Benjamin Named All Ten Sons for the Brother He Never Found
When the Egyptian viceroy asked Benjamin about his children, Benjamin listed ten names. Every one was a coded lament for a brother he thought was dead.
Table of Contents
The Brother Benjamin Did Not Recognize
Twenty-two years had passed. Benjamin had been a child the last time he saw Joseph, small enough that the older brothers could move him aside like a piece of furniture when they were deciding what to do with the boy in the pit. He had not been there for the sale. He had grown up with a story about a torn coat and a father who never fully came back.
Now he was a grown man with sons of his own, standing in the hall of the Egyptian viceroy, and the viceroy was looking at his face with an expression Benjamin could not read. Joseph had been holding himself together since the moment he first saw his brothers file in from Canaan, and by now he had the discipline of a man who had survived fifteen years of Egyptian political life. He held it together now, barely.
He asked a careful question. The kind of question a foreign dignitary asks to fill silence. Do you have a brother from the same mother?
Ten Sons, Ten Names for One Missing Brother
Benjamin answered first: I had one, but I do not know what has become of him.
Joseph felt the floor move. He kept his face still.
He asked the next question. The polite question. Do you have a wife? Do you have children?
Benjamin listed his ten sons. Bela. Becher. Ashbel. Gera. Naaman. Ehi. Rosh. Muppim. Huppim. Ard. They are not beautiful names. They are not the kind of names you give children to celebrate anything. The midrashic tradition preserved by Ginzberg unpacks what each one means and finds the same word at the bottom of all of them: Joseph.
Bela, because his brother was swallowed up. Becher, because he was the firstborn of his mother. Ashbel, because God took him. Gera, because he was a stranger in a foreign land. Naaman, because he was pleasant and beautiful. Ehi, my brother. Rosh, because he was chief among them. Muppim, because he was from the mouth of his father. Huppim, because he did not see his bridal canopy, gone before he was old enough to marry. Ard, because he went down.
Every son Benjamin had was a word for the shape of the absence.
The Proof Joseph Demanded
When Joseph finally could not contain himself any longer, before the revelation, still testing, still pressing, he demanded proof that Benjamin's grief was real. How can I know that your oath about your brother is true?
Benjamin answered: from the names of my ten sons, which I gave them in memory of my brother's life and trials, you can know.
This was the testimony Joseph had not planned to receive. He had planned to test them with the cup in the sack. He had planned to see whether they would abandon Benjamin the way they had abandoned him. He had not planned to hear that his youngest brother had been naming children after him for twenty years, building a memorial in the only material he had available, which was the register of his own household.
The Meal That Almost Broke Him Earlier
Before the revelation, Joseph had seated them at a banquet. The brothers marveled at the arrangement of the seating, because the Egyptian governor had seated them in birth order, oldest to youngest, without anyone telling him how old they were. Then Joseph gave Benjamin five times the food he gave the others: his own portion, his wife Asenath's portion, and the portions of his two sons Ephraim and Manasseh.
The brothers watched and ate and did not understand what they were watching. Benjamin ate from four extra plates and did not know why the governor of Egypt was watching him the way a man watches a thing he thought he had lost. The breastplate of the Tabernacle, the tradition says, would later carry an onyx stone for Joseph and a jasper stone for Benjamin, side by side, the two sons of Rachel set back together in the high priest's vestments, the order restored in cloth and stone what had been torn apart in a field near Dothan.
← All myths