Pesach5 min read

Moses Argued Five Times Before God Lost Patience

Moses refused five times at the burning bush. He made excuses. God grew impatient. Each refusal is recorded, each argument addressed, and in the end Moses went.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Bush That Burned Without Burning Up
  2. Five Excuses and the Answers That Came Back
  3. What the Staff and the Serpent Meant
  4. The Punishment That Stuck

The Bush That Burned Without Burning Up

Moses had been in the wilderness of Midian for forty years when the bush caught fire and refused to be consumed. He was eighty years old by then. He had gone from prince of Egypt to fugitive in a single afternoon, and in the decades since had married Zipporah, fathered sons, and settled into the life of a shepherd working his father-in-law's flocks. The burning bush was not merely a strange phenomenon. It was a summons, and the particular strangeness of fire that did not consume what it burned was the wonder of it. Moses stopped and looked, and the voice from inside the flame knew his name.

The instructions were direct. "Go down to Egypt. Confront Pharaoh. Bring my people out of slavery." Moses stood at the edge of the fire and began his negotiation. He was not the right man, he said. Who was he, to go to Pharaoh, to speak for all of Israel? God answered: "I will be with you, and this will be the sign, you will worship on this mountain when it is done." Moses was not satisfied. He pressed the next objection immediately.

Five Excuses and the Answers That Came Back

The people would not believe him, Moses said. They would ask for God's name and Moses would not know what to say. God gave him the Name: "I Am What I Am. Tell them I Am sent you." Moses had a third objection ready. They still would not believe him. No name would be sufficient. God turned Moses' shepherd's staff into a serpent and back again, and turned his hand leprous and restored it clean. Two signs, hard to dismiss. Moses offered his fourth objection. He could not speak well. He was slow of tongue, slow of mouth. Something about his voice or manner was inadequate for the task of addressing Pharaoh. God said: "Who made your mouth? I did. I will teach you what to say. Go."

Moses asked, for the fifth time, that God send someone else instead. That is when God's anger kindled against him. The text in Exodus uses the specific word for divine anger, and the tradition took it seriously. God told him Aaron his brother could speak well enough, that Aaron was coming out to meet him in the desert at this moment, and that they would go together. But the permission to use Aaron as a spokesperson carried a cost. Moses was originally supposed to be both prophet and priest. Because he had pushed God past the fourth answer and into the fifth, the high priesthood would pass to Aaron permanently and Moses would not inherit it.

What the Staff and the Serpent Meant

When God asked Moses what was in his hand, Moses answered: "a rod." A simple shepherd's staff. The transformation God performed with it was a preview. The same object that was adequate for tending sheep would split the sea and draw water from rock and represent the power of the God of Israel before the court of Egypt. But in the moment at the bush, the staff becoming a serpent and then reverting carried a more immediate message. Moses had told God that Israel would not believe him. God's response was to show him that his own ordinary possession, the thing already in his hand, was not what it appeared to be, just as Moses himself was not what he appeared to be, just as the burning bush was not what a burning bush appeared to be. The problem of credibility had already been addressed before Moses raised it.

The Punishment That Stuck

The tradition tracked what Moses' reluctance had cost him with precision. He had delayed at the burning bush for seven days, pressing objection after objection. That delay introduced the first sign of God's displeasure. When the journey to Egypt began, God met Moses at a night-lodging and threatened to kill him because he had failed to circumcise his son. Zipporah performed the circumcision herself and averted the threat. The tradition saw this as directly connected to the delay at the bush, one thing in Moses' private life being called to account because of the hesitation at his public commission.

And the high priesthood never returned to Moses' line. Aaron became Kohen Gadol. Moses became the greatest prophet in Israel's history, the lawgiver, the one who stood on Sinai while Israel waited below, the one who shattered the tablets and then climbed back up and argued God out of annihilating a nation. He was present at every decisive moment of the covenant's formation. But the priestly office, the incense and the vestments and the entrance into the Holy of Holies on Yom Kippur, those were not his. He had asked one question too many at the burning bush, and the cost was permanent.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

5 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Legends of the Jews, IV. Moses In Egypt, Moses Declines The MissionLegends of the Jews

Legends of the Jews (Ginzberg) turns to Moses Declines The Mission.

The familiar story is this: Moses encounters the burning bush. But there's so much more to it than just a fiery spectacle. According to Ginzberg's retelling in Legends of the Jews, that initial "Draw not nigh hither" wasn't just about physical proximity. It was a message about the very nature of the mission God was entrusting to him. It was for Moses, and Moses alone.

The voice warned him, Ginzberg continues, not to take on honors meant for others – the priesthood for Aaron, royalty for David. Then comes the command to remove his shoes, a symbolic act of severing ties with earthly concerns. That meant everything, even his marriage!

Can you imagine being told to give up your conjugal life? Apparently, the angel Michael had the same thought! He questioned God, "Can it be Thy purpose to destroy mankind? Blessing can prevail only if male and female are united." God's response, as recorded in Legends of the Jews, was that Moses had already fulfilled his duty in that regard. Now, God desired him to unite with the Shekinah, the Divine Presence, so that it might descend upon the earth for his sake. Heavy stuff.

But here's where it gets really interesting: God reveals to Moses not just the near future – Israel receiving the Torah on Mount Sinai – but also the far future, their eventual worship of the golden calf. As we find in Midrash Rabbah, even knowing their future failings, God chose to redeem them based on their present actions, upholding the promise to Jacob: "I will go down with thee into Egypt, and I will also surely bring thee up again."

God then commanded Moses to go to Pharaoh and demand the release of His people. But Moses, understandably, balked. "Thou didst undertake to do it Thyself," he argued, "and now it is Thy purpose to send me thither?" He had legitimate concerns, practical ones. How could he possibly feed and care for such a massive population, especially the vulnerable – pregnant women, newborns, children? How could he face the dangers of Egypt? And, most importantly, did Israel even deserve redemption?

He even argued with God about the timeline, pointing out that the appointed time of oppression, according to his calculations from the covenant with Abraham, wasn't yet complete!

But God, in His infinite wisdom, had answers for everything. "I will be with thee," He reassured Moses. "Whatever thou desirest I will do." He promised to provide for the people and assuaged Moses' fears about Israel's worthiness, saying they would be redeemed on account of the merits they would acquire at Mount Sinai. And as for the timeline? God clarified that the four hundred years of bondage began with the birth of Isaac, not Jacob's descent into Egypt.

Finally convinced of God's unwavering resolve, Moses made one last plea: to know God's Great Name. He didn't want to be stumped when the Israelites inevitably asked. God's answer, as recounted in Legends of the Jews, is profound: "My Name is according to My acts." Elohim when judging, Lord Zebaot when battling, El Shaddai in patience, Adonai in mercy. But for the Israelites, he was to say, "I am He that was, that is, and that ever will be." the verse says, Moses' reaction to learning about God's name seems reluctant, with Moses saying “Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof."

And get this: God even revealed the future was only for Moses' ears, not for the people. A little too much to handle at once.

But the story doesn't end there. Moses, still hesitant, questions why God first identified Himself as the God of his father but now only as the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. God, in a moment of striking honesty, admits that the initial flattery was just that – flattery. The true relationship was with the patriarchs themselves.

God agreed to reveal His Great and Holy Name to Moses, a secret so powerful that the celestials themselves cried out in praise. And, knowing Pharaoh's stubbornness, God forewarned Moses of the challenges ahead, lest he later accuse God of deception.

It's a powerful story, isn't it? It reminds us that even the greatest leaders confront doubt, fear, and a sense of inadequacy. Moses' initial refusal, his questioning, his bargaining… it all makes him so relatable, so human. And it highlights the immense responsibility that comes with being chosen, with being called to a purpose larger than oneself. What would we do if we were in Moses' sandals?

Full source
Legends of the Jews 4:208Legends of the Jews

Even after God revealed Himself in the burning bush, even after all the reassurances, Moses still hesitated. "But," he argued, "they will not believe me! They won't listen. They'll say, 'The Lord hasn't appeared to you!'"

God, with infinite patience, responded with a question of His own: "What is that in your hand?"

"A rod," Moses answered. A simple shepherd's staff.

Here, according to the Legends of the Jews, things took a sharp turn. God’s tone becomes… well, let's just say less patient. "You deserve to be castigated with it!" God declared. Castigated by your own walking stick!

Why such a strong reaction? The text implies Moses's reluctance was more than just nerves. God says, "If you didn't intend to take My mission upon yourself, you should have said so in the beginning!" It's as if Moses was dragging his feet, and in doing so, making things more complicated.

And what was the complication? The revelation of the Shem HaMeforash (שֵׁם הַמְּפֹרָשׁ), the Ineffable Name of God. God accuses Moses of waiting until this profound secret was revealed before voicing his refusal, almost as if to gain leverage. "Now that I've told you the secret," God seems to imply, "you think you can back out?"

The stakes were high. God had intended to use Moses as an instrument for miracles. But Moses's lack of faith, his suspicion of the Israelites, was a stumbling block. God even compares him to the slanderous serpent from the Garden of Eden! And the punishment? Leprosy – the same affliction that befell the serpent, according to this tradition.

It’s a harsh lesson. But perhaps it's a reminder that when we doubt, when we hesitate, we not only hinder ourselves, but we also risk delaying the very miracles we're meant to bring into the world. Could Moses's initial reluctance have inadvertently brought on the very plagues he was destined to overcome? It's a question worth pondering.

Full source
Legends of the Jews, IV. Moses In Egypt, Moses Punished For His StubbornnessLegends of the Jews

Even Moses, arguably the most important prophet in Judaism, tried to avoid his divine calling. And, as the Legends of the Jews (Ginzberg) tells us, he paid a price for that reluctance.

So, what happened? God appears to Moses in the burning bush and tasks him with freeing the Israelites from slavery in Egypt. Seems straightforward enough. But Moses, overwhelmed by the enormity of the task, keeps making excuses.

"But, behold, they will not believe me," Moses argues, "nor hearken unto my voice, for they will say, 'The Lord hath not appeared unto thee.'" (Exodus 4:1).

God, understandably, isn't thrilled. According to Ginzberg, God basically says, "You deserve to be punished! You held back until I revealed the secret of My Ineffable Name – the Shem HaMeforash – and then you refuse?" The Shem HaMeforash, by the way, is the explicit name of God, a powerful and closely guarded secret.

To demonstrate His power, God performs a few miracles. First, He turns Moses’ staff into a serpent and back again. Then, He makes Moses' hand leprous and then heals it. These weren't just parlor tricks. The Zohar tells us that these signs were meant to communicate deeper meanings. The leprosy, for example, symbolized the defilement of the Israelites by the Egyptians, and Moses' healing foreshadowed their eventual purification.

But Moses still isn't convinced. He claims he's not eloquent enough. He argues that Pharaoh won't listen to him. He even suggests that God should send someone else – "Send by the hand of him whom Thou wilt send!" (Exodus 4:13). Ouch.

According to Midrash Rabbah, God patiently tries to persuade Moses for seven whole days. He doesn't want to be seen as abusing His power, forcing someone against their will. But Moses remains "obdurate," unyielding.

One of Moses' arguments, as recounted in Legends of the Jews, is particularly interesting. He says that Pharaoh's court is filled with people who speak all seventy languages of the world (a symbolic number representing all the nations). If he, Moses, can't speak all those languages, he'll be mocked! God's response? "Adam, who was taught by none, could give names to the beasts in the seventy languages. Was it not I that made him to speak?"

Moses even tries to suggest that God should send both him and Aaron. He implies that one person can't handle both the tasks of chastising Egypt and redeeming Israel. God responds, "The holy spirit hath already come upon thy brother Aaron, and even now he is awaiting thee…and when his eyes rest upon thee he will rejoice."

But, why was Moses so hesitant? The text offers a fascinating insight. God showed Moses a vision of future generations of scholars interpreting the Torah, all acknowledging that their knowledge stemmed from Moses himself. He saw Rabbi Akiva, a towering figure in Jewish law, explaining the "crowns upon the letters" of the Torah. Essentially, Moses realized the immense responsibility and legacy that awaited him. He saw the weight of the Torah, of wisdom, of the future, and he was daunted.

So, what was Moses' punishment for his stubbornness? According to Legends of the Jews, two things. First, the priesthood was taken away from Moses' descendants and given to Aaron's. God had originally intended Moses to be the High Priest, but because of his refusal, that honor went to his brother. (Though it's noted that Moses himself still performed priestly duties in the Tabernacle). Second, God refused to cure Moses' speech impediment completely. Moses had complained about being "slow of speech and of a slow tongue" (Exodus 4:10), and while God would help him, He wouldn't fully remove this limitation.

It's a harsh lesson, isn't it? Moses, despite his greatness, wasn't exempt from consequences. And it begs the question: why? Why was he punished so severely for simply being afraid?

Perhaps it's because leadership requires a leap of faith. Maybe it’s because sometimes, the greatest among us are called to step up even when they don't feel ready. And maybe, just maybe, the story of Moses' initial reluctance is there to remind us that even the most extraordinary individuals are still human, with doubts and fears just like us.

What do you think? Is Moses' punishment fair? And how does this story resonate with your own experiences of being asked to do something difficult?

Full source
Targum Pseudo-Jonathan on Exodus 4:14Targum Pseudo-Jonathan on Exodus

Four refusals in, the Holy One's patience runs out. Targum Pseudo-Jonathan preserves the flash: the anger of the Lord was kindled against Mosheh. This is unusual. The Torah rarely describes God as angry with Moses, and the Targum does not soften the phrase.

Yet the anger is not punitive. It is generative. Out of divine frustration comes the appointment that will shape the entire priesthood: Is it not manifest before Me that Aharon thy brother speaking can speak?

The Brother Who Can Speak

The Targum plays on a Hebrew doubling, daber yedaber, literally speaking will speak, by rendering it as speaking can speak. Aaron is fluent in a way Moses is not. Where Moses stammers, Aaron flows.

Then the tender detail: behold, also, he cometh forth to meet thee, and will see thee and rejoice in his heart. The Targum emphasizes that Aaron is already en route. He is not waiting for Moses to arrive; he is walking toward him. And when he sees his younger brother, he will rejoice in his heart.

The sages of the Targumic tradition note that the older brother could have been jealous. Aaron had stayed in Egypt, endured the slavery, perhaps even served as a prophet himself (Shemot Rabbah 5:20). The younger brother, absent for forty years in Midian, returns with the commission. Aaron rejoices anyway.

The takeaway: God's anger, even at Moses, does not abandon him. It reroutes him. The stammerer is paired with the fluent. The reluctant prophet is given a brother who will speak for him. And who will, astonishingly, be happy about it.

Full source
Yalkut Shimoni on Torah 173:1Yalkut Shimoni on Torah

"And the anger of the LORD was kindled against Moses" (Exodus 4:14). Rabbi Yehoshua ben Korcha says: Every kindling of anger stated in the Torah leaves a mark, except this one, in which no mark is stated. Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai says: This too leaves a mark, as it is said, "Is there not Aaron your brother the Levite?" - and is he not a priest? This is what it says: I had said you would be a priest and he a Levite; now he is a priest and you are a Levite. And the Sages say: Moses served as priest only during the seven days of consecration alone. And some say: it ceased only from the seed of Moses, as it is said (Psalms 99:6), "Moses and Aaron among His priests, and Samuel among those who call on His name." What is the force of "and it says"? Should you say that this verse is written about later generations, therefore "it says": "Moses and Aaron among His priests." And does every kindling of anger in the Torah leave a mark? But is it not written, "and he went out from Pharaoh in hot anger" (Exodus 11:8), and he said nothing to him? Resh Lakish said: He slapped him and went out. But is it not written (Exodus 7:15), "and you shall stand to meet him at the bank of the river"? And Resh Lakish said: He is a king, so show him a pleasant face; and Rabbi Yochanan said: He is wicked, so be brazen toward him - reverse them.

Full source