6 min read

The Third Day When Pain Peaks and a Father Guards His Son

Bereshit Rabbah uses Simeon and Levi's massacre to teach post-circumcision care, then reads Jacob's warning against the evil eye on the third day.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Day Simeon and Levi Chose
  2. A Verse About a Massacre Becomes a Medical Rule
  3. The Father Watching His Sons Leave for Egypt
  4. Two Kinds of Exposure

The Day Simeon and Levi Chose

The men of Shechem had circumcised themselves. Every male in the city had agreed to the condition of marriage that Dinah's brothers had set, and now they were three days past the procedure, lying in their houses at the worst moment of the healing.

That was when Simeon and Levi came through the gates with their swords.

Genesis 34:25 records it plainly: it was on the third day, when they were in pain, that the two sons of Jacob took their swords and came upon the city with confidence and killed all the males. A massacre timed to the physiology of the wound. They did not come on the first day, when the men were still upright. They came on the third day, when the pain was at its highest point and a grown man could barely stand.

The Torah paused on that detail. On the third day, when they were in pain. The rabbis of Bereshit Rabbah circled the phrase and would not let go of it. If the Torah tells us explicitly that the third day is the day of greatest pain, the rabbis argued, then the Torah is teaching something about every circumcision, not just this one.

A Verse About a Massacre Becomes a Medical Rule

Bereshit Rabbah 80:9 took a verse about one of the most violent scenes in Genesis and turned it into a practical ruling about how to care for a newly circumcised infant.

A debate developed immediately. The rule was clear, the third day is the day of greatest pain, so a baby who has just had the brit milah needs particular attention on the third day. But when exactly does the count begin?

Rabbi Berekhya said the third day means the third day from the circumcision itself, not counting the day of the procedure. Rabbi Levi said it means the third day counting from the circumcision, so the circumcision day is day one.

The practical difference mattered. A father who was not sure which day was the third day, the day when he needed to be most attentive to his son's comfort and recovery, needed an answer. The sages gave him two answers and then argued about which one was binding. The violence at Shechem, the clinical precision of two brothers who knew exactly when to strike for maximum effect, became the text from which rabbis extracted the human body's healing timeline.

The Father Watching His Sons Leave for Egypt

The second passage in Bereshit Rabbah shifts from the wound of circumcision to a different kind of vulnerability. Jacob's sons are preparing to go down to Egypt for grain in the middle of a famine. Jacob watches them and says something the Torah records as a warning: why do you make yourselves conspicuous?

The midrash unpacked what Jacob meant. Do not take bread openly in your hands as you travel. Do not all enter through the same gate. Do not walk together in a group that announces itself. The concern was the evil eye, the ayin hara, the accumulated envy of people who see a household that still has food moving through a land where food has run out.

There was no shortage in Jacob's house. The family had grain. That was exactly the problem. A man with resources moving through a landscape of desperate people was a target not for theft alone but for something the rabbis regarded as a real force: the focused attention of resentment. Jacob told his sons to scatter their approach, to spread the evidence of their survival thin enough that it would not draw concentrated malice down on them.

The circumcised infant needed protection on the third day when his body was at its most exposed. Jacob's sons needed protection as they crossed into famine country with food in their sacks. In both cases, a father was calibrating the care to the specific shape of the danger.

Two Kinds of Exposure

The baby at the brit milah and Jacob's sons walking into famine country were both in the same position: at the moment of greatest vulnerability, with a careful father trying to calibrate exactly the right protection. Simeon and Levi had exploited that vulnerability once, and the rabbis of Bereshit Rabbah used the record of that exploitation to derive the medical rule. Jacob had lived with those sons. He knew what they were capable of. When his remaining sons prepared for the journey to Egypt, he told them to guard themselves against the same concentrated attention that his older sons had once used as a weapon.

The third day of circumcision was the day the infant's body was most exposed. The road through famine country was the stretch when the family's intact resources made them most visible. In both cases, the father's job was to know the specific shape of the danger and to build a protection that fit it precisely. Not a general caution. A targeted one.

Bereshit Rabbah held these two passages together because the same structural principle ran through them. The wound that heals and the road through hunger are different dangers. What Simeon and Levi did at Shechem and what Jacob feared from envious neighbors are different threats. But in both cases, the father who understood the physiology of vulnerability was the father who could protect what he was responsible for guarding.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

3 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Bereshit Rabbah 80:9Bereshit Rabbah

Sometimes, the answer lies hidden in plain sight, tucked away in ancient commentaries on the Torah. Consider the seemingly simple act of bathing a baby after circumcision. It turns out, this practice has a fascinating and surprisingly complex history, rooted in a particular verse in Genesis.

The verse in question speaks of the sons of Jacob, Simeon and Levi, and their vengeful attack on the city of Shechem after their sister Dina was violated. (Genesis 34:25) reads: "It was on the third day, when they were in pain, that the two sons of Jacob, Simeon and Levi, Dina's brothers, each man took his sword, and came upon the city confidently, and killed all the males.”

What does this violent verse have to do with bathing a baby? Well, the Rabbis of the Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary), specifically in Bereshit Rabbah 80, saw a connection. They focused on the phrase, "It was on the third day, when they were in pain." This "third day," they reasoned, was significant.

The Midrash then launches into a discussion about whether it is permissible to bathe a child with hot water on Shabbat (the Sabbath), especially if that Shabbat coincides with the third day after circumcision. the third day after circumcision is often considered the most painful for the infant.

The text references a debate between the school of Rabbi Meir, who apparently taught that one bathes "the circumcision," and Rabbi Yosei, who insisted that the correct teaching is that one bathes "the child." Rabbi Ze’eira even recounts how Rabbi Yosei would constantly correct him, saying, "Say over your mishna [your teaching], [one bathes the child], as we learned..." This highlights the importance of the correct phrasing and the subtle difference in meaning.

Why the fuss over this tiny change in wording? Well, the Midrash explains that if one only bathes the circumcision, what's the difference between a child's wound and an adult's wound? The point, they argue, is to teach us that we bathe the entire body of the child, something that wouldn't be permitted for an adult (except for the specific wound).

The discussion continues with Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya, who specifies that one bathes the child on the third day from circumcision that coincides with Shabbat. Rabbi Yaakov bar Aḥa adds that Rabbi Yoḥanan and Rabbi Yonatan would instruct midwives to perform all necessary treatments on Shabbat if the third day after circumcision fell on that day.

Then, Shmuel chimes in, suggesting that the reason for these leniencies is due to danger. In other words, the health and well-being of the child overrides the usual restrictions of Shabbat. Rabbi Yosei counters by saying that if danger is the concern, then surely we can prepare hot water on Shabbat itself! He references a teaching that allows one to heat a cloth and place it on a wound on Shabbat for healing purposes.

Finally, Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi concludes that there is no prohibition at all; it is entirely permissible to bathe the child on the third day, even on Shabbat.

So, what can we take away from this ancient discussion? It shows us how Jewish law and custom aren't static. They're born from wrestling with scripture, debating interpretations, and always, always prioritizing human well-being. This passage in Bereshit Rabbah, sparked by a verse about violence and revenge, ultimately leads us to a beautiful and compassionate practice: caring for a newborn child in its time of need. It makes you wonder, doesn’t it, how many other everyday Jewish customs have such surprising and thought-provoking origins?

Full source
Bereshit Rabbah 91:2Bereshit Rabbah

The story begins with Jacob observing his sons. "Why do you make yourselves conspicuous?" he asks them. But what exactly did he mean? According to this Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary), Jacob wasn't just worried about general safety. He specifically cautioned them: "Do not take out bread [perusa]…in your hands, and do not enter all of you in one entrance, due to the evil eye." The ayin hara, the evil eye, is a powerful concept in Jewish tradition, a belief that envy and ill-will can manifest as a tangible curse. Jacob, ever the patriarch, wanted to protect his family from such negativity. The Midrash emphasizes that there was no shortage of food in Jacob’s household, so openly displaying wealth might incite jealousy.

Then comes the pivotal moment. Famine strikes, and Jacob hears there's grain in Egypt. "Behold, I have heard that there is grain in Egypt. Go down there and acquire grain for us from there, and we will live and not die" (Genesis 42:2). Simple enough. But Rabbi Abba bar Kahana sees something deeper within the words "Go down [redu]…and acquire…for us from there." He points out that the numerical value of reduReish (200) + dalet (4) + vav (6) – equals 210. This, Rabbi Abba suggests, is a subtle hint, a prophetic whisper that Jacob's descendants were destined to spend 210 years in Egyptian servitude.

"Ten of Joseph's brothers went down to acquire grain from Egypt" (Genesis 42:3). But why emphasize that they were "Joseph's brothers?" Rabbi Binyamin raises a fascinating point. Isn't it obvious they are ten brothers? He suggests that nine parts of their motivation was fraternity – a desire to find Joseph, their lost brother – and only one part was about acquiring grain. This adds a layer of emotional complexity to their journey, reminding us that family bonds often run deeper than practical needs.

Then, there's Benjamin. "But Benjamin, Joseph’s brother, Jacob did not send with his brothers, as he said: Lest disaster befall him" (Genesis 42:4). Jacob, already scarred by the presumed loss of Joseph, couldn’t bear the thought of losing another son. This verse, in its simple declaration, speaks volumes about a father's love and fear. The text emphasizes that since the verse specifies that Joseph’s brothers came with the exception of Benjamin, it highlights the need for the previous statement clarifying the number of brothers.

What does this all mean for us today? Perhaps it's a reminder to be mindful of our actions, to avoid unnecessary displays of wealth that might incite envy. Maybe it's a call to look deeper into the words of Torah, to search for hidden meanings and prophetic whispers. Or perhaps, it's simply a poignant reminder of the enduring power of family, and the lengths we'll go to protect those we love. These layers of meaning and interpretation remind us that the Torah is not just a book, but a living, breathing text that continues to speak to us across the generations.

Full source
Midrash Tanchuma, Miketz 8Midrash Tanchuma

"And Jacob said to his sons, Why do you look upon one another?" (Genesis 42:1). Jacob said to his sons: You are mighty men, you are handsome; do not enter through one gate and do not stand in one place, lest the evil eye gain power over you. "Behold, I have heard that there is grain (shever) in Egypt; go down (redu) there" (Genesis 42:2). What is "go down"? He foresaw that they would go down there and be enslaved in Egypt for the number of years equal to the numerical value of redu [the letters of "go down" total two hundred and ten, the years of the Egyptian bondage]. "Go down there," for whoever buys produce from the market, it is a descent for him. "And Joseph's brothers went down" (Genesis 42:3) and so forth. Scripture should have written "the sons of Israel." Rather, because at first they did not treat him with brotherhood and sold him, but in the end they were regretful and saying, "When shall we go down to Egypt and bring our brother back to our father?" And when their father told them to go down to Egypt, they all gave a single mind to bring him back.

Rabbi Yehudah bar Simon said: Joseph too knew that his brothers were going down to Egypt to buy food. What did he do? He set watchmen over all the gates and said to them: See, everyone who enters to buy food, write his name and the name of his father, and in the evening bring me your slips. They did so. When the sons of Jacob came, each one entered through his own gate, and they wrote their names and the names of their father. In the evening they brought their slips before Joseph. This one reads "Reuben son of Jacob," and one reads "Simeon son of Jacob," and one "Levi," and so the gatekeepers, each one his own. Immediately Joseph said to them: Close the storehouses and open one storehouse. And he gave their names to the keeper of the storehouse and said to him: See, when these men come into your hand, seize them and dispatch them before me. Three days passed and they did not come. Immediately Joseph took seventy mighty men from the king's house and dispatched them on his behalf to seek them out in the market. They went and found them in the market of harlots. And what was their business in the market of harlots? Rather, they said: Joseph our brother was handsome of form and handsome of appearance; perhaps he is in some den of harlots. Immediately they seized them and brought them before Joseph.

"And he recognized them, but made himself a stranger to them, and spoke with them" (Genesis 42:7) and so forth. This teaches that he made himself a stranger to them. He took the goblet and tapped upon it. He said to them: I see in my goblet that you are spies. They said to him: We are honest men; but thus our father commanded us, do not enter through one gate. He said to them: In the market of harlots, what was your business? Were you not afraid of the eye? Where is your father's command? They said to him: A lost thing was lost to us, and we were seeking it there. He said to them: What lost thing? I see in the goblet that two of you destroyed the great city of Shechem. They said to him: And who are they? He tapped on the goblet and said to them: Simeon and Levi are their names. Immediately they were shaken, and they said to him: Your servants are twelve brothers. He said to them: And where are the other two? They said to him: The youngest is with our father today, and the one is no more. He said to them: Bring your youngest brother to me, and your words will be verified. He took Simeon and bound him before their eyes and said to them: This one will be held imprisoned until you bring your brother and your words are verified. And when they had gone, he brought him out and fed him and gave him drink.

Immediately, "Joseph commanded, and they filled their vessels with grain" (Genesis 42:25) and so forth. They went to their father and recounted to him the whole event. Their father answered and said to them: Where is Simeon? They said to him: That man, the lord of the land, seized him so that we would bring our youngest brother. He said to them: You have bereaved me; "Joseph is no more, and Simeon" and so forth (Genesis 42:36). "And Reuben said to his father, saying, You may put to death my two sons" and so forth (Genesis 42:37). He said to him: Fool, are your sons not my sons? Judah said to them: Leave this old man be until the bread is finished, as it is said, "And it came to pass when they had finished eating" and so forth (Genesis 43:2). Judah said to him: Father, if Benjamin goes with us, it is uncertain whether he will be seized or whether he will not be seized; but if he does not go with us, all of us are dead. It is better that you set aside the uncertain and take hold of the certain. "I will be surety for him; of my hand you shall require him" (Genesis 43:9). Immediately he sent him with them and said to them: "Take of the choice fruits of the land in your vessels, and bring down to the man a present" and so forth (Genesis 43:11). Therefore it is written: "And Jacob saw that there was grain in Egypt" (Genesis 42:1).

Full source