Parshat Noach5 min read

Noah Saw Demons Courting His Sons After Flood

The water was gone. The ground still held the shape of the sea. Shem, Ham, and Japheth stood while their father named what had already begun.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. A Father's Ban on Blood
  2. The Waters Rose at Peak Green
  3. God Remembered a Name and the Beasts
  4. Clean Beasts on a New Altar

Noah stood on drying ground and watched his children the way a man watches a fire that has already burned his city once. The water was gone. The fear was not.

Noah Saw Demons Courting His Sons After Flood Click for full size

"I see, and behold the demons have begun their seductions against you and against your children," he said.

Shem looked at the mud. Ham looked at the hills. Japheth looked at his father. The new world flinched.

A Father's Ban on Blood

Ark-wood still creaked in memory. Fresh soil smelled clean. The old man smelled blood waiting to be spilled again.

"After my death you will shed human blood and be wiped from the earth," he said. Whoever sheds a man's blood, whoever eats the blood of flesh, will be destroyed. No seed left under heaven for the eater of blood or the spiller of it. He spoke the two as one poison with two mouths.

The demons had not drowned with the wicked. Seductions restart as soon as feet find mud. The Flood was water. The next ruin, he knew, could be chosen cup by cup and knife by knife.

Sons who had watched the world die now heard that the world could die again by their own hands. He named agents. He named consequences. He left them no fog to hide in.

The Waters Rose at Peak Green

He looked at green returning to the hills and did not trust green alone. Green had been thick when the windows of heaven opened.

The six hundredth year of his life, the second month, the seventeenth day (Genesis 7:11). The season when everything sprouts. Wheat in the ear. Barley filling. Trees just beginning to set fruit. If the waters had fallen after harvest, when the fields were already bare, a man might have called the flood a cleaning. It fell at the hour of plenty, so no one could call judgment a favor to agriculture.

"Behold, all nature holds its own productions," the voice had said when the rain began. Wheat. Barley. Seed brought on to complete generation. "But you corrupt its mercies."

Noah, building an altar in that same ordered cosmos of months, remembered the precision. The God who schedules catastrophe also schedules memory. Mercy and judgment share a calendar. That knowledge kept his joy from turning stupid.

God Remembered a Name and the Beasts

"God remembered Noah and every living thing" (Genesis 8:1). The verse named the man. It named the beasts. It named the cattle. It did not add his wife. It did not add the sons standing in the mud.

Noah heard his own name spoken from heaven and looked at the household around him as if they had been folded inside that one word. When a house is of one mind, one name can carry it. The beasts came before the cattle in the remembrance, wildness named first, as if the untamed had to be held before the tame could be kept.

Survival had never been random drift. It was a date, a door shut, a door opened, a name recalled. The children stepped closer. He did not pretend they had been forgotten. He had been named, and they had lived inside the naming.

Clean Beasts on a New Altar

He took of the clean cattle and the clean birds and offered whole burnt offerings (Genesis 8:20). Everything on that altar had already been gift. He returned first fruits of a spared menagerie.

The altar was how he fought the future he feared. Not with another hull of gopher wood, but with fire that said the new ground is claimed for thanks before it can be claimed for murder. The children watched. The demons, in his seeing, watched too. Smoke went up as a boundary marker. This family would at least begin by giving back.

Ash settled on his beard. Hands that had sealed pitch into seams now sealed a covenant gesture into the first post-Flood air. He offered the clean animals whole. He offered them as if sight and thought had to go up with the smoke, unpolluted, before the next hunger could take the ground.

Rainbow light, if it already stood, did not cancel his speech. Promise from Heaven and vigilance from Noah were meant to share the same sky. The children stepped carefully around the altar stones. Somewhere a demon, in his telling, learned that this family had been warned in public, and that a public warning is harder to unwind than a private fear.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

4 sources

The texts behind this telling. Some cards carry a translation of the source; others are our own retelling of it, and each card says which. Every card links out to the original.

Book of Jubilees 7:38Book of Jubilees

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.Sefaria Community Translation · CC-BY

The Book of Jubilees, a text considered canonical by some but not included in the standard Hebrew Bible, gives us a peek into Noah's anxieties about the future. Specifically, Jubilees 7. And it’s heavy stuff.

Noah, having witnessed the utter devastation of the flood, is deeply concerned about the future of humanity. He's not just worried about another flood, but about something far more insidious: the influence of demons. The world is starting over, but are the spiritual dangers truly gone?

“For I see, and behold the demons have begun (their) seductions against you and against your children," Noah laments. He's witnessing the subtle, creeping influence of these entities, and it scares him, profoundly.

His big fear? That humanity will succumb to violence. He warns his children: "…now I fear on your behalf, that after my death ye will shed the blood of men upon the earth, and that ye, too, will be destroyed from the face of the earth."

This isn't just a vague prophecy. It’s a direct warning against bloodshed.

The text gets even more specific, laying down a very clear prohibition: "For whoso sheddeth man's blood, and whoso eateth the blood of any flesh, will all be destroyed from the earth."

It's not just about the act of killing, but also about the potential for internalizing violence, for absorbing its essence. It speaks to the idea that violence corrupts, not just the victim, but also the perpetrator.

And the consequences? Utter annihilation. "And there will not be left any man that eateth blood. Or that sheddeth the blood of man on the earth, Nor will there be left to him any seed or descendants living under heaven." A stark and terrifying vision of a future wiped clean.

Noah’s words are a powerful reminder. Are we vigilant against the forces that might lead us towards violence and destruction? Are we mindful of the subtle ways that negativity can seep into our lives and the lives of our children? It’s a question worth pondering, even thousands of years after Noah voiced his concerns.

Full source
The Midrash of Philo 11:2The Midrash of Philo

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.The Works of Philo Judaeus, trans. C. D. Yonge, London, H. G. Bohn, 1854-1890 · Public Domain

Sometimes, the smallest detail holds a hidden universe. Take the timing of the great flood. It wasn't just any time. The Torah is very specific, telling us the deluge began "in the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, in the second month, on the seventeenth day of the month" (Genesis 7:11). But the Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary), that incredible pattern of interpretation and commentary, dives even deeper.

The Midrash of Philo, a collection of interpretations attributed to the Jewish philosopher Philo of Alexandria, offers a fascinating perspective. It suggests that the flood actually began during the vernal equinox – a time of rebirth and renewal. Why this specific time?

Well, Philo argues that the sacred historian, meaning the author of Genesis, was meticulously accurate in fixing the day and month when the deluge began, pointing us to the twenty-seventh day of the seventh month, which he connects to the vernal equinox. This is the time when life bursts forth, when seeds sprout and plants grow. It's a period of abundance and fertility.

So, why unleash destruction at such a promising time? According to Philo, it's precisely because of this abundance that the punishment is so severe. Imagine: nature is at its peak, offering its bounty, and humanity is simultaneously corrupting these gifts. It's a stark contrast, a profound betrayal of the divine purpose. Philo puts it powerfully, saying that God is essentially telling humanity, "behold..all nature contains its own productions within itself..but you, like mortals, corrupt its mercies."

Now, consider the alternative. What if the flood had occurred during the autumnal equinox, after the harvest, when the fields are bare? Philo suggests it wouldn't have been seen as such a harsh punishment. It might even have been viewed as beneficial, a cleansing of the land.

The timing is also linked to the creation of Adam. Just as Adam, the first human, was created during the vernal equinox, so too does the "new beginning" after the flood, with Noah, coincide with this time of renewal. Noah, in a way, becomes a second Adam, a fresh start for humanity. As Philo says, "the first beginning of the generation of our race, after the destruction caused by the deluge, commenced with Noah, men being again sown and procreated, therefore he also is recognised as resembling the first man born of the earth."

And what about the number 600, Noah's age when the flood began? Philo connects this to the number six, the number associated with creation itself. He sees it as a divine rebuke: God created the world through the number six, yet humanity's wickedness was so extreme that He had to destroy it, essentially undoing His creation. Philo states that "the world was created under the number six, therefore, by this same number does he reprove the wicked."

So, the next time you read the story of Noah's flood, remember that it's not just a tale of destruction. It's a story about timing, about the contrast between divine gifts and human corruption, and about the possibility of renewal, even after utter devastation. The Midrash of Philo invites us to contemplate the deeper meanings woven into the narrative, revealing layers of wisdom that speak to us even today. What does it mean to corrupt the divine gifts in our own time?

Full source
The Midrash of Philo 20:9The Midrash of Philo

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.The Works of Philo Judaeus, trans. C. D. Yonge, London, H. G. Bohn, 1854-1890 · Public Domain

He sacrifices some animals. End of story. But what if there was a deeper meaning hidden within those verses?

That's what the Midrash of Philo explores when it asks about (Genesis 8:20): "He took of the cattle and of the flying animals, and he offered whole burnt offerings on the altar." Philo, a Jewish philosopher from Alexandria, writing in the first century, wasn't just interested in the literal act. He wanted to understand the inner significance.

He starts by reminding us that everything Noah offered came from God in the first place. It was a gift, freely given. And Noah chose the clean animals, the ones deemed pure and acceptable. He burned them as "entire and pure first fruits."

Here’s where it gets interesting. Philo argues that these animals also represent something else entirely.

He suggests that the "clean cattle" and "clean birds" symbolize the outward senses and the intellect of a wise person.: our senses – sight, hearing, touch – connect us to the world, like cattle grazing in a field. And our intellect, soaring like a bird, allows us to reason and understand.

These animals, then, become metaphors for our thoughts, the very contents of our minds. And Philo argues that a truly wise person offers these in their integrity, as a perfect, unpolluted offering to God. It's about dedicating our minds, our thoughts, and our senses to something higher, offering them as a display of gratitude to the Father.

It transforms a simple act of sacrifice into a profound spiritual exercise. It's not just about burning animals on an altar. It's about purifying our thoughts and dedicating our minds to the divine. It's about offering the best of ourselves, not just the best of our livestock.

So, next time you read about Noah’s sacrifice, remember Philo’s interpretation. Consider what you are offering to the world, what thoughts and intentions you are dedicating to something greater than yourself. What are your "clean cattle" and "clean birds," and how can you offer them as a pure and unblemished sacrifice? Perhaps that is the truest offering of all.

Full source
The Midrash of Philo 1:1The Midrash of Philo

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.The Works of Philo Judaeus, trans. C. D. Yonge, London, H. G. Bohn, 1854-1890 · Public Domain

They weren't afraid to ask the tough questions.

Take this one, for example, posed in The Midrash of Philo: Why does the Torah specifically mention that God remembered Noah, the animals, and the livestock after the flood subsided (Genesis 8:1), but conspicuously leaves out his wife and children? Did God forget about them? Did they not matter as much?

Ouch.

It seems a bit harsh. After all, Noah's family was right there with him, enduring the same trials and tribulations. They helped care for the animals, kept the Ark afloat, and basically ensured the survival of humanity. Shouldn't they get a shout-out from the Torah, too?

The question itself highlights a fascinating aspect of rabbinic thought. They weren't afraid to confront the text, to question its nuances, and to seek deeper meaning beyond the literal words. This wasn't about finding fault, but about unlocking hidden truths. They saw the Torah as a living document, constantly speaking to new generations.

So, what’s the answer? Why the apparent omission? The Midrash of Philo doesn't explicitly offer a solution here, leaving room for interpretation and further discussion. Perhaps the omission was intentional, prompting us to reflect on the often-unseen contributions of women in biblical narratives.

Or perhaps, by mentioning Noah, the text implicitly includes his entire family. After all, he wouldn’t be Noah without them, would he?

Whatever the reason, this seemingly simple question opens up a rich and complex conversation about memory, recognition, and the value of every individual, both great and small. And that, my friends, is the magic of Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary). It invites us to think, to question, and to find ourselves within the ancient stories.

Full source