5 min read

Abraham Faced Nimrod, the King of Sodom, and Ten Promised Nations

Abraham smashed idols and Nimrod lit the furnace. A king tried to pay him for a war fought free. God named ten nations his heirs would inherit in two eras.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The idol-smashing and what came after it
  2. The furnace that proved a God and changed nothing
  3. The king who tried to pay him
  4. The ten nations and the ones who had already left

The idol-smashing and what came after it

Terah ran an idol shop in Ur, and his son had opinions about the inventory. When a woman came in carrying flour to offer to the statues, Abraham took the flour, set it in front of the largest idol, then picked up a club and smashed every statue in the shop except the biggest one. He placed the club in the surviving idol's hands. When his father came back and demanded an explanation, Abraham told him the big idol had gotten into a quarrel with the others and destroyed them all.

Terah was not persuaded. He dragged his son to Nimrod.

The furnace that proved a God and changed nothing

Nimrod was the king of the world as far as Nimrod was concerned. He ran through a series of escalating theological demands. Bow to fire. Abraham declined: bow to water instead, which extinguishes fire. Bow to water. Bow to clouds, which carry water. Bow to wind, which scatters clouds. Bow to humans, who contain wind when they breathe. At each step, Abraham found something that had power over the last thing and offered it as a superior candidate for worship. Nimrod eventually gave up the theological argument and ordered Abraham thrown into a furnace. Abraham walked out.

The rabbis of Bereshit Rabbah did not present this as a comfortable triumph. Abraham emerged from the furnace and continued to live in a world where Nimrod was still the king. The encounter proved something about Abraham's God. It did not change Nimrod's arrangements.

The king who tried to pay him

Later, much later, after Abraham had come back from defeating the coalition of four kings who had kidnapped Lot, he passed through the Valley of Shaveh. The text of Genesis 14 says the valley was also called the King's Valley. The rabbis noted that and moved past it toward the more interesting detail.

The King of Sodom came out to meet Abraham there. He made what looked like a generous offer. Keep the goods you recovered. Just give me back my people. But Bereshit Rabbah read the subtext. The King of Sodom had watched Abraham fight a war on his behalf without being asked, rescue captives who were Sodom's citizens, refuse to take any spoil for himself. Now the king was showing up in the King's Valley to manage what came next.

Abraham wanted nothing from him. He had already sworn to God that he would not take even a sandal-strap from Sodom, so that Sodom could never say it had enriched Abraham. He understood the political transaction the king was offering and declined it entirely. He returned the people. He took nothing. He walked away with his nephew Lot and a clean ledger.

The rabbis saw this as Abraham's definitive statement about who his patron was. He had already been wealthy before the battle. He would not be wealthy because of it. The King of Sodom went back to his valley without a relationship to use.

The ten nations and the ones who had already left

God had promised Abraham's descendants not seven nations, the standard number in the later promise, but ten. The list in Genesis 15 included the Kenites, the Kenizzites, and the Kadmonites in addition to the usual seven. Abraham's descendants would eventually occupy all of it. But when? And what happened to the extra three?

Bereshit Rabbah addressed the gap plainly. The extra territories were held in reserve for the messianic era. The standard seven nations that Israel would conquer entering Canaan under Joshua were the immediate inheritance. The remaining three, including Edom, Ammon, and Moab as the rabbis identified them, would come in at the end of history. The promise was not being broken by geography or timing. It was being fulfilled in two stages that the Torah announced together but did not explain separately.

Abraham, standing in that landscape, held a promise that pointed both forward into Joshua's campaigns and forward again into a future no one in his generation would see. He did not own any of it yet. He was a wandering Aramaean on contested ground, with kings who knew his name and a map that was partly present tense and partly eschatology. The promise was the deed. The land would catch up to it eventually.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

4 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Bereshit Rabbah 38:13Bereshit Rabbah

The Torah gives us glimpses, but it's in the rabbinic stories, the aggadah (non-legal rabbinic narrative), that we really get a sense of the spiritual climate. One story, found in Bereshit Rabbah 38, illuminates a fascinating family dynamic and a pivotal moment of choice.

The verse in (Genesis 11:28) tells us simply that "Haran died in the presence of Teraḥ his father in the land of his birth, in Ur of the Chaldeans.” But the rabbis ask, why did Haran die? Bereshit Rabbah offers a compelling explanation, painting a picture of Teraḥ as an idol worshipper and, perhaps more significantly, an idol merchant.

In Rabbi Ḥiyya, grandson of Rav Ada of Yafo, Teraḥ would sometimes leave his son Abraham in charge of the idol shop. Now, Abraham, ever the proto-monotheist, would ask, "How old are you?" Let’s say the man replies, "Fifty or sixty years old." Abraham, incredulous, would retort, "Woe to you! You're sixty years old, and you're going to prostrate yourself before something that's only a day old?" The customer, understandably ashamed, would leave empty-handed.

One day, a woman came bearing an offering of fine flour, instructing Abraham to present it to the idols. Abraham, taking matters into his own hands, grabbed a club and smashed all the idols, placing the club in the hand of the largest one. You can already imagine where this is going, can't you?

When Teraḥ returned, he demanded to know what happened. Abraham, with a touch of mischievousness, explained that the idols had argued over who would eat the flour first. The biggest idol, in a fit of righteous anger, grabbed the club and smashed the others. Teraḥ, of course, was not amused. "Are you mocking me?" he exclaimed. "Are they sentient at all?" And Abraham, with devastating logic, replied: "Do your ears not hear what your mouth is saying?" A powerful moment.

Teraḥ, furious, dragged Abraham before Nimrod, the ruler of the land. Nimrod, a figure often associated with tyranny in Jewish tradition, demanded that Abraham bow down to fire. Abraham, never one to back down from a theological debate, countered with a series of escalating arguments. "Let us bow down to water, which extinguishes fire," he suggested. Nimrod agreed. Then Abraham: "Let us bow down to the clouds, which bear the water." Again, Nimrod conceded. Finally, Abraham proposed: "Let us bow down to the wind, which scatters the clouds."

Nimrod, growing impatient, declared that he would only bow to fire. He threatened to throw Abraham into a fiery furnace, daring his God to save him.

And here's where Haran, Abraham's brother, enters the story in a truly tragic way. He was, shall we say, hedging his bets. He thought, "If Abraham wins, I'll side with Abraham. If Nimrod wins, I'll side with Nimrod." He was waiting to see which way the wind would blow.

When Abraham was miraculously saved from the fire, Haran declared, "I am with Abraham!" But his declaration rang hollow. His opportunistic faith didn't save him. Nimrod's men threw him into the fire, and he was consumed. Bereshit Rabbah concludes that this is the meaning of the verse: "Haran died in the presence of Teraḥ his father."

This story, as we find in Midrash Rabbah, isn't just a colorful anecdote. It's a powerful lesson about faith, conviction, and the dangers of sitting on the fence. Haran's tragedy serves as a stark reminder that true belief demands courage and commitment, even in the face of adversity. And it’s a reminder that sometimes, the choices we make, or fail to make, have profound and lasting consequences.

What do you make of Haran's choice? Is it a story about the importance of taking a stand, or a cautionary tale about the dangers of religious zealotry? Perhaps it's a bit of both.

Full source
Bereshit Rabbah 43:5Bereshit Rabbah

Bereshit Rabbah turns to The King of Sodom Met Abraham in the Valley of Shaveh.

That’s kind of what we find in Bereshit Rabbah 43, a fascinating peek behind the curtain of Abraham’s victory over Kedorlaomer. (Genesis 14:17) tells us, "The king of Sodom went out to meet him after his return from smiting Kedorlaomer and the kings who were with him, to the valley of Shaveh, which is the valley of the king." But the Rabbis see so much more in these few words.

Rabbi Abba bar Kahana uses a rather colorful image. He says the King of Sodom started to "wag his tail" at Abraham. Imagine the scene! The king, fresh from a near-defeat, trying to cozy up to the man who just saved his skin. He's trying to butter Abraham up, to ingratiate himself. "Just as you descended into the fiery furnace and were rescued," the king says, "I, too, descended into the clay pits and was rescued!"

It's a desperate attempt to create a bond, a shared experience, with the hero of the hour. But is it genuine? Probably not. The Rabbis seem to imply it's pure self-interest.

And what about this "valley of Shaveh?" Rabbi Berekhya and Rabbi Ḥanina, citing Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman, paint an even more bizarre picture. They say the valley was called "Shaveh" because all the idolaters came to a consensus – hushvu in Hebrew – to honor Abraham. They chopped down cedars, built a huge platform, and literally put Abraham on a pedestal!

They lauded him, quoting (Genesis 23:6): “Hear us, my lord, [you are a Godly ruler in our midst]…” They even went so far as to say, "You are king over us, you are ruler over us, you are god over us!" Can you imagine the pressure? The sheer awkwardness of being declared a god by a bunch of idolaters?

But here's where Abraham’s true character shines through. He doesn't accept their deification. Instead, he responds, "Let the world not lack its [true] King, and let the world not lack its [true] God." He deflects their misplaced adoration, directing them back to the one true God.

It's a powerful moment, displaying Abraham’s humility and unwavering faith. He could have seized the opportunity, embraced the power, and become a literal god-king. But he doesn't. He understands that true leadership isn't about personal glory, but about pointing others towards something greater than himself.

So, what can we take away from this midrashic (rabbinic interpretive commentary) exploration? Perhaps it's a reminder that even in moments of triumph, humility and integrity are paramount. And that sometimes, the most challenging tests come not from our enemies, but from the awkward, self-serving praise of those who seek to benefit from our success.

Full source
Bereshit Rabbah 44:23Bereshit Rabbah

The Torah is often remembered as a clear-cut set of instructions, but sometimes, things get a little… complicated. Take the story of God's promise to Abraham in (Genesis 15:19-21). God promises the land of Canaan to Abraham's descendants, listing ten nations that inhabit it: "the Kenites, the Kenizites, and the Kadmonites.. the Ḥitites, the Perizites, and the Refa’im.. the Emorites, the Canaanites, the Girgashites, and the Yevusites."

Then, a question arises. If you count them all up later, the Israelites only conquer the land from seven nations. What happened to the other three? What’s the deal? The ancient Rabbis grappled with this very question!

As we find in Bereshit Rabbah 44, Rabbi Dostai, quoting Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman, points out an initial oddity: the Ḥivites are missing from the list in Genesis 15. Normally, they’re included in lists of Canaanite nations (like in (Genesis 10:17) and 34:2). So, why are the Refa’im mentioned instead? The answer offered is that the Hivites and the Refa’im are one and the same. Okay, that clears that up. But what about the missing nations?

Rabbi Ḥelbo, relaying a teaching from Rabbi Abba in the name of Rabbi Yoḥanan, explains that God intended to give Israel the land of ten peoples. But He only gave them seven. We get the seven listed: “The Ḥitites, the Perizites, and the Refa’im, the Emorites, the Canaanites, the Girgashites, and the Yevusites.” So, which three didn't make the cut? What happened to the Kenites, Kenizites, and Kadmonites?

This is where it gets really interesting, because we find a divergence of opinions.

Rabbi says they are Arabia, the Shalmaite, and the Nabatean. Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai offers a different take: Damascus, Asia Minor, and Apamea. Rabbi Eliezer ben Yaakov suggests Asia Minor, Thrace, and Carthage.

And then, the Rabbis, in a general consensus, say that the three nations not given were Edom, Moab, and "the foremost of the children of Ammon," based on (Daniel 11:41). This explanation draws support from other verses. (Deuteronomy 2:5) states God wouldn't give even a foot's tread of Edom's land because He gave Mount Seir to Esau. Similarly, (Deuteronomy 2:9) forbids besieging Moab.

So, what's the connection? The text explains that the Kenizite descends from Esau, while the Kenite and Kadmonite come from Ammon and Moab.

But here’s the kicker: all is not lost! The text promises that in the messianic era, these lands will revert to the people of Israel. This fulfills God's original promise to Abraham! For now, though, God only gave them seven, "seven nations greater and mightier than you," as (Deuteronomy 7:1) puts it.

The passage ends with a poignant saying from Rabbi Yitzḥak: "A pig grazes with ten [offspring], and a sheep with not even one." It’s a folk saying that highlights a disparity: pigs, considered impure, are plentiful, while sheep, considered pure, are scarcer. All these nations, God promised to Abraham, while “Sarai, Abram’s wife, had not borne him any children” (Genesis 16:1). It's a reminder that God's promises, though sometimes delayed or seemingly incomplete, are ultimately fulfilled – even if it takes a messianic age to do it. So, sometimes the promises we receive aren't immediately realized, but that doesn’t mean they won't be. Just something to think about.

Full source
Yalkut Shimoni on Torah 78:2Yalkut Shimoni on Torah

"To your offspring I have given this land" (Genesis 15:18). Rav Huna and Rabbi Dostai in the name of Rav Shmuel bar Nachmani said: even the mere utterance of the Holy One, blessed be He, is already a finished deed, as it says "I have given," for it is not written here "I will give" but rather "I have given." Likewise it is not written "Let the redeemed of the LORD say, whom He will redeem" but "whom He has redeemed." "For the LORD will ransom Jacob" is not written here, but "For He has ransomed" (Jeremiah 31:10). "I will whistle to them and gather them, for I will redeem them" is not written here, but "for I have redeemed them." "And the LORD will create over every dwelling place of Mount Zion" is not written here, but "and the LORD has created" (Isaiah 4:5), for it is already created and made ready.

"The Kenite and the Kenizzite" (Genesis 15:19-21). Because the Hivvite is not mentioned here, He brings the Rephaim in their place. It arose in the mind of the Omnipresent to give Israel an inheritance of ten nations: the Kenite, the Kenizzite, and the Kadmonite are three; and the others, the Hittite, the Perizzite, the Rephaim, the Amorite, the Canaanite, the Girgashite, and the Jebusite, making ten. Yet He gave them only the seven. Which are the three He did not give them? Rav says: the Arabians, the Shalmites, and the Nabateans. Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai says: the Damascenes, the Asians, and the Spaniards. Rabbi Eliezer ben Yaakov says: Asia, Turkey, and Carthage. The Sages say: Edom, Moab, and the chief of the children of Ammon are the three He did not give them in this world, as it says of Edom "For I will not give you of his land as a possession" (Deuteronomy 2:5), and of Moab it is written "Do not harass Moab." The Kenite is Esau; the Kenizzite and the Kadmonite are Ammon and Moab. In the days of the Messiah they will return and belong to Israel, to fulfill the word of the Holy One, blessed be He: "They shall lay their hand on Edom and Moab, and the children of Ammon shall obey them" (Isaiah 11:14). But for now He has given them the seven, as it says "seven nations greater and mightier than you" (Deuteronomy 7:1).

Rav Yitzchak said: a sow grazes among ten, but a ewe lamb not even with one. All these the Holy One, blessed be He, said to Abraham that He would give him, the Kenite and the Kenizzite and the rest, and still "Sarai, Abram's wife, had borne him no children" (Genesis 16:1).

Full source