5 min read

Goliath Fell Face First and Drove His Idol Dagon Into the Dirt

The Philistine giant hit the dust face-first so Dagon on his chest met the ground before David's blade reached his neck.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Image on the Breastplate
  2. The Stone and the Lean
  3. Carcass Upon Carcass
  4. The Son Yishai Never Meant to Have

For forty days the giant had walked out in the morning and again in the evening and said the same thing to the same silent hillside. Nobody on the Israelite side answered him, because there was no answer that was not also a volunteer.

Goliath Fell Face First and Drove His Idol Dagon Into the Dirt Click for full size

Then Yishai's youngest came down into the camp with bread and roasted grain and ten cheeses for his brothers' commander, heard the speech once, and asked who this uncircumcised Philistine thought he was talking about.

The Image on the Breastplate

Six cubits and a span of him, and bronze from the helmet down. The shaft of his spear was like a weaver's beam and a man walked in front of him carrying the shield, because the shield was too much to carry and fight behind at the same time.

On the breastplate, over the heart, was Dagon. The Philistines took their god into the field the way other armies take a standard, and Goliath wore his on the front of his chest where everyone could see whose mouth was doing the cursing.

The Stone and the Lean

They had tried to put Saul's armor on David first. He got as far as walking a few steps in it and then took all of it off again, because he had never worn any of it and a man cannot fight in equipment he is still thinking about. He went down to the wadi instead and picked five smooth stones out of the bed and put them in the shepherd's bag.

He did not answer the speech. He ran at the line while the giant was still talking, and he had the sling turning before he was in range.

The stone went into the soft place above the eye and the giant stopped. For a moment he was still standing, which is the part that decides everything, because a body that size can go down in any direction it likes and there was nothing left inside him to choose. Sideways would have made a hill of armor with the head at the far end of it. Backwards would have put the throat up and the face out of reach.

He went forward.

Carcass Upon Carcass

Dagon hit the valley floor first, with the full weight of the man who had been wearing him coming down on top. Carcass upon carcass of idols, the way the warning in Leviticus had said it (Leviticus 26:30). The god went into the dirt and then his soldier landed on him and pressed him in.

The mouth went in with him. Forty mornings of cursing the armies of the living God, and it ended with a face full of valley floor, hidden in the dust together, faces covered in concealment (Job 40:13).

And the fall left the nape of the neck up in the air where anyone could reach it. "You will tread on their high places," the blessing says, and the high place of a man is the back of his neck (Deuteronomy 33:29). So David did not have to climb six cubits and a span of dead Philistine to finish the work. He came up on the body from behind, pulled the giant's own sword out of the giant's own sheath, and took the head off at ground level.

The Philistine line watched all of it from close enough to see which way the armor had gone. They had come out that morning behind a champion with a god on his chest, and what they had in front of them now was a boy standing on a dead man's back with the sword going up, and their god somewhere underneath the whole arrangement where nobody could get at him.

The Son Yishai Never Meant to Have

Long afterward, when he was king and had learned what he was capable of, David said something before the Holy One about his own beginning.

"Master of the universe, did my father Yishai intend to produce me? Was his intention not for his own pleasure? When they had finished, this one turned his face one way and that one turned her face the other way, and it was You who put every drop where it had to go."

He was not confessing on anyone's behalf. Rabbi Aha had already said that even the most pious of the pious cannot get through that act without one aspect of iniquity in it, so David was only refusing to be told he came from something cleaner than everyone else does. "For my father and my mother have forsaken me, but the Lord will take me" (Psalms 27:10).

Yishai had not intended him and had not sent him either. He sent bread and cheese and instructions to come back with news of his brothers. What came back was a head.

The Philistines were already running by then, and nobody stopped to pick anything up. The image on the breastplate stayed where it had landed, face down in the dirt of the valley, under the weight of the man who had carried it out every morning for forty days.

DavidGoliathDagonPhilistineSlingVayikra Rabbah
← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

2 sources

The texts behind this telling. Some cards carry a translation of the source; others are our own retelling of it, and each card says which. Every card links out to the original.

Vayikra Rabbah 10:7Vayikra Rabbah

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.The Sefaria Midrash Rabbah, 2022 · CC-BY

Those little nuggets that make us pause and think, "Huh, I never thought of it that way before." Take the story of David and Goliath, for example. The familiar version gives us the basics: young David, giant Goliath, slingshot, victory. But have you ever considered how Goliath fell?

The verse in I (Samuel 17:49) tells us, "He fell on his face to the ground." But why on his face? That's the question the ancient Rabbis confront in Vayikra Rabbah, a collection of homiletic interpretations of the Book of Leviticus. And their answers? Well, they're fascinating.

One explanation is surprisingly practical. The Rabbis suggest that Goliath fell on his face so that David wouldn't have to walk too far to behead him. According to this reading, the tzadik, the righteous David, shouldn't have to exert extra effort. Goliath was six cubits and a span tall – that's one big dude! – and having him conveniently face-down simply made the grim task a little easier. Makes sense. But there's more! Another interpretation takes a more theological approach. The Rabbis propose that Goliath fell on his face because Dagon, his god, was situated on his heart. Remember, Goliath was a Philistine, and Dagon was a major Philistine deity. By falling face down, he was fulfilling the prophecy found in (Leviticus 26:30): "I will place your carcasses upon the carcasses of your idols. A complete and utter defeat not just of Goliath, but of his entire belief system.

The interpretations keep coming! Perhaps, the Rabbis suggest, Goliath fell on his face so that "the mouth that blasphemed and cursed would be placed in the dust." It's a poetic justice, a fitting end for someone who dared to mock the God of Israel. As it says in (Job 40:13), "Hide them in the dust together; cover their faces in concealment."

Finally, the Rabbis offer yet another perspective, drawing on (Deuteronomy 33:29): "Your enemies will deceive you, but you will tread on their high places." In this context, "high place" is understood not as a literal location, but as the nape of the neck. According to this interpretation, Goliath fell in such a way that his nape was exposed and vulnerable, allowing David to deliver the final blow.

So, what do we make of all this? Are these Rabbis just splitting hairs? I don't think so. What they’re doing is diving deep into the text, searching for layers of meaning beyond the surface narrative. They're not just telling a story; they're exploring themes of justice, divine providence, and the ultimate triumph of good over evil.

And isn't that what makes these ancient texts so compelling? They invite us to engage, to question, to wrestle with the complexities of faith and human experience. The story of David and Goliath is more than just a children's tale, it's an invitation to explore the depths of our own understanding. And sometimes, it all starts with asking a simple question: Why did he fall on his face?

Full source
Vayikra Rabbah 14:5Vayikra Rabbah

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.The Sefaria Midrash Rabbah, 2022 · CC-BY

Vayikra Rabbah turns to Yishai and the King.

Instead of a straightforward biological explanation, we explore something far more profound: the nature of intention, and even, dare I say, a touch of the less-than-perfect that seems to accompany even the holiest acts.

The passage begins with a surprising connection to (Psalm 51:7): "I was brought forth in iniquity." Iniquity? That sounds Rabbi Acha takes this head-on, suggesting that even the most righteous person isn't entirely free from some element of imperfection. Is anything truly pure?

The text then turns its attention to the act of procreation itself. Even when a couple intends to bring a child into the world, can we honestly say that there isn't at least a little bit of personal pleasure involved? The Maharzu, a commentary on the Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary), points out the similarity here to sinful sexual activity. It's a bold claim, but it forces us to confront uncomfortable truths about human motivation.

King David, in a moment of raw honesty, even challenges God, asking, "Master of the Universe, did my father Yishai really intend to produce me? Wasn't his intention at least partly for his own pleasure?" The text paints a vivid picture: after the act, the couple turns away from each other, and it's God who ensures that the seed finds its mark.

David continues, quoting (Psalm 27:10), "For my father and my mother have forsaken me, but the Lord will take me," and then returns to the poignant statement, "In sin my mother conceived me" (Psalm 51:7). This isn't about blame or shame, but about acknowledging the complex, often messy, reality of human existence.

Then Rabbi Ḥiyya bar Abba offers another layer to the discussion: A woman, he says, conceives only after her menstrual period, close to the time of purification. He draws a connection between the Hebrew word for sin, chet, and the concept of purification, hitui, referencing (Leviticus 14:52) and also the tractate Niddah 31b, which deals with the laws of menstruation.

It's a fascinating twist. The very act of becoming ritually pure after menstruation is linked, in a way, to the possibility of conception. And, according to Rabbi Ḥiyya bar Abba, this is especially true if the child is male. Hence the verse, "When a woman conceives and bears a male child."

So what are we to make of all this? Is the Midrash suggesting that there's something inherently flawed about human conception? I don't think so. Instead, it seems to be highlighting the paradoxical nature of creation itself. It’s about acknowledging that even in the most sacred acts, there's a mingling of intention, desire, and divine intervention. It’s about recognizing that we are, all of us, products of a complex and sometimes messy world. And perhaps, it’s in that very messiness that we find the spark of the divine.

Full source