6 min read

Solomon Wandered as a Beggar and Wrote It Down

He held out his hand in a market that did not know him. The worst day was not the blank stares. It was the face that went pale.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Claim No Market Would Buy
  2. The Face That Went Pale
  3. He Counted Seven Vanities
  4. Joab Stood and Spoke Before the Sword
  5. He Wrote Breath of Breaths

He stood at the edge of a market in a city he did not know, holding out his hand. Solomon had been saying it for weeks. He was the king of Judah. He had built the Temple. He had spoken with demons and commanded the wind.

Solomon Wandered as a Beggar and Wrote It Down Click for full size

The merchants looked past him. Children ran. A woman offered him bread from pity and moved quickly away.

He was not believed. That was the weather of those years. Banished from his house, stripped of his realm, sent among strangers without a coin or a companion, he told a story too large for a beggar's face. It was easier to call him mad than to hear him.

The Claim No Market Would Buy

He ate what strangers left. He slept in doorways. The man who had once opened his mouth and had every wise thing he needed pour out now opened his mouth and had nothing come out but a claim no one would accept.

In some cities he learned to stop saying it. In others he said it anyway, half out of pride, half because a wound keeps asserting itself. He wandered far-off lands. He begged his daily bread. People thought him a lunatic because he never tired of assuring them that he was Solomon, Judah's great and mighty king.

The throne at home was occupied. Ashmedai sat where Solomon had sat. The ring was gone from the finger that had ruled spirits. The beggar kept walking.

The Face That Went Pale

The lowest point was not the disbelief. The lowest point was the day someone recognized him.

He had almost grown used to the blank stares, the shrug, the small charity of people who gave him a crust so they could stop thinking about him. He was not prepared for the face that stopped. The face that looked at him fully. The face that went pale.

A person who had known him in his greatness, who could measure the distance between the king and the rags on the same body, standing in the same market, holding out the same hand.

There is a pain only recognition can cause. To be seen in full degradation by someone who knows what you were is not the same as being invisible. It is worse. A stranger's pity is abstract. This person's pity was specific, and Solomon had to stand inside it. Recollections stirred. The present misery became almost unendurable.

He did not die of it. He stored it. Later he would need a word for what a closed hand holds when the thing inside has already gone.

He Counted Seven Vanities

When the ring came back, and Ashmedai was driven out, and Solomon sat on the throne again, he did not suppress the memory. He made it scripture.

The book is Kohelet. The first verse announces the program: hevel havalim (הבל הבלים), vapor of vapors, all is vapor (Ecclesiastes 1:2). Breath. Something that dissipates the moment you close your hand around it. He used the word thirty-eight times. He had earned it.

He counted the vanities. Seven of them. He had lived across all of them: wisdom, pleasure, wealth, power, building, love, and the throne itself. He called each one vapor. Not because they were false. Because he had reached the end of each and found it give way to the next without resolving into anything solid. He had gone all the way through and come out with nothing in his hands (Ecclesiastes 2:11).

Seven is the shape of a complete circuit. He had not listed seven random disappointments. He had walked a structure. At the bottom of it he had stood in a market with his hand out, saying he was king, and the last vanity, kingship itself, had turned its judgments on him. A just man perished in his righteousness. Justice had stepped away, and the king was left without the side that had kept him standing.

Joab Stood and Spoke Before the Sword

The beggar who had not been believed now sat in judgment again. Joab was brought in for the murder of Abner. Solomon was already convinced of the guilt. He granted a defense anyway.

"Why didst thou kill Abner?"

Joab said he was the avenger of his brother Asahel, whom Abner had slain.

Solomon said Asahel had sought to kill Abner, and Abner had acted in self-defense.

Joab said Abner might have disabled Asahel without going to extremes. Then he pressed: Abner had aimed at the fifth rib. That is not a light wound.

Solomon heard him out. The man who had begged from strangers and been called mad still asked a guilty captain to speak before the sentence. Kingship, when it returned, did not come back as appetite. It came back as a hearing.

He Wrote Breath of Breaths

He wrote it all down. The markets. The pale face. The seven vanities. The days when a just man perishes in his own righteousness because the ground under kingship has shifted.

The book ends where it should end, not with a solution but with a position: fear God and keep the commandments, for this is the whole of humanity (Ecclesiastes 12:13). After the exile and the recognition and the rags and the hand held out in foreign markets, the conclusion is plain. Stand in the right relation to what is above you. That is all. That is enough.

A man who had gone to the bottom of each vanity and come back wrote that down, and it fits on one line.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

3 sources

The texts behind this telling. Some cards carry a translation of the source; others are our own retelling of it, and each card says which. Every card links out to the original.

Legends of the Jews 5:137Legends of the Jews

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.The Legends of the Jews by Louis Ginzberg (1909) · Public Domain

Solomon is familiar. The wisest of men, builder of the Temple, ruler of a glorious kingdom. But what happens when that power is stripped away? What happens when the mighty fall?

Banished from his home, deprived of his realm, he wandered far-off lands. The man who commanded armies, who spoke with animals, reduced to begging for his daily bread among strangers.

It gets worse. Not only was he destitute, but he was also disbelieved. He couldn't just blend in, could he? He kept insisting he was Solomon, the great and mighty king of Judah. People must have thought he was completely mad, a lunatic ranting about a past that seemed utterly impossible.

We can almost hear the whispers: "Poor man, lost his mind." The King who once held court now mistaken for a madman on the street.

But the lowest depth of despair, the point where the pain became almost unbearable? That came when someone did recognize him.

Pause and consider that. To be utterly alone, disbelieved, might be one thing. But to be seen, to be recognized for who you once were, while in such a state of degradation? The Zohar tells us that even the memory of past glory can be a source of intense pain in times of suffering.

The recollections, the associations that stirred within him at that moment… Ginzberg, in Legends of the Jews, describes it as almost unendurable. We can only imagine the flood of memories, the stark contrast between his former glory and his present misery. Think of the weight of everything he had lost, now amplified by the pity, or perhaps the scorn, in the eyes of the one who remembered.

What does this story, this glimpse into the humbled life of Solomon, teach us? Perhaps it's a reminder that even the mightiest can fall. Perhaps it's a meditation on the fleeting nature of earthly power and glory. Or maybe, just maybe, it's a lesson in empathy. To look beyond the surface, to see the humanity, even the former greatness, in those who are down on their luck. It is a stark warning of how far one can fall, and to treat everyone with respect as each human is made in God's image. As we find in Midrash Rabbah, the world is supported by three things: by justice, by truth, and by peace.

Full source
Idra Zuta 1:82Idra Zuta

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.Idra Zuta, The Small Gathering, trans. Michal Ricardo · CC-BY

King Solomon certainly did. He grappled with this very question in Kohelet (Ecclesiastes) 7:15, saying, "All things have I seen in the days of my vanity; there is a just man who perishes in his righteousness…"

What did he mean by "vanity"?

The Idra Zuta, a profound section of the Zohar – that foundational text of Jewish mysticism – offers a fascinating answer. It connects Solomon's lament to the very structure of the Divine.

In Idra Zuta, this "vanity" isn't just about fleeting earthly pleasures. It speaks to seven higher vanities, aspects of what's called the king's face. These are actually the seven Sfirot – divine emanations or attributes –: Chesed (loving-kindness), Gvurah (strength or judgment), Tiferet (beauty or balance), Netzach (endurance), Hod (splendor), Yesod (foundation), and Malchut (kingship or sovereignty).

It's Malchut, the last of these seven, that's particularly relevant here. This is holy Malchut. When Malchut is stirred up, especially with her judgments, that verse from Kohelet – "there is a just man who perishes in his righteousness" – comes into play. Why? Because, according to the Idra Zuta, at these times, justice becomes separated from righteousness.

Think of it like this: righteousness, Tzedek, needs justice, Din, to be fully realized. When they're disconnected, Malchut – the divine attribute that manifests in the world – is left without the support of the "right side," so to speak. This imbalance can lead to suffering and injustice.

The text even offers an alternative reading of a verse to emphasize this point. Instead of reading about a lack of judgment, it suggests we read about ruin coming because of this lack.

So, what’s the takeaway? The Idra Zuta isn't just offering a theological explanation for suffering. It's suggesting that the challenges we see in the world are reflections of a deeper, cosmic reality. When balance is disrupted in the divine realm – when justice and righteousness are separated – it manifests in the world around us.

Does that mean we're powerless? Absolutely not! If anything, it gives us a powerful call to action. A world where righteousness and justice walk hand in hand.

Full source
Legends of the Jews 5:13Legends of the Jews

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.The Legends of the Jews by Louis Ginzberg (1909) · Public Domain

Legends of the Jews turns to Solomon Gives Joab a Chance to Defend Abner's Murder.

Solomon, wise as he was, suspected Joab of some pretty dark deeds, specifically the murder of Abner. But even with suspicions running high, Solomon, being the just ruler he strived to be, gave Joab the chance to defend himself. It's like a scene straight out of a courtroom drama, only with kings and ancient lore instead of lawyers and paperwork.

"Why didst thou kill Abner?" Solomon asked, cutting straight to the heart of the matter.

Joab's response was immediate: "I was the avenger of my brother Asahel, whom Abner had slain." A seemingly justifiable act of revenge. A life for a life, the ancient code. But Solomon, ever the shrewd judge, wasn't buying it.

"Why, it was Asahel who sought to kill Abner," Solomon countered, "and Abner acted in self-defense." Ouch. The narrative starts to crumble. It wasn't a cold-blooded murder, but self-preservation. Or was it?

Joab wasn't giving up that easily. "Abner might have disabled Asahel without going to extremes." He argued that Abner could have simply wounded Asahel, not killed him.

Then comes the zinger, dripping with sarcasm, "What! Abner aimed directly at Asahel's fifth rib, and thou wouldst say he could not have managed to wound him lightly?"

It's this moment that truly sticks with you. Joab isn't denying the act, but arguing the degree of force used. He’s saying Abner went for the kill shot – a clear indication, in Joab's mind, of malicious intent.

But what does it all mean? Is Joab justified in his actions, driven by familial duty and a sense of justice, however twisted? Or is he simply a murderer hiding behind a veil of righteous indignation? Solomon certainly seems to believe the latter. This brief exchange encapsulates the complexities of justice, revenge, and the shades of gray that exist even in the most black-and-white situations. It makes you wonder: how do we justify our own actions, especially when driven by emotion? And how easily can we convince ourselves that we're in the right, even when the truth is far more complicated?

Full source