Parshat Noach5 min read

How the Sons of Japheth Named Every Nation

After Babel scattered humanity, the sons of Japheth walked into empty lands and stamped their names on every river, city, and people they found.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Scattering After the Tower
  2. The Sons Who Named the Lands
  3. What the Tower Left Behind
  4. A Table Becomes a Story

The Scattering After the Tower

When the tower fell silent and the languages broke apart, the sons of men had no choice but to walk. They moved in families, in clans, in small groups clutching whatever they could carry, and they spread toward the four corners of the earth. For a generation, the whole world had spoken one tongue. Now every household woke to a language the neighbors could not follow. The common project was finished. The ground under the tower still held the imprint of a million footsteps going up and coming down, but the builders were gone.

Japheth's sons were among those who walked. Seven of them, named in the Torah's Table of Nations: Gomer, Magog, Madai, Javan, Tuval, Meshekh, and Tiras. They had grown up in a world where everything was still unnamed in the final sense, where the land was old but the maps were not yet drawn. So they drew them by walking through them.

The Sons Who Named the Lands

The Book of Jasher, an ancient Hebrew text referenced in the Torah itself, records what happened after the dispersal. The sons of Japheth and their children divided themselves across the face of the earth, each group carrying a name and leaving it wherever they settled. Cities were called after the men who built their first walls. Rivers took the names of the men who first waded across them. Whole peoples became known by the name of the ancestor who had gathered them in one place and told them: this is where we stay.

Gomer's children settled in what later ages would call one of the great northern territories. Madai's descendants moved toward the east and became the Medes. Javan's sons went west into the islands and the coastal lands where a civilization of sailors and scholars would one day flourish. Tuval and Meshekh filled out the northern reaches. Tiras and his children found their own territories and set their names on the stone.

The Targum Pseudo-Jonathan, the Aramaic translation of Genesis composed in Palestine and reaching its final form around the seventh century CE, presses even harder. It gives the sons their addresses in the language of the known world: Gomer becomes Afriki, Magog becomes Germania, Madai becomes Medi, Javan becomes Makadonia, Tuval becomes Iatinia, Meshekh becomes Asia, Tiras becomes Tharki. Stop and read that list again. Africa. Germany. Media. Macedonia. Italy. Asia. Thrace. The translator is pointing at real places on the map of the Roman world and saying: every one of these nations, even the ones that would one day rule over Israel and destroy its Temple, has a name in the family tree. They are not strangers. They are cousins.

What the Tower Left Behind

The Legends of the Jews preserves a detail about the tower itself that puts the dispersal into sharper relief. The tower had grown so tall that a man who dropped a brick at the top would take a full year to hear it hit the ground. The builders had stopped mourning when a worker fell to his death, because workers were replaceable. They wept when a brick was lost, because bricks were not. The tower had turned human beings into tools and tools into sacred objects, and it took the confusion of languages to undo the logic entirely.

When the families of Japheth walked away from the wreckage, they were carrying something the tower's builders had forgotten how to carry: the weight of a name that belonged to a person rather than a project. They could name rivers after themselves because they were people again, not components. The dispersal was a punishment, but it was also a restoration. The world got its maps. The nations got their founders. The family of Noah spread across the face of the earth and left their names on it like a signature on a document that was still being written.

A Table Becomes a Story

Genesis 10 lists these names in parallel columns, one generation after another, without comment on who built what or settled where. Scanning the list brings in the sound of them: Gomer, Ashkenaz, Riphath, Togarmah. Javan, Elishah, Tarshish, Kittim, Dodanim. They are names without faces, ancestors without scenes.

But the older traditions refused to let them stay that way. Behind each name was a man who had once stood on empty ground and looked out across territory that had no name yet, and who had built something there and called it after himself. Behind each name was a family that had survived the tower and the scattering and the confusion of tongues, and had found a place in the world and put down roots. The Table of Nations is not an abstraction. It is a record of what happened when the world was young and every nation on earth was one man's grandchild deciding where to make his home.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

4 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Jasher 10Book of Jasher

The version

Chapter 10 picks up after the Tower of Babel. Remember that story? Humanity, united and speaking one language, tries to build a tower reaching to heaven. God, not thrilled with this ambition, scatters them across the earth and confuses their languages. What happens next?

The Book of Jasher tells us that after this scattering, the sons of men "spread forth into many divisions… dispersed into the four corners of the earth," each family developing its own language, settling its own land, and building its own cities. Each group named their new home after themselves, their children, or significant events. It's a story of rebuilding, of diversification, and of laying the foundations for the world as we know it.

Specifically, the text details the descendants of Noah's sons – Japheth, Ham, and Shem – and the lands they populated. The sons of Japheth, according to Jasher, spread throughout Europe and parts of Asia. We hear about the Francum (likely the Franks) in the land of Franza (France), the Bartonim in Bartonia (perhaps Britain), and the Javanim in Makdonia (Macedonia). The children of Tugarma are said to have become ten families, settling in the north and building cities along the rivers Hithlah and Italac. It's like a very ancient, somewhat speculative, map of the world taking shape.

Then comes the line of Ham, traditionally associated with Africa and parts of the Middle East. His descendants, including Cush, Mitzraim (Egypt), Phut, and Canaan, also built cities and named them accordingly. We even get a mention of the infamous cities of Sodom and Gomorrah, built by four men who named them after themselves.

Finally, we have the line of Shem, often associated with the Semitic peoples. His descendants, including Elam, Ashur, Arpachshad, Lud, and Aram, also went their separate ways, building cities and establishing their own identities. We learn that Ashur and his family ventured to a distant land and built the cities of Ninevah, Resen, Calach, and Rehobother, remaining there to this day.

It's fascinating to see how this text attempts to connect biblical figures to later nations and cultures. It's important to remember that this is one particular tradition, and not necessarily a historically accurate account. Modern historians and linguists have different theories about the origins of languages and the migrations of peoples.

But the Book of Jasher isn't really trying to be a modern history textbook. It's more interested in telling a story about origins, about how the world as the author knew it came to be. It’s about giving names and identities to the nations, grounding them in a biblical narrative.

It’s also a reminder that even after a cataclysmic event like the Tower of Babel, humanity persevered. People rebuilt, they adapted, and they created new societies. Each group, while distinct, was still part of the larger human family, descended from Noah and ultimately connected to one another.

What does it all mean? Perhaps it's a call to remember our shared ancestry, even as we celebrate our diverse cultures and identities. Maybe it’s an encouragement to build bridges, rather than towers that reach for the sky in hubris. Whatever you take away from it, the Book of Jasher offers a unique and thought-provoking glimpse into how one ancient tradition understood the origins of our world.

Full source
Legends of the Jews 4:100Legends of the Jews

Years blurring into decades, every thought, every action geared toward one monumental goal. That’s the story of the Tower of Babel, but not just the part The familiar version gives us about God scattering the people. This is about the human cost, the sheer, unwavering, almost terrifying devotion of its builders.

The tower, according to the legends, took many, many years to construct. It grew so tall, so impossibly high, that it took a full year just to climb to the top. Can you picture that? A year-long ascent! It really puts the scale of the endeavor into perspective, doesn’t it?

The Zohar, that foundational text of Jewish mysticism, and Ginzberg, in his masterful retelling in Legends of the Jews, paints a grim picture of the builders’ priorities. A single brick, baked in the sun and destined for the tower, became more valuable than a human life. If a worker fell from the dizzying heights, plunging to their death, no one cared. No one mourned. But if a brick fell? Oh, that was a tragedy. Tears would flow, because replacing that single brick would take another year.

It’s a chilling illustration of misplaced values, isn’t it? The ambition to reach the heavens had completely warped their sense of humanity.

And it gets worse.

According to the Midrash Rabbah, their obsession was so complete that even the miracle of childbirth was secondary to the task at hand. When a woman in the brickyards went into labor, she wasn't allowed to stop working. She would mold bricks as she gave birth, then tie the newborn child to her body with a sheet, and just keep on molding. Unbelievable. This wasn't just about building a tower. It was about a collective madness, a single-minded pursuit that sacrificed everything – even the most basic human decencies – at the altar of ambition.

What does this story tell us about ourselves? About our own ambitions? About the things we value, and the price we're willing to pay to achieve them? Are we so focused on our goals that we lose sight of the human element, the very thing that makes life worth living? Food for thought, isn't it?

Full source
Targum Pseudo-Jonathan on Genesis 10:2Targum Pseudo-Jonathan on Genesis

Targum Pseudo-Jonathan on (Genesis 10:2) does something the plain biblical list never does, it gives the sons of Japheth their addresses. Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Thubal, and Meshek, and Thiras. And the names of their provinces, Afriki, and Germania, and Medi, and Makadonia, and Iatinia, and Asia, and Tharki.

Stop and read that list again. Afriki. Germania. Media. Macedonia. Italy. Asia. Thrace. The Targum is pointing to real places on the map of late antiquity, the known world of the Roman Empire and beyond. The seven sons of Japheth become the seven great gentile geographies.

This is Jewish ethnography at its most bold. Pseudo-Jonathan wants you to see that every nation, even the ones that will later rule over Israel or wage war with Jerusalem, has a name in the family tree of Noah. Rome descends from Japheth. So does Greece. So does the ancient kingdom of Media, which would one day produce the Persian sages who met Esther's generation.

The Maggid lingers on this for a reason. The Table of Nations is not a tedious genealogy. It is Torah's declaration that all peoples are cousins, mapped from a single ark.

The takeaway: before we argue with any nation, Torah reminds us they share a grandfather with us. The seven of Japheth and the rest of Noah's line spread across the whole earth, but the common root was a wooden boat.

Full source
Bereshit Rabbah 37:1Bereshit Rabbah

Bereshit Rabbah turns to The Descendants of Yefet and the Nations They Became.

The text dives right in, identifying Gomer, Magog, and Madai with Africa, Germania, and Madai (which, makes sense. ). Then we have Yavan, Tuval, and Meshekh, equated with Macedonia, Isnia, and Tonia. It’s like a puzzle, fitting names to places, trying to make sense of the world through the lens of scripture.

What about Tiras? Here, we encounter a bit of disagreement. Rabbi Simon says Tiras is Persia. But the Rabbis (plural, a broader consensus) suggest it's Thrace, an area encompassing parts of modern-day Greece, Turkey, and Bulgaria. Already, we see different opinions, different interpretations, reflecting the vibrant pattern of rabbinic thought.

Moving on to the sons of Gomer: Ashkenaz, Rifat, and Togarma (Genesis 10:3). Our text links them to Asia, Adiabene, and Germania. But wait, Rabbi Berekhya chimes in, suggesting that Germania might actually be Germanicia, a city in ancient Syria. These aren't just dry historical facts; they're glimpses into how these scholars understood their world, drawing connections that might seem surprising to us today.

Then come the sons of Yavan: Elisha, Tarshish, Kitim, and Dodanim (Genesis 10:4). These are linked to Hellas (Greece), Tarsus, Italia (Italy), and Dardania. Here's where things get even more interesting. We have a textual wrinkle. One verse says "Dodanim," but another, in I (Chronicles 1:7), says "Rodanim." Is it a mistake? Or does it hold deeper meaning?

Rabbi Simon and Rabbi Hanin offer interpretations. Rabbi Simon suggests Dodanim refers to the fact that they were Israel’s cousins (benei dodin). Rodanim, on the other hand, implies that they would come and oppress (rodin) them. It's a play on words, a clever way to explain the shifting relationship between Israel and these other nations. They were sometimes seen as kin, sometimes as oppressors.

Rabbi Hanina adds another layer: “When Israel is ascendant, they say to them: ‘We are your cousins,’ and when they are in decline, they come and oppress them.” In other words, these nations’ behavior towards Israel depended on Israel’s own standing in the world. A poignant observation on power dynamics and the complexities of international relations, even thousands of years ago.

What’s the takeaway from all this? It's not just about memorizing ancient names and locations. It's about understanding how our ancestors made sense of their world, how they used scripture to map out their place in the cosmos, and how they grappled with the ever-changing relationships between nations. And perhaps, it's a reminder that even today, those relationships are often shaped by power, perception, and the ever-present human tendency to see others as either kin or foe.

Full source