6 min read

Noah and Pharaoh Both Walked Away Limping

Pharaoh sat down on the gold throne Solomon had sent as a marriage payment. He did not know the mechanism. A lion of gold tore into his leg.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Throne That Bit Back
  2. Good, Pure, and Locked Out
  3. A Name Wider Than the Ark
  4. Midwives, Memory, and the Road Past Injury

Noah stepped off the ark onto wet ground and the lion was already watching. The world had been washed clean of every other threat, and still a beast from the cargo turned and closed its jaws on the man who had kept it alive through the flood. Teeth found flesh. Noah staggered. When he walked again, he walked with a limp that never fully left him.

Noah and Pharaoh Both Walked Away Limping Click for full size

Righteous. Faultless in his generation (Genesis 6:9). Saved when the windows of heaven opened. The flood had not promised an unscarred exit. One fate waits for the righteous and the wicked, Ecclesiastes says, and a limp marks both ends of that hard sentence (Ecclesiastes 9:2).

The Throne That Bit Back

Pharaoh sat down on a throne that was not built for ignorance. Solomon had given it as payment when Pharaoh's daughter entered the royal house, a machine of gold and mechanism, lions and steps arranged so that a man who did not know the seat would find the seat knew him. Pharaoh did not know the seat.

He settled his weight. The hidden work of the throne moved. A lion of the mechanism found him the way the flesh-and-blood lion had found Noah. Pain tore through a leg. When Pharaoh rose, he rose limping, a wicked king marked with the same animal signature the righteous survivor had carried out of the ark.

Noah built. Pharaoh oppressed. Two limps, one sentence, no soft edge on the scandal. One fate still wrote the same injury across both bodies. Justice under the sun does not always sort cleanly in the flesh. The limp is the proof the verse was not poetry alone.

Servants steadied Pharaoh. He cursed the throne and the gift and the marriage price. The limp stayed. Across centuries of retelling, Noah's limp stayed too, a private weather system in the first steps of a reborn world.

Good, Pure, and Locked Out

"For the good," the sages name Moses, the infant of whom it was said that he was good (Exodus 2:2). Rabbi Meir even heard circumcision already present in that word. "For the pure" names Aaron, busy purifying Israel. "For the impure" names the scouts who slandered the Land. Moses and Aaron praised the Land and still died outside it, sharing an exclusion with the mouths that had poisoned the report.

One fate again, not as a joke but as a pressure. The man who sacrifices, like Josiah pouring animals into a national Passover, and the man who does not sacrifice, stand under the same wide sky of event. Names pile up until the verse stops being abstract. Bodies that served and bodies that betrayed can share a border they did not choose.

Noah limped. Pharaoh limped. Moses stood on Nebo and looked at a country his feet would not enter. The wicked and the pure do not become the same kind of soul. They can still meet the same kind of closed gate in the flesh.

A Name Wider Than the Ark

Against that hard leveling the tradition sets something that outruns furniture and even holy furniture. Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai said a good name is more beloved than the Ark of the Covenant. The Ark traveled only a limited road, three days' journey seeking a resting place (Numbers 10:33). A good name crosses from one end of the world to the other.

David's name went out into all the lands, and fear of him settled on the nations (1 Chronicles 14:17). Priesthood can lapse. Kingship can end. A good name keeps walking after the oil dries and the crown is stored. The disciples of Rabbi Abba and Abba Tzidoni, in the name of Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman, added that the tribes were more beloved in death than in life. Only after death did the full count of their names become a merit written for their children, six names set on the priestly stones in a way life had not yet locked (Exodus 28:10).

Noah's limp was a fate shared with a wicked king. Noah's name was not. The ark rested. The name of the man who walked out of it, scarred and still chosen, kept moving through every generation that retold the flood.

Midwives, Memory, and the Road Past Injury

Rabbi Yehuda opened the names of the midwives, Shifra and Pu'a, and found Yokheved and Miriam inside them. Shifra, who tended children, who procreated, who helped Israel multiply even under a decree of drowning. A good name can hide inside a work name until the work is done and the true name steps forward.

Pharaoh limped and remained Pharaoh, a title heavy with drowning orders and hard labor. Noah limped and remained the man who planted and failed and began again. One fate touched the leg. It did not write the same sentence on the tongue that later generations would say aloud.

At night Noah's hand found the old scar without meaning to. Rain on the roof still made him listen harder than other men. Far away in a later palace, a different lion, metal and cunning, had taught a different man the same limp for a different reason. Between them Ecclesiastes held its bleak equality. Above them a good name kept traveling farther than any ark on poles, farther than any throne with hidden teeth, out to the edges of the world where limps are forgotten and only the name still walks without a cane.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

2 sources

The texts behind this telling. Some cards carry a translation of the source; others are our own retelling of it, and each card says which. Every card links out to the original.

Kohelet Rabbah 1:3Kohelet Rabbah

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.The Sefaria Midrash Rabbah, 2022 · CC-BY

Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai, a prominent figure in the Zohar (the foundational text of Jewish mysticism), puts it this way: a good name is more beloved than the Ark of the Covenant itself! Now, that's a pretty bold statement. The Ark, the most sacred object, only traveled a limited distance – three days, as we see in (Numbers 10:33), seeking a resting place. But a good name? That travels from one end of the world to the other.

How? Well, look at David. (1 (Chronicles 14:1)7) tells us, "The name of David went out to all the lands; and the Lord imposed fear of him upon all the nations." A good name resonates far beyond physical boundaries. It's a legacy, evidence of character, a ripple effect of positive influence.

It doesn’t stop there. According to Rabbi Shimon, that good name is even more precious than priesthood or kingdom. Why? Because those things can fade, they can lapse. But a good name? That endures.

Then the disciples of Rabbi Abba and Abba Tzidoni, speaking in the name of Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman, offer another angle: the tribes are more beloved in their death than in their lifetimes. It seems counterintuitive. But they point out that during their lives, it wasn't written "Six of their names," while after their deaths, it was (Exodus 28:10). Only after their deaths did the remembrance of their names become a source of merit for their descendants. It’s like the full impact of their lives wasn’t truly felt until after they were gone.

Now, let’s talk about names themselves. Rabbi Yehuda dives into the meaning behind the names of the midwives, Shifra and Pu’a, in (Exodus 1:15). He identifies them as Yokheved and Miriam, respectively, and unpacks the layers of meaning embedded within their titles. Shifra, he suggests, might be Yokheved because she would "tend to" (mishaperet) the children. Or, perhaps, it’s because she "procreated" (shepara verava) – giving birth to Moses at the remarkable age of one hundred and thirty! Another interpretation is that the Israelites procreated due to her, or that she bettered (shiperu) the Israelite women with mitzvot (commandments), good deeds. She could even be named Shifra as praise (of her character), as we see a similar word used in (Job 26:13): “With His breath the heavens were calmed [shifra].”

And Pu’a? Rabbi Yehuda connects that name to Miriam, who would make a comforting sound (po’a) to the women in labor, helping them through childbirth. Alternatively, Pu’a could be linked to her cries (po’a) and weeping over her brother Moses when he was cast into the Nile. Another interpretation suggests that Pu’a revealed (hofia) the actions of her brother, prophesying about him even before he was born, according to Etz Yosef. Or perhaps she stood boldly (pa’at) before Pharaoh, warning him of the Day of Judgment!

The Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary) goes on to teach us that we are called by three names: the one our parents give us, the one others call us, and the one we are called in the book of our lineage. This third name, written by God, spans from Creation to the end of all generations. It's our true name, the one that expresses the purpose for which we were created.

So, what's in a name? Apparently, everything. It's a reflection of our character, our actions, our legacy, and ultimately, our purpose in this world. And maybe, just maybe, striving to live up to a "good name" is the most enduring thing we can do.

Full source
Kohelet Rabbah 1:1Kohelet Rabbah

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.The Sefaria Midrash Rabbah, 2022 · CC-BY

The book of Ecclesiastes, or Kohelet in Hebrew, certainly does. And the rabbis of the Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary), in Kohelet Rabbah, wrestled with it too. Specifically, they hone in on a verse that really throws a wrench into our sense of justice: "Everything is as it is for everyone; there is one fate for the righteous and for the wicked…" (Ecclesiastes 9:2). How do we make sense of that?

Rabbi Shimon bar Abba kicks things off by offering examples. “The righteous”? That’s Noah. A man so righteous that God saved him from the flood. (Genesis 6:9) tells us, "Noah was a righteous man, he was faultless." But, according to the Rabbis, even Noah wasn't immune to suffering. The story goes that when he came out of the ark, a lion bit him, leaving him with a limp.

"the wicked?" Well, who's a better example than Pharaoh? But hold on, the Rabbis point out that Pharaoh, in his own way, also experienced a similar fate. When he went to sit on the throne that Solomon had given him as payment for his daughter's hand in marriage (Solomon, ever the diplomat!), he didn't know how it worked, and he was bitten by a lion and left limping! So, righteous Noah and wicked Pharaoh – both ended up with a limp. “There is one fate for the righteous and for the wicked,”.

The Midrash continues, piling on more examples. "For the good" – that's Moses, of course. (Exodus 2:2) says, "She saw him, that he was good." Rabbi Meir even suggests that "good" here refers to the fact that Moses was already circumcised. "And for the pure?" That's Aaron, busy with purifying the people of Israel. But then, "for the impure?" That's the scouts who slandered the Land of Israel, leading to the Israelites' extended wandering in the desert. Moses and Aaron, who spoke so highly of the land, were ultimately denied entry, just like those who spoke against it.

Then we have "one who sacrifices," like Josiah, who, as we read in II (Chronicles 35:7), generously donated to the people for the Passover offering. And "one who does not sacrifice," like Ahab, who actually stopped people from bringing sacrifices to the Temple in Jerusalem. But both, in the end, met a violent end, dying by arrows.

The examples keep coming, each one hammering home the same point. "Like the good," David, described in I (Samuel 16:12) as being "of good appearance." Rabbi Yitzchak adds that David was "of good appearance in halakha," meaning his wisdom and knowledge of Jewish law were so radiant that anyone who saw him would be reminded of it. "So is the sinner," Nebuchadnezzar, who, as (Daniel 4:24) tells us, was advised to "redeem your sins with charity." David built the foundations of the Temple (according to some traditions), and ruled for forty years. Nebuchadnezzar destroyed it and also ruled for forty years. "One fate."

And what about oaths? "One who takes an oath," like Zedekiah, who, as II (Chronicles 36:13) recounts, rebelled against Nebuchadnezzar despite swearing an oath to him. Rabbi Yosei says the oath was taken on the covenant of circumcision, while Rabbi says it was on the altar. And "one who is apprehensive of an oath," like Samson, who, in (Judges 15:12), asks the men of Judah to swear they won't harm him themselves. Zedekiah and Samson? Both ultimately had their eyes gouged out.

Finally, the Midrash offers one more chilling pair: "For the righteous," Aaron's sons, and "for the wicked," the congregation of Korach, who rebelled against Moses and Aaron. Both groups approached the altar, and both suffered fiery deaths. As (Leviticus 16:1) somberly states, "After the death of the two sons of Aaron.."

So, what are we left with? Is the Midrash suggesting that righteousness doesn't matter? That there's no divine justice? Not exactly. Instead, it seems to be confronting the complexities of life, acknowledging that suffering and reward aren't always neatly aligned. Maybe the point isn't to find a perfect equation, but to accept the mystery and to strive for righteousness even when the world seems unfair. Maybe it's about recognizing that fate, whatever it may be, is just one part of the story, and that our choices, our intentions, and our actions ultimately define who we are.

But perhaps, in acknowledging the seeming randomness of life, we can find a deeper appreciation for the moments of goodness, and a renewed commitment to creating a more just and compassionate world. Because, ultimately, what else can we do?

Full source