Parshat Vayetzei4 min read

Laban Embraced Jacob to Search Him for Hidden Gold

When Jacob arrived in Haran empty-handed, Laban's welcome embrace was not affection. The midrash says he was frisking his nephew for a hidden fortune.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. A Scene That Looks Like a Reunion
  2. The Frisk
  3. The Prophet and the Calculation
  4. The Scheme That Followed

A Scene That Looks Like a Reunion

Laban hears that his sister Rebekah's son is at the well. He runs out to meet him. He embraces him, he kisses him, he brings him into his house (Genesis 29:13). Read quickly, it is the warmth of family reunion after decades of silence. A young man who had fled from his brother's rage and walked hundreds of miles is finally received by kin.

The Legends of the Jews, Louis Ginzberg's vast compilation of rabbinic traditions, strips the warmth off the scene immediately. Laban had heard that Eliezer, Abraham's servant, had arrived in Haran a generation earlier with ten camels laden with gifts when he came seeking a bride for Isaac. The logic of family arithmetic was straightforward: Abraham's grandson was arriving now. Where were the gifts?

The Frisk

Laban embraced Jacob and felt for gold. The midrash is explicit: the embrace was a search. He pressed his hands along Jacob's body looking for hidden wealth. He found nothing. Jacob had left Beer Sheba carrying nothing but a staff. He had fled from Esau in a hurry, with no time to pack a caravan of gifts and no caravan to pack. He arrived at his uncle's house exactly as empty-handed as he appeared.

Laban, frustrated, moved from the physical search to the verbal one. He asked after Jacob's wealth directly. When Jacob explained, when it became clear that this nephew had arrived with nothing, Laban recalibrated quickly. He consulted his teraphim, his household divination objects. They gave him a warning he had not expected: do not send him away. This man's fortune, his mazal, his star, is coming behind him.

The Prophet and the Calculation

Laban was not generous by instinct. He was calculating by instinct. The teraphim told him Jacob's luck was on its way, and Laban believed the teraphim. He would house the nephew. He would feed the nephew. He would wait for the luck to arrive and position himself to benefit from it.

The midrash notes that Jacob's own tears at their meeting were not tears of joy. He was weeping from a comparison he could not stop making. Eliezer had arrived here with ten camels bearing gifts when he came seeking a wife. Jacob had arrived with a staff. He had nothing to offer Rachel. He could see already how this household worked, and he could see that he had arrived inside it at the worst possible moment of his life, with the man who ran it already disappointed.

The Scheme That Followed

A month passed, and Laban's calculation deepened. The Book of Jubilees, which retells Genesis in a priestly calendar framework from the second century BCE, adds an ethical dimension the other accounts leave implicit: it is very wicked to give the younger before the elder, a commandment framed as a principle of natural order. Laban was already planning to violate it. He would offer Jacob both daughters and would position the one Jacob did not want as the one that had to come first.

The scheme was not impulsive. Laban consulted the teraphim again when he needed advice on how to hold Jacob. Their answer was direct: a wife is his wage. He had something Jacob wanted more than gold. He would use it as the price for twenty years of service, switching the daughters on the wedding night, resetting the terms every time Jacob tried to leave, extracting everything the arriving luck had promised would come.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

6 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Legends of the Jews, VI. Jacob, Jacob With LabanLegends of the Jews

Legends of the Jews (Ginzberg) turns to Jacob With Laban.

Apparently, the locals were shocked by such displays of affection, and they criticized Jacob for it. According to Ginzberg, their strictness stemmed from a desire to avoid the immorality that had led to the Flood. The gossip and judgment even brought Jacob to tears!

Why the tears? Was it just from the reprimand? No, there was more to it than that. Jacob couldn't help but compare himself to Eliezer, his grandfather Abraham's servant. Eliezer had arrived in Haran with ten camels laden with gifts when seeking a bride for Isaac. Jacob, on the other hand, had nothing. Nothing to offer Rachel. As if that wasn't bad enough, Jacob also foresaw that Rachel wouldn't be buried beside him, a thought that filled him with sorrow.

Upon learning that Jacob was her cousin, Rachel rushed home to tell her father, Laban. Now, Laban...he was a character. He immediately thought of Eliezer’s lavish arrival and assumed Jacob must be carrying a fortune. When he saw Jacob was empty-handed, Laban suspected he might be hiding riches in his girdle or even his mouth! He hugged and kissed Jacob, all in a desperate attempt to find hidden treasure. Can you imagine?

When Jacob explained that he had been robbed by Eliphaz (Esau's son!), Laban was dismayed. Jacob recounted how he'd convinced Eliphaz to spare his life and instead take all his possessions, arguing that the descendants of Abraham were destined for servitude and that it was better for him to fulfill that destiny by losing his wealth than by losing his life. (This idea of the "descendants of Abraham" being obligated to serve for four hundred years is a fascinating one, found also in (Genesis 15:13) and (Exodus 12:40).)

Laban, now realizing Jacob had no money, consulted his teraphim (household idols) for advice. These idols, as Ginzberg tells us, warned Laban to keep Jacob around, saying his presence would bring good fortune. So, Laban, ever the schemer, sought a way to keep Jacob in his service. The teraphim suggested offering Jacob a wife, knowing his interest in women would keep him from leaving.

Laban then asked Jacob what he wanted as wages. Jacob, completely smitten with Rachel, declared that he only wanted her as his wife. Rachel, aware of her father's cunning, warned Jacob that he was no match for Laban's trickery, to which Jacob replied, "I am his brother in cunning!" (A playful echo of their ancestor's, Abraham, dealings perhaps?)

Rachel then revealed Laban's plan to marry off her older sister, Leah, first. To avoid being tricked, Jacob and Rachel devised a secret sign so he could identify her on their wedding night. Despite all precautions, Laban, as we know, was not easily outsmarted. Jacob’s careful wording of the marriage agreement – specifying “Rachel, not Leah; your daughter, so you don't bring me some other woman named Rachel; the younger daughter, so you don't exchange their names in the meantime” – proved futile. As the saying goes, "It profits not if a villain is cast into a sawmill."

Laban deceived not only Jacob but also the wedding guests, setting the stage for a dramatic and complicated family saga.

So, what does this all mean for us? Maybe it's a reminder that even auspicious beginnings can have their challenges. That even when fate seems to be on our side, we still need to be cautious and prepared. And perhaps, most importantly, it's a lesson in the enduring power of love, even in the face of deception and hardship. After all, it was Jacob's love for Rachel that drove this whole story forward, shaping the destiny of generations to come.

Full source
Legends of the Jews 6:116Legends of the Jews

Laban, in the Bible, certainly felt that way about his nephew, Jacob.

Laban wasn't exactly known for his generosity. When he heard about Jacob's arrival, penniless and seeking refuge, he was, shall we say, less than thrilled. "What?!" he likely grumbled, "Am I supposed to feed and house this guy for a month? A year maybe? He’s arrived with absolutely nothing!"

Sounds pretty selfish. But Instead of relying on his own judgment (or lack thereof), Laban turned to his teraphim (תְּרָפִים). These teraphim were household idols – sort of like ancient fortune-telling devices. He consulted them, asking for advice on what to do with this suddenly-appeared nephew.

The teraphim gave him quite a surprising answer.

They warned him, "Don't you dare send him away! His mazal, his star, his constellation, is so incredibly lucky that everything he touches will turn to gold. The blessing of the Lord will rest on everything you do, in your house and in your fields, all because of him.”

Wow. Can you imagine hearing that?

Laban, a shrewd businessman if nothing else, understood the implication immediately. This Jacob, this seemingly destitute relative, was actually a golden ticket. According to this particular legend, Laban wasn't acting out of kindness or familial love. He was acting in his own self-interest.

The Zohar, that foundational text of Kabbalah, often explores the hidden meanings behind biblical stories. It suggests that even seemingly mundane events have deeper spiritual significance. In this case, Laban's reliance on idols highlights the contrast between true blessing and perceived fortune. Did Laban ever truly understand the source of the blessing? Or did he just see Jacob as a means to an end?

This little snippet from Legends of the Jews, as retold by Ginzberg, makes you think, doesn't it? How often do we judge people based on their initial appearance or circumstances? How often do we fail to recognize the potential blessings hidden within unexpected encounters? And how often do we chase after what appears lucky, rather than seeking true, lasting blessing?

Full source
Legends of the Jews 6:117Legends of the Jews

Sometimes, the answers are stranger than it first appears. Let's

Laban, as we know, wasn't exactly winning any "Uncle of the Year" awards. He wanted to keep Jacob around, benefiting from his hard work and, let's be honest, probably just his sheer presence. But how to do it? He was in a bit of a pickle, unsure how to approach Jacob. Offering him more work seemed risky. What if Jacob demanded something outrageous in return?

So, what did he do? He consulted his teraphim.

teraphim are a fascinating and somewhat mysterious part of the ancient Near East. They were household idols, often believed to possess prophetic powers (Judges 17:5, (Ezekiel 21:2)6). Laban relied on them for guidance. What did these idols advise? The answer is… well, quite something.

"A wife is his wage," they reportedly told him. "He will ask nothing else of thee but a wife. It is his nature to be attracted by women, and whenever he threatens to leave thee, do but offer him another wife, and he will not depart." (Legends of the Jews).

Can you believe that? The idea that Jacob could be essentially… bribed… into staying with the promise of marriage. It paints a rather unflattering picture, doesn't it? Both of Jacob and of Laban’s manipulative tendencies.

According to this particular legend, Laban thought Jacob was so easily swayed by the prospect of marriage that he wouldn't even consider asking for anything else. Just dangle a wife in front of him, and poof, any thoughts of leaving would vanish. It's a pretty cynical view of love and relationships, isn't it?

This little tidbit, found in Ginzberg's retelling in Legends of the Jews, really highlights the complex and often morally ambiguous characters we encounter in these stories. Was Jacob really so easily manipulated? Was Laban truly that calculating? Or is this a commentary on the societal expectations and power dynamics of the time?

It certainly makes you wonder about the role of women in these narratives, doesn't it? Were they seen as mere bargaining chips in the games of men? Food for thought,.

Full source
Book of Jubilees 28:14Book of Jubilees

Book of Jubilees turns to Laban Tricks Jacob Into Marrying Leah First.

Chapter 28? It's all about Jacob, Leah, and Rachel. The familiar version gives us the basic story: Jacob loves Rachel, but Laban tricks him into marrying Leah first. But the Book of Jubilees adds a layer of ethical concern we might not have considered.

The passage begins with a strong commandment: "And command thou the children of Israel that they do not this thing; let them neither take nor give the younger before they have given the elder, for it is very wicked."

Whoa. Did you catch that?

This isn't just about Laban being sneaky. It's about a fundamental principle of fairness. The younger before the elder? The Book of Jubilees frames this as "very wicked," a violation of natural order, a disruption of what's right. It's a pretty blunt assessment, isn't it?

Now, the narrative unfolds. Remember, Jacob has already unknowingly married Leah. Then, Laban makes his proposition. “Let the seven days of the feast of this one pass by, and I shall give thee Rachel, that thou mayest serve me another seven years, that thou mayest pasture my sheep as thou didst in the former week.”

Seven more years!

The Book of Jubilees highlights the specific timeframe, emphasizing the length of Jacob’s continued servitude. It’s not just a matter of days or weeks. It’s another seven years of his life dedicated to Laban. Talk about commitment!

And then, the deed is done. “And on the day when the seven days of the feast of Leah had passed, Laban gave Rachel to Jacob, that he might serve him another seven years."

The starkness of this passage is striking. It's a simple statement of fact, yet it carries the weight of Jacob's disappointment, Laban's manipulation, and the Book of Jubilees’ condemnation.

What does it all mean? The Book of Jubilees isn’t just telling a story; it’s teaching a lesson. It's saying that even in love, even in pursuit of our deepest desires, we must uphold ethical principles. The order of things matters. Fairness matters.

And perhaps, it's a reminder that sometimes, the things we work hardest for come with unexpected costs. Costs that might make us question whether the prize was truly worth the price. We're left wondering: what does it truly mean to earn something, if the way we acquire it violates a fundamental sense of right and wrong? A question worth pondering long after the story ends.

Full source
Yalkut Shimoni on Torah 124:7Yalkut Shimoni on Torah

"And Jacob told Rachel that he was her father's kinsman and that he was Rebecca's son" (Genesis 29:12). If it be for trickery, "he was her father's kinsman" [like Laban]; and if it be for righteousness, "he was Rebecca's son." "And she ran and told her father." A woman is accustomed to go only to her mother's house. But it is written, "and told her father"? He said: her mother had died, and to whom did she have to tell it, if not to her father.

"And when Laban heard the report of Jacob his sister's son" (Genesis 29:13). He said: When Eliezer, who was merely the household's [servant], came, it is written of him, "And the servant took ten camels"; how much more so this one, who is the beloved of the house! And when he saw nothing on his back, "and he embraced him", he said, Perhaps they are gold coins, and he is carrying them in his belt. And when he found nothing, "and he kissed him", he said, Perhaps they are jewels, and he is holding them in his mouth. And when he found nothing, he said: What did you think, that I came laden with money? I did not come laden with anything but words. "And he recounted to Laban all these things."

"And Laban said to him: Surely you are my bone and my flesh" (Genesis 29:14). He said: I had supposed I would make you king over me; but since you have nothing with you, you are my bone and my flesh, like this bone, I will crush you. "And he stayed with him a month of days", this teaches you proper conduct: how long is a man obligated to take in his relatives? Up to a month. "And Laban said to Jacob: Because you are my kinsman [shall you serve me for nothing]?" (Genesis 29:15). And if not, would you serve me for free? Is such a thing possible? Rather, if a worker was worth ten coins, he would give him five; and if he hired him for six coins, he would give him three. He said to him: What do you suppose, that I came seeking money from you? I came only for the sake of your two daughters.

"And Laban had two daughters" (Genesis 29:16), like two beams running through from one end of the world to the other. This one raised up chieftains and this one raised up chieftains; this one raised up kings and this one raised up kings; from this one arose slayers of lions and from this one arose slayers of lions; from this one arose conquerors of lands and from this one arose conquerors of lands; from this one arose dividers of lands and from this one arose dividers of lands. The offering of this one's son overrides the Sabbath, and the war of this one's son overrides the Sabbath. To this one were given two nights and to this one were given two nights: to Leah, the night of Pharaoh and the night of Sennacherib; and to Rachel, the night of Gideon and the night of Mordecai, "On that night the king's sleep fled" (Esther 6). "The name of the elder was Leah", great (gedolah) in her gifts: priesthood forever and kingship forever. "And the name of the younger was Rachel", small (ketannah) in her gifts: Joseph for a time, Saul for a time.

Full source
Midrash Aggadah, Genesis 29:13Midrash Aggadah

"And it came to pass, when Laban heard", he rejoiced with great joy in his heart. He said: Eliezer the servant of Abraham brought much money; this one, all the more so. Immediately, "and Laban ran to meet him," out of his great joy.

"And he embraced him", he was feeling about in his bosom [to see] whether he had brought money or not, and he did not find any. Laban said: Perhaps a pearl was placed in his mouth. Immediately, "and he kissed him," to know whether he would find the pearl.

"And he brought him to his house", he said: Perhaps he has money with him and will leave it in the house. And he still did not trust him, until he went with him in the outer house and searched out his needs. "And he recounted to Laban", Jacob recounted to him how the matter of Eliphaz had been, that he had robbed him of his money.

Full source