5 min read

The Locked Garden Held Israel Together in Egypt

Vayikra Rabbah reads Egyptian slavery as a time when Israelite women, men, and elders guarded their bodies and held the world from collapse.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. Something Living Stayed Locked Inside
  2. The Exception Proved the Pressure
  3. A Handful of Quiet Was Worth Two Handfuls of Toil
  4. Moses Needed Wings
  5. Ten Sins and What Showed

Something Living Stayed Locked Inside

Pharaoh owned the labor. He owned the clay and the brick quotas and the backs bent double under the sun. He owned the fear that moved through the camps at night when the taskmasters counted the piles and found them short. But he did not own everything. Something stayed locked inside the people, and Vayikra Rabbah, compiled in fifth-century Palestine, said that locked thing was what brought them out.

The Song of Songs called it plainly: a locked garden is my sister, my bride. A locked fountain. A sealed spring. Rabbi Pinchas read those images not as praise of a woman but as praise of a people under pressure. The married women: a locked garden. The virgins: a locked fountain. The men who guarded themselves: a sealed spring.

Egypt could not get in. That was the claim. And because Egypt could not get in, Israel could be led out.

The Exception Proved the Pressure

One woman broke. Her son, whose father was an Egyptian, is named in Leviticus 24:11 in a way that no other individual in the long wilderness narrative is named. The exception was so rare that it required a name. Vayikra Rabbah noticed this. The single case stood out against a background of general fidelity so complete that the exception had to be recorded as anomaly rather than example.

This was the midrash's method of argument: find the outlier and let it testify about the rule. The one locked door that opened under force revealed how many doors had stayed shut. The one breach in the garden wall confirmed how solid the rest of the wall had been.

A locked garden was not an image of coldness. Something fragrant and living was inside it. Something that Pharaoh, for all his soldiers and all his cruelty, did not get to enter or possess.

A Handful of Quiet Was Worth Two Handfuls of Toil

But Egypt's damage ran in more directions than the obvious one. The pressure was not only physical. Vayikra Rabbah opened one teaching with Ecclesiastes: a handful of tranquility is better than two handfuls of toil and herding wind. The meal offering in Leviticus 2, the voluntary gift of the ordinary Israelite who brought fine flour and oil rather than an animal, became an occasion for this proverb.

The person who brought a small meal offering was not poor in the contemptible sense. The person who brought a small meal offering had made a different calculation. Two handfuls of wind-chasing wealth or a single palm of genuine peace, of doing what mattered with what was actually at hand. The midrash refused to let the small offering be embarrassing. It made it into an argument against anxiety.

Israel had survived Egypt by protecting something interior. The same interior discipline that kept the garden locked also knew when enough was enough, when the scramble for more was only another kind of slavery dressed in freedom's clothing.

Moses Needed Wings

When Moses stood before Pharaoh, he did not stand alone. He stood with elders. He stood with the accumulated weight of men and women who had maintained their dignity through generations of forced labor. Rabbi Akiva put it as a simile: Israel is like a bird. A bird cannot fly without its wings. Israel could not move without its elders.

Moses carried Joseph's bones out of Egypt. That act was not only piety. It was remembrance. Joseph had been sold into slavery by his brothers and had risen to save the region from famine without losing his commitment to integrity. His bones were a portable record of what it looked like to stay whole under pressure. Moses carried the record so the people could carry the example.

The elders were living examples of the same thing. Torah scholarship, according to Rabbi Yosei bar Chalafta, was the mechanism by which the community's accumulated wisdom was preserved and transmitted. Without the elders, the community lost its wings. It could not rise.

Ten Sins and What Showed

Vayikra Rabbah was not naive about the pressures Egypt had created. It knew that people broke. It listed ten sins that could bring tzaraat on a person's skin, beginning with idol worship and moving through murder, sexual immorality, theft, and slander. The list acknowledged that slavery and humiliation were not clean. They created temptations. They created desperation. They created resentments that came out as lashon hara, evil speech, against neighbors and against God.

The skin that showed the consequence was not a judge. It was a mirror. It reported what had already happened internally, so that the community could address the rupture and begin repair. The priest who examined the spot and declared it dim was not condemning. The priest was starting the process of recognition that led to restoration.

What had locked the garden was the same thing that made the skin's report bearable: the knowledge that the community was oriented toward wholeness. The locked spring, the sealed fountain, was not merely self-protective. It was the condition under which healing remained possible.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

6 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Vayikra Rabbah 32:5Vayikra Rabbah

Vayikra Rabbah turns to Israelite Women Guarded Their Virtue in Egypt.

Rabbi Pinchas offers an interpretation: "A locked fountain – these are the virgins. A locked garden – these are the married women. A sealed spring – these are the males." The implication? That the Israelites, by and large, maintained sexual fidelity and purity, especially in the face of hardship and temptation. The Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary) emphasizes that the one Israelite woman who didn't maintain this standard is specifically called out by name (Leviticus 24:11), highlighting just how rare her transgression was.

It’s further taught in the name of Rabbi Natan that the "locked garden" and "locked fountain" can also be understood as alluding to "typical and atypical" forms of intercourse – that is, vaginal and anal intercourse. This suggests a broader commitment to sexual boundaries and sanctity within the Israelite community.

The story goes deeper. Rabbi Pinchas, again in the name of Rabbi Ḥiyya bar Abba, takes it a step further: "A locked garden… because Israel restrained themselves from licentiousness in Egypt, they were delivered from Egypt." Their self-control, their commitment to a moral code, was directly linked to their eventual freedom. Shelaḥayikh, "your branches" in the Song of Songs (4:13), becomes shiluḥayikh, "your being sent out." The very act of restraint paved the way for their exodus.

And it wasn't just a collective effort. Individual acts of righteousness played a crucial role, too. Rabbi Huna, citing Rabbi Ḥiyya bar Abba, points to Sarah and Joseph. Sarah, when taken by Pharaoh, resisted temptation, and her virtue influenced all the women around her. Joseph, facing Potiphar's wife, famously resisted her advances, setting an example for all of Israel. These individual acts of kedushah (holiness), of holiness and separation, rippled outwards, strengthening the entire community.

In fact, Rabbi Ḥiyya bar Abba states that this restraint from licentiousness alone would have been sufficient for Israel to be redeemed!

Rav Huna, in the name of bar Kappara, gives us four reasons for Israel's redemption: they did not change their name, their language, they did not speak slander, and there was not one among them who was found to be steeped in licentiousness. They held onto their identity, their heritage, and their integrity. They maintained their Hebrew names, refusing to adopt Egyptian ones. They continued to speak Hebrew, as evidenced by (Genesis 14:13) and (Exodus 5:3). They refrained from lashon hara, slanderous speech, even when entrusted with sensitive information (Exodus 11:2).

And as we've seen, they largely avoided licentiousness, with the single exception serving to underscore the rule. The Midrash even explores the name of that woman, Shelomit bat Divri, to extract meaning. Rabbi Levi suggests that “Shelomit” means she was overly friendly and talkative with everyone, which led to her transgression. "Daughter of Divri" implies she caused a "davar," a matter, to befall her son. And "of the tribe of Dan" signifies a disgrace to him, his family, and his tribe.

So, what can we take away from this Midrash? It's a powerful reminder that even in the darkest of times, individual choices matter. Maintaining our values, guarding our integrity, and resisting temptation can have a profound impact, not just on ourselves, but on our entire community. It suggests that true freedom isn't just about physical liberation, but also about the freedom to choose righteousness, even when it's difficult. It's a message that resonates just as strongly today as it did centuries ago.

Full source
Vayikra Rabbah 3:1Vayikra Rabbah

The book of Leviticus, specifically chapter 2, opens with the laws of the minchah, the meal offering. "When a person presents a meal offering to the Lord, his offering shall be of high quality flour; he shall pour oil upon it, and place frankincense on it." (Leviticus 2:1). Sounds straightforward. But then, Vayikra Rabbah 3, our collection of rabbinic interpretations, throws us a curveball, opening with a quote from Ecclesiastes: "A handful of tranquility is better than two handfuls of toil and herding wind [ureut ruaḥ]" (Ecclesiastes 4:6).

What does that mean, "herding wind"? It’s all about misplaced priorities, about chasing after things that ultimately leave us empty. Rabbi Yitzchak uses this verse to kick off a fascinating discussion about what truly matters.

He starts with learning. Is it better to know a little well, or a lot superficially? Rabbi Yitzchak suggests that mastering two orders of the Mishna (a major compilation of Jewish oral law) is preferable to a shallow understanding of all six. Why? Because the person who studies superficially is driven by ureut ruaḥ – a desire, a vanity, to be seen as a master of halakhot (Jewish laws).

The text then expands this idea. Is it better to scrape by honestly, or to borrow with interest in the hopes of getting rich quickly? Is it better to work hard and give charity from your own earnings, or to steal and then donate the stolen money? In each case, the answer is clear: authenticity and integrity matter more than appearances. As the parable says, "She is promiscuous for apples and distributes to the ill," highlighting the absurdity of doing wrong in order to appear righteous.

The phrase ureut ruaḥ keeps popping up. It's translated as "herding wind," but the text cleverly plays on the word reutei, suggesting that it is really about someone's desire or will. It highlights the emptiness of seeking status and recognition through superficial means.

Rabbi Berekhya offers a powerful image: a single footstep of God in Egypt, as it says: "I will pass through the land of Egypt that night [and I will smite all the firstborn in the land of Egypt]" (Exodus 12:12), was greater than the "handfuls of furnace soot of Moses and Aaron." What? The plague of boils wasn’t as effective as the Exodus itself because one engendered salvation and the other did not. It's a reminder that actions that bring true salvation are far more valuable than grand gestures that ultimately fall short.

Rabbi Ḥiyya bar Abba sees "a handful of tranquility" as Shabbat, the day of rest, while "two handfuls of toil" represent the six workdays. He reminds us that true salvation comes from embracing the peace of Shabbat, quoting (Isaiah 30:15): “With repose [beshuva] and tranquility you will be saved.”

And Rabbi Yaakov bar Korshoi contrasts this world with the World to Come, saying that the desire of the wicked is to perform their actions in this world for immediate gratification, even if it means facing consequences later. This echoes the teaching in Pirkei Avot (Ethics of the Fathers) 4:17: "One hour of repentance and good deeds in this world is better than all of life in the World to Come, and one hour of satisfaction in the World to Come is better than all of life in this world."

Finally, Rabbi Yitzchak circles back to the original offering: "a handful of tranquility" is like the freewill meal offering of the poor, while "two handfuls of toil" represent the finely ground incense of spices of the wealthy. The simple, heartfelt offering brings atonement, while the elaborate one does not.

So, what’s the takeaway? Vayikra Rabbah 3 isn’t just about offerings or religious rituals. It's a profound meditation on what truly matters in life. Are we chasing after empty titles and fleeting recognition? Or are we cultivating inner peace, acting with integrity, and offering what we can, however small, with a sincere heart? It asks us to examine our motivations and ensure that we’re not just "herding wind." It's a reminder that sometimes, less really is more. A handful of tranquility, after all, is a precious thing.

Full source
Vayikra Rabbah 11:8Vayikra Rabbah

In the beautiful pattern of Jewish tradition, the role of elders is absolutely fundamental. It’s a theme that echoes throughout our sacred texts. Vayikra Rabbah, specifically Vayikra Rabbah 11, shines a light on just how vital elders are to the very fabric of the community.

Rabbi Akiva, a towering figure in Jewish thought, offers a striking analogy: Israel, he says, is like a bird. And what does a bird need to fly? Wings! In the same way, Israel can't truly soar, can't fully realize its potential, without its elders.

It's a powerful image, isn't it? The bird, representing the vibrant community, grounded without the strength and experience of its elders.

Rabbi Yosei bar Ḥalafta takes this idea further. He emphasizes the profound significance of Torah scholarship, zikna in Hebrew. Now, zikna literally means "old age," but the Sages often interpret it to refer to Torah scholarship. (See, for example, Kiddushin (the sanctification blessing over wine) 32b). According to Rabbi Yosei, if elders possess this wisdom, they are deeply cherished. And even if younger men are wise, their youthfulness takes a backseat to the wisdom they possess. Their youth is secondary to their knowledge.

And it’s not just one or two instances where we see this reverence for elders. Rabbi Shimon bar Yoḥai points out that the Holy One, blessed be He, consistently honors the elders. Time and again, we see God elevating them.: At the burning bush, God tells Moses, "Go and gather the elders of Israel" (Exodus 3:16). Before the Exodus from Egypt, God instructs Moses, "and you shall go, you and the elders of Israel" (Exodus 3:18). At Sinai, it wasn't just Moses; it was "ascend to the Lord; you, Aaron, Nadav and Avihu, and seventy of the elders of Israel" (Exodus 24:1). In the wilderness, God commands, "Gather for me seventy men [of the elders of Israel]" (Numbers 11:16). And again, at the Tent of Meeting, we see "and the elders of Israel" (Numbers 11:16).

The message is clear: Elders are not an afterthought. They are integral to God's plan.

This honor isn't just a thing of the past either. According to (Isaiah 24:23), even in the future, the Holy One, blessed be He, will continue to honor the elders. "The moon will be disgraced and the sun will be ashamed, [for the Lord of hosts will reign on Mount Zion and in Jerusalem]…and before His elders, glory."

Rabbi Yishmael bar Beivai, Rabbi Shimon, and Rabbi Reuven, citing Rabbi Ḥanina, add another layer. They suggest that the Holy One will actually appoint an academy of elders. It’s right there in the text: "before His elders, glory." God's own elders.

Rabbi Avin, in the name of Rabbi Yishmael ben Rabbi Yehoshua, even paints a vivid picture: the Holy One, blessed be He, sitting as on a threshing floor, with the righteous gathered before Him. It's reminiscent of the scene described in I (Kings 22:10), where "The king of Israel and Yehoshafat king of Judah were sitting, each on his throne, dressed in garb, on the threshing floor [at the entrance of the gate of Samaria]."

Were they literally on a threshing floor? Probably not. But the image evokes the way the Sanhedrin, the ancient Jewish court, was arranged – like half of a circular threshing floor, so that everyone could see each other (Mishna Sanhedrin 4:3).

Solomon, known for his wisdom, even said, "I saw Him constricting Himself in their midst." This idea is echoed in (Proverbs 31:23): "Her husband is renowned at the gates, as he sits with the elders of the land." This entire chapter, by the way, is often interpreted as an allegory for the relationship between God (the husband) and the congregation of Israel (the wife).

So, what does all this mean for us today? It's a powerful reminder to value the wisdom, experience, and guidance of our elders. To create spaces where their voices are heard, their stories are cherished, and their presence is celebrated. Because just like that bird needs its wings, we, as a community, need our elders to truly soar. They are essential. And without them, we are incomplete.

Full source
Vayikra Rabbah 16:1Vayikra Rabbah

Disease is often remembered as random, a matter of bad luck. But what if certain behaviors, certain flaws in our character, actually pave the way for illness and hardship? That’s what

The passage begins with a seemingly straightforward verse from (Leviticus 14:2): “This shall be the law of the leper on the day of his purification: He shall be brought to the priest.” But the rabbis, never content with the surface meaning, see a deeper connection here. They link this verse about leprosy to a passage in Proverbs (6:16-19) that lists six things God hates, and a seventh that is an abomination. "They are six that the Lord hates, and seven that are an abomination to His soul."

Rabbi Meir sees a simple numerical connection: six plus seven equals thirteen. But the other Rabbis offer a more profound interpretation: the seventh item on the list, "one who incites discord among brothers," is the worst of them all. It's so damaging that it encompasses the negativity of all the others.

So, what are these sins that are so offensive? "Haughty eyes, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood, a heart devising iniquitous thoughts, feet hastening to run to evil, he who utters lies as a false witness, and he who incites discord among brothers." According to Rabbi Yoḥanan, all of these transgressions can lead to leprosy. "Haughty eyes" – the arrogance of the daughters of Zion, described in Isaiah (3:16-17). As it is written: “Because the daughters of Zion are haughty and they walk with outstretched necks and painted eyes,” and it is written: “The Lord will afflict the head of the daughters of Zion with scabs.” They flaunted their wealth and beauty, caring only about outward appearances. They’d even wear elaborate shoes, as Rabbi Abba bar Kahana points out, some adorned with serpent designs, symbols of idolatry. Others, according to the Rabbis, would fill eggshells with balsam and place them under their heels. When they saw young men, they would stomp on the eggshells, releasing a seductive scent, "like the venom of a serpent."

Their punishment? The Lord afflicted them with scabs, says Isaiah. Rabbi Elazar believes this was leprosy, connecting it to (Leviticus 14:56). Rabbi Yosei ben Rabbi Ḥanina, however, suggests it was swarms of lice. Either way, the message is clear: pride comes before a fall, and outward vanity can lead to inner corruption, resulting in physical ailments.

Then there's "a lying tongue." The rabbis use the example of Miriam, who spoke against Moses (Numbers 12:1). The consequence? "The cloud withdrew from upon the Tent, and behold, Miriam was leprous like snow" (Numbers 12:10).

"Hands that shed innocent blood" brings to mind Yoav, whose violent acts ultimately led to his downfall. As it is written: “The Lord will repay his blood upon his head,” (I (Kings 2:3)2) and “It shall rest on the head of Yoav…those who suffer from discharge and lepers” (II (Samuel 3:2)9).

We then have "a heart devising iniquitous thoughts," exemplified by Uzziah, who attempted to usurp the high priesthood. "The Lord afflicted the king, and he was a leper until the day of his death" (II Kings 15:5).

"Feet hastening to run to evil" reminds us of Geḥazi, who chased after Naaman for personal gain. As it is stated: “The leprosy of Naaman shall cleave to you” (II (Kings 5:2)7).

And finally, that most abominable sin, "he who incites discord among brothers." The rabbis point to Pharaoh, who sowed division between Abraham and Sarah. "The Lord afflicted [vaynaga] Pharaoh" (Genesis 12:17), and nega can mean leprosy.

It’s fascinating how the rabbis connect these moral failings to a physical disease. They're not saying that everyone with leprosy is guilty of these sins, but rather highlighting a profound connection between our inner lives and our physical well-being.

The passage continues with a discussion of other types of skin diseases, particularly one called raatan. Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel heard an elder say that “there are twenty-four types of skin disease and none is more problematic for the conduct of sexual relations than raatan.” Rabbi Pedat even suggests that Pharaoh was afflicted with it! The text also mentions precautions to take around those suffering from raatan, highlighting the contagious nature of the ailment.

The passage concludes with a statement from Rabbi Yosei: "This shall be the law of the leper [hametzora]," which hints at the defamer [hamotzi shem ra]. The Torah refers to the law of the leper [metzora] rather than the law of leprosy in order to hint to the fact that one who defames others [motzi shem ra] becomes a leper. The idea is that lashon hara, evil speech, is a spiritual disease that can manifest physically.

So, what's the takeaway here? It's a powerful reminder that our actions have consequences, not just for ourselves, but for the world around us. By cultivating humility, honesty, and compassion, and by avoiding arrogance, deceit, and divisiveness, we can not only improve our own lives but also contribute to a healthier, more harmonious world. Is it a literal one-to-one correlation? Maybe not. But the message resonates: our inner landscape shapes our outer reality. And that's something worth pondering.

Full source
Vayikra Rabbah 30:1Vayikra Rabbah

The verse in Leviticus (23:40) instructs us: "You shall take for you on the first day the fruit of a pleasant tree, branches of date palms, and a bough of a leafy tree, and willows of the brook, and you shall rejoice before the Lord your God seven days." But what does it all mean?

Vayikra Rabbah, a Midrashic (rabbinic interpretive commentary) compilation on the Book of Leviticus, dives deep into this verse, and it all starts with a surprising connection to Proverbs: "Take my admonishment, and not silver" (Proverbs 8:10). Rabbi Abba bar Kahana uses this to illustrate a powerful point: we should prioritize the wisdom of the Torah over material wealth. Why spend all your money on things that don't truly nourish your soul? As Isaiah (55:2) asks, "Why do you weigh out silver not for bread?"

The Midrash continues, "Why do you exert yourselves while the nations of the world are satisfied? 'For no satisfaction' – it is because you did not get your fill of the wine of Torah." It's a powerful image: are we chasing after fleeting pleasures while neglecting the true sustenance that comes from Torah study? Rabbi Berekhya and Rabbi Ḥiyya his father, citing Rabbi Yosei ben Nehorai, even suggest that charity collectors (except for those supporting Torah teachers) will be held accountable if they pressure people excessively. The value of Torah is immeasurable; no amount of money can truly compensate a teacher for the wisdom they impart.

There's a fascinating teaching that from Rosh Hashanah (the Jewish New Year), our sustenance for the year is determined, except for what we spend on Shabbat (the Sabbath), holidays, and Torah education for our children. If we increase our spending in those areas, our sustenance increases; if we decrease, it decreases. It’s like the universe is saying, "Invest in what truly matters, and you will be rewarded."

The story of Rabbi Yoḥanan and Rabbi Ḥiyya bar Abba really brings this home. Rabbi Yoḥanan, walking with his student, points out field after field, vineyard after vineyard, olive grove after olive grove – all of which he sold to dedicate himself to Torah study. Rabbi Ḥiyya weeps, concerned that his teacher has left nothing for his old age. But Rabbi Yoḥanan's response is profound: "Is it insignificant in your eyes what I did, that I sold an item that was created in six days and acquired an item that was given in forty days?" He's referring to the Torah, given to Moses on Mount Sinai over forty days, contrasting it with the material world created in six.

The impact of Rabbi Yoḥanan's devotion was clear. After his death, his generation said of him, "If a man would give all the wealth of his house for love… he would be scorned [boz yavuzu lo]" (Song of Songs 8:7). The Yefe To’ar commentary explains this "scorn" as a reference to gaining a portion of the spoils of the war of Gog and Magog – implying that his devotion to Torah earned him an eternal reward. Similarly, the extraordinary honor given to Rabbi Hoshaya of Tireya after his death, with his bier floating in the air, prompted the same verse, emphasizing the unparalleled love the Holy One had for him. And Rabbi Elazar ben Rabbi Shimon was lauded for his mastery of all aspects of Jewish learning, symbolized by "all the powders of the merchant" (Song of Songs 3:6).

Rabbi Abba bar Kahana concludes with a powerful connection between the mitzvah (commandment) of taking the lulav and the Exodus from Egypt. Just as taking a simple bundle of hyssop in Egypt (Exodus 12:22) – a small act costing only four maot – led to the Israelites acquiring immense wealth, so too does the lulav, which requires a significant investment and fulfills multiple mitzvot (commandments), bring abundant reward.

So, as we wave the lulav and etrog each year, let's remember that Sukkot (the Festival of Tabernacles) isn't just about dwelling in temporary booths. It's a powerful reminder to invest in what truly matters – in Torah, in learning, in spiritual growth. Because, ultimately, those are the things that sustain us, not just for seven days, but for eternity.

Full source
Pesikta DeRav Kahana 11:6Pesikta de-Rav Kahana

"A locked garden is my sister, my bride; a locked spring, a sealed fountain" (Song of Songs 4:12). Rabbi Judah bar Simon in the name of Rabbi Joshua ben Levi gave a parable: To a king who had grown daughters and had not managed to marry them off, and he went off to a country across the sea. The daughters arose and saw to themselves and married men, and each one took her husband's signet and his seal. After some days the king came back from across the sea and heard the voice of people slandering his daughters, saying that the king's daughters had been promiscuous. What did he do? He issued a proclamation: Let everyone come out to the parade ground. He called his first son-in-law and said to him, Who are you? He said, I am your son-in-law. He brought out the signet and said, Whose is this? He said, Mine. He brought out the seal and said, Whose is this? He said, Mine. And so with the second, and so with the third. The king said: My daughters saw to themselves and married, and you say the king's daughters were promiscuous!

So too: because the nations of the world taunted Israel, saying to them that they were the children of the Egyptians, for they had ruled over the bodies of Israel, all the more so over their wives, Rabbi Hoshaya said: At that hour the Holy One, blessed be He, called to the angel appointed over conception and said to him: Go and form for Me the shape of the child in the likeness of its fathers. This is what is written, "of Reuben, the family of the Reubenites; of Simeon, the family of the Simeonites" (compare Numbers 26:7, 14). Rabbi Marinus son of Rabbi Hoshaya said: like a man who says, my son, my likeness, my image. Rabbi Iddi said: the letter heh at the head of the word [Ha-Reubeni] and the letter yod at its end, Yah testifies concerning them that they are the children of their fathers. And what is the reason? "For there the tribes went up, the tribes of Yah, a testimony for Israel" (Psalms 122:4), that they are the children of their fathers.

Another interpretation: "A locked garden is my sister, my bride, a locked spring" (Song of Songs 4:12), these are the virgins; "a locked spring", these are the married women; "a sealed fountain", these are the males. It was taught in the name of Rabbi Nathan: "a locked garden, a locked spring," twice, [guarded] in the natural way and in an unnatural way. Rabbi Hunia in the name of Rabbi Hiyya bar Ba: Sarah went down to Egypt and fenced herself off from immorality, and all the women were fenced off by her merit. Rabbi Hiyya bar Ba said: It was worthy enough that he who fences off immorality for himself, that Israel should be redeemed by his merit.

Rabbi Huna in the name of Bar Kappara said: By the merit of four things Israel was redeemed from Egypt, that they did not change their names, that they did not change their language, that there was no slander among them, and that there was no licentiousness among them. They did not change their names: Reuben and Simeon went down, Reuben and Simeon came up. They did not change their language: "for it is my mouth that speaks to you" (Genesis 45:12), and he spoke in the holy tongue. There was no slander among them: "Speak now in the ears of the people, and let them ask" (Exodus 11:2), you find that the matter was entrusted to them a full twelve months and not one of them was found who informed on his fellow. There was no licentiousness among them: know that this is so, for there was one woman and Scripture publicized her, "and his mother's name was Shelomith bat Dibri of the tribe of Dan" (Leviticus 24:11). Rabbi Pinhas in the name of Rabbi Hiyya bar Ba: By the merit that Israel went down to Egypt and fenced themselves off from immorality, by that merit "your shoots" (Song of Songs 4:13), your being sent forth [reread as your release]. Therefore it is said, "And it came to pass when Pharaoh let the people go."

Full source