6 min read

Four Courts Opened Over One Human Year of Judgment

Abaye sent a man to sow the fast grain while the slow crop still thrived. A sick scholar's friends kept praying. The court might still be open.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Seed Went Under First
  2. The Line Moved Like Sheep
  3. He Woke and the Court Was Open
  4. They Prayed After the Decree

The sick man was still breathing when the lamp guttered. His friends did not wait for Rosh Hashanah. They stood around the bed and cried out anyway, because Rabbi Joseph had said a decree might not have shut yet, and a voice could still get in.

Four Courts Opened Over One Human Year of Judgment Click for full size

Outside, in a field that did not care about the bed, Abaye watched the slow grain thrive and sent a man to sow the fast kind before the next court could weigh a seed still hiding. A crop already up has already passed one sitting. The seed in the bag has not.

The Seed Went Under First

On Passover the court was not looking at stalks already hardening toward harvest. Those had survived their accidents. The ruling fell on what had just been sown, the tender future still under soil. A farmer could sharpen the sickle and mend the cistern roof. He could not talk the court off the row he had just covered with his heel.

Raba said judgment on grain comes twice, at sowing and before reaping, so a blight before Passover and a blight after it are not the same paper. Abaye took that as work, not as a theory. He saw the slow grain thriving and shoved the fast seed in, so that by the time the next sitting opened the plant would already have begun and would not stand there naked as a new case.

On Shavuot the fruit stood in. Branches held their small green promises, and heaven measured what sweetness would reach a mouth months later. On Sukkot the water entered. Rain, cisterns, rivers, the thirst of beasts and children, all waiting on one decree. The field, the orchard, and the cloud could not speak. Their futures were being weighed anyway.

The Line Moved Like Sheep

Then came Rosh Hashanah. Human beings passed before God as sheep before a shepherd, one by one, heart by heart. The One who fashioned all hearts understands all their works (Psalm 33:15). Nothing had to be explained. No witness needed to be called. A person could hear the shofar (שופר), the ram's horn, and know the file had been opened on him.

Rabbi Meir gave the cleanest rhythm. Everyone is called to account on the New Year, and the sentence is fixed on Yom Kippur. The horn opens the court. The fast seals it. A person can hear that and know where to stand, when to plead, when to tremble, when to change. The sinner is not hunted by surprise. The calendar itself becomes a summons, and the summons gives time to return before the seal descends.

Rabbi Joshua accepted the yearly summons but divided its consequences by season. Grain at Passover. Fruit at Shavuot. Rain at Sukkot. Human fate completed on Yom Kippur. He would not let bread, fruit, water, and breath share one date as if they were one body. Each had to come up in its hour.

He Woke and the Court Was Open

Rabbi Jose would not leave a life inside appointed festivals. He lifted Job's words and set them at the bedside. "You remember him every morning" (Job 7:18). A person wakes, and the court is already open. Before bread. Before speech. Before the day's first excuse.

Rabbi Nathan pressed the verse even closer. God tests a person every moment. Not yearly. Not daily. Breath by breath the scale is alive. Jose would not borrow Nathan's verse, because trying is not the same as judging. He took another line instead, the one that asks God to maintain the cause of His servant and the cause of His people Israel every day (1 Kings 8:59). Every day. The king first, then the people, so the king does not sit outside while the court works itself into anger.

A student asked Jose whether a man could sleep through a morning and still claim he was waiting for Tishrei. Jose did not answer with a date. He pointed at the window, where the light was already up, and told the student to wash and pray as if the file had been pulled overnight. The student washed. He did not eat first.

They Prayed After the Decree

Back at the sickbed the friends were still crying out. Rabbi Joseph had named the reason they were allowed to. If Jose is right, and a man is judged every day, then prayer for the sick still has room to enter. A decree may be near. The door has not necessarily shut.

Rabbi Isaac made the door wider. Crying out is good before the decree and after it. A person does not know which court has convened, which paper has been signed, which mercy is waiting for a voice. The year is not a machine. It is a series of openings. The grain waits. The fruit waits. The rain waits. The sick person waits while friends pray at the bedside, and none of them can see which sitting they are standing in.

The man on the bed did not hear Meir's clean calendar or Nathan's every moment. He heard voices in a small room and the scrape of a stool. He breathed. The friends kept at it because Joseph had refused to tell them to wait for autumn. Outside, Abaye's fast seed was already in the dirt, racing a court the sick man would never walk to. Bread, fruit, rain, and breath were under different dates, and still the same pressure. Someone wanted a door that had not closed. Someone else wanted a crop that had already begun. The year turned with both of them in it, and no single hour held the whole weight.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

2 sources

The texts behind this telling. Some cards carry a translation of the source; others are our own retelling of it, and each card says which. Every card links out to the original.

Ein Yaakov, Rosh Hashanah 1:10Ein Yaakov, Rosh Hashanah

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.En Jacob, Agada of the Babylonian Talmud, S. H. Glick (1916-1921) · Public Domain

(8) With whose opinion does our Mishnah (the earliest code of rabbinic law) agree? Neither with that of R. Maier, nor with that of R. Juda, nor with that of R. Jose, nor with that of R. Nathan; for we are taught in a Baraitha that R. Maier says: "All are called to account on the New Year's Day, and on the Day of Atonement their sentence is fixed." R. Joshua says: "All are called to account on the New Year's Day, but each sentence is passed upon at its special time: on Passover in respect to grain; at Pentecost in respect to the fruit of the trees; at Tabernacles in respect to rain; and man is called to account on the New Year's Day, and his sentence is passed upon on the Day of Atonement." R. Jose says: "Judgment is every day passed upon men, as it is said (Job 7, 1) Thou rememberest him every morning." R. Nathan holds that men are judged at all times, as it is said (Ib.) Thou triest him every moment. [Hence our Mishnah agrees with no authority]. And if you should say that the Mishnah indeed agrees with the opinion of R. Juda, and our Mishnah refers to the passing of judgment, even so there would still remain difficulty about [the judgment of] men [for R. Juda says it is on the Day of Atonement, while our Mishnah says on New Year's Day]. Said Raba: "The Tana of our Mishnah is in accord with the academy of R. Ishmael; for it was taught in the academy of R. Ishmael: At four periods is the world judged: on Passover, in regard to grain; on Pentecost, in regard to the fruit of trees; on Tabernacles, in regard to rain; but man is judged on New Year's Day and the final sentence is passed upon him on the Day of Atonement. But our Mishnah speaks only about the opening of the trial. Said R. Chisda: "What is the reason of R. Jose's opinion?" Did not R. Jose give as reason the passage (Job 7, 18) Thou rememberest him every moment? We must therefore say that R. Chisda asked as follows: "Why does not R. Jose, in support of his opinion, quote the same passage as R. Nathan? Because trying is not judging, but merely investigating." If so, then remembering is also not judging, but merely investigating the case]. Therefore, said R. Chisda, the opinion of R. Jose is based on the following passage (I Kings 8, 59) That God may maintain the cause of His servant and the cause of His people Israel every day. Another thing said R. Chisda: "When a king and the people appear before justice, the king should be considered first; as it is written (Ib.) To maintain the cause of his servant (David, the king); and after this it says, and the cause of His people." Why so? If you wish, you may say because it would not be good ethics to have the king sit outside of the court during the trial of the people; and if you wish you may say, it [the king] should be tried before the court gets excited with anger. Said R. Joseph: "According to whom do we nowadays pray for the sick and for the faint [scholars]? It is according to the opinion of R. Jose [who maintains that man is judged every day]. And if you wish you can say it agrees even with the opinion of the Rabbis, as, for example, with that of R. Isaac who said that it is well that man should cry for help before as well as after, the divine decree."

Full source
Ein Yaakov, Rosh Hashanah 1:9Ein Yaakov, Rosh Hashanah

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.En Jacob, Agada of the Babylonian Talmud, S. H. Glick (1916-1921) · Public Domain

(7) (Fol. 16) MISHNAH (the earliest code of rabbinic law): At four periods in each year the world is judged; on Passover, in respect to the growth of grain; on Pentecost, in respect to the fruit of trees; on the New Year's Day all human beings pass before Him (the Lord) as sheep before a shepherd; as it is said (Ps. 30, 9) He who hath fashioned all their hearts understandeth all their works; on Tabernacles judgment is rendered in regard to water (rain). GEMARA (the rabbinic commentary on the Mishnah): Which stage of the growing grain [does the Divine judgment affect on the Passover]? Does it affect the standing crops which are about to be reaped? What judgment could effect them, since they are in existence despite all the preordained accidents that the standing crops had to undergo [before Passover]? The Mishnah does not refer to standing crops ready to be reaped, but to such that were just sown. Shall we then say that only one judgment is passed upon grain [for the period from sowing until reaping]? Have we not been taught in a Baraitha: If an incident or injury befall grain before the Passover, it was the result of a decree pronounced on the Passover prior to the sowing season; but if such an incident happened after the Passover, then it was the result of a decree that had been passed on the Passover immediately [preceding the sowing season]; if an accident of misfortune befall a man before the Day of Atonement, it was the result of a decree passed on the Day of Atonement prior to the accident; but if such an accident happened after the Day of Atonement, then it was the cause of a decree passed on the Day of Atonement immediately preceding the accident. Hence there are several decrees passed upon. Said Raba: "Infer from this that judgment is passed twice yearly, at sowing and before reaping." "Therefore," said Abaye, "when a man sees that the grain which ripens slowly is thriving, he should, as soon as possible, sow such grain as ripens quickly so that by the time of the next judgment the grain will already have begun to grow [thus avoiding one judgment]."

Full source