5 min read

The Banner of Love and the Woe That Came With It

God walks his own wine cellar and finds sixty-nine barrels turned to vinegar. One barrel holds. Then the Tabernacle stands and God groans.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Vinegar Cellar and the One Good Barrel
  2. The Tabernacle Stands and God Groans
  3. The Tent of Zimri and the Frozen Lawgiver
  4. The Spear of Phinehas and the Angels Who Cried Out

The Vinegar Cellar and the One Good Barrel

Rabbi Abahu, working in Caesarea in the third century, needed an image for what it meant to be chosen, and he found one that was not flattering. God, he said, is the wealthy man whose entire wine cellar has turned to vinegar. He walks down the stairs. He lifts lid after lid. Rot, rot, rot. The smell of failed fermentation filling the darkness. Then he reaches one barrel that still smells the way wine is supposed to smell, the way the vintner intended when he pressed the grapes. That barrel is Israel.

Abahu built this picture out of Song of Songs 2:4: He brought me to the banquet house, and his banner of love is upon me. The numerical value of the Hebrew word for wine, yayin, is seventy. There are seventy nations in the world. Sixty-nine casks of vinegar. One cask of what wine was supposed to be.

Bamidbar Rabbah, working through the Book of Numbers in twelfth-century Europe out of much older Palestinian material, did not soften this image. The banner over Israel is not a parade flag. It is the cloth a merchant drapes over the one thing in a damaged shipment worth saving. The love is real. The damage is also real. And the banner is both a sign of favor and a measure of how far everything else has fallen.

The Tabernacle Stands and God Groans

The Tabernacle was finished on the first of Nisan. The poles were set in their sockets, the curtains were hung, the Ark was carried into the Holy of Holies, and fire came down from heaven to consume the first offering. A people who had been slaves in Egypt three months earlier now had a house built exactly to divine specification. Trumpets sounded. The cloud of presence settled over the tent.

And then Bamidbar Rabbah recorded a sound underneath the celebration that the Torah itself does not mention. God said: Oy li. Woe to me.

The midrash asked what could possibly cause grief on this day. The answer was Zimri. Not Zimri-as-he-was-then, the prince of the tribe of Simeon standing among the joyful people. Zimri-as-he-would-be, the Zimri of Numbers 25, the man who would take a Midianite woman into his tent in front of Moses and the entire weeping congregation, who would provoke a plague, whose act of contempt would cost twenty-four thousand lives. God looked at the Tabernacle just finished and saw the man inside the rejoicing crowd who would make it necessary to groan.

The dedication day held both simultaneously: the banner of love and the woe that came with it. The single good barrel of wine, and the knowledge of what was waiting to spoil it.

The Tent of Zimri and the Frozen Lawgiver

When Zimri walked into his tent with Cozbi the Midianite woman and the plague began to move through the camp, Moses stood at the entrance to the Tent of Meeting and wept. He did not act. The law that would have permitted Phinehas to act required a very specific set of circumstances, and Moses was frozen between what he knew and what the law required him to wait for. The greatest prophet, the man who had carried the tablets down the mountain, stood at the threshold of the tent he had built to divine specification and could not move while the count of the dead climbed.

The Spear of Phinehas and the Angels Who Cried Out

Phinehas was not frozen. He saw the circumstances clearly, took a spear, and went in after Zimri and Cozbi. The angels watching from the upper worlds, Bamidbar Rabbah says, cried out with him when the spear found its mark. Not from satisfaction at the deaths, but because the plague had stopped. The woe that God had spoken on dedication day had reached its limit. The angels understood what it had cost to stop it.

The banner of love requires exactly this calculation. You cannot love one thing in a world where everything else has gone to vinegar without knowing, from the beginning, what the vinegar can do to what you love. God walked down the cellar stairs knowing. The woe was spoken before the banner was raised. Both were true simultaneously, from the first moment the poles went into their sockets and the cloud settled and the fire fell.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

3 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Bamidbar Rabbah 2:3Bamidbar Rabbah

It might seem like a minor detail, but according to Jewish tradition, it reveals something profound about God's love for His people.

Bamidbar Rabbah, a collection of rabbinic interpretations on the Book of Numbers. Here, the Rabbis explore the verse "He brought me to the banquet house, and his banner of love is upon me" (Song of Songs 2:4). But what does it really mean?

Rabbi Abahu uses a striking analogy. Imagine a wealthy man who discovers his vast wine cellar is full of vinegar – except for one precious barrel of fine wine. That single barrel, he declares, is as dear to him as the entire storehouse. Similarly, God created seventy nations, but He finds pleasure only in Israel. That's quite a statement, isn't it? Where do we get the number seventy? Rabbi Abahu points out that the numerical value of the Hebrew word for wine, yayin (יַיִן), is seventy (yod-ten, yod-ten, and nun-fifty). Of all those nations, "His banner of love is upon me" – Israel.

Rabbi Yehuda offers another interpretation, linking the "banquet house" to Mount Sinai, where Moses received the Torah, which can be expounded in forty-nine different ways. And again, "his banner of love is upon me." It's as if the Torah itself is a banner of God's affection.

Then we have Rabbi Ḥanina with a powerful image. In ancient times, pointing at the king’s image was a capital offense! But children in the study hall point to God’s name in the texts. Instead of being angered, God says, “His banner of love is upon me” – his finger, vegudalo, is beloved by Me. Notice the play on words here. The Hebrew words for "his banner" (vediglo) and "his finger" (vegudalo) share the same letters. The love is in the details!

Rabbi Yisakhar adds that even someone who skips around in their Torah study, jumping umdaleg from halakha (Jewish law) to halakha and from verse to verse, is dear to God. Even their skipping, dilugo, is beloved. It’s not about perfection; it’s about the effort and the connection. (Again, we see that wordplay, vediglo and dilugo).

The text continues, emphasizing that while all nations have banners, only the banner of Jacob – that is, Israel – is dear to God. Why?

The Midrash (rabbinic commentary) then takes us back to Mount Sinai. When God appeared, twenty-two myriads of angels descended with Him, arranged according to banners, as it says, “Preeminent [dagul] among a myriad” (Song of Songs 5:10). Seeing this, the Israelites yearned for their own banners. "If only we could be arranged according to banners like them," they cried. And God, hearing their desire, promised to fulfill it. That’s why He instructed Moses to organize them into tribes, each with its own distinct banner.

So, what’s the takeaway? It’s not just about flags and formations. It's about God's intimate and particular love for Israel, expressed through order, identity, and even their deepest desires. The act of arranging them under banners was an act of love, a way of showing that each tribe, each individual, had a place and purpose within the larger whole. And it all began with a yearning, a desire to be closer to the Divine. Don't you find that inspiring?

Full source
Bamidbar Rabbah 12:7Bamidbar Rabbah

The ancient rabbis grappled with that feeling too, especially when things were going well for the Israelites. Take the story in Bamidbar Rabbah 12, which begins with a single, loaded word: “Vayhi.” It’s often translated simply as “and it was,” but in this context, it carries a weight of sorrow. Vayhi – there was woe [vai haya].

Who uttered this "woe?" According to Rabbi Avin, it was, in a manner of speaking, God Himself. Why? Rabbi Avin offers a parable. Imagine a king with a difficult, complaining wife. He asks her to make him a royal purple garment. She works on it diligently, without a peep of complaint. But when she finishes and presents it to him, the king cries out, "Woe!" He fears she will revert to her old, contentious ways.

The Israelites, the story goes, were constantly complaining. We see it in (Exodus 15:24), "The people complained against Moses." And again in (Exodus 16:2), "The entire congregation of the children of Israel complained against Moses and against Aaron." Even as far as (Numbers 17:6), "You have killed the people of the Lord."

Then God commands them to build a Sanctuary, a Mishkan, as it is written: “They shall craft a sanctuary for Me…” (Exodus 25:8). And while they are engaged in this sacred work, they don't complain. But when the Tabernacle is complete, God cries "Woe!" Let them not return to their old ways!

But that's not the only interpretation. The Bamidbar Rabbah offers other voices that cried out in woe.

The firstborn sons, for example. Before the Tabernacle, they held a special priestly role. Independent altars were permitted, and the firstborn performed the sacrifices, as (Exodus 24:5) states: “He sent the young men of the children of Israel, and they offered up burnt offerings…” And we see in (Exodus 19:24), "You shall ascend, and Aaron with you, but the priests and the people [shall not advance to ascend]." Rabbi Yehoshua ben Korḥa and Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi debated who these priests were, some saying the firstborn, and others Nadav and Avihu, the sons of Aaron.

But with the establishment of the Tabernacle and the formal priesthood of the Levites, the firstborn lost their unique status. Rabbi Abba bar Mamal connects it to the golden calf incident, saying the firstborn lost their priesthood because they sacrificed to the calf. We even find that priests who served idols in the First Temple were disqualified in the Second Temple, as (Ezekiel 44:15) tells us: “But the priests, the Levites, sons of Tzadok, [who kept the commission of My Sanctuary when the children of Israel strayed from Me, they shall approach Me to serve Me].” So, the firstborn shouted woe at the Tabernacle's erection – a lament for their lost privilege.

Even the angels cried out! They feared God would abandon them and descend to dwell on Earth. But God reassured them, saying, "As you live, the essence is on high," as it is written: “His glory covered the heavens” (Habakkuk 3:3), and then “His praise filled the earth” (Habakkuk 3:3). Or did He? Rabbi Simon, quoting Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi, suggests God misled them. (Psalm 148:13) says, "His glory is on earth and the heavens" – earth first, then the heavens. The angels' woe, then, is a cry of displacement, a fear of losing their unique connection to the Divine.

And finally, the nations of the world join in the lament. Why? Because before the Tabernacle, God fought their wars directly. Now that He dwells in the Israelites' midst, He will surely fight for them even more fiercely! Their "woe" is a cry of fear, a recognition of the enhanced power and protection now afforded to Israel.

So, what does this all mean? Vayhi. "And it was." But so much more than that. It's a reminder that even in moments of great joy and accomplishment, there can be undercurrents of loss, fear, and uncertainty. It's a recognition that progress often comes with a price, and that even the most sacred endeavors can stir up complex emotions. It asks us: What "woe" might be hiding beneath the surface of our own achievements? And how can we address those hidden anxieties and ensure that our blessings truly lead to greater good?

Full source
Bamidbar Rabbah 20:25Bamidbar Rabbah

The story of Pinḥas (Phineas) in the book of Numbers is a wild ride, a tale of zealotry, divine intervention, and a whole lot of questions about what's right and wrong.

The scene is set during a troubling time for the Israelites. They're engaging in forbidden relationships with Midianite women and worshiping foreign gods. God is furious, and a plague breaks out. It's a mess. Right in the middle of this chaos, Zimri, a leader from the tribe of Simeon, brazenly brings a Midianite woman, Cozbi, into his tent in front of everyone. It's a public act of defiance.

Then comes Pinḥas. (Numbers 25:7) tells us, "Pinḥas, son of Elazar, son of Aaron the priest, saw, and he arose from the midst of the congregation, and he took a spear in his hand." But Bamidbar Rabbah (Numbers Rabbah) 20 asks a pointed question: did only Pinḥas see? After all, the verse right before this one (Numbers 25:6) says this was all happening "Before the eyes of Moses, and before the eyes of the entire congregation of the children of Israel"!

The explanation offered is that Pinḥas "saw the action and recalled the halakha" – the relevant Jewish law. He remembered the ruling: "One who engages in intercourse with an Aramean woman, zealots strike him." In other words, he understood the severity of the situation and the appropriate response according to Jewish law.

But it wasn't simple. Bamidbar Rabbah tells us that there was debate among the people about whether Zimri's actions warranted the death penalty. Pinḥas took it upon himself to act. He concealed a spear beneath his garments, approached Zimri and Cozbi, and under the pretense of needing to "satisfy his needs" (a euphemism, to say the least) gained access to their tent. Then, in a shocking act, he stabbed both of them through their bellies.

Now, this is where the story gets really interesting. Bamidbar Rabbah emphasizes that Pinḥas stabbed them "one atop the other, into the impurity of the two of them, so there will not be any in Israel saying that there had been no impurity there." This was a public demonstration, a clear statement against the sin that was corrupting the community.

But more than that, the text describes twelve miracles that occurred during this act! According to the Midrash, an angel reattached them as they separated, shut their mouths so they couldn't scream, guided the spear with incredible accuracy, lengthened the spear, gave Pinḥas superhuman strength. the list goes on. One particularly striking miracle: the angel "elevated the lintel so that the two of them could emerge between his shoulders, suspended before the eyes of all." It was a public spectacle, divinely orchestrated.

What are we to make of all this? Was Pinḥas a hero or a vigilante? The text clearly portrays him as a zealot acting in defense of God's honor. His actions stopped the plague, which had already killed twenty-four thousand people, as (Numbers 25:9) tells us.

The Rabbis, in Bamidbar Rabbah, even compare Pinḥas to a "wise man" who pacifies the "wrath of a king" (Proverbs 16:14), arguing that Pinḥas’s actions assuaged God's anger and prevented the complete destruction of Israel.

But the story doesn't end there. After the act, the members of Zimri's tribe sought to attack Pinḥas. An angel intervened, afflicting them. However, Pinḥas, seeing the angel's destructive intent, prayed and stopped him. The text interprets the word "vayfalel" (prayed) in (Psalms 106:30) as also meaning "performing judgment," linking it to the phrase "biflilim" (in court) from (Exodus 21:22). Pinḥas, even in his zealotry, understood the limits of divine wrath.

The story of Pinḥas is complex and challenging. It raises questions about religious zeal, the use of violence, and the nature of divine justice. It's a story that continues to be debated and interpreted, reminding us that even in the most sacred texts, there are difficult and uncomfortable truths to confront. The Bamidbar Rabbah offers a glimpse into the rabbinic understanding of this pivotal moment, highlighting the miracles, the motivations, and the ultimate impact of Pinḥas's actions. It leaves us pondering: what does it truly mean to act in the name of God?

Full source