5 min read

Philo Read the Flood as a Clock, Not a Catastrophe

The flood begins and ends on what reads like the same date. Philo of Alexandria says the coincidence is impossible. The calendar is the whole meaning.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Date Nobody Asks About
  2. The Seventh Month That Was Also the First
  3. The Six Hundredth Year
  4. The Marriage at the Center

The Date Nobody Asks About

Genesis says the flood began in the six hundredth year of Noah's life, the seventh month, the twenty-seventh day. Most readers note the number, confirm the sense of age and weight it conveys, and move on. The flood is coming and the ark is waiting and the animals need to be loaded.

Philo of Alexandria, writing in the first century, could not move on. He asked the question almost no one before him had thought to ask: why this specific day?

To Philo, scripture never wastes a number. If the Torah dates an event to the day, the day is doing theological work. A flood that arrives on a random morning is a tragedy of weather. A flood that arrives on a day selected before the world existed is a verdict, a judicial act, a precisely measured response to a precisely measured failure. The date was the first clue that the flood was not catastrophe but calendar.

The Seventh Month That Was Also the First

The flood begins in the seventh month. The ark comes to rest also in the seventh month, on the twenty-seventh day. The water opens and the water retreats on what reads like the same slot in the calendar. Philo noticed this and found it impossible to be coincidence.

His argument was numerical. The seventh month held a particular significance in the Jewish calendar: it contained Rosh Hashanah, Yom Kippur, and Sukkot. It was the month of divine judgment and atonement. A flood that both opened and closed in the seventh month was not a flood that ran on the schedule of rainfall and evaporation. It was a flood that ran on the schedule of divine judgment: it opened when the verdict was rendered and closed when the account was settled.

The twenty-seventh day also carried meaning in Philo's arithmetic. The number twenty-seven is three cubed, and three and its powers were associated in ancient numerological thinking with completion and structure. A flood that arrived and departed on the twenty-seventh of the same month was a flood that had a shape, that formed a closed cycle, that began and ended in a single mathematical statement rather than spilling open into chaos.

The Six Hundredth Year

Philo pressed the six hundredth year next. Six hundred is 60 times 10, and 60 was for Philo a number associated with perfect counting, with the complete inventory of a thing. The hundredth year of a six-count expressed something about totality: a full reckoning, a complete inventory of human transgression in the generations from Adam to Noah, added up and found sufficient to justify what was coming.

Noah himself was the pivot. The Torah says he was righteous, blameless in his generation. The flood was not a response to Noah. It was a response to everyone else, and it arrived precisely when the arithmetic of their failure reached the number at which the divine accounting closed the ledger and opened the rain. Noah's six hundredth year was not a biographical detail. It was the completion date of an invoice that had been accumulating since Cain.

The Marriage at the Center

Philo added one more element that most readers of the flood story miss entirely: Noah's marriage. The Torah mentions that Noah's wife was with him in the ark, and that his sons' wives were with them. The marriages of Noah's sons had been made before the flood. Noah himself, the tradition held, had entered the flood within a valid marriage, and the covenant of marriage persisted through the chaos.

For Philo, this was not domestic detail. The flood destroyed everything that the pre-Noachian world had constructed. The only institution that survived intact, that entered the ark and emerged from it unchanged, was the covenant between a man and a woman that had been established before the waters came. The calendar-flood was also a test of what in human life was built to last: and marriage, the most intimate of the covenants, rode through the year of destruction without being redefined or dissolved.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

3 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

The Midrash of Philo 11:1The Midrash of Philo

(Genesis 7:11) isn’t messing around. Why that precise moment for the deluge to begin?

Specifically, the Midrash of Philo, a collection of interpretations and expansions on the Torah, wrestles with this very issue. Why the six hundredth year of NOAH’s life, the seventh month, and the twenty-seventh day? What's the hidden meaning?

Okay, first things first. Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary). What exactly is that? Essentially, it’s how Jewish tradition takes the biblical text and runs with it. It’s not about rewriting the text, but rather enriching it with stories, explanations, and moral lessons. And the Midrash of Philo? Well, it attributes its interpretations to Philo of Alexandria, a Jewish philosopher who lived in Egypt during the Roman era.

So, what does this particular Midrash have to say about the timing of the flood?

Unfortunately, the text provided simply poses the question. It doesn’t offer an answer. It's like setting the stage for a grand performance… but then the curtain drops! We’re left hanging, wondering what profound insight the Midrash is about to reveal.

This is actually quite common in Midrashic literature. Often, a question is posed, inviting further discussion and interpretation. It's an invitation to dive deeper. A challenge to unlock the secrets hidden within the text.

Perhaps the timing relates to astrological alignments, to cycles of sin and repentance, or to some other cosmic significance. Maybe the numbers themselves hold the key, revealing a hidden code that unlocks a deeper understanding of GOD’s plan.

What do you think? Why that specific moment? Is it simply a historical marker, or does it point to something more profound? The beauty of Midrash is that it invites us to participate in the conversation, to bring our own perspectives and insights to the table. It encourages us to confront the text, to wrestle with its meaning, and to discover its relevance in our own lives.

So, next time you read about the Great Flood, take a moment to consider the timing. Think about those seemingly insignificant numbers and ask yourself: what secrets might they hold? Because sometimes, the greatest insights are found not in the answers, but in the questions themselves.

Full source
The Midrash of Philo 4:2The Midrash of Philo

Sometimes, it's like the universe is trying to tell us something!

Take the story of the Flood, the mabul. According to the Midrash of Philo, there's a fascinating detail about timing that readers often overlook. The Flood begins in the seventh month, on the twenty-seventh day. And then – get this – the waters begin to recede, the ark rests on the mountains, also in the seventh month, on the twenty-seventh day. What's going on here?

Philo suggests it's more than just a random occurrence. It's an “homonymy of months and days," a deliberate mirroring. But why?

Well, the start of the Flood in the seventh month is connected to the birthday of a righteous man, likely referring to Noah himself, and occurs near the vernal equinox, the spring equinox. The diminution, the receding of the waters, happens in the seventh month starting from the highest point of the flood, near the autumnal equinox. See the pattern? The two equinoxes are separated by those very seven months, with five months in between.

But here's where it gets really interesting. This "seventh month" connected to the spring equinox? It’s also considered the first month, according to Philo. Why? Because the creation of the world, the very beginning, took place during that time of abundance.: spring is a time of rebirth, of blossoming, of new beginnings. It makes sense.

So, while the seventh month in the autumnal equinox is technically "first in dignity," its significance, its essence, if you will, comes from the number seven and its connection to the air, to the very atmosphere that sustains life.

Therefore, the Flood, this cataclysmic event, took place in the seventh month not chronologically, but "according to nature." Its principle, its starting point, is deeply rooted in the spring season, in that sense of renewal, even amidst destruction.

What are we to make of this? Perhaps Philo is hinting at a cyclical nature to things. Destruction and creation, endings and beginnings, all intertwined and reflected in the rhythms of nature. The Flood, as terrible as it was, wasn't just a random act of divine anger. It was part of a larger cosmic pattern, a reset button pushed by the Almighty, leading to a new chapter. A chapter that, like the spring equinox, held the promise of a new beginning. And maybe, just maybe, that’s a lesson we can still take to heart today.

Full source
The Midrash of Philo 15:1The Midrash of Philo

The floodwaters had receded. The earth was dry. The ark door stood ajar. So, why didn’t he just… leave?

That’s the question the Midrash of Philo, a collection of interpretations and expansions on the Hebrew Bible attributed to the ancient Jewish philosopher Philo of Alexandria, asks. Seems obvious. The rain stopped. The animals are getting restless. Time to go!

Noah, righteous Noah, waited.

He waited for a command. Specifically, he waited for God to say, "Go forth, thou, and thy wife, and thy sons, and thy sons' wives, together with all the rest of the living creatures" (Genesis 8:16).

Why this hesitation? Why this need for explicit instruction?

The Midrash of Philo sees a profound lesson in Noah's patience. It speaks to the importance of acting only when divinely sanctioned, even when the path ahead seems clear.: Noah had spent months, maybe even over a year, cooped up in that ark. He could have easily justified striking out on his own, claiming the implied permission of a world ready to be rebuilt.

But he didn't.

He understood, perhaps intuitively, that even in a world reborn, God’s guidance remained paramount. It wasn't enough to simply survive the flood; he needed to rebuild according to God’s will. This required more than just physical dryness; it required spiritual direction.

This idea resonates, doesn't it? How often do we rush ahead, assuming we know best, only to stumble? Noah's example reminds us to pause, to listen, to seek guidance – whether from our own inner voice, from trusted advisors, or from the Divine.

Maybe, just maybe, the real flood wasn’t the one that covered the earth, but the one of our own impulses and desires that can cloud our judgment. And perhaps, like Noah, we need a clear command, a moment of profound clarity, to truly step forward into a new beginning.

Full source