5 min read

The Temple Emptied from Hunger Before the Sword Arrived

The last men inside the sanctuary did not leave because courage failed. They left because famine won. Then Simon stepped forward and carved his name in brass.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Men Who Could Not Stay
  2. What Judas Maccabeus Came Back To
  3. Simon and the Brass Tablet
  4. What the Sanctuary Survived

The Men Who Could Not Stay

Picture the last defenders inside the sanctuary. Not an army at full strength, not a chorus of heroes with torches and drawn swords. A few gaunt men, hollow-eyed from months of siege, holding the gates of the holy enclosure while their bodies ran out of what bodies need to keep standing.

First Maccabees does not make this a story of cowardice. It makes it a story of hunger. The text says plainly: only a few remained in the sanctuary, because the famine prevailed over them, and each man scattered to his own place. The Temple did not empty because the defenders lost their nerve. It emptied because devotion still needs bread, and the bread was gone.

Philip, one of the Seleucid officials who had been governing Jerusalem, looked at what was left inside the sanctuary and recognized an opportunity. The defenders had thinned to almost nothing. The holy precincts that had held against every direct assault were about to fall to the simplest of besiegers: time without food.

What Judas Maccabeus Came Back To

Judas Maccabeus had not been inside Jerusalem when this happened. He was in the south, fighting. The word reached him and he returned with his forces, not to a triumphant capital but to a sanctuary that had been stretched to the edge of abandonment.

First Maccabees records his prayer over the holy place. He stood before it and asked what could be done. He had won battles with men who were outnumbered and under-equipped, who had prayed before every charge and fought as if they expected God to show up with them in the field. Now he stood before a sanctuary that had nearly collapsed not to enemy swords but to the slow arithmetic of insufficient grain.

The prayer was not a victory speech. It was a man standing in front of something precious that had almost slipped away while he was elsewhere, asking how to hold it.

Simon and the Brass Tablet

Years later, the sanctuary still standing, a different kind of threat had passed, and Simon, the last surviving son of Mattathias, received what his brothers Judas and Jonathan had never been given: a formal public commission carved into brass and set up on pillars on Mount Zion.

The text of that commission described what Simon had done, what he had built, what he had defended. It recorded the grants given to him: high priest, commander, ethnarch, leader of the Jews and priests. All of this was inscribed in bronze and posted at the sanctuary in a form that anyone who came to pray could read.

The contrast with the hollow-faced men scattering from the sanctuary during the famine is the Maccabean arc in miniature. From men too hungry to stand at the gate to a people with authority carved in metal and displayed at the entrance to the holy place. From famine to formal commission. From a sanctuary that nearly emptied to a sanctuary with an official constitution posted on its walls.

What the Sanctuary Survived

First Maccabees keeps circling back to the Temple not because it is making a simple argument about military heroism but because the sanctuary is its measure of whether Israel is still itself. When the defenders scatter from hunger, Israel is in danger of ceasing to be Israel, not because of what the enemy has done but because of what ordinary human need can strip away. When Simon's authority is carved in brass and posted at the holy place, the argument is settled for that generation: the sanctuary has a people, and the people have a leader who has earned his standing in plain sight.

The brass tablet was not arrogance. It was a document made to outlast the men who needed it. The families who had scattered from the sanctuary during the famine could come back to Jerusalem and read in permanent metal what their persistence had purchased.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

3 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

The Book of Maccabees I 6:60The Book of Maccabees I

Our story takes us to the Beit Hamikdash, the Holy Temple in Jerusalem, during the time of the Maccabees. The Book of Maccabees I gives us a glimpse of a truly desperate situation.

You're among the last few defenders of your faith, holed up in the most sacred place on Earth. But it's not just enemy soldiers you're battling. A devastating famine has gripped the land. People are starving, forced to abandon their posts, to scatter and seek any means of survival. "There were but a few left in the sanctuary," the verse says, "because the famine did so prevail against them, that they were fain to disperse themselves, every man to his own place." It paints a stark picture of dwindling hope.

Can you feel the weight of that? The isolation? The gnawing hunger?

As if things weren't dire enough, political intrigue is brewing in the background. Philip, a man appointed by the late King Antiochus to tutor his son, the young Antiochus, and ensure his ascension to the throne, suddenly reappears on the scene.

That Philip "was returned out of Persia and Media, and the king’s host also that went with him, and that he sought to take unto him the ruling of the affairs." He's back from the East, with an army at his command, and he has designs on power.

Talk about bad timing.

So, what does this mean for our beleaguered defenders in the Temple? Well, Philip's power grab adds another layer of complexity to an already volatile situation. It means that even as the Maccabees struggle to survive, they also have to contend with the shifting sands of political alliances and betrayals.

"Wherefore he went in all haste, and said to the king and the captains of the host and the company." Philip is clearly a man of action, ready to make his move.

This passage is a snapshot of a pivotal moment. A moment where faith, survival, and political ambition collide. What would you do in such a situation? How do you hold on to hope when everything seems lost? How do you choose between faith and survival?

The story of the Maccabees is far from over, and we'll continue to see how these events unfold. But for now, let's remember the resilience of those few souls in the Temple, facing impossible odds, and the reminder that even in the darkest of times, the flame of hope can still flicker.

Full source
The Book of Maccabees I 15:1The Book of Maccabees I

The Book of Maccabees I turns to Simon and the Holy Sanctuary.

Where were these brass tablets to be placed? None other than within the sacred grounds of the Temple, in a place where everyone could see them.

It didn't stop there.

Recognizing the importance of preservation, copies of the decree were also stored in the Temple treasury. A little like burying a time capsule. The idea was clear: to ensure that Simon and his sons, the leaders of the Jewish people, would always have access to this vital document. It's like saying, "This is so important, we need multiple backups!"

Now, who was behind all this official decree-making?

Well, the story goes that Antiochus, son of Demetrius the king, sent letters "from the isles of the sea" to Simon, who's identified here as both the high priest and prince of the Jews, and, to all the Jewish people. Imagine the scene – messengers arriving from across the sea, bearing letters from a king, addressed to the entire nation.

What's interesting here is the dual role assigned to Simon. High Priest, of course, carries immense spiritual weight. But "prince of the Jews"? That's a political designation, highlighting his leadership within the community and his standing in the eyes of foreign powers. It shows how Simon held both religious and secular power in a very turbulent time.

It really makes you wonder about the weight of leadership in those days, doesn't it? How do you balance the spiritual and the political, especially when your nation's very survival is at stake? And what does it mean to truly immortalize a moment? Is it enough to just write it down, or do we need to live it out, day after day?

Full source
The Book of Maccabees I 4:59The Book of Maccabees I

Sometimes, the story is right there in the history books... well, maybe "history books" isn't quite the right term here.

They weren't just military leaders; they were architects of tradition. The First Book of Maccabees, a historical text from the Second Temple period preserved in the Septuagint, tells us something fascinating about the origins of Hanukkah.

After the triumphant rededication of the Temple in Jerusalem, Judas and his brothers, along with "the whole congregation of Israel," made a momentous decision. They ordained that the days of the Temple's dedication should be commemorated every year, for eight days, starting on the 25th of Kislev (Casleu in the text). This wasn't just a somber remembrance,. The decree called for celebrating "with mirth and gladness." Can you imagine the joy, the sheer relief, after years of oppression and desecration?

The story doesn't end with celebration. The First Book of Maccabees goes on to describe practical steps taken to secure the peace. They rebuilt Mount Zion, surrounding it with high, strong walls and towers. This wasn't just about aesthetics; it was about preventing the Gentiles from, as the text says, "come and tread it down as they had done before.” They weren't taking any chances.

And they didn't stop there. A garrison was stationed on Mount Zion to keep watch. Bethsura, a strategically important town, was also fortified. This was all done to create a buffer, a defense "against Idumea" (a neighboring region).

So, what do we take away from this brief passage? It's more than just a historical record. It's a glimpse into the very human process of creating a holiday. It shows us that Hanukkah wasn't just handed down from on high. It was born out of a specific moment in time, a moment of victory, yes, but also a moment that demanded practical action to safeguard the future. It's a reminder that even our most cherished traditions are often the result of human decisions, made with courage and a deep sense of responsibility.

Full source