6 min read

The Pit That Followed Joseph Across Four Generations

Joseph was sold to merchants who had followed birds to a pit. Manasseh stood beside him interpreting. Jacob confessed. The wound never finished traveling.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Merchants Who Followed the Birds
  2. Why the Judgment Fell on Midian
  3. Manasseh at the Edge of the Pit Again
  4. Jacob Confessed What He Had Withheld
  5. The Death of Abimenos

The Merchants Who Followed the Birds

The Midianite traders were thirsty. They had been traveling through the hill country of Canaan and they saw birds circling over a low place in the ground and assumed there was water below. They went to look. What they found at the bottom of the pit was not water. It was a boy.

He was beautiful in a way that made the cover story the brothers offered instantly unbelievable. The brothers said he was a runaway slave. The Midianites looked at him and laughed. By the look of him, they said, you are his slaves. The brothers reached for their weapons. Give him back, they said, or die. The merchants held their ground. They paid the price. They took the boy south toward Egypt, and the brothers stood at the edge of the pit they had thrown him into, holding twenty pieces of silver, watching the caravan disappear.

The debt the Midianites were carrying without knowing it would take four centuries to collect. It would collect through Moses and Phinehas in the wilderness, through wars and reprisals, through a chain of consequence that ran from one pit in Canaan all the way to the edge of the land Israel was trying to enter. The merchants had bought something they could not keep, and the purchase price was too low for what they had taken.

Why the Judgment Fell on Midian

When Moses led the campaign against Midian in the wilderness, the rabbis asked why. What had Midian done that was not also done by others? The answer the tradition preserved was precise: they had handled Joseph. They had been instruments in the mechanism that put Jacob's son into slavery in a foreign country. They had profited from a transaction in which a free person was sold. When the accounting came, it came in full.

The rabbis were not comfortable leaving divine justice vague. They wanted to know who owed what to whom, and they were willing to trace the debt across generations to find its origin. The pit that the brothers dug became the account from which all subsequent reckoning was drawn. Midian was not punished for a general wickedness. It was punished for a specific act, performed in a specific place, on a specific afternoon when birds had circled over a boy in a hole and led thirsty merchants to the worst transaction of their lives.

Manasseh at the Edge of the Pit Again

Joseph rose in Egypt and became the second most powerful man in the country. He had sons, and the eldest was Manasseh, who served as his interpreter when the brothers came down from Canaan during the famine. He stood between his father and the men his father recognized and they did not recognize, translating words in both directions, not knowing what he was standing in the middle of.

The rabbis noted what Manasseh carried in this role. He was Joseph's son. His Egyptian education had given him fluency in a language his uncles did not speak. His father's history had placed him in a room with the brothers who had caused it. He translated without knowing the stakes of the conversation he was facilitating. He was standing at the edge of a wound that had started before he was born, close enough to touch it, far enough from the original event to be innocent of it.

This is the generational pattern the tradition wanted to trace: the wound travels. It does not dissolve between the first generation and the second. It looks different in each container, but its pressure is the same.

Jacob Confessed What He Had Withheld

When Jacob learned that Joseph was alive, the news arrived slowly. The brothers came back from Egypt and said Joseph lives and he is ruler over all Egypt. Jacob's heart went numb. He did not believe them immediately. He could not. He had been living inside his son's death for twenty years, and the shape of that grief had become the shape of his days.

When he finally understood it was true, the tradition preserved something he said that the Torah does not quite contain: he confessed that he had withheld his proper mourning from the son he thought was dead, that his grief had been compounded by a knowledge he had not fully processed, the knowledge of what his sons had done, or what they might have done, the knowledge he had chosen not to press. The pit in Canaan had not been far from the patriarch's tent. The birds that circled over it were birds he had not stopped to watch.

The Death of Abimenos

After Jacob died, the brothers feared that Joseph would finally settle the account. They sent a message claiming their father had instructed Joseph to forgive them. Joseph wept when he heard this. He told them: am I in the place of God? You meant evil against me and God meant it for good. The forgiveness he had offered before his father died was not a performance. It was his actual position.

The death that came to Abimenos, the man the tradition identifies as the figure who had most actively conspired in the selling, arrived in the form of his own body turning against him. The pit he had been party to digging had left its mark inside him as well, and when the reckoning came, it came as illness rather than war, as a body that knew what it had done even when the mind was finished arguing.

Four scenes. Four people. One pit. The wound that had opened in a dry field in Canaan did not close when Joseph arrived safely in Egypt. It traveled with everyone who had touched it, finding its way into each generation's particular form of consequence, patient and unhurried, the way very old debts tend to move.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

5 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Legends of the Jews 1:27Legends of the Jews

The familiar version gives us the basics: Joseph, the favored son, with his infamous coat, is tossed into a pit by his jealous brothers. But what happened exactly down there? And how did he go from pit to Potiphar's house?

In Legends of the Jews, that incredible compilation of rabbinic lore by Rabbi Louis Ginzberg, things get pretty interesting. While Joseph's brothers were still arguing about what to do with him, a group of Midianite merchants just happened to be passing by.

These weren't just any merchants,. They were drawn to the pit by circling birds, assuming there was water down there. Thirsty after their travels, they approached, hoping for a drink. Instead, they heard something else: Joseph's cries.

Peering into the pit, they saw him – a "youth of beautiful figure and comely appearance," as Ginzberg puts it. Can you imagine their surprise? They hauled him out and, naturally, asked, "Who are you? How did you get down there?"

Now, here’s where it gets even more intriguing. As the Midianites continued on their journey with Joseph, they encountered his brothers. And the brothers, trying to cover their tracks, claimed Joseph was a runaway slave. "Why have you done such a thing, to steal our slave and carry him away with you? We threw the lad into the pit, because he was disobedient. Now, then, return our slave to us."

But the Midianites weren’t buying it. They saw through the brothers' deception. "What, this lad, you say, is your slave, your servant? More likely is it that you all are slaves unto him, for in beauty of form, in pleasant looks, and fair appearance, he excelleth you all. Why, then, will you speak lies unto us? We will not give ear unto your words, nor believe you, for we found the lad in the wilderness, in a pit, and we took him out, and we will carry him away with us on our journey."

The sons of Jacob, desperate to keep their secret, even threatened the Midianites: "Restore our slave to us, lest you meet death at the edge of the sword."

Think about this for a moment. The brothers, already guilty of a terrible act, are now willing to resort to violence to maintain their lie! It really paints a picture of their state of mind.

This little detail, not found in the main biblical narrative, adds a layer of complexity to the story. It highlights the brothers' continued deception and the Midianites' role as unwitting saviors. It makes us wonder: were the Midianites simply lucky passersby, or was there a hand of Providence at play, guiding them to that pit at just the right moment?

It also illustrates how folklore and legend can enrich and expand our understanding of even the most familiar stories. It invites us to ask questions, to imagine the untold details, and to appreciate the richness and depth of our tradition. Because sometimes, the most fascinating stories are the ones that fill in the gaps between the lines.

Full source
Legends of the Jews 1:221Legends of the Jews

A monumental work compiled by Louis Ginzberg, the brothers spoke freely, thinking their words were veiled by the interpreter, Manasseh. Little did they know, Joseph understood every syllable of Hebrew. Can you imagine the tension, the suppressed emotions simmering beneath the surface as Joseph listened to them speak?

Why did Joseph choose to hold Simon hostage? The reasoning, as we find in Ginzberg's retelling, is layered with history and a touch of retribution. Joseph remembered the past. Simon, along with Levi, had advocated for his death all those years ago. Only the intervention of Reuben and Judah had spared him. This wasn't mere sibling rivalry; this was a brush with death.

Why not detain Levi as well? Joseph, ever the strategist, feared the combined might of Simon and Levi. The text suggests that if both remained in Egypt, their combined fury could bring devastation, just as they had once brought upon the city of Shechem. Remember that story? It’s a powerful one, demonstrating the strength, and sometimes ruthlessness, of these brothers.

There was another reason for choosing Simon. He wasn't as beloved as Levi. Joseph shrewdly calculated that the brothers would be less likely to violently resist Simon’s detention. Levi, their wise man and high priest, was indispensable. Depriving them of him might provoke a response that could destroy Egypt.

And finally, there’s the personal element. Simon, it was said, was the one who actually lowered Joseph into the pit. Imagine the years of resentment, the simmering anger Joseph must have felt. This wasn't just about justice; it was about a deeply personal wound. So, with Manasseh acting as interpreter, Joseph set his plan in motion, a plan woven with threads of the past, fear of the present, and a desire for some form of reckoning. It makes you wonder, doesn't it, how much of our past dictates our present actions, even when we think we've moved on?

Full source
Legends of the Jews 1:324Legends of the Jews

Perhaps they were discussing the old days, lost loved ones, or maybe even just the weather. We don’t know for sure, but it’s a safe bet Jacob wasn’t expecting what was about to happen.

Suddenly, his sons arrive. Not just any arrival, but a grand entrance! They’re decked out in finery, laden with gifts, all courtesy of Joseph. And they bring incredible news: "Good news! Joseph, your son, is alive! He rules all of Egypt, and he sends you greetings!"

Can you imagine the shock? The disbelief? After all these years of mourning, believing Joseph to be dead… it's understandable that Jacob didn’t immediately jump for joy. According to Ginzberg's retelling in Legends of the Jews, Jacob initially refused to believe them. It's a deeply human reaction, isn't it? Especially considering the brothers’ history. They had, after all, deceived him before. And as the saying goes, "it is the punishment of the liar that his words are not believed even when he speaks the truth."

Then, the sons opened their packs. They revealed the lavish gifts Joseph had sent to each of them. Seeing this tangible proof, the seeds of doubt began to wither. Still, Joseph, knowing his father, had anticipated this very reaction. He’d given his brothers a secret password, a specific memory to unlock Jacob’s heart.

He had instructed them, "If my father will not believe your words, tell him that when I took leave of him, to see whether it was well with you, he had been teaching me the law of the heifer whose neck is broken in the valley." That law is the eglah arufah (עגלה ערופה), the ritual of the broken-necked heifer, performed when a body is found and the killer is unknown, a way to atone for the unintended shedding of blood.

When they repeated those words, the last vestiges of doubt vanished. The Zohar tells us that these specific words, a reminder of their shared past and Joseph’s dedication to Jewish law even in a foreign land, were the key.

And then, Jacob speaks. A beautiful, powerful declaration: "Great is the steadfastness of my son Joseph. In spite of all his sufferings he has remained constant in his piety. Yea, great are the benefits that the Lord hath conferred upon me. He saved me from the hands of Esau, and from the hands of Laban, and from the Canaanites who pursued after me. I have tasted many joys, and I hope to see more, but never did I hope to set eyes upon Joseph again, and now I shall go down to him and behold him before my death."

It's a moment of profound joy, tinged with the bittersweet awareness of his own mortality. Jacob acknowledges the hardships he’s endured, the miracles he’s witnessed. But the thought of seeing Joseph again, of embracing his son one last time, fills him with a hope he thought long extinguished. It's a reminder that even in the darkest of times, even after years of sorrow, joy and reunion are still possible.

What does this story tell us? Perhaps that even when surrounded by wealth and power, the deepest connections are rooted in shared memories and unwavering faith. Or maybe it's a evidence of the enduring power of hope, even in the face of seemingly insurmountable odds. Whatever you take away from it, the reunion of Jacob and Joseph is a story that resonates across generations, a beacon of light in the tradition of Jewish history.

Full source
Legends of the Jews 1:460Legends of the Jews

So ends one era, and another begins.

Can you imagine the emotions swirling within him as he returned from burying his father, Jacob, in the Cave of Machpelah? As he passed the very pit where his brothers had cast him so many years before, he looked down and uttered a blessing: "Blessed be God who permitted a miracle to come to pass for me here!"

It seems innocent enough. A moment of gratitude. But remember, words have power.

His brothers, however, interpreted these words – words, we are told, that Joseph uttered simply because the law required it – very differently. They jumped to the conclusion that Joseph was still harboring resentment, that he was waiting for their father to die so he could finally exact revenge. Ginzberg, in Legends of the Jews, paints a picture of their growing paranoia.

And there was more fuel for their fear. They noticed that since their father's passing, Joseph had stopped inviting them to dine with him. Was this another sign of his hatred? Were they right to be afraid?

But, as is so often the case, appearances can be deceiving. Joseph's motivations were far more complex, and arguably, more noble. "So long as my father was alive," Joseph reasoned, "he bade me sit at the head of the table, though Judah is king, and Reuben is the first-born. It was my father's wish, and I complied with it." See, Joseph was honoring his father.

But now? Now things were different. "But now it is not seemly that I should have the first seat in their presence, and yet, being ruler of Egypt, I cannot yield my place to any other." He couldn't disrespect his brothers by taking precedence, but he couldn't disrespect his position in Egypt either. So, he chose what he thought was the best solution: he simply avoided the situation altogether.

Isn't it fascinating how easily misunderstandings can arise, even within families? How a simple blessing can be twisted into a threat, a change in dining habits into a sign of malice? Perhaps Joseph’s story reminds us to always strive for understanding, to give others the benefit of the doubt, and to remember that motivations are often far more nuanced than they appear on the surface.

Full source
Targum Pseudo-Jonathan on Genesis 50:17Targum Pseudo-Jonathan on Genesis

The brothers were terrified. So they did what frightened children do, they invoked the father. "Thus shall you say to Joseph: forgive now the guilt of thy brethren and their sin, for they committed evil against thee. But forgive, I beseech thee, the guilt of the servants of the God of thy father."

The Targum Pseudo-Jonathan on Genesis (50:17), a tannaitic-era Aramaic translation enriched with midrashic expansion, preserves the plea almost word for word from the Hebrew. What the Targum highlights is the hinge the brothers lean on: they do not ask as sons of Jacob. They ask as servants of the God of Jacob.

This is the quiet genius of their appeal. They know Joseph loves their father. They know, too, that Jacob's God is now Joseph's God. So they stack the appeal carefully. First: forgive for our father's sake. Second: forgive for the sake of the God our father served. They are asking Joseph to rise above personal memory and answer to something higher than memory.

Joseph wept.

The Targum does not explain the tears, but the sages who carried this text. And later rabbis who would cite it across our 3,279 texts from Midrash Rabbah, understood them. Joseph wept because he realized the brothers had never truly believed the earlier reconciliation. All these years, they had lived in his house the way a guest lives in a rented room: carefully, always packing.

The takeaway: forgiveness given once may need to be given again, and again, until the one being forgiven can finally unpack.

Full source