6 min read

Adam Found Refuge After Bringing Death Into the World

God banishes Adam instead of killing him on the spot, and Bamidbar Rabbah reads Eden's eastern gate as the first city of refuge ever opened.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. He Deserved to Die That Day
  2. The Righteous Were Like a Palm Tree, Not a Willow
  3. Aaron Stood Between the Two Camps
  4. Avner Died Because David's Speech Was Too Pure

He Deserved to Die That Day

The warning had been plain: on the day you eat from it, you will die. Adam ate. The thing he had been told would happen did not happen that day, or the next, or the year after. He lived nine hundred and thirty years. He was driven from the garden with thorns in the ground ahead of him and the memory of what had been behind him, but he was not struck down. He stood at the eastern gate of Eden with his wife, with the cherubim behind them, with the flaming sword turning in every direction, and walked into a world he had not yet seen.

Bamidbar Rabbah asks what that banishment actually was. Numbers 35 commands Moses to set aside cities of refuge for those who kill without intent, so that the blood avenger cannot pursue them before a trial. An unwitting killer flees east and finds shelter. Adam brought death into the world. He did not intend the full consequence of what he did the way a deliberate murderer intends killing, and God, rather than ending him at once, drove him east. The garden's eastern gate, Bamidbar Rabbah concludes, was the first city of refuge ever opened. The law in Numbers echoes the mercy in Eden.

The Righteous Were Like a Palm Tree, Not a Willow

Mercy and righteousness are not the same thing, and Bamidbar Rabbah does not conflate them. When it brings the Levites near to serve Aaron, Psalm 92 opens: the righteous will blossom like a palm tree. The midrash pulls the image apart with precision. A palm tree's shade does not fall directly beneath it. The shade is far from the trunk. The fruit takes years to develop. The righteous are like that: their reward is distant, deferred, arriving not in their own time but in the World to Come.

The palm gives everything it has. Branches can be woven into mats. Fibers from the trunk can be twisted into rope. The date clusters sustain travelers. Even the shadow cools the air. Nothing from the palm is wasted, but none of it arrives quickly. The midrash holds that image before the Levites as they take up their station: what they do matters, but the weight of its meaning may land long after they are gone. The righteous sustain the world not because the world immediately acknowledges them but because their words, their presence, and their discipline keep something alive that would otherwise collapse.

Aaron Stood Between the Two Camps

Bamidbar Rabbah brings a verse about marriage into a teaching about Israel and God. The Torah's words about a man and a woman are read as a parable for the covenant between God and Israel. When Israel turned away at the Golden Calf, the relationship cracked. Hosea heard God say you will call me my husband. The Calf was the straying. The desert wandering was the consequence. But the relationship does not end.

Aaron stands inside that story not simply as a priest but as a man who survived what his sons did not survive. His sons Nadav and Avihu brought unauthorized fire and were consumed. He stood at the altar after that and said nothing, and the midrash reads his silence as grief held inside obedience. The Levites' service, organized around Aaron's continued priesthood, becomes a form of repair. The tribe that answered the Calf crisis by standing with Moses now dedicates itself to the Tent that replaced the Calf's altar. Service built on surviving failure carries a different weight than service that has never been tested.

Avner Died Because David's Speech Was Too Pure

Bamidbar Rabbah reaches for a principle from Psalms 12:7: the sayings of the Lord are pure sayings, refined like silver seven times. Then it applies that principle in an unexpected direction. God, in the Torah's own language, sometimes adds extra words to a verse in order to avoid uttering something impure. Noah is told about animals in terms of the pure and the not pure, rather than the pure and the impure, because even in divine instruction the language reaches toward cleanness.

David speaks with the same discipline. When he received the news of Avner's death, he composed a lament over him. The rabbis see in that lament a scruple about the purity of speech: a man of his caliber even in grief chose words that would not profane the moment. Words are not neutral. They carry what is put into them, and what is put into them shapes what comes out of the people who receive them.

Adam at Eden's gate did not yet have Torah's language of purity and impurity. He had only the body of his consequence and the mercy of an eastern opening. But the same God who drove him from the garden eventually gave his descendants a law that named cities of refuge and refined speech and the blossoming of the righteous at the end of long waiting. Eden's exile was the first exile. Numbers 35 was not the first refuge. Both of them belong to a single story about the gap between what a person deserves on a given day and what God chooses to give instead.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

5 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Bamidbar Rabbah 23:13Bamidbar Rabbah

A powerful image. "The power of His deeds He told to His people" (Psalms 111:6). According to Bamidbar Rabbah, God could have simply created a new land for the Israelites. But instead, God chose to demonstrate divine power by vanquishing their enemies and giving them their land. This, the text suggests, is the ultimate expression of divine strength: "The power of His deeds He told to His people, in giving them the inheritance of nations" (Psalms 111:6). It’s a reminder that God's actions are not just about outcomes, but about revealing divine nature.

Then the narrative shifts, focusing on the concept of cities of refuge. "You shall designate cities for you, cities of refuge they shall be for you, and the murderer who smites a person unwittingly shall flee there" (Numbers 35:11). These cities offered sanctuary to those who had accidentally taken a life. But why this provision?

The text turns to (Psalm 25:8), "Good and upright is the Lord; therefore, He instructs sinners on the way." David, in (Psalm 25:6), pleads, "Remember Your mercy, Lord, and Your kindnesses, [for they are eternal]." The Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary) connects this to Adam. Adam, who, according to (Genesis 2:17), was supposed to die the day he ate from the Tree of Knowledge. But God showed mercy. Instead of immediate death, Adam was banished from Eden, living for 930 years. This banishment, the Midrash argues, is akin to the unintentional murderer seeking refuge. Adam brought death to humanity, yet was given a form of sanctuary. This act highlights a profound principle: even in the face of transgression, divine mercy seeks a path to redemption.

How would someone find these cities of refuge? Imagine being in a state of panic and grief, desperately trying to reach safety. God, according to this passage, anticipated this. "Prepare the way for you" (Deuteronomy 19:3), God tells Moses, meaning to create clear paths to the cities of refuge. As the text explains, markers were to be placed, inscribed with "Murderer, to the city of refuge," guiding the way. What does this tell us? That divine justice is tempered with compassion, ensuring that even those who have erred have a chance at atonement. If God makes a path for murderers to find refuge, how much more so for the righteous?

Of course, the cities of refuge were not for intentional murderers. The text makes this crystal clear: "And the murderer who smites a person unwittingly shall flee there – but not intentionally." If someone intentionally killed another and sought refuge, even clinging to the altar, they were to be brought to justice. The example given is Yoav, who fled to the altar but was ultimately killed. Why? Because, as (Exodus 21:14) states, "If a man acts intentionally against his neighbor [to kill him…you shall take him from My altar to die]."

Yoav's story is complex. He knew the law, so why did he seek sanctuary at the altar? The text suggests it was about legacy. Those executed by the court were not buried with their ancestors. Yoav preferred death at the altar, ensuring burial with his family. The text points out that David had commanded that Yoav be killed for the deaths of Avner and Amasa (I Kings 2:5). Yoav had followed David’s orders to have Uriya killed (II (Samuel 11:1)5), a deed that haunted David.

The text then explores the reasons for Avner's death. Some say it was because he treated the lives of young men as a game, citing II (Samuel 2:14): "Avner said to Yoav: Let the lads rise now and play before us." Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi offers another reason: Avner placed his name before David's in a message (II (Samuel 3:1)2). Others suggest it was because Avner failed to reconcile Saul and David, or because he didn't object to Saul's actions regarding Nov.

The narrative concludes with Rabbi Yehuda stating that all the curses David placed on Yoav were ultimately fulfilled in David’s descendants. Each curse, "zav" (discharge), leper, leaners on crutches, falling by the sword, lacking food, is linked to a specific descendant of David.

So, what are we left with? A powerful exploration of justice, mercy, and accountability. The cities of refuge offer a glimpse into God's compassion, providing a path to redemption for those who have erred unintentionally. But the story of Yoav reminds us that intentional acts of violence cannot be excused, even by seeking sanctuary. It's a complex tapestry, woven with threads of law, compassion, and the enduring consequences of our choices. It leaves us pondering the delicate balance between justice and mercy, and the profound responsibility we each bear for our actions.

Full source
Bamidbar Rabbah 3:1Bamidbar Rabbah

It all starts with the verse, "Bring the tribe of Levi near and stand it before Aaron the priest, and they shall serve him" (Numbers 3:5–6).

The text immediately connects this verse to (Psalms 92:13-14): “The righteous man will blossom like a palm tree; [like a cedar in Lebanon, he will grow tall]. Planted in the House of the Lord, [they will blossom in the courtyards of our God].” But why a palm tree? What’s so special about it?

The Midrash (rabbinic commentary) dives deep. "Just as this palm tree, its shade is far removed," the text says, "so, the righteous, the granting of their reward is far removed from them, until the World to Come." It suggests that true righteousness isn't about immediate gratification, but about a long-term commitment, a reward that may not be visible in this life.

There's more. The palm tree produces all sorts of things: juicy dates, unripe dates, even thorns! This, we’re told, is like the people of Israel. There are Torah scholars, plain folk, and those who are less knowledgeable. We're a diverse bunch, aren’t we? And just as some dates make it to the storehouse while others don't, some Israelites entered the Land of Israel while others didn’t. It's a reminder that not everyone reaches the same destination, but everyone has a role.

And those thorns? They represent the righteous! Anyone who doesn't protect themselves from the righteous, the text warns, will feel their bite like a snake. Whoa! Strong words. It emphasizes the power and importance of respecting those who dedicate themselves to righteousness. "All their statements are like fiery coals," the Midrash states, meaning their words can have a profound impact.

Here's where it gets really interesting. The palm tree has no waste! Dates for eating, soft branches for waving during Sukkot (the Feast of Tabernacles), hard branches for roofing a sukka (temporary dwelling), bast for ropes, leaves for sieves, planks for building. everything is useful. So too, we are told, with Israel. Some are masters of Bible, some of Mishna (oral law), some of aggada (storytelling), some perform mitzvot (commandments), and some give charity. Everyone has something to contribute!

And the heart of the palm tree? "Directed upward," the text says. "So, Israel, their heart is directed to their Father in Heaven." Our focus, our yearning, should be towards the Divine. As it says in (Psalms 25:15), “My eyes are always toward the Lord, for He takes my feet from the net.”

Rabbi Tanhuma even tells a story about a palm tree in Ḥamtan that wouldn't bear fruit until it was pollinated by a male palm from Jericho, the one it desired! This emphasizes that the righteous also have desire, and their ultimate desire is for the Holy One, blessed be He.

But the palm tree isn’t alone in this lesson. The text brings in the cedar tree too! After all, Psalms 92 mentions both. While the palm provides fruit, the cedar offers wood for crafting. "Utensils are crafted from cedars," we’re reminded. And just as both trees can be dangerous to climb without care, so too, anyone who confronts Israel will ultimately face consequences. Think of Pharaoh, who was afflicted after taking Sarah (Genesis 12:17).

The palm tree becomes a symbol of the tribe of Levi. Because they stood strong during the incident of the Golden Calf (Exodus 32:26), they were elevated. "Planted in the House of the Lord," the text says, referring to the Temple service and the dedication of the Levites.

So, what does it all mean? The palm tree isn't just a tree. It's a mirror, reflecting the diversity, the potential, and the aspirations of the Jewish people. It's a reminder that everyone has something to offer, that righteousness is a long-term commitment, and that our hearts should always be directed towards something higher. Next time you see a palm tree, take a moment. Consider its lessons. What can you learn from this ancient symbol? What can it teach you about your own life, your own community, your own relationship with the Divine?

Full source
Bamidbar Rabbah 9:45Bamidbar Rabbah

Bamidbar Rabbah turns to Aaron Beyond the Firmament.

They ask, what if this isn't just about a husband and wife? What if it’s an allegory for the relationship between God and Israel?

The Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary) interprets the "man" in the verse as none other than the Holy One, blessed be He! As it says in (Exodus 15:3), "The Lord is a Man of war." And who is the "wife" who might stray? According to (Hosea 2:18), God says, "…you will call Me my spouse [ishi]." That’s right, it's Israel!

So, when the verse speaks of a wife straying, the Rabbis see it as Israel straying from following God. Remember the Golden Calf incident? As we find in (Exodus 32:8), "They have quickly strayed [saru]," which is closely related to the word "stray [tiste]" in our original verse. The Midrash even points out the Aramaic translation, "They have quickly strayed [satu]."

And what is this "trespass" the wife commits? It's idol worship, of course! Bamidbar Rabbah connects this to (Numbers 31:16), "To commit trespass against the Lord in the matter of Peor."

The Midrash doesn't stop there. It continues to examine the verses, drawing parallels between the details of the suspected adulteress's situation and the events surrounding the Golden Calf.

For example, the verse says, "And a man had lain with her carnally [shikhvat zera].." The Rabbis connect this to Aaron, who crafted the calf. The "carnally" part? That refers to the way the calf was worshipped – by passing their offspring [zaram] before it in the fire, reminiscent of (Leviticus 18:21) where God says, "And you shall not give from your offspring [umizarakha] to pass to Molekh."

The verse continues, "And it was hidden from the eyes of her husband, and she was secluded.." The Midrash interprets this as Israel thinking they could hide their actions from God, echoing (Psalms 94:7) ("They said: The Lord will not see") and (Job 22:14) ("Clouds obscure for Him, and He does not see"). They believed they were acting in secret. As (Isaiah 29:15) says, "Woe to those who go to the depths from the Lord to conceal [lastir] a scheme […and they say: Who sees us and who knows of us]?"

Even the lack of a witness is interpreted symbolically: "And there is no witness [ve’ed] against her" means there was no prophet to warn them. They even killed Hur, who dared to rebuke them!

What about the "spirit of jealousy [kina]"? That, says the Midrash, refers to God's own jealousy, as stated in (Exodus 20:5): "For I, the Lord your God, am a jealous [kana] God." God warns Israel, just as it says in (Exodus 32:7): "Go, descend, because your people has become corrupted…"

The story culminates in the offering the husband brings on behalf of his wife. In our allegorical reading, "The man shall bring" refers to the Holy One, blessed be He, bringing His "wife," Israel, "to the priest," which is Moses. As (Psalms 99:6) says, "Moses and Aaron were among His priests." The offering of "one-tenth of an ephah of barley flour" represents the Ten Commandments, and the "barley flour" symbolizes how Israel, through idol worship, had become like dispersed flour. The lack of oil and frankincense signifies that God initially refused to be appeased, echoing His words in (Exodus 32:10) ("Now, let Me be…").

But ultimately, as we know, God relents. The priest brings her near, meaning Moses prays on their behalf. And God, in His mercy, forgives them, as it says in (Exodus 32:14): "The Lord reconsidered the evil."

So, what does this all mean? It's a powerful reminder that our relationship with God is like a marriage. It requires faithfulness, commitment, and a constant effort to stay true. And when we stray, as we inevitably do, repentance and forgiveness are always possible. The story of the Golden Calf, and the suspected adulteress, serves as a constant call to return to the covenant, to remember our commitment, and to strive for a deeper connection with the Divine.

Full source
Bamidbar Rabbah 19:2Bamidbar Rabbah

The Bamidbar Rabbah (Numbers Rabbah), a collection of rabbinic teachings on the Book of Numbers, dives into this very idea. It's almost like the Torah is trying to protect us, to elevate us even in the way it speaks.

"This is the statute of the Torah" – and the text reminds us of the verse from Psalms (12:7): "the sayings of the Lord are pure sayings, refined seven times." Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi makes a fascinating observation. He points out that God, in His infinite wisdom, sometimes adds extra words to the Torah in order to avoid directly uttering something impure.

Think about Noah's Ark. Instead of saying "impure animals," the Torah says, "From the pure animals, and from the animals that is not pure" (Genesis 7:8). And again, "and of the animals that are not pure" (Genesis 7:2). It's a subtle shift, but a powerful one. The Torah uses "not pure" (lo tehora) rather than "impure" (teme’a). Why?

Rabbi Yudan takes this idea further. When the Torah introduces the signs of impure animals, it begins with the signs of purity. Consider the camel. It's not written, "the camel, because it does not have split hooves," but rather, "[the camel,] because it brings up the cud [but does not have split hooves]" (Leviticus 11:4). Same with the hare and the pig. The Torah leads with a positive attribute before pointing out the deficiency. It's like the Torah is trying to find the good in everything, even in what is considered impure.

This reminds me of a beautiful teaching from Rabbi Yehoshua of Sikhnin in the name of Rabbi Levi: in the time of David, children, before they had "tasted sin," could expound the Torah with forty-nine reasons for purity and forty-nine reasons for impurity for any given question! Imagine that level of understanding, that innocent brilliance! David would pray for them, saying, "You, Lord, preserve them..keep their Torah in their heart..Keep them secure, from this generation, forever" (Psalms 12:8).

But here's the heartbreaking part: even with all that potential, all that divine protection, they would go to war and fall. Why? Because, there were slanderers, lashon hara, in their midst.

David lamented, "Amid lions, I lie among the eager, [men whose teeth are spears and arrows, whose tongues are a honed sword]" (Psalms 57:5). The text identifies these "lions" as scholars like Avner and Amasa, but the "eager" ones are identified with those eager to slander, like Do’eg and Aḥitofel. The Zifites, who betrayed David to Saul, are described as having tongues like "a honed sword" (Psalms 54:2). David then cries out, "Rise above the heavens, God" (Psalms 57:6) – remove Your Divine Presence from their midst!

The text draws a stark contrast: the generation of Ahab were idolaters, but because they had no slanderers, they were victorious in war! Ovadya's actions in hiding the prophets of God from Jezebel (I (Kings 18:1)3) show the importance of protecting those who speak truth. The text even points out the difficulty in getting them water, protecting these individuals was clearly a challenge. And Elijah, despite being seemingly alone (I (Kings 18:2)2), was supported by a people who kept silent rather than betray him.

The text takes an unexpected turn, recounting a conversation with a serpent. Why does it bite and kill? The serpent's answer is chilling: "If the serpent bites without a whisper, there is no advantage to the charmer" (Ecclesiastes 10:11). In other words, is it possible that I would do anything that was not stated to me from on High? It's a powerful statement about the destructive power of lashon hara, slander.

"Why do you bite one limb and all the limbs feel it?" the serpent is asked. And the serpent replies, "You say it to me? Say it to the master of the tongue [baal halashon], who is here and kills in Rome." Wow.

Why is slander called "third" – lishna telita’i, a "triple tongue"? Because, the text explains, it kills three: the speaker, the listener, and the subject. In Saul's time, it killed four: Do’eg, Saul, Aḥimelekh, and Avner.

The text then explores the reasons for Avner's death. Was it because he put his name before David's? Because he treated war like a game? Or because he didn't push for reconciliation between Saul and David? Each explanation highlights the devastating consequences of pride, recklessness, and a failure to promote peace.

Finally, the text analyzes the laws of the red heifer (parah adumah), a complex ritual purification process. Rabbi Ḥanan ben Pazi points out the repetition of "seven" throughout the passage – seven heifers, seven burnings, seven sprinklings, seven immersions, seven impure, seven pure, seven priests. If someone questions the number of times "priest" is mentioned, he explains that Moses and Aaron are included, as it is stated: "The Lord spoke to Moses and to Aaron, saying: This is the statute of the Torah" (Numbers 19:1–2).

So, what's the takeaway from all of this? It's a profound reminder of the power of words. The Torah is incredibly careful with how it speaks, avoiding even the slightest hint of impurity. And we, too, must be mindful of our own speech. Slander, gossip, and negativity can have devastating consequences, destroying individuals and even entire communities. Let us strive to use our words for good, to build bridges, and to promote peace and understanding. Let's cultivate a world where our words are as pure and refined as the Torah itself.

Full source
Midrash Tanchuma Buber, Masei 8:1Midrash Tanchuma Buber, Masei

(Numbers 35:9-10:) AND THE LORD SPOKE, WHEN YOU CROSS , etc. This is what Scripture says (in Psalms 25:8): GOOD AND UPRIGHT IS THE LORD; THEREFORE HE INSTRUCTS SINNERS IN THE WAY. (Ibid., verse 6:) REMEMBER YOUR MERCIES, O LORD, AND YOUR ACTS OF STEADFAST LOVE, etc. David said before the Holy One, blessed be He: Master of the Universe, were it not for Your mercies that went before the first man, Adam, he would have had no standing. For You said to him (in Genesis 2:17): FOR ON THE DAY THAT YOU EAT OF IT YOU SHALL SURELY DIE; yet You did not do so, but rather You sent him out of the Garden of Eden, as it is said (in Genesis 3:24): AND HE DROVE OUT THE MAN. And why was he driven out? Because he brought death to generations, he should have died immediately; but because You had mercy upon him, You drove him out, in the manner of one who kills by mistake, who is exiled to the cities of refuge. Therefore it is said: REMEMBER YOUR MERCIES, O LORD, AND YOUR ACTS OF STEADFAST LOVE, etc.

When Moses arose, the Holy One, blessed be He, said to him (in Numbers 35:11): YOU SHALL PROVIDE FOR YOURSELVES CITIES, etc. Moses said: Master of the Universe, this one who kills a person by mistake in the south or in the north, from where will he know where the cities of refuge are, so that he may flee there? He said to him (in Deuteronomy 19:3): YOU SHALL PREPARE FOR YOURSELF THE WAY, you shall make the way straight for yourself, so that they will not go astray, and the blood avenger find him and kill him, when he has no judgment of death. He said to Him: How? He said to him: Set up for them markers directed toward the cities of refuge, so that he will know to go there; and upon every marker is inscribed: "Killer, to the cities of refuge," as it is said (in Deuteronomy 19:3): YOU SHALL PREPARE FOR YOURSELF THE WAY, etc. Therefore David said (in Psalms 25:8): GOOD AND UPRIGHT IS THE LORD; THEREFORE HE INSTRUCTS SINNERS IN THE WAY. If for killers He made a path and a way that they might flee and be saved, for the righteous how much the more so! (Psalms 25:9:) HE LEADS THE HUMBLE IN JUSTICE.

Full source