not Accept Aaron's Death
  4. The Three Walls

A Noblewoman Who Thought Matchmaking Was Easy

A wealthy Roman woman cornered Rabbi Yosei ben Halafta with the question theologians have asked since the sixth day of creation. What has God been doing since He rested? The world runs itself, more or less. The seasons turn. The Torah was given. What occupies the creator of the universe on an ordinary Tuesday?

Rabbi Yosei's answer was domestic and precise. God is busy making matches. Deciding who belongs with whom. Pairing this man with that woman, this family with that city, this soul with its proper circumstances. It sounds simple to the woman, and she said so. She could do that herself. She had a thousand male servants and a thousand female servants. She could pair them all in an afternoon.

Rabbi Berekhya, recording the conversation in Bamidbar Rabbah, let the noblewoman try. She paired them up that night. In the morning, one man had a broken head, one woman had a black eye, this one was furious, that one was weeping. The pairing had been done without error, technically. Every servant had been assigned a partner. But the matching had not been done. Finding the right two people for each other is not clerical work. It is the ongoing labor of creation, the thing God does every day, and it requires knowing something about each person that a list cannot hold.

The noblewoman went back to Rabbi Yosei and admitted the difficulty. He said: you see? And walked away.

Solomon Sat with the Red Heifer and Said Nothing

Solomon had cataloged everything. The language of birds. The behavior of cedars and hyssop. The medicinal properties of every plant in the Judean hills. He had decoded the riddles from Sheba, judged the lawsuit over a baby by threatening to divide it, built and furnished the Temple to dimensions that aligned with the cosmic structure. He had read every text and questioned every sage and sat with every hard passage of Torah until he found a way through.

Then he sat with Numbers 19, the law of the red heifer. A completely red cow, without blemish, that had never been yoked. It was to be slaughtered outside the camp, burned entirely, and its ashes mixed with water to purify those who had become impure through contact with the dead. The paradox was built into the ceremony: the ashes that purified the impure made the priest who handled them impure. The same substance, the same act, the same moment produced opposite effects in different people.

Solomon studied this. He set down his pen. Ecclesiastes 7:23 contains the record of his defeat: I said I will be wise, but it was far from me. The wisest man who had ever lived admitted that the red heifer was beyond him. Not because it was complicated in a technical sense. Because it was one of those points where the logic of creation simply stops being available to human minds, where the divine order operates on a principle that wisdom cannot reach.

A Nation That Could Not Accept Aaron's Death

The third scene in Bamidbar Rabbah's sequence of walls is the death of Aaron on Mount Hor. Numbers 20:28-29 records it with terrible economy: Moses stripped Aaron of his priestly vestments and put them on Eleazar, and Aaron died there on the top of the mountain. The people saw that Aaron had died. They wept for thirty days.

What the people could not accept was not the grief, but the mechanism. Aaron, who had stood between the living and the dead during Korach's rebellion (Numbers 17:13), who had held up the censer and stopped the plague, who had literally blocked the angel of death with his body and with the incense smoke, was the man death could not reach as long as he held the incense. The people had seen this. They had watched Aaron run into the middle of the plague and the plague stopped at his feet.

How, then, was he dead? They refused to believe it. The tradition in Bamidbar Rabbah says the people thought Moses had killed Aaron for some hidden reason, that there had been a quarrel at the top of the mountain, that the man who had stopped death could not have been taken by death. Moses had to show them what had happened in the cave. He had to bring Eleazar down in Aaron's vestments so they could see that the priesthood had transferred, that the anointing had moved rather than disappeared, that Aaron's death was real and the world had not broken.

The Three Walls

Bamidbar Rabbah's three passages share a single structure. A person or a people of considerable intelligence and capability runs at full speed into a wall. The Roman noblewoman discovers that pairing human beings requires something that cannot be systematized. Solomon discovers that one commandment in the Torah operates on a logic that wisdom cannot follow. Israel discovers that the man who stopped death could not stop his own.

The walls are not punishments. They are not placed to frustrate. They are the points where the design of creation insists on its own authority over even the best human minds. The matchmaking belongs to God because the knowledge required for it belongs to God. The red heifer belongs to a category of law that resists explanation because some things are held in trust that cannot be handed over. And Aaron's death belongs to the order of creation that no individual charisma, however genuine, can permanently suspend.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

4 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Bamidbar Rabbah 3:6Bamidbar Rabbah

Bamidbar Rabbah turns to God Settles Individuals in a House After Creation.

In Bamidbar Rabbah, a collection of rabbinic teachings on the Book of Numbers, we find a fascinating discussion sparked by the verse, "The Lord spoke to Moses in the wilderness of Sinai, saying" (Numbers 3:14). This verse is then connected to a seemingly unrelated verse from Psalms: "God settles individuals in a house" (Psalms 68:7). What's the connection?

One interpretation is that God takes individuals and builds them into families, into "dynastic houses." Think of David, the shepherd boy who became king, or Aaron, the brother of Moses, who established the priestly line. As the text says, "House of David, so said the Lord" (Jeremiah 21:12), and "House of Levi, bless the Lord" (Psalms 135:20). Even the Israelites themselves, once a small group, were multiplied by God, as it says, "The Lord your God has multiplied you" (Deuteronomy 1:10). That's "God settles individuals in a house."

The Midrash (rabbinic commentary) doesn't stop there. A noblewoman asks Rabbi Yosei ben Ḥalafta what God has been doing since the six days of creation. The rabbi's initial answer is intriguing: "He elevates ladders and lowers ladders." In other words, God is constantly changing fortunes, making the wealthy poor and the poor wealthy, as we see in (1 Samuel 2:7): "The Lord impoverishes and makes wealthy.."

Rabbi Berekhya offers a different, perhaps more intimate, response. He suggests that Rabbi Yosei actually told the noblewoman that God is busy making matches, deciding who will marry whom and settling them in houses.

The noblewoman, confident in her own abilities, scoffs! "I can make one thousand matches in one day!" she declares. So, she pairs off a thousand slaves and a thousand maidservants. The result? Utter chaos! By morning, the slaves and maidservants are fighting, injured, and miserable.

The noblewoman, humbled, turns back to Rabbi Yosei. His response is profound: "If this matter is insignificant in your eyes, it is as difficult before the Omnipresent like the parting of the Red Sea." In other words, matchmaking isn't just a trivial task; it's a divine undertaking, requiring wisdom and understanding beyond human capability.

The Midrash continues, explaining that God "settles individuals," bringing them together from different places and settling them in one house. And "He joyously [bakosharot] leads out prisoners" (Psalms 68:7) – a phrase loaded with meaning. Bakosharot is a fascinating wordplay, a combination of bekhi (weeping) and shirot (singing). If the couple is not deserving, they weep; if they are, they sing.

It also suggests that God matches each person with their kindred soul. And when someone marries a suitable partner, God creates "houses" – families – through them. The text makes it clear that the term "individual" (yaḥid) implies greatness, drawing parallels to verses like "Who is like your people Israel, one [eḥad] nation in the land" (II (Samuel 7:2)3). These unions, when blessed, produce children who become scholars, deciding what is permitted (umakhshirim) and what is forbidden (osrim).

Conversely, if someone marries an unsuitable partner, the result can be "ignorant sons" who dwell in a "parched land [tzeḥiḥa]" (Psalms 68:7), a place of thirst – not for water, but for Torah, echoing the prophet Amos's words (8:11): "Not famine for bread and not thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the Lord."

The Midrash then connects this idea to the story of Amram and Yokheved, the parents of Moses. It was through their union that a redeemer was born, leading the Israelites out of Egypt. Similarly, the Israelites themselves, who descended into Egypt as individuals, were multiplied into a great nation. Their liberation was also linked to their avoidance of licentiousness, as symbolized by the locked garden, fountain, and spring in (Song of Songs 4:12).

Rabbi Akiva adds another layer, suggesting that the Exodus occurred in the month of Nisan because it was the most auspicious time for travel – neither too hot nor too cold. Rabbi Elazar interprets bakosharot as referring to the weeping of the Israelites and Moses in Egypt, which turned into singing upon their redemption.

The text goes on to explore the merits that led to the Exodus, citing Jacob's struggle with the angel, the uprightness of the matriarchs, and the faithfulness of the tribe of Levi, who remained true to God even amidst Egyptian idolatry. Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi emphasizes the merit of the Tabernacle, foreshadowing the divine presence that would dwell among the Israelites.

So, what does all this mean for us? Perhaps it's a reminder that matchmaking, family building, and community are all sacred acts, imbued with divine significance. It encourages us to see the hand of God not only in the grand sweep of history but also in the intimate details of our lives, in the connections we forge, and in the homes we build. And maybe, just maybe, to appreciate the incredible complexity of finding the right "match," whether it's a life partner, a friend, or even a calling.

Full source
Bamidbar Rabbah 19:3Bamidbar Rabbah

The Book of Ecclesiastes puts it perfectly: “All this I attempted with wisdom; I said: I will become wise, but it is distant from me” (Ecclesiastes 7:23). This feeling, this yearning, is at the heart of a fascinating passage in Bamidbar Rabbah 19, a section of the great Midrashic (rabbinic interpretive commentary) collection, Bamidbar Rabbah (Numbers Rabbah).

The passage kicks off by talking about Solomon, the wisest of all men. The text reminds us that “God granted wisdom to Solomon…[like the sand that is on the seashore]” (I Kings 5:9). What does the sand have to do with it? Well, the Rabbis offer a beautiful explanation: Solomon’s wisdom was like the sand, encompassing the wisdom of all of Israel, whose numbers were also likened to the sand of the sea (Hosea 2:1). Rabbi Levi adds another layer, suggesting that just as sand acts as a barrier for the sea, so too, wisdom was contained within Solomon.

Even Solomon's legendary wisdom had its limits. As the passage points out, “Solomon’s wisdom exceeded the wisdom of all the people of the east” (I (Kings 5:1)0). What was the wisdom of these "people of the east"? Apparently, they were experts in divination by bird calls. Intriguing. Rabbi Shimon ben Gamliel even praises some of their customs: they kissed on the hand instead of the mouth, cut with knives instead of biting, and sought counsel in open spaces.

Then there's the wisdom of Egypt, which Solomon also surpassed. The Midrash tells a story of Solomon seeking craftsmen from Pharaoh Nekho to build the Temple. Pharaoh, in a sly move, sends him workers destined to die within the year. Solomon, through Divine insight, knows their fate and sends them back with shrouds. A rather morbid mic drop, wouldn’t you say?

But hold on, the text doesn't stop with Solomon. It goes even further back, comparing Solomon’s wisdom to that of Adam, the first man. Remember how God consulted the angels before creating Adam? The angels questioned the point of creating humankind. To demonstrate humanity's potential, God paraded all the animals before them. The angels couldn't name them, but Adam could. “This one it is fitting to call bull, this one lion, this one horse…” (Genesis 2:20). Even more profound, Adam named God Himself, recognizing Him as “Lord” (Isaiah 42:8).

The passage continues, drawing parallels between Solomon and other wise figures: Abraham, Moses, and Joseph. The story of Joseph is particularly fascinating. The Egyptians, begrudgingly acknowledging his wisdom, tested him by presenting him with tablets written in seventy languages. Joseph, through Divine assistance, was able to read them all, even mastering the sacred tongue (Psalms 81:6).

We then get a glimpse into Solomon's understanding of the natural world. The text asks, rhetorically, how could Solomon speak to trees, animals, and fish? The answer is that he understood the symbolic meaning behind them. For example, he pondered why a leper is purified with both cedar and hyssop. The answer? Because the leper’s pride was as towering as the cedar, and his healing comes through humility, as small as the hyssop.

The passage ends with a powerful statement: Even with all his vast knowledge, Solomon confessed that some things were simply beyond his grasp. He investigated, he asked, he searched, but the mystery of the red heifer (parah adumah), a ritual sacrifice described in Numbers 19, remained elusive. "I said: I will become wise, but it is distant from me" (Ecclesiastes 7:23).

What does this all mean for us? Perhaps it's a reminder that the pursuit of wisdom is a lifelong journey. That even the wisest among us encounter mysteries that defy understanding. And that humility, like the hyssop, is an essential ingredient in the quest for knowledge. Maybe the point isn't to know everything, but to keep striving, to keep asking, and to accept that some things will always remain just beyond our reach. The beauty, perhaps, lies in the reaching itself.

Full source
Bamidbar Rabbah 19:20Bamidbar Rabbah

The Torah, in its unflinching honesty, shows us just that. a passage from Bamidbar Rabbah (Numbers Rabbah) 19, which explores the immediate aftermath of Aaron's death.

The verse we begin with is from (Numbers 20:29): "The entire congregation saw that Aaron had perished, and they wept for Aaron thirty days, the entire house of Israel." But the Midrash, a method of interpreting scripture that unearths deeper meanings, asks a crucial question: what exactly did they see?

In Bamidbar Rabbah, when Moses and Eleazar came down from the mountain without Aaron, the people were. skeptical, to say the least. They demanded, "Where is Aaron?" When told of his death, their response was laced with disbelief and a hint of accusation: "How could the angel of death harm him, a person who stood against the angel of death and stopped him?" This is a direct reference to (Numbers 17:13), where Aaron's actions halted a plague.

The people were on the verge of violence, threatening to stone Moses and Eleazar if they didn't produce Aaron. Can you imagine the pressure? Moses, in a moment of desperation, turned to prayer. "Master of the universe, deliver us from suspicion!" And in that moment, the Holy One, blessed be He, opened the cave where Aaron had died, revealing the truth to the entire congregation. "The entire congregation saw that Aaron had perished." It wasn't just about witnessing death; it was about dispelling doubt and restoring faith in Moses' leadership.

But the story doesn't end there. The Midrash then connects Aaron's death to another event: an attack by the "Canaanite, king of Arad" (Numbers 21:1). The text explains that with Aaron's passing, the protective "clouds of glory" dissipated, leaving Israel vulnerable, "like a woman whose hair is exposed." This imagery is powerful – a loss of divine protection, a sense of being exposed and unsafe.

Who was this "king of Arad"? The Midrash identifies him as Amalek. But why the different name? Here's where it gets interesting. Israel was forbidden from warring against the descendants of Esau, and Amalek was a grandson of Esau. So, God essentially said, "This one is not prohibited for you like the children of Esau. It is for you like the Canaanites, in whose regard it is stated: 'You shall utterly destroy them' (Deuteronomy 20:17)." Hence, the "Canaanite" label.

Bamidbar Rabbah emphasizes that Amalek was always a "chastising whip" for Israel, appearing when they faltered in their faith. Remember when they asked, "Is the Lord in our midst?" (Exodus 17:7)? Immediately, "Amalek came" (Exodus 17:8). This pattern repeats itself, highlighting the connection between spiritual vulnerability and external threats. As Ginzberg's Legends of the Jews elaborates, Amalek represents a constant challenge to Israel's faith and commitment.

The passage concludes by noting that after Aaron's death, the Israelites traveled "seven journeys in reverse." This detail, seemingly minor, reveals the profound impact of Aaron's loss. They were not just grieving; they were disoriented, losing their way both physically and spiritually. The verses in (Deuteronomy 10:6) and (Numbers 33:30-39) are closely examined to prove this point.

So, what can we take away from this interplay of grief, vulnerability, and attack? Perhaps it's a reminder that loss can expose our weaknesses, making us susceptible to external threats. But it's also a evidence of the resilience of the human spirit, and the enduring power of faith, even in the face of profound sorrow. It reminds us that even when the protective clouds seem to dissipate, the potential for renewal and strength remains.

Full source
Midrash Tanchuma, Chukat 6Midrash Tanchuma

R. Isaac began [his discourse] (with Eccl. 7:23), “All this I tested with wisdom; I thought I could fathom it, but it eludes me.” It is written (in I Kings 5:9), “So God gave Solomon wisdom and discernment in great measure, with understanding...” R. Johanan said a parable in the name of R. Simeon ben Yehozedek, “This is comparable to a king who had a friend, and the king loved him exceedingly. The king said to him, ‘Ask me anything you want and I will give it to you.’ And that friend was very wise. He said [to himself], ‘If I ask him to make me a duke, it [alone] will come to me.” Rather I will ask him for something that is attached to all the advantages.’ Immediately he answered and said to the king, ‘Since you asked that I should ask for something in front of you, I am asking from you that you marry off your daughter to me.’ The king said, ‘By your life, I want this. Behold my daughter is [given] into your house.’ So [too] at the time that the Holy One, blessed be He, said to Solomon (in I Kings 3:5), ‘Ask what I should give to you,’ Solomon said [to himself], ‘What shall I ask; If I ask for silver and gold, it [alone] will come to me. If I ask for the monarchy, it [alone] will come to me. Rather I will ask for something that is attached to all the things.’ Immediately he said in front of the Holy One, blessed be He, ‘Master of the World, I only request from you wisdom.’ [Then] the Holy One, blessed be He, said to him, ‘You have asked well in asking for wisdom, as all the things are attached to it. Silver and gold are attached to it, as stated (in Prov. 8:19), “My fruit is better than gold, fine gold, and my produce than choice silver.” Monarchy is attached to it, as stated (in Prov. 8:15), “Through me kings reign.” Behold everything is given to you.’” Hence it is written (in I Kings 5:9), “So God gave Solomon wisdom,” as He gave him wisdom as a gift. (I (Kings 5:9), cont.) “As vast as the sand of the sea.” The rabbis say, “[This] teaches that He gave him as much wisdom as all Israel, who are compared to the sand, as stated (in Hos. 2:1), ‘The number of the Children of Israel shall be like that of the sands of the sea.’ How is this? The sages have knowledge, the elders of knowledge and the children have knowledge, but they are different, one from the other. And [so] if all of Israel would be on one side and Solomon on the other side, his wisdom would be greater than theirs.” R. Levi said, “Just as sand is a wall and a fence for [the sea], that it not go out and flood the world; so that his wisdom stand in front of his [evil] impulse, that he not sin.” The proverb says, “If you lack knowledge, what have you gained? If you have gained knowledge, what do you lack?” Like (in Prov. 25:28) “A city broken into with no walls,” so “is a person who does not restrain his spirit.” (I (Kings 5:10):) “Now Solomon's wisdom surpassed the wisdom of all the people of the East.” And what was the wisdom of the peoples of the East? [In that] they knew about astrology and were astute at divination (from birds). Rabban Simeon ben Gamaliel said, “I like three things about the people of the East: They do not kiss on the mouth, but only on the hand; When they cut meat, they cut only with a knife and not on the back of the hand; And when they take counsel, they take it only in the field.

It is therefore stated (in Gen. 31:4), ‘So Jacob sent and called Rachel and Leah to the field where his flock was.’” (I (Kings 5:10), cont.) “From all the wisdom of Egypt.” What was the wisdom of Egypt? You find that when Solomon wanted to build the Temple, he sent to Pharaoh Necho and said to him, “Send me craftsmen [to work] for a wage, for I want to build the Temple.” What did Pharaoh do? He gathered all his astrologers and said to them, “Foresee which people are going to die this year and send them to him. So that I can come to him with a grievance and say to him, ‘Give me the value of the craftsmen that you killed.’” When they came to Solomon, he foresaw through the holy spirit that they would die during that year. He [therefore] gave them shrouds and sent them [back] to [Pharaoh]. He sent to him, saying, “Do you not have shrouds to bury your dead? Here they are for you with their shrouds. Go and bury your dead.” Hence it is stated, (I (Kings 5:10), cont.) “from all the wisdom of Egypt.” (I (Kings 5:11):) “And he was wiser than any man, than Ethan the Ezrahite, and Heman, Chalkol, and Darda the sons of Mahol.” “Wiser than any man (literally, than all of Adam),” than the first Adam. And what was his wisdom? You find that, when the Holy One, blessed be He, wanted to create the first Adam, he consulted with the ministering angels. He said to them (in Gen. 1:26), “Let us make humankind (Adam) in Our image.” They said to him (in Ps. 8:5), “What is a human that You are mindful of him?” He said to them, “This Adam that I want to create Adam shall have wisdom greater than yours.” What did He do? He gathered all cattle, wild beasts, and fowl pass before them. He said to them, “What are the names of these [beings]?” They, however, did not know. When He had created Adam, He made them pass before him. He said to him, “What are the names of these [beings]?” He said, “It is fitting to call this one an ox, this one a lion, this one a horse, [...]” and so on for all of them. It is so stated (in Gen. 2:20), “So Adam recited names for all the cattle.” He said to him, “And you, what is your name?” Adam said to him, “Adam, because I was created out of the ground (adamah).” The Holy One, blessed be He, said to him, “I, what is My name?” He said to him, “The Lord, because you are Lord over all creatures,” namely as written (in Is. 42:8), “I am the Lord, that is My name,” which the first Adam gave me. “That is my name,” the one which I have agreed to [for use] between Me and My creatures. (I (Kings 5:11), cont.) “[Wiser] than Ethan the Ezrahite.” This is Abraham, of whom it is stated (in Ps. 89:1), “A maskil (a psalm of erudition) of Ethan the Ezrahite.” (I (Kings 5:11), cont.) “And Heman (rt. 'mn).” This is Moses, of whom it is stated (in Numb. 12:7 with reference to Moses), “he is trusted (rt. 'mn) in all My house.” (I (Kings 5:11), cont.) “Calcol (klkl).” This is Joseph, of whom it is stated (in Gen. 47:12), “And joseph sustained (rt. klkl) [his father and his brothers].” The Egyptians said, “Has this slave come to rule over us for any reason but because of his wisdom?” What did they do to him? They brought seventy tablets and wrote on them in seventy tongues. Then when they cast them before him. He read each and every one in its own tongue. And not only that, but he spoke in the holy tongue, which they did not have the ability to understand, as stated (in Ps. 81:6), “He made it a statute upon Joseph, when he went out over the land of Egypt. I hear a language I had not known.” (I (Kings 5:11), cont.) “Darda (drd')].” This is the generation (dor) of the desert, which had knowledge (de'ah). (I (Kings 5:11), cont.) “The children of Mahol,” i.e., the Children of Israel whom the Divine Presence forgave (rt. mhl) for the deed of the calf. (I (Kings 5:12):) “Moreover he composed three thousand proverbs.” R. Samuel bar Nahman said, “We have gone over all of the scriptures and have found that Solomon only uttered prophetically close to eight hundred verses. Then what is meant by three thousand? [This number] teaches that each and every verse that he spoke contains two [or] three interpretations, just as it says (in Prov. 25:12), ‘Like an earring of gold, a necklace of fine gold, [so is a wise reprover to a listening ear].’” But the rabbis say, “Every verse has three thousand proverbs, while each and every proverb has a thousand and five interpretations.” [(I (Kings 5:12), cont.) “And his song numbered a thousand and five.”] “Songs” is not written here, but “song,” the song of the proverb. (I (Kings 5:13):) “And he spoke with/concerning ('al) the trees.” Is it possible that a person would speak with the trees? Solomon merely said, “For what reason is a leper cleansed through the tallest among the trees (the cedar) and through the lowest of the low (the hyssop); through (according to Lev. 14:4) cedar wood, [crimson stuff,] and hyssop?’ It is simply because he had exalted himself like the cedar, that he was stricken with leprosy. As soon as he humbled himself like the hyssop, he was therefore cured through hyssop”. (I (Kings 5:13), cont.) “He also spoke with/concerning ('al) the cattle and the fowl.” Is it possible that [a person] would speak with cattle and with fowl? Rather [the passage is concerned with] why the cattle are permitted [as food] with [the cutting of] two organs (the gullet and the windpipe); but the fowl, with [the cutting of] one organ (i.e., the gullet or the windpipe). Because cattle were created from the dry land, as stated (in Gen. 1:14), “Let the earth bring forth the living creatures after its kind, cattle, creeping things,” they are permitted with two organs. But in regard to fowl, because they were created from the mud, they were permitted with one organ. As one text says [they came] from the dry land, while another text says [they came] from the sea. [The text stating fowls came] from the dry land is what is written (in Gen. 2:19), “So from the ground the Lord God formed every beast of the field and every fowl of the heavens.” The other text says (in Gen. 1:20), “Let the waters swarm with swarms of living creatures and the fowl fly above the earth.” Bar Qappara said, “They were created from the mud which is in the sea.” R. Abbin said the name of R. Jose the Galilean said, “Nevertheless, the feet of the cock resemble the scaly skin of the fish.” (I (Kings 5:13), cont.) “And with/concerning ('al) the creeping things.” Is it possible that one would speak with a creeping thing? Solomon simply said, “What is the reason that in the case of the eight swarming creatures which are in the Torah, one is culpable for hunting or injuring them (on the Sabbath); but in the case of the rest of the swarming creatures, one is exempt? For the reason that they (i.e. the former) have skins.” (I (Kings 5:13) cont.) “And with/concerning ('al) the fish.” Is it possible that one would so speak? Solomon merely said, “For what reason do cattle, beasts, and birds require ritual slaughtering, while fish do not require ritual slaughtering?” Jacob the man of Kefar Gibburayya taught in Tyre with respect to fish, that they do require ritual slaughtering. When R. Haggai heard, he sent for him to come. He said to him, “On what basis did you decide this?” He said to him, “From here (in Gen. 1:20), ‘Let the waters swarm with swarms of living creatures, and let the fowl fly.’ Just as fowl require ritual slaughtering, so do the fish require ritual slaughtering.” He said to them (i.e., those standing by), “Lay him down to receive lashes.” He said to him, “Shall a person who speaks words of Torah be lashed?” He said to him, “You did not decide [the law] well.” He said to him, “On what basis?” He said to him, “From here (in Numb. 11:22), ‘Are there enough flocks and herds to slaughter for them; are there enough fish in the sea to gather for them?’ The former require ritual slaughtering, while the latter [is taken] through gathering.” He said to him, “Give [me] your beating, as it is good for retention.” And again did Jacob the man of Kefar Gibburayya teach in Tyre, [this time] with respect to an Israelite man, who came upon a foreign woman and had her bear him a son, that he should be circumcised on the Sabbath. When R. Haggai heard, he sent for him to come. He said to him, “On what basis do you hold this?” He said to him, “[From this which is written] (in Numb. 1:18) ‘then they registered their lineages according to their families according to the house of their fathers.’” He said to them (i.e., those standing by), “Lay him down to receive lashes.” He said to him, “Shall a person who speaks words of Torah be lashed?” He said to him, “You did not decide [the law] well.” He said to him, “Where is it shown?” He said to him, “Lie down and listen.” He said to him, “If one of the gentiles came to you in order to become a proselyte on condition that you circumcise him on the Sabbath day or on the Day of Atonement, would you profane the Sabbath on account of him or not?” He said to him, “One does not profane the Sabbath or the Day of Atonement for him but only for the son of an Israelite woman.” He said to him, “On what basis do you hold this?” He said to him (in Ezra 10:3), “So now let us make a covenant with our God to put away all (foreign) wives and (anyone] born of them […].” He said to him, “Would you lash me on the basis of [a non-Mosaic text]?” He said to him, “It is written (ibid.), ‘let it be done [according to] the Torah.’” He said to him, “From which [piece of] Torah?” He said to him, “From that of R. Johanan, when he said in the name of R. Simeon ben Johay, ‘It is written (in Deut. 7:3), “You shall not intermarry with them; do not give your daughters to their sons.” Why? (Deut. 7:4:) “Because they will turn your children away from following me.” Your child that comes from an Israelite woman is called "your child"; but that which comes from a foreign woman is called, not "your child," but "her child,” as stated (in Gen. 21:13), “And I will also make the son of the maidservant into a nation.”’" He said to him, “Give [me] your beating, as it is good for retention.” Solomon said, “About all these things I have knowledge; but in the case of the parashah on the red heifer, I have investigated it, inquired into it, and examined it. Still (at the end of the verse in Eccl. 7:23), ‘I thought I could fathom it, but it eludes me.’” (Eccl. 8:1:) “Who is like the wise person, and who knows the explanation of a saying?” (Eccl. 8:1:) Who is like the wise person? This is the Holy One, blessed be He, since it is stated about Him (in Prov. 3:19), “Through wisdom the Lord founded the earth.” (Eccl. 8:1, cont.) “And who knows the explanation of a saying?” This [also] is the Holy One, blessed be He, who explained the Torah for Moses. (Eccl. 8:1, cont.) “A person's wisdom lights up his face.” R. Judan said, “Great is the power of the prophets, as they [are able to] compare the Almighty above to the form of a man, as stated (Daniel 8:16), ‘And I heard the voice of a man.’” And R. Judah bar Simon says [the proof] is from here (in (Ezekiel 1:2)6), “and on the image of a chair was an image of a man.” (Eccl. 8:1, cont.) “And the radiance ('oz) of his face is changed (for the better),” in that he changes the principle of judgment into a principle of mercy with respect to Israel. R. Joshua of Sikhnin said in the name of R. Levi, “Over each and every word that the Holy One, blessed be He, spoke to Moses, He spoke to him of its [related] uncleanness and of its purification. When he made known the Parashah (starting with Lev. 21:1), ‘Speak (Emor) unto the priests,’ [Moses] said to him, ‘Master of the world, if a priest becomes unclean (through touching a human corpse), what means is there for his purification?’ When [the Holy One, blessed be He,] did not answer, at that time the face of Moses turned yellow (with shame). Then when the Holy One, blessed be He, reached the parashah on the [red] heifer, the Holy One, blessed be He, said to him, ‘Moses, [when I gave you] that saying which I spoke to you (in Lev. 21:1), “Go, speak unto the priests,” then you said to me, “If one becomes unclean, what means will there be for his purification,” I did not answer [you at that time. Now] this is his purification (in Numb. 19:17), “They shall take some ashes from the burning of the sin offering (i.e., the red heifer).”‘”

Full source