Parshat Chayei Sarah5 min read

Sarah Was a Prophetess Who Saw What Abraham Could Not

Bereshit Rabbah insists Sarah's greatness was not derived from Abraham's. She was named at creation, saw visions he never received.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Laugh That Was Not Doubt
  2. Named at Creation Before Abraham
  3. The Vision Abraham Did Not Receive
  4. The Souls Made in Haran
  5. Sarah's Legacy and the Consolation of Zion

The Laugh That Was Not Doubt

Sarah was behind the tent flap when the angels made their announcement. She was old. Abraham was old. The age of childbearing was long past. She heard the promise and she laughed.

To the men outside the tent, the laugh sounded like doubt, the very human inability to believe what is being said. God asked Abraham why Sarah laughed (Genesis 18:13), and Sarah denied that she had, which looked like the behavior of someone who knew she was caught disbelieving.

The rabbis of Bereshit Rabbah read it differently. Sarah was a prophetess. She had seen what was coming before the angels said a word. Her laugh was the laugh of recognition, not incredulity, the laughter of someone who sees the thing she already knew was on its way finally arrive at her door.

Named at Creation Before Abraham

Bereshit Rabbah 9 arrives at Sarah through an unexpected detour: the ritual of the sotah, the suspected adulteress in Numbers 5. The offering of the sotah is barley flour, plain and unadorned, because it recalls sin, whereas the Nazirite's offering that precedes it in the text is elevated and honored. The contrast between these two states of the same human material launches the midrash into a meditation on women who were suspected by their husbands but vindicated by God. Sarah is the first name on that list.

She was taken into Pharaoh's household when Abraham presented her as his sister. She was there without her husband, in a foreign palace, under a foreign king's authority. And God sent plagues on Pharaoh's household before Pharaoh could touch her. The protection was active before the threat was completed. The angels in heaven, the midrash says, wept on Sarah's behalf on the nights she was in danger and God did not stand aside.

The Vision Abraham Did Not Receive

The Zohar and related kabbalistic traditions take the claim further: Sarah's prophetic vision was superior to Abraham's in its clarity, not its frequency. Abraham received visions. Sarah perceived what those visions meant. When God told Abraham to listen to Sarah's voice (Genesis 21:12), the tradition reads this as instruction, not merely counsel. God was telling Abraham that the prophetic insight in the household belonged to his wife and he was to defer to it.

Sarah's insistence on expelling Hagar and Ishmael was not, in this reading, a jealous mother's reaction. It was a prophetess's accurate reading of what the covenant required and what Ishmael's presence in the household would cost Isaac. Abraham resisted. God sided with Sarah. The prophetic track record was already established before God needed to adjudicate.

The Souls Made in Haran

Genesis 12:5 lists the people Abraham and Sarah brought with them when they left Haran: the people that they had made in Haran. The word made stopped the rabbis. You do not make people. The tradition reads it as converts, people whom Abraham and Sarah had brought under the wings of the divine presence. Abraham worked on the men and Sarah worked on the women, and both of them accomplished what neither could have accomplished alone.

The tradition in Ginzberg's synthesis reads Sarah's role in the Haran community as a parallel to Abraham's, not a subordinate version of it. She was not the wife of a patriarch who let her help. She was a distinct spiritual authority who operated in a domain Abraham could not reach, converting women to the monotheistic understanding of the world that Abraham had arrived at through his own study and she had arrived at through her own vision.

Sarah's Legacy and the Consolation of Zion

The Pesikta DeRav Kahana, a collection of rabbinic teachings connected to holidays and special Torah readings, places Sarah at the center of the theological argument about barrenness and divine fulfillment. The verse he seats the barren woman as a joyful mother of children (Psalms 113:9) is applied to Sarah as the paradigm case. She waited decades for a child not because God had forgotten her but because the covenant's timing was not hers to determine. When the time came, it came fully.

The consolation offered to Zion in exile draws on the same principle: the barren city that seems to have been abandoned will be given more children than the married city (Isaiah 54:1). The tradition reads Sarah's body as a type of Zion's exile, and both as arguments that the divine promise operates on a timeline that cannot be read from inside the waiting.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

5 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Bamidbar Rabbah 9:13Bamidbar Rabbah

Especially when we explore the curious case of the sotah – the suspected adulteress – in Numbers chapter 5. It’s a wild ride, full of ritual, suspicion, and a whole lot of barley flour.

"The man shall bring his wife to the priest, and he shall bring her offering on her behalf, one-tenth of an ephah of barley flour; he shall not pour oil upon it, and he shall not place frankincense upon it, for it is a meal offering of jealousy, a meal offering of remembrance, a reminder of iniquity" (Numbers 5:15).

Before we even get to the sotah ritual itself, Bamidbar Rabbah 9 points out something interesting. The preceding verses discuss a man's sacred items going to the priest. "A man’s sacred items shall be his; [anything that a man gives the priest shall be his]" (Numbers 5:10). The Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary) asks, do Israelites even eat sacred items? Of course not! The text is teaching us that if you bring vow offerings, gift offerings, and first fruits to the priest willingly and generously, you will be blessed. The reward? Priestly descendants! As the text says, "His daughters will marry priests, and his grandchildren will be priests." People who partake of sacred items.

If you skimp on your obligations, if you mock the mitzvot (commandments) and don’t bring those sacred items, then ultimately, "the man shall bring his wife to the priest"… in a very different context. It's a harsh lesson, isn't it? An entrance not opened for mitzvot is opened for… trouble. Money not spent on good deeds ends up going to the doctor, says the Midrash. Ouch.

And then, the offering itself. "And he shall bring her offering on her behalf." It has to come from his resources. He didn't share his harvest with the priest before, and now he's got to spend money on this whole ordeal! What's that about?

Notice the unusual composition of the offering. "One-tenth of an ephah of barley flour." Why barley? The Midrash connects it to the Ten Commandments. The woman’s transgression, if she committed it, is seen as a violation of those fundamental principles. And why barley flour specifically? Because, as Bamidbar Rabbah suggests, she fed her lover delicacies, so she gets the animal feed equivalent in her offering. Ouch, again!

And there’s more. "He shall not pour oil upon it, and he shall not place frankincense upon it." Now, Rabbi Shimon has an interesting take: Normally, an offering from a sinner should include oil and frankincense, so they aren't rewarded for their sins. So why the exception here? The Midrash explains that it's so her offering won’t be glorified. Oil is a source of light. The Hebrew word, yitzhar, shares a root with words like tzohorayim (noon) and tzohar (a source of light). But if she has chosen darkness, then her offering gets no light. And frankincense? That evokes the matriarchs – Sarah, Rebecca, Leah, and Rachel. "I will go to the mountain of myrrh," (Song of Songs 4:6), says the text, referring to the patriarchs, "and to the hill of frankincense," referring to the matriarchs. If she has strayed from their path, let their memory not be present in her offering. Frankincense, after all, is linked to memory. As we see in (Leviticus 2:2), "The priest shall burn its memorial portion [azkarata] on the altar."

"For it is a meal offering of jealousy [kenaot]." The Midrash emphasizes that this is a double jealousy. It's the husband’s jealousy, of course, but it's also the paramour's! He, too, faces consequences if she's found guilty. And just as she provoked jealousy down here on Earth, she also provoked zealotry [kina] above, in the heavens.

Then comes the "meal offering of remembrance." If she's innocent, it's a remembrance for the good. But if she’s guilty, it’s a "reminder of iniquity." It’s a fork in the road, a moment of truth.

Finally, "The priest shall bring her near and have her stand before the Lord" (Numbers 5:16). She doesn't get to waltz in during a festive pilgrimage, surrounded by crowds. The priest doesn't wait for a more dramatic moment. He brings her before God at the first chance he gets. And "have her stand" means she stands alone. No supportive slaves or maidservants to embolden her. She stands "before the Lord" – specifically, at the Nikanor Gate. A humbling and exposed position.

What's so powerful about this whole sotah narrative is how it holds a mirror up to our own lives. Are we investing in the things that truly matter? Are we choosing light over darkness? Are we honoring the legacies of those who came before us? And are we mindful of the consequences – both earthly and spiritual – of our choices? It's a lot to consider, isn't it?

Full source
Bereshit Rabbah 20:6Bereshit Rabbah

Why does (Genesis 3:16) say, "To the woman He said: I will increase your suffering and your pregnancy; in pain you shall give birth to children, and your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you?" It's a tough verse, and Jewish tradition grapples with it in fascinating ways.

One intriguing idea, found in Bereshit Rabbah, a classic collection of Rabbinic interpretations of Genesis, questions whether God even speaks directly to women at all! Rabbi Yehuda ben Rabbi Simon and Rabbi Yoḥanan, citing Rabbi Elazar ben Rabbi Simon, suggest that God only spoke directly to Sarah, and even then, only because it was necessary.

Why? Well, God had been talking to Abraham about why Sarah laughed when she overheard that she would conceive in her old age (Genesis 18:13). Sarah denied it: "I did not laugh" (Genesis 18:15). So, according to this reading, God had to set the record straight: "No, but you did laugh" (Genesis 18:15). Rabbi Abba bar Kahana, in the name of Rabbi Yitzḥak, even points out that God spoke to her indirectly! Instead of a direct "Yes, you laughed," it was a roundabout way of saying the same thing.

Wait! What about Hagar? Doesn't (Genesis 16:13) say, "She called the name of the Lord, who spoke to her?" Rabbi Yehoshua bar Rabbi Neḥemya, in the name of Rabbi Idi, explains that God spoke to her through an angel. And Rabbi Elazar, citing Rabbi Yosei ben Zimra, suggests it was through Shem, Noah's son! The text implies that Hagar consulted with Shem, who was a spiritual leader in that era.

Let’s dig deeper into that loaded phrase, "I will increase [harba arbe] your suffering and your pregnancy." Rabbi Abba bar Kahana, again in the name of Rabbi Shmuel, offers a fascinating insight: "Any fetus who has reached harba, I shall grant it growth [arbe]." He connects this to the gestation period, suggesting that a fetus born after 212 days – the numerical value of the Hebrew word harba – can survive. It's a very early understanding of premature birth!

Rabbi Huna adds to this, noting that if a fetus is "formed" to be born after nine months but comes early at seven or eight, it won't survive. However, if "formed" to be born after seven months, it has a chance even if born later.

They even asked Rabbi Abahu where this idea comes from! He cleverly uses Greek: zeta, the seventh letter, sounds like "live," while eta, the eighth letter, sounds like "dying." It's a playful, almost poetic way to understand the fragility of life.

Rabbi Berekhya, in the name of Rabbi Shmuel, then throws another number into the mix, suggesting that a woman will always give birth after 271, 272, or 273 days – nine months plus a few days for conception.

There's even a story about Ḥiyya bar Ada, who was struggling to understand something Rav was teaching because he was worried about his donkey giving birth! He knew that sometimes a donkey gives birth early (after a lunar year) and sometimes late (after a solar year), an eleven day range! Rav challenged him, citing (Job 39:1-2), which seems to imply a set term for animal pregnancies. Ḥiyya bar Ada cleverly replies that Job is speaking of small animals, and he is speaking of a large, non-kosher one.

The text then returns to the Genesis verse, unpacking the layers of suffering: "Your suffering" is the pain of conception; "and your pregnancy" is the discomfort of menstruation; "in pain" is the pain of miscarriage; "you shall give birth" is the pain of childbirth; "to children" is the difficulty of raising children.

Finally, Rabbi Elazar ben Rabbi Shimon offers a striking thought: It's easier for a man to support an entire legion with olives in the Galilee than to raise one child in the Land of Israel. It's a powerful statement about the immense challenges and responsibilities of parenthood.

So, what do we take away from this deep dive into Bereshit Rabbah 20? It’s not just a simple explanation of a difficult verse. It's a glimpse into how the Rabbis wrestled with questions of divine communication, the mysteries of childbirth, and the profound complexities of human life. It's a reminder that even the most challenging texts can offer surprising insights when we approach them with curiosity and a willingness to explore.

Full source
Legends of the Jews 5:190Legends of the Jews

The angels in heaven apparently felt that way on behalf of Sarah.

The familiar version gives us Abraham. The patriarch, the man of faith. Well, there's a fascinating little aside in Legends of the Jews by Ginzberg that I think you'll appreciate. It's all about a moment of divine intervention, a bit of cosmic accounting, if you will.

So, Abraham prays for Abimelech, king of the Philistines, who was unwell. God answers Abraham's prayer, and Abimelech recovers. Great. A mitzvah! A good deed!

The angels? They weren't so sure.

According to Ginzberg, they raised a ruckus, a loud cry, and said to God, "O Lord of the world! All these years has Sarah been barren, just like Abimelech's wife was. Now Abraham prayed, and Abimelech's wife has been granted a child? It is only fair that Sarah should be remembered and granted a child, too!"

Talk about speaking truth to power!

And when did this happen? On Rosh Hashanah, the New Year! That pivotal moment when, as the angels pointed out, the fortunes of humankind are decided in heaven for the entire year. What a time to make your case!

Did their plea work? Absolutely.

Ginzberg tells us that barely seven months later, on the first day of Passover, Isaac was born. Isn't that amazing? A divine response, timed perfectly, arriving on another hugely significant holiday.

It makes you wonder, doesn't it? About the power of prayer, sure, but also about the importance of speaking up for what’s just. And about the divine timing of things. Maybe, just maybe, the things we're waiting for are also being discussed in the heavenly court, right now. Maybe our moment is coming, timed perfectly, just like Isaac's birth on Passover.

Full source
Bereshit Rabbah 39:14Bereshit Rabbah

It’s more profound than it first appears. (Genesis 12:5) tells us, “Abram took Sarai his wife, and Lot, son of his brother, and all their property that they had acquired, and the people that they had made in Ḥaran; they departed to go to the land of Canaan and they came to the land of Canaan.” But it’s that phrase, “the people that they had made in Ḥaran,” that has sparked centuries of fascinating discussion.

What does it mean that they "made" people? Did Abraham and Sarah suddenly develop the ability to create life? Of course not! Rabbi Elazar bar Zimra poses a powerful challenge in Bereshit Rabbah: If all the people on earth gathered together, could they create even a single gnat and breathe a soul into it? No way! So, what’s going on here?

The explanation lies in understanding the depth of conversion. The text isn't talking about physical creation, but spiritual creation. "The people that they had made" refers to the proselytes, the converts, that Abraham and Sarah brought into their belief.

Then the question arises: If it means converts, why does the Torah use the word "made"? Why not just say "that they converted"? Here’s where it gets really interesting. The rabbis explain that anyone who draws an idol worshipper near and converts him, it is as though he has created him. It’s not just about changing someone's mind; it’s about giving them a whole new spiritual life, a new identity, a new purpose. It's an act of profound creation.

Okay, so if it’s about creating a new spiritual life, why doesn’t the Torah say “that he made”? Why "they?" Rav Huna offers a beautiful insight: Abraham converted the men, and Sarah converted the women. Each played a vital role in this spiritual rebirth, a collaborative effort to build a community of faith.

The idea that converting someone is akin to creating them is a powerful one. It elevates the act of welcoming others into our community to something truly sacred. It suggests that when we open our hearts and minds to those seeking a new path, we are participating in an act of creation, bringing forth something new and beautiful into the world.

What does this mean for us today? Perhaps it's a reminder that extending a hand to those seeking meaning and purpose is one of the most profound things we can do. It’s not just about sharing our beliefs; it’s about helping to shape a new spiritual identity, a new life. And that, my friends, is an act of creation in its truest form.

Full source
Pesikta DeRav Kahana 20:1Pesikta de-Rav Kahana

"Sing, O barren one." [1] "He sets the barren woman of the house as a joyful mother of children" (Psalms 113:9). There are seven barren women: Sarah, Rebekah, Rachel, and Leah, and the wife of Manoah, and Hannah, and Zion.

Another interpretation: "He sets the barren woman of the house" (ibid.) refers to our mother Sarah, "And Sarai was barren" (Genesis 11:30). "A joyful mother of children" (Psalms ibid.) refers to "Sarah has nursed children" (Genesis 21:7).

Another interpretation: "He sets the barren woman of the house" (Psalms ibid.) refers to Rebekah, "And Isaac entreated the LORD for his wife, because she was barren" (Genesis 25:21). "A joyful mother of children" (Psalms ibid.): "And the LORD was entreated of him, and Rebekah his wife conceived" (Genesis ibid.).

Another interpretation: "He sets the barren woman of the house" (Psalms ibid.) refers to Leah, "And the LORD saw that Leah was hated, and He opened her womb" (Genesis 29:31) -- from here that Leah was barren. "A joyful mother of children" (Psalms ibid.): "for I have borne him six sons" (Genesis 30:20).

Another interpretation: "He sets the barren woman of the house" (Psalms ibid.) refers to Rachel, "and Rachel was barren" (Genesis 29:31). "A joyful mother of children" (Psalms ibid.): "the sons of Rachel, Joseph and Benjamin" (Genesis 35:24).

Another interpretation: "He sets the barren woman of the house" (Psalms ibid.) refers to the wife of Manoah, "And the angel of the LORD appeared to the woman, and said to her, Behold now, you are barren and have not borne" (Judges 13:3). "A joyful mother of children" (Psalms ibid.): "and you shall conceive and bear a son" (Judges ibid.).

Another interpretation: "He sets the barren woman of the house" (Psalms 113:9) refers to Hannah, "And Peninnah had children, but Hannah had no children" (1 Samuel 1:2). "A joyful mother of children" (Psalms 113:9): "and she conceived and bore three sons and two daughters" (1 Samuel 2:21).

Another interpretation: "He sets the barren woman of the house" (Psalms ibid.) refers to Zion, "Sing, O barren one who did not bear" (Isaiah 54:1). "A joyful mother of children": "and you will say in your heart, Who has borne me these, [and the rest]" (Isaiah 49:21).

Full source