5 min read

Judas Fell While the Maccabean War Kept Moving

Judas breaks the right wing at his last battle and dies when the left closes behind him, then Simon carries the war to the ends of the earth.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Trumpets Sounded From Both Sides
  2. The Trap That Took Jonathan
  3. John Carried the Warning Home
  4. The Men Sent to Take Gazara

The Trumpets Sounded From Both Sides

Bacchides positioned his strongest force on the right wing. Judas saw this and chose to strike there, not to avoid the difficulty but to aim directly at it. If the right wing broke, the battle might break with it. He gathered the hardiest fighters and charged.

The right wing crumbled and ran toward Mount Azotus. For a moment the old Maccabean pattern held: a smaller force finding the critical point in a larger army and driving through it before the enemy could recover. Courage becoming movement. Movement becoming surprise. Surprise becoming survival.

Then the left wing closed from behind.

Judas had broken through one side and was now surrounded. The men with him were the ones he had selected for this specific charge. They were excellent fighters. They were trapped. Judas fought until there was nothing left to fight with, and then the battle ended.

1 Maccabees does not dramatize his death. It states it plainly: Judas fell, and those still with him fled. The army that had followed him looked at the field and understood what the day had cost. They gathered the body and buried it in the tomb of his fathers at Modein, and they mourned for him greatly. All Israel mourned with great lamentation and grieved many days.

The Trap That Took Jonathan

After Judas, Jonathan led. He was more cautious than his brother, more patient with negotiation and delay, better at surviving the years when open battle was impossible. He held the remnant together through seasons when the Maccabean cause had shrunk to a small group hiding in the desert. He built alliances with Rome. He secured letters from the Seleucid court. He served as high priest.

Tryphon was a Seleucid general who had his own ambitions for the throne. He recognized in Jonathan a problem: the Hasmonean leader had grown too strong, too legitimate, too connected for his purposes. Tryphon invited Jonathan to a meeting at Ptolemais with a large honor guard. When Jonathan arrived, Tryphon closed the city gates. The honor guard was seized. Jonathan was a prisoner.

Tryphon then sent a message to Simon, who had now become the last surviving son of Mattathias: release Jonathan for a ransom of one hundred talents of silver and two of his sons as hostages, and Jonathan goes free. Simon paid. He knew it was probably a lie. He paid anyway, because refusing to pay and having Jonathan die as a result was worse than paying and having Jonathan die as a result. Tryphon kept the silver and the sons and killed Jonathan at a place called Baskama.

John Carried the Warning Home

Simon sent his son John to the commanders in Gazara with orders to prepare the fighting force and to watch for trouble. John arrived and the work began. Then a letter came, an invitation from Ptolemy. "Come to your grandfather," the letter said. "Come quickly."

John did not come. The timing was wrong. The invitation was too convenient. He had heard what Ptolemy had done to his father and his brothers at the feast in Jericho, and an invitation that arrived while he was actively preparing military positions did not feel like a grandfather's longing for company. He weighed the parchment in his hands at Gazara, with the fighting force half-assembled around him and the memory of Jericho fresh, and read the warmth in the words as the cover it was.

The Men Sent to Take Gazara

Ptolemy had not waited for John to walk into the open. He had also sent men to seize Gazara by force, to take the stronghold and the son together. They came expecting a young commander who had swallowed the invitation and let his guard down. Instead they found a son who had already counted the dead at Jericho and read his grandfather's hand in the letter.

John had anticipated them. The men were killed before the trap could close, struck down inside the very position they had come to capture. John's survival became the survival of the Maccabean enterprise. He would lead next, as John Hyrcanus, and the dynasty would continue for another generation.

But none of this undid what had been lost. Judas in battle. Jonathan at Ptolemais. Simon at a feast. Three brothers taken by three different varieties of violence, the open kind, the deceptive kind, and the intimate kind that operates behind a table with wine on it. The Maccabean revolt kept moving because it could not afford to stop, not because it had not paid an extraordinary price to get wherever it was going next.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

3 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

The Book of Maccabees I 9:17The Book of Maccabees I

The trumpets blared – both sides, locked in a deadly embrace. Can you imagine the cacophony? The earth itself seemed to tremble under the combined roar of the armies. Maccabees I, Chapter 9, tells us that the battle raged relentlessly from sunrise to sunset. A grueling, bloody test of strength and will.

Judas, ever the strategist, noticed something crucial. Bacchides, the opposing general, had positioned himself and the bulk of his forces on the right flank. Knowing this, Judas made a daring move. He gathered his bravest warriors, the "hardy men," as Maccabees calls them, and launched a ferocious attack against that very right wing.

It worked! Judas and his men routed the enemy's right flank, driving them back towards the mount of Azotus. A significant victory. A evidence of Judas's leadership and the courage of his soldiers.

The battle was far from over.

The left wing of Bacchides' army witnessed the collapse of their comrades on the right. Seeing their advantage, they pressed their attack, relentlessly pursuing Judas and his men from behind. The tide had turned. The hunters had become the hunted.

What do you do in a situation like that? How do you maintain hope when victory seems to slip through your fingers? It’s a question that echoes through the ages, from the battlefields of the Maccabees to the challenges we face today. And it reminds us that even in moments of triumph, vigilance and adaptability are key.

Full source
The Book of Maccabees I 15:24The Book of Maccabees I

Take, for instance, this little snapshot from the First Book of Maccabees, chapter 15. It might seem like a dry list At first, but hidden within it are whispers of power, alliances, and a desperate siege.

The passage begins with a flurry of names: Sampsames, the Lacedemonians (better known as the Spartans!), Delos, Myndus, Sicyon, Caria, Samos… the list goes on! Pamphylia, Lycia, Halicarnassus, Rhodus, Aradus, Cos, Side, Aradus (again!), Gortyna, Cnidus, Cyprus, and Cyrene. What are all these places?

These are cities and regions, scattered across the ancient Mediterranean world. And they're significant because they represent the breadth of diplomatic efforts undertaken by the Hasmonean dynasty, specifically Simon the High Priest.

Think of it like this: Simon wasn't just leading a Jewish community in Judea. He was actively building relationships, forging alliances, and projecting influence on the international stage. He was letting everyone know that the Jewish people were back, independent, and a force to be reckoned with. These letters were essentially Simon's way of saying, "We're here, we're legitimate, and we're ready to do business."

Then, after this impressive roll call of international connections that "the copy hereof they wrote to Simon the high priest." It's a small detail, but an important one. It shows that Simon was at the center of this diplomatic web, receiving reports and solidifying his position as a leader.

But the peace wouldn't last, would it?

Suddenly, the scene shifts: "So Antiochus the king camped against Dora the second day, assaulting it continually, and making engines, by which means he shut up Tryphon, that he could neither go out nor in."

Here, we have a stark contrast. The diplomatic efforts are set aside, replaced by the brutal reality of warfare. Antiochus, a Seleucid king, is laying siege to the city of Dora, trapping Tryphon inside. Tryphon, if you remember from previous chapters, was a treacherous character who had murdered the previous king and was now being hunted down.

This siege is more than just a military maneuver. It's a power play. It’s a reminder that even with all the diplomatic successes, the threat of violence and oppression was ever-present. Antiochus is essentially sending a message: "Don't get too comfortable. I'm still in charge."

So, what can we take away from this short passage?

First, it highlights the importance of diplomacy and building alliances, especially when facing powerful adversaries. Simon the High Priest understood this well, and he worked tirelessly to secure his people's freedom and security.

Second, it reminds us that even the best-laid plans can be disrupted by violence and conflict. The world is a complex place, and power struggles are a constant reality.

And finally, it shows us the resilience and determination of the Jewish people. Despite facing constant threats and challenges, they continued to fight for their freedom and their right to self-determination.

These few verses from Maccabees I offer a glimpse into a turbulent time, a time of war, diplomacy, and the struggle for survival. And they remind us that even today, these themes are still relevant. We are still writing our own Book of Maccabees, aren't we?

Full source
The Book of Maccabees I 16:1The Book of Maccabees I

The Book of Maccabees I turns to John's Transgression.

In the midst of all this, we have John.

Our passage is brief, almost startlingly so. "Then came up John from Gazera, and told Simon his father what Cendebeus had done." (1 Maccabees 16). That’s it. A single sentence. But packed within it is a world of implication.

Who are these people? Simon, of course, is Simon Maccabaeus, one of the key figures in the Maccabean revolt, by this point serving as high priest and leader of the Jewish people. He's a pillar of strength, a symbol of resilience. John is his son, a chip off the old block, actively involved in the military campaigns. And Cendebeus? He's the villain of our little scene – a general appointed by the Seleucid king to harass and antagonize the Jewish people.

Gazera, where John is coming from, was a strategic location, often contested in the battles between the Maccabees and their enemies. So, John’s presence there suggests he's involved in defending this vital territory.

What did Cendebeus do? Alas, the text doesn't explicitly tell us here. We have to infer from the surrounding narrative. But knowing the context, we can safely assume it wasn't good news. Cendebeus was likely engaged in military aggression, threatening Jewish settlements, and generally making life difficult for everyone.

The real power of this verse lies in its understated nature. It's a simple report, a messenger delivering vital information. But that information sets in motion a chain of events. Simon, upon hearing his son's report, would have undoubtedly taken action. He would have strategized, mobilized his forces, and responded to Cendebeus's aggression.: this is how history often works. Not with grand pronouncements and sweeping declarations, but with quiet conversations and urgent messages passed between individuals. A single piece of information, delivered at the right time, can alter the course of a battle, a war, or even a nation.

John's journey from Gazera wasn't just a physical one; it was a journey of responsibility, of loyalty, and of courage. He knew the weight of his message. He knew that his father's actions would depend on the accuracy and urgency of his report. And he delivered.

This little verse reminds us that even the smallest roles can be pivotal. We may not all be Simons, leading armies and shaping destinies. But we can all be Johns, messengers of truth, bearers of vital information, and participants in the unfolding story of our world. What messages are we carrying, and how are we shaping the narrative around us?

Full source