Every Prophet Failed to Comfort Jerusalem Until God Came
After the Temple burned, God sent prophet after prophet to console Jerusalem. Each one was sent away. Then God stopped sending messengers and came himself.
Table of Contents
The City That Would Not Be Consoled
The Temple had burned. The city was rubble and ash. The people who had survived were on the roads to Babylon. And Jerusalem, in the midrashic imagination, sat in the ruins and refused to be consoled.
God sent the prophets. One by one they came, each carrying their message of comfort, their promises of eventual restoration, their assurances that the God who had withdrawn had not forgotten. And one by one Jerusalem turned them away. The comfort was real but it was not the right comfort, because it came from messengers rather than from the one who had left.
The midrash on Isaiah 40 in the collection connected to Yalkut Shimoni, the major anthology of midrashim compiled around the 13th century CE, preserved this tradition as the backstory to one of the most beloved verses in all of Scripture: Comfort, oh comfort My people (Isaiah 40:1).
Why Prophets Could Not Do What Was Needed
The midrash laid out the logic of Jerusalem's refusal through a series of analogies, each one tightening the argument. Who most needs to be comforted when a wife dies? Not the children, not the servants. The husband. So too with Zion: the verse from Lamentations, He has made me dwell in darkness like those long dead (Lamentations 3:6), was read as Zion speaking in God's voice. It is Me, the midrash heard Zion saying, it is My darkness, it is My desolation that needs comforting.
The second analogy: when two children are taken captive during their father's lifetime, who needs comforting most? The father. My children have gone forth from me and are no more (Jeremiah 10:20) was read as God's lament over Israel in exile. The comfort Jerusalem needed was the comfort of the one who had lost what the Temple represented, not the comfort of messengers sent on his behalf.
The third analogy completed the argument. When a house burns down, to whom do you offer comfort? The owner. The Temple's destruction was God's house burning. What Jerusalem required was not prophetic reassurance but divine presence, the owner coming in person to stand in the ashes of what had been his.
Before the Temple Had a Fixed Address
The second midrashic strand here came from a tradition about the Shechinah's history in Jerusalem before and after the Temple's construction. The Mekhilta, the tannaitic commentary on Exodus compiled in the 2nd century CE, preserved a principle: before King Solomon built the Temple on Mount Moriah, the divine presence had no fixed address. The Shechinah could rest anywhere within Jerusalem. Every rooftop, every courtyard, every street was potentially a dwelling place for God's presence. The entire city was sacred enough.
Then the Temple was built, and the Shechinah contracted. The principle the Mekhilta stated was stark: once one place was chosen, all others were excluded. The selection of Mount Moriah desanctified the rest of Jerusalem in this specific sense, concentrating what had been diffuse into a single building. The proof text came from Psalms: For the Lord has chosen Zion, He has desired it for His dwelling place (Psalm 132:13).
The implication was devastating when read against the destruction. When the Temple burned, it was not just a building that was lost. It was the concentrated dwelling of what had once spread across the whole city. The destruction did not simply remove God's presence from one site. It collapsed the whole geography of sacred space in Jerusalem into a ruin.
The Double Comfort and What It Meant
Isaiah 40:1 says: Comfort, oh comfort My people. The word is doubled. The rabbis asked why. The answer the tradition developed was that the double comfort corresponded to the double loss. Jerusalem had lost its people and God had lost his house. The verse was addressed, in the midrash's reading, to both parties simultaneously: comfort My people, comfort Me. The verse that sounds like God commanding the prophets to console Israel was actually God finally doing what the prophets had failed to do, coming in person, speaking the word himself twice, because what was needed had always been the speaker's own voice rather than any messenger.
← All myths