6 min read

Moses Asked How God Waits Out the Wicked

Cloud clung to the rock. Moses wanted the map, not a soft word. He could not stomach a marketplace where the wicked laughed. A stone rolled under his sandal.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. Abundance That Refused to Drip
  2. The Double Ledger of Patience
  3. Back and Forth in the First Dust
  4. The Answer Moses Had to Carry Down

Moses climbed the last shelf of rock with dust on his tongue and did not ask for a soft word. He asked for the map. Cloud clung to the stone. He pressed God for the ways that run the world when the wicked laugh in the marketplace and the righteous count their bruises. "Please make known to me Your ways," he said, and the request was not philosophy. It was a man who had led a stiff people and still could not stomach the books that seemed to balance wrong.

Moses Asked How God Waits Out the Wicked Click for full size

God did not hand him a chart of abstractions. "You ask for My ways, but you will know My life," came the answer, close enough to burn. The ways were not a lecture. They were the living patience that holds a world together long enough for a few good deeds and a few bad ones to finish their work.

Abundance That Refused to Drip

Righteous deeds belong to the Lord, the teaching runs, and then the measures open wider than a dry season expects. Pardon poured full from Isaiah's call to return, for He will abundantly pardon (Isaiah 55:7). Redemption stacked the same way from the psalm that waits for the Lord more than watchmen for morning (Psalms 130:7). Deliverances came in the plural, a God of salvations, not a single emergency exit (Psalms 68:21).

Moses lifted his face into that rain while a people who still remembered thirst waited below. Forgiveness was not a thin channel scratched in dust. It fell like water that finally finds the cracked field and does not apologize for flooding the furrows. He had seen Pharaoh's stubbornness. He had seen Israel's. The abundance did not erase either. It outlasted both long enough for a path to open through the sea.

A stone rolled under his sandal. He stepped aside, caught his balance, and kept his face toward the Presence that had just refused to make mercy look scarce.

The Double Ledger of Patience

Justice still stood in the old song: His ways are justice, a God of faithfulness without iniquity, righteous and upright is He (Deuteronomy 32:4). Beside it sat a harder counterpoint. God prolongs His spirit with the wicked and pays them in this world for the few good deeds they managed, so that the account can close clean when destruction comes. He prolongs His spirit with the righteous and lifts from them the few bad deeds they carried, then returns them toward quiet.

Moses turned the bitterness over on his tongue. In the valley of the vision a wicked man walked free under a full sun while a careful man limped and paid a tax he did not earn. Early coin for early sins. Early subtraction of the righteous person's small failures so the rest can stand. The world does not always show the final page at noon.

"Therefore the wicked will not stand in judgment," the psalm concludes in another register. The wise are Israel, who recognized the holiness of the Ark overlaid with pure gold (Exodus 25:11). The fools turn away, estranged, or worse, call the world a jest and empty the morning and evening of God's name. God spoke the charge clean: I created the world, and it was so (Genesis 1:7). You say otherwise. Denial of the making is the first refusal to stand when the court finally sits.

It would be good if the wicked judged others only as they would judge themselves. The standard they love for strangers would crush them at home. Moses heard that and did not laugh. He bound the saying into the same staff he carried down every hard mountain.

Back and Forth in the First Dust

Before any ledger of nations, dust had already been shaped under a double pressure. "Back and forth You formed me," the psalm sings of the first human frame (Psalms 139:5). One master says two faces, front and back, a creature already looking both ways. Another says a face and a tail, a form still half-beast until the human settles. A third pair lands harder: "back" as the act of creation itself, "forth" as the punishment that follows when the creature fails the gift.

The Flood sat in that "forth." God blotted out every living substance from the face of the ground (Genesis 7:23). Moses watched water rise in the telling until roofs sank and mouths closed. The same hands that pressed Adam from dust later washed the world that dust had filled with violence. Creation and judgment shared one grammar. Moses, who already knew water as both path and grave, felt the old pair lock into place: form, then the cost of what the form chose.

Adam rose from the ground able to face both worlds if he proved worthy, back and forth as a double portion, or else to arrive only to give account with the hand of God still heavy on him. Dual dust. Dual destiny. No neutral clay. Moses reached toward the image as if he could steady the first man, then dropped his hand because the Flood had already answered what unsteadied dust becomes.

The Answer Moses Had to Carry Down

Moses came off the height with no neat proverb for the camp. He carried rain that pardons more than the eye expects, a patience that pays the wicked early and trims the righteous early, and a first human shaped for two directions before the Flood ever rose. The people would still watch scoundrels prosper. The people would still ask why. He could at least refuse the lie that God had no system, only mood.

At the foot of the mountain a child chased a goat through thorn. Moses stepped aside and let them pass. Somewhere above the cloud, the double ledger kept its slow count. Somewhere below, Adam's children still walked with faces that could turn toward life or toward the water that erases.

He drove his staff into the dust, pulled it free, and walked toward a camp that would need both justice and the rain that refuses to drip. Behind him the rock held the heat of the question he had thrown. Ahead of him tents waited with men who wanted simple fairness by nightfall. He carried neither simple nor fair. He carried the ways.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

3 sources

The texts behind this telling. Some cards carry a translation of the source; others are our own retelling of it, and each card says which. Every card links out to the original.

Midrash Tehillim 1:19Midrash Tehillim

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.Rabbi Mike Feuer, Jerusalem Anthology · CC-BY

Midrash Tehillim, a collection of rabbinic interpretations on the Book of Psalms, wrestles with this very idea, pulling in verses from all over the Hebrew Bible to paint a vivid picture.

The opening line, "Therefore, the wicked will not stand in judgment," isn't just a statement; it's a conclusion drawn from a much larger argument. But what is that argument? Well, it hinges on understanding who the "wise" and the "fools" truly are.

(Proverbs 15:7) tells us, "The lips of the wise disperse knowledge." But who are the wise? According to Midrash Tehillim, the wise are the people of Israel. And what makes them wise? They recognized the holiness of the Ark, as described in (Exodus 25:11): "And you shall overlay it with pure gold." Israel understood sacredness.

The Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary) continues, "the hearts of fools are not the same." These fools, it claims, are the Gentile nations, those "estranged from God. The wise embrace the divine, while the fools turn away.

The Midrash then offers another interpretation of that same verse from Proverbs. The wise, the people of Israel, consistently exalt God's name, proclaiming it "morning and evening." But the hearts of fools? They don't. They're the minim, the heretics, who dismiss the world as mere foolishness. It's a rejection of divine purpose, a claim that existence itself is meaningless.

Rabbi Yudan and Rabbi Pinchas add a powerful layer to this. They suggest God essentially says to the wicked, "I created the world," referencing (Genesis 1:7), "And it was so." In other words, God's creation is evidence of divine power and intention. But the wicked? "You say otherwise." This denial of creation itself is a fundamental rejection of God.

Therefore, the Midrash reiterates, "the wicked will not stand in judgment." But here's a twist: Rabbi Abba bar Kahana suggests it would be good if they did judge others only as they would judge themselves. Talk about a thought experiment!

The Midrash isn't done yet! Rabbi Abba bar Kahana argues that the wicked sin twice. These are the four kingdoms that will not stand on the day of judgment. Rabbi Shmuel bar Nachmani adds that a single affliction destroys them, and they are immediately called to account. There’s no prolonged struggle, just swift consequence.

The Midrash concludes by linking the word "judgment" to its use in (Jeremiah 10:8): "But they are altogether senseless and foolish; the instruction of idols is but wood!" It’s a harsh condemnation of those who worship false gods, those who choose ignorance over wisdom.

Midrash Tehillim leaves us with a sobering reflection. (Psalm 34:22) reminds us that "The wicked will perish." And (Proverbs 24:16) offers a contrasting image: "For the righteous falls seven times and rises again, but the wicked stumble in times of calamity, not twice."

So, what does it all mean? Perhaps it's a reminder that our choices have consequences, not just in this world but, according to this ancient text, in the world to come. It’s a call to choose wisdom over foolishness, to embrace the divine rather than deny it. A call for self-reflection, urging us to consider how we judge others and, more importantly, how we judge ourselves.

Full source
Midrash Tehillim 103:8Midrash Tehillim

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.Rabbi Mike Feuer, Jerusalem Anthology · CC-BY

A simple statement: "Doing righteous deeds is of the Lord." But it’s what follows that truly captivates. Rabbi Yitzhak proclaims that everything is in abundance. Righteous deeds in abundance! The verse from Isaiah (55:7) is then invoked: "And to our God, for He will abundantly pardon. Forgiveness not as a meager trickle, but as a boundless ocean. And it doesn’t stop there. We also have the promise of redemption in abundance, drawn from (Psalms 130:7). It's like a cascading waterfall of divine grace.

Rabbi Shmuel bar Nachman takes this idea even further, stating that even salvation is abundant, citing (Psalms 68:21): "The Lord is to us a God of deliverances." It’s a reminder that God isn't just willing to forgive; He actively works to liberate us from the shackles of our past.

What about those times when we don’t see that abundance? When it feels like God is distant, even punishing? The Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary) tackles that too. "God made known His ways to Moses," it says. Rabbi Berechiah, in the name of Rabbi Abba bar Kahana, tells us of Moses pleading with God: "Please make known to me Your ways." And God's response? "You ask for My ways, but you will know My life." It's a profound exchange. God isn’t just revealing abstract principles; He’s offering a glimpse into the very essence of His being.

This leads to a crucial point about God’s patience. The Midrash contrasts God's justice with His mercy. While (Deuteronomy 32:4) declares, "His ways are justice. A God of faithfulness without iniquity, righteous and upright is He," Rabbi Shmuel bar Nachman offers a counterpoint: "He prolongs His spirit with the wicked and rewards them for the few good deeds they did in this world in order to destroy them. And He prolongs His spirit with the righteous and takes from them the few bad deeds they did in this world and returns them to tranquility."

What does this mean? Essentially, God is patient. He allows the wicked to enjoy temporary rewards, perhaps as a form of delayed judgment, while also offering the righteous a path to purification by addressing their imperfections in this world. It's not about arbitrary punishment or reward, but about a deeper process of spiritual refinement.

Rabbi Abba, quoting Rabbi Tanchum, adds another layer to this understanding: "He began to exact debts. Not to forever strive or perpetually bear a grudge... I engaged in strife with the generation of the Flood, with the people of Sodom, and also with the people of the Tower of Babel, and I won and lost against them. And when Moses overcame me, I was appeased with my world. Be because I do not engage in strife forever." This paints a picture of a God who, while capable of righteous anger, ultimately seeks reconciliation. The image of Moses "overcoming" God is striking, suggesting that even divine judgment can be tempered by human compassion and intercession.

Finally, the Midrash concludes with a powerful image of distance and forgiveness. "As far as the east is from the west, He has distanced our transgressions from Him." But Rabbi Yirmiyah offers a subtle, yet profound, shift in perspective. He urges us not to pray that God distance us from our sin, but rather that our sin be distanced from us. In other words, the responsibility lies not just with God, but with us. We must actively work to separate ourselves from the actions that hold us back.

So, what does all this mean for us today? It's a reminder that even when we stumble, even when we feel lost in our mistakes, the potential for forgiveness and redemption is always present. It’s a call to embrace the abundance of God’s grace, to strive for righteousness, and to actively distance ourselves from the things that keep us from becoming our best selves. It's a story not just of divine forgiveness, but of the ongoing, dynamic relationship between humanity and the Divine. And that, my friends, is a story worth holding onto.

Full source
Midrash Tehillim 139:4Midrash Tehillim

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.Rabbi Mike Feuer, Jerusalem Anthology · CC-BY

Specifically, What does that even mean? The rabbis of old grappled with this, and their interpretations reveal fascinating insights into our dual nature, our purpose, and even the nature of God's creation itself.

The Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary) presents a disagreement between Rav and Shmuel. One says that Adam was created with two faces – a front and a back. The other says he was created with a face and… a tail. A tail! Now, that's a visual. According to the one who said "face," since it is written "back and forth you formed me," it makes sense. But according to the one who said "tail," what does "back and forth" mean?

Rabbi Ami, in the name of Rabbi Ami (yes, you read that right!) offers an alternative. "Back" refers to the act of Creation itself, that initial spark, and "forth" refers to punishment. Creation and punishment, inextricably linked. Granted, "back" refers to the act of Creation, as we say during Friday night prayers. But what does "forth" refer to? It refers to the punishment of the Flood, as it says (Genesis 7:23), "And He blotted out every living substance which was upon the face of the ground."

This idea of duality continues. The Midrash even touches on the relationship between men and women, with a somewhat… antiquated perspective. The Midrash says that a man should not follow a woman, and if he encounters her on a bridge, he should push her aside. But what the Midrash is getting at, underneath all of that, is the idea that the male aspect should be dominant. And it makes sense that the male aspect should be dominant, as it is taught that "A man should not follow a woman on the road, even if she is his wife. If he encounters her on a bridge, he should push her aside and anyone who follows a woman into a river has no share in the World to Come."

Rabbi Yochanan offers another interpretation of "back and forth you formed me," saying that if a person is worthy, he can enjoy both worlds, back and forth. But if not, he comes to give an account. And you laid your hand upon me, as you said (Job 13:21), "Your hand is heavy upon me." It’s a reminder that our actions have consequences, both in this world and the next.

Then we have Rabbi Eliezer the Androgynos (referring to someone of indeterminate gender), who offers a truly radical idea: that the first humans were created intersex! As it says (Genesis 1:27), "male and female He created them." This suggests a blurring of the lines, a unity of genders in the original human form. Rabbi Shmuel doubles down on this idea, saying, "Two faces were created, and he was made with a back and a front."

Perhaps the most intriguing image is presented by Rabbi Tanchuma, in the name of Rabbi Berechia in the name of Rabbi Elazar: Adam was created as a golem – an unformed, shapeless mass – and lay from the beginning of the world to its end. A giant, inert figure waiting for God to breathe life into him. A figure that lay from the beginning of the world to its end. This is what is written, "Your golems have seen" (Psalms 139:16).

The Midrash then expands outward, connecting Adam's creation to the creation of the entire world. Rabbi Yehuda son of Rabbi Nachman in the name of Rabbi Shimon in the name of Rabbi Elazar said: "God created the whole world from east to west, as it is said, 'Behind and before you encircle me.' From north to south, as it is said, 'From one end of the earth to the other end of the earth.' And even in the space of the world, as it is said, 'Your hand is upon me.'"

Rabbi Elazar says that "Behind refers to the work of the first day of creation, and before refers to the work of the last day of creation," while Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish flips that around, saying "Behind refers to the work of the last day of creation, and before refers to the work of the beginning of creation."

What are we to make of all this? Tails, two faces, golems spanning millennia… Is this meant to be taken literally? Probably not. But these interpretations, these midrashim, offer us a glimpse into the ancient rabbis' attempts to understand the profound mystery of human existence. They explored the duality within us, the potential for both good and evil, the connection between creation and consequence.

The Midrash Tehillim 139 invites us to contemplate our own creation, our own purpose. To consider the "back and forth" within ourselves – the forces that shape us, the choices we make, and the legacy we leave behind. Even the word "Kluso" (a type of bird) only appears later in the Torah. As Rabbi Shemlai said: just as the physical characteristics of Klusso (an animal mentioned in the Talmud) are similar to those of a domesticated animal, a wild animal, and a bird, so too is the Torah of God similar, in that it contains laws for domesticated animals, wild animals, and birds. As it is written (Leviticus 11:2): "This is the animal that you may eat." And finally (ibid. 12:2): "When a woman conceives." Thus, you may derive from this analogy that both man and the Temple were created with two hands. It is written (Psalms 119:73): "Your hands have made me and fashioned me; give me understanding, that I may learn Your commandments." And it is written (Exodus 15:17): "The sanctuary, O Lord, that Your hands have established." So, the next time you look in the mirror, remember Adam, remember the golem, remember the endless interpretations, and ask yourself: What am I creating "back and forth" in my own life?

Full source