4 min read

Moses Sent Priests to Receive Gifts and Spies to Scout the Land

The priests came back with sacred portions and clean hands. The spies came back with fear and a report that cost Israel forty years in the desert.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The first mission was about receiving
  2. The word that means sacrifice
  3. The second mission started in the south
  4. Two kinds of messengers

The first mission was about receiving

Before the spies, before the forty days of desert punishment, Moses was teaching Israel how to give. Numbers 5:9 states the rule simply: every gift of all the sacred items of the children of Israel, which they present to the priest, shall be his. One verse, a brief instruction about priestly portions.

The rabbis who compiled Bamidbar Rabbah read it as an economy in miniature. Every gift catches an enormous net. Teruma from the grain harvest. Halla, the portion of dough lifted off the bread before baking. The hides of sacrificed animals. Firstborn beasts. The five shekels of pidyon haben, the ransom paid for a firstborn son. The redemption price for a firstborn donkey. The first fruits carried up to Jerusalem in decorated baskets by farmers who had been waiting all year to make the walk.

The word that means sacrifice

The rabbis paused on a strange word in the verse. The Torah says the Israelites will yakrivu the gifts to the priest, and yakrivu can mean both present and sacrifice. Rabbi Yishmael asked the question out loud: "does anyone sacrifice teruma?" You do not burn first fruits on an altar. You hand them to a priest. So why does the Torah use a word that means sacrifice?

His answer was about approach. When you give a sacred portion, the act of bringing it close is itself the sacrifice. The hand that lifts the grain and walks it to the priest is doing something the altar fire does from a different angle. The messenger who carries sacred portions to the one who receives them is already doing sacred work.

The second mission started in the south

Moses sent twelve men to scout the land of Canaan. "Ascend there in the south, and ascend the highland," he told them. It sounded like a logistics assignment. Go and see the land. Come back with a report.

The rabbis of Bamidbar Rabbah 16 remembered what they found in the highland. Three children of giants: Ahiman, Sheshai, and Talmai. The text gave their names and then, in midrashic fashion, the rabbis cracked those names open. Ahiman meant my brother is from us, as if the giant were claiming kinship with the spies themselves, absorbing them by name into a relationship they could not refuse. Sheshai's name pointed to the whiteness of the ground his footprints made, enormous impressions that turned the dust pale. Talmai's name said he plowed furrows in the earth with his walking.

The giants did not have to attack the spies. The spies attacked themselves. They looked at the furrows in the earth and felt themselves become grasshoppers. They compared their own size to the size of what they saw and performed the arithmetic of defeat in front of a jury of their own fear.

Two kinds of messengers

The contrast the midrash drew was stark. The priests who received sacred portions came back with their hands full of what Israel had given and what God had commanded. The spies who scouted Canaan came back with a report that was technically accurate and entirely wrong. The land was real. The giants were real. The walled cities were real. And all of it was supposed to be irrelevant, because the God who rained bread from the sky and split the sea was the same God who had promised the land.

The priests understood their mission as receiving what was already flowing. The spies understood their mission as assessment, as if the question of whether to enter the land was still open. Moses had not sent them to decide. He had sent them to see. They returned having decided, and their decision cost Israel forty years.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

2 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Bamidbar Rabbah 8:6Bamidbar Rabbah

It states: "Every gift of all the sacred items of the children of Israel that they will present to the priest shall be his." Sounds But the rabbis of the Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary), those brilliant interpreters of our tradition, didn't take things at face value. They wanted to know: what exactly does this verse encompass?

The Bamidbar Rabbah, a collection of rabbinic interpretations on the Book of Numbers, really digs into this. The phrase “Every gift [teruma]” teaches us, the Midrash says, that the law of teruma, that is, the obligation to give a portion of one's harvest to the priests, applies to absolutely everything that grows from the ground. Got a prize-winning pumpkin? A perfect patch of wheat? A portion of it goes to the priests.

It doesn't stop there! "Of all the sacred items of the children of Israel" – this phrase, according to the Midrash, includes other unspecified sacred items, things that aren't explicitly mentioned but are still considered holy. And the key takeaway? No part of any of it is for the Lord. It all goes to the priests. This is similar, the Midrash points out, to the law regarding robbery from a proselyte, as stated in (Numbers 5:8) – "That is returned." In that case, the entire stolen property is given to the priests.

So, what else is included in this generous priestly gift package? The Midrash asks, "I wonder, what else do I include?" And it answers: Ḥalla (the portion of dough given to the priest), dedications, hides, firstborn animals, the redemption money for a firstborn son (pidyon haben), and the redemption of a firstborn donkey (peter chamor). It's quite a list!

Then, Rabbi Yishmael raises a fascinating point. The verse says, "That they will present [yakrivu]." But yakrivu can also mean "they will sacrifice." Does one sacrifice teruma? Why does the verse use the word "sacrifice" in connection with teruma?

The answer, according to the Midrash, lies in the verse from (Exodus 23:19): "The choicest first fruits [of your land you shall bring to the house of the Lord your God]." But what are we supposed to do with those first fruits once we bring them to the Temple? We aren't told. That's where our verse in Numbers comes in: "That they will present to the priest, shall be his." This teaches us that the first fruits, too, are given in their entirety to the priests.

So, why all of this detail? Why does the Torah, and by extension the Midrash, care so much about where these offerings end up? Perhaps it's about supporting the priestly class, ensuring they can focus on their sacred duties without having to worry about their livelihoods. Or maybe it's about emphasizing the importance of generosity and communal responsibility. Maybe it's both.

Whatever the reason, it’s clear that the seemingly simple verse from (Numbers 5:9) opens a window into a complex system of ritual, obligation, and social structure. And it reminds us that even the most seemingly mundane details in the Torah can hold profound meaning, waiting to be uncovered. What other seemingly simple verses might hold similar secrets? That, my friends, is a question worth pondering.

Full source
Bamidbar Rabbah 16:11Bamidbar Rabbah

The story of the spies sent to scout the Land of Canaan in the Book of Numbers is a powerful example of how fear and negative speech can derail even the most promising journeys.

The Torah tells us, "Moses sent them to scout the land of Canaan, he said to them: Ascend there in the South, and ascend the highland" (Numbers 13:17). But it wasn't just the land they were meant to explore; it was their own hearts and minds.

Rabbi Berekhya HaKohen (a priest) ben Rabbi, as quoted in Bamidbar Rabbah 16, highlights a particularly daunting encounter: the spies met three children of giants: Aḥiman, Sheshai, and Talmai (Numbers 13:22). Now, these weren’t your average Joes. The text even gives us a little etymology, a play on their names to emphasize their imposing nature. Aḥiman, it says, means "My brethren [aḥai], who [man] will come against us?" Sheshai was “as hard as marble [shayish],” and Talmai would “make furrows [telamim] in the ground.”

Understandably, the spies were terrified. And here's where things take a dark turn. They returned to the Israelite camp and spread a discouraging report, saying, “For they are stronger than we [mimenu]” (Numbers 13:31). Reish Lakish, also in Bamidbar Rabbah, points out a subtle but devastating interpretation of that word, "mimenu." It can mean "than us," but it can also mean "than Him" – referring to God! The spies, in their fear, were essentially saying that the giants were stronger than the Almighty.

This, according to the Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary), was no mere slip of the tongue. It was a profound act of invective, a blasphemy. And the consequences were severe. Because of this, Reish Lakish says, harsh decrees were issued against them. As we find in Bamidbar Rabbah, God says to Jeremiah, "Go and say to them: You do not know what you expressed from your mouths... You ignited a fire upon yourselves.” A day for each of the forty days they scouted the land, a year for each day, they would wander in the wilderness (Numbers 14:34).

But it doesn't end there. The spies also said, "We were as grasshoppers in our eyes" (Numbers 13:33), which God says, "I forgive them for this." But then they added, "And likewise we were in their eyes" (Numbers 13:33). As the text in Bamidbar Rabbah says, "'Do you know what I rendered you in their eyes? Who is to say that you were not as angels in their eyes? What have you caused yourselves?' In accordance with the number of the days that you scouted the land” (Numbers 14:34).

It was one thing to see themselves as small, but to assume that the giants saw them the same way? That was a step too far. They had projected their own lack of faith and self-worth onto others, and in doing so, sealed their fate. They would not enter the Promised Land.

But there's a glimmer of hope in the end. God tells Israel, "In this world, because they were flesh and blood messengers, it was decreed in their regard that they would not enter the Land. However, in the World to Come, I will send you My messenger and he will clear the path,” as it is stated: “Behold, I am sending My messenger, and he will clear a way before Me and suddenly the Lord whom you seek will come to His Sanctuary” (Malachi 3:1).

So, what can we take away from this ancient story? Perhaps it’s a reminder to be mindful of the words we speak and the thoughts we entertain. Fear can be a powerful force, but it doesn't have to define us. And sometimes, the biggest obstacles we face are not external giants, but the internal ones we create ourselves. Maybe, just maybe, we are seen as angels in the eyes of others, and we should remember that before we let fear take over.

Full source