4 min read

Nimrod Died Because Esau Wanted the Coat of Adam

Esau came home exhausted the day he sold his birthright. The midrash says he had just killed someone. That someone was Nimrod, and the reason was a garment.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Garment That Began With Adam
  2. What the Coat Made Nimrod
  3. The Day Esau Came in From the Field
  4. The Coat That Changed Hands Again

The Garment That Began With Adam

When Adam and Eve left Eden, God made them garments of skin. The plain text of Genesis says this. It does not say what those garments were made of or what they could do. The midrashic tradition has an extensive answer to both questions.

The garments were not ordinary clothes. They were sewn from the light of the primordial world, or from the skin of the Leviathan, depending on the tradition, and they carried within them a dominion over the animal kingdom. The creature who wore them was recognized by every animal as the master of the created order. They bowed. They submitted. They did not flee.

The coat passed from Adam to his son Seth, from Seth through generations to Noah, and from Noah's son Ham the garment passed, by theft or inheritance, to Ham's descendant Nimrod. This is why Genesis 10:9 calls Nimrod a mighty hunter before the Lord. He was not extraordinary as a hunter by skill. He was extraordinary because of what he was wearing. The animals came to him. They did not run.

What the Coat Made Nimrod

With the coat Nimrod made himself a king. He gathered the animals to him, fed the people from the hunt, and leveraged his apparent supernatural authority over wildlife into political authority over humans. The tradition preserved in Otzar Midrashim describes him as a king who declared himself a god. He had the oracle of the stars, which told him that a child would be born who would oppose him and defeat him. He built a palace and posted guards at the entrance and ordered that every pregnant woman who came through the gates be registered, and every male child of the dangerous generation be killed.

He was thinking of Abraham, who was born in that generation and hid in a cave for years. He was not thinking of Esau, who would not be born for another several centuries. But the coat connected them across the generations.

The Day Esau Came in From the Field

Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer, the early medieval narrative midrash from Palestine, reads the day Esau sold his birthright as the day he had just committed murder. The Torah says he was exhausted from the field. The midrash says the field was a battlefield and the body on it was Nimrod's. Rabbi Tanchuma describes the divergence between Jacob and Esau in stark terms: the one went by the way of life, the other went by the way of death. The day of the birthright was a specific death, with a specific victim and a specific motive.

Esau wanted the coat. Nimrod had it. Nimrod was the most powerful hunter in the world because of what he was wearing, and Esau was also a hunter, a man who lived by the field, a man who understood what dominion over animals was worth. He killed Nimrod and took the garment.

Then he ran home because people were coming to avenge the killing, and he threw himself at Jacob's lentil soup and traded away everything he had been born into for a bowl of food.

The Coat That Changed Hands Again

The garment of Adam reappears later in the patriarchal story. Rebekah, who understood what was at stake with the blessing and the birthright, dressed Jacob in Esau's garments when she sent him to receive Isaac's blessing. Some traditions identify those garments with the original coat: it had come from Eden to Nimrod to Esau, and it sat in Esau's house, and Rebekah knew where it was.

Isaac, whose eyes were dim, smelled the garment and said the smell was like the smell of the field which the Lord had blessed. The field that smelled of blessing was not a specific location. It was the original dominion, the one that had belonged to Adam before any field had a name. The garment carried that smell across the centuries, from the garden to the cave to the hunter to the murderer to the younger son standing at his father's deathbed.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

3 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Legends of the Jews 4:94Legends of the Jews

Our tales are full of such figures, some righteous, some…not so much. to the story of one of the first: Nimrod.

His origin is a bit unusual, right from the start. Nimrod was born to Cush and his wife in their old age. Can you imagine how special that child would be? A late-in-life miracle! According to Ginzberg's retelling in Legends of the Jews, Cush loved Nimrod dearly and gave him an extraordinary gift: the clothes made of skins that God Himself had fashioned for Adam and Eve after they left Paradise.

Wait a minute… Adam and Eve's clothes? How did that happen? Well, the story goes that these weren't just any clothes. They had a special power. These garments had been passed down through generations: from Adam and Eve to Enoch, then to Methuselah, and finally to Noah, who took them into the ark. As we find in Midrash Rabbah, these were no ordinary threads!

Then, things get a little… sneaky. When the inhabitants of the ark were about to disembark, Ham, one of Noah's sons, stole the garments and hid them, eventually passing them on to his firstborn, Cush. Cush, in turn, kept them hidden for many years until his son Nimrod turned twenty. What a family heirloom!

But here's where the story gets really interesting. These clothes weren't just a fashion statement. They possessed a remarkable power. Anyone who wore them was said to be invincible and irresistible. The Zohar tells us that certain objects can hold spiritual power, and these clothes were a prime example. As soon as the animals of the forest caught sight of Nimrod wearing them, they bowed down before him! And in battles with men, he was always victorious.

Of course, nobody knew the real source of Nimrod’s strength. They attributed it to his personal bravery and skill. So, naturally, they appointed him king. After all, who wouldn't want to be ruled by someone who seemed so powerful?

This happened after a conflict between the descendants of Cush and the descendants of Japheth. Nimrod, wearing those magical garments, triumphed over the enemy with the help of only a few warriors. He then chose Shinar (שִׁנְעָר), the ancient name for Mesopotamia, as his capital. From there, he expanded his dominion further and further, using both cunning and force, until he became the sole ruler of the entire world.

According to the Legends, Nimrod was the first mortal to hold such universal sway. It's a fascinating parallel, isn’t it? The story says that the ninth ruler to possess the same power will be the Messiah. So, this idea of a single, all-powerful ruler, whether for good or ill, has deep roots in our tradition.

What does this tell us about power, clothing, and perception? Is it about inherent strength, or the illusion of it? And what does it say about our longing for a single, unifying leader, someone who can bring order to chaos – a longing that can be both a blessing and a curse? Food for thought, isn't it?

Full source
Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer 32:12Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer

Take the tale of Jacob and Esau, those iconic twins from the Book of Genesis. We know their story. Isaac and Rebekah's sons, forever locked in sibling rivalry. But Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer, a fascinating early collection of biblical stories and elaborations, gives us a particularly stark portrayal of their diverging destinies.

Rabbi Tanchuma, a well-respected sage, offers a powerful image: "The two lads grew up; the one went by the way of life, and the other went by the way of death." Dramatic, isn't it? It's a blunt assessment, but then again, the stakes are high when we are talking about the future of a family, a nation, and an idea.

He hangs this observation on the familiar verse from Genesis (25:27): "And the boys grew, and Esau was a cunning hunter." But it's what Rabbi Tanchuma adds that's so striking. He explains that Jacob, by "dwelling in tents," was in fact walking "the way of life," dedicating himself to Torah study "all his days."

"dwelling in tents" isn't just about camping out. In this context, it symbolizes a life devoted to learning and spiritual growth. Jacob chooses a life of introspection and connection to the divine.

And Esau? According to Rabbi Tanchuma, he "went on the way of death." Why such strong language? Because, we're told, Esau not only murdered Nimrod (yes, that Nimrod, the mighty hunter) and his son Chavir, but he also plotted to kill his own brother, Jacob. As Rebekah overhears in (Genesis 27:41), Esau says, "The days of mourning for my father are at hand; then I will kill my brother Jacob."

That’s So, what are we to make of this dramatic contrast? Is it simply a story of good versus evil? A predetermined fate? Or does it point to something deeper about the choices we make and the paths we choose to walk?

Perhaps Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer is suggesting that the "way of life" isn't just about studying sacred texts, but about choosing connection over violence, learning over destruction, and ultimately, life over death. And that maybe, just maybe, the choice is always ours to make.

Full source
Avraham our Father, The Story of Avraham our Father and NimrodOtzar Midrashim (Eisenstein)

It was said before Abraham was born. Nimrod was a heretic concerning the truth of the lord blessed be he. He was conceited and he said that he himself was a God. And the people of his time served and bowed to him. He was so - an established king, and he was wise and he saw in the wisdom of the stars that there will be one man born in his time that will oppose him and deny him from his faith and he will be victorious over him. And he [Nimrod] trembled with a great fear. What did he do? He sent after his lesser officers and he told them this matter. He consulted them about what to do concerning this future child that will come. They advised him "we agree on the following: that you will build a great palace and place guards in the opening and declare among your kingdom that every woman that they pass through and come there after...[unknown]... if it's a son, you will slaughter him on her womb and if it's a daughter, it will live and you will give gifts to the mother and dress her in royal garments and they will call before her. Such will be done to a mother of a daughter. When Nimrod hear their advice, he was greatly gladdened much so. He declared in all the countries of his kingdom that there will come all the nations to build a great palace for the king 60 ama high, 80 ama long. After it was completed, he declared that all the women shall come and pass through the house and remain there until they gave birth. He commanded officials to bring them there....[unknown]... He decreed that the born son will be slaughtered on the chest of the mother and if a daughter, the mother was dressed in clothing of fine linens and silks colorfully embroidered and she will go out from there and they will give her much honor. So commanded King Nimrod and they left the house with honor.

Full source