5 min read

The Kiss at Sinai That Israel Refuses to Wash Off

Sinai was not thunder. It was a mouth on a mouth. And every century since, Israel has paid for that kiss in blood and refused to wipe it away.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. A Commandment With a Mouth
  2. The Tower That Protected What the Kiss Had Left
  3. Egypt Had Already Known What Was at Stake
  4. Why Israel Keeps Dying for That Kiss

A Commandment With a Mouth

The first line of the Song of Songs asks for kisses. The mouth that asked was Israel's, the rabbis said, and the mouth being addressed was God's, and the moment they were describing was Sinai.

Rabbi Yochanan pictured what happened when the first commandment was given. An angel carried it, he imagined, walking through the camp from person to person. The angel read out the law, the consequence, the reward, and then asked: do you accept this? If the answer was yes, the angel leaned down and kissed the person on the mouth. The kiss was the seal of the covenant. Not just an agreement between parties. A contact between them. The commandment entered the body through the mouth before it entered the mind through the ears.

Other rabbis pushed the image further and removed the angel entirely. The commandment itself, the dibur, the spoken word issuing from the divine mouth, walked the camp. It went to every person, asked the question, waited for the answer, and when the answer was yes, pressed its mouth against theirs. Sinai was not a broadcast. It was sixty thousand individual negotiations, each one ending in a touch.

The Tower That Protected What the Kiss Had Left

After Sinai, Israel wore the evidence. The rabbis who read the Song of Songs as a record of the God-Israel relationship found the line your neck is like the tower of David, built magnificently, and understood immediately what neck jewelry it was describing. The jewelry Israel wore was not ornamental. It was the sign of having said yes to the angel at Sinai, the adornment that marked a person who had accepted the commandment and received the seal.

The tower of David was built defensively: a thousand shields hung on it, all the armor of heroes. The neck that resembles it is not simply beautiful. It is defended. What Israel wore around its throat was both the sign of the kiss and the armor against what would come next. The two were the same object. The intimacy at Sinai had not just given Israel something to cherish. It had given them something to protect, which meant giving them something that could be attacked.

Egypt Had Already Known What Was at Stake

The rabbis read the Exodus through the lens of the Song. When God took Israel out of Egypt, they were not rescuing a suffering labor force. They were reclaiming a beloved from a household that had held her too long. The Shir HaShirim Rabbah heard Egypt as the place of detention and the Exodus as the moment the beloved was freed to run toward the one she had been promised to.

This framing changed the moral weight of the plagues. They were not punishments delivered to a nation that had made a bad policy decision about Hebrew labor. They were the acts of someone with a prior claim, coming to collect what had always been his. The suffering of Egypt was the cost of having held back what did not belong to Egypt. It was the cost of detention.

When Israel came out, it came out as a bride leaving a house she had been trapped in, moving toward the one who had been waiting at the door. The Song preserves that motion in its opening lines, the urgency, the wanting, the draw toward something that has been held apart too long.

Why Israel Keeps Dying for That Kiss

The rabbis of Shir HaShirim Rabbah asked the hard question and did not let themselves off the hook: why does Israel keep dying? Why does the nation that accepted the covenant at Sinai keep finding itself in front of swords and fires and exile decrees? If the kiss was real, why does the kissed body keep bleeding?

Their answer was not comfort dressed up as theology. It was the thing itself. Israel keeps dying because Israel keeps refusing to remove the kiss. Every nation that has ever asked Israel to exchange the covenant for safety has been told no. Not always with heroism. Sometimes with terror and trembling. But no. The kiss is still on the mouth. The tower of David is still hung with shields. The beloved is still moving toward the one who asked, through whatever is in the way.

Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai pictured the divine utterance circling the camp and pressing each mouth in turn, and the angels asking: "who is this who comes up from the wilderness, leaning on her beloved?" The answer was the same every time. It was Israel. Coming up from whatever wilderness the current century had made of the promised land. Leaning, as always, on the one whose kiss was still there.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

4 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Shir HaShirim Rabbah 2:2Shir HaShirim Rabbah

Shir HaShirim Rabbah turns to The Sensual Experience of Receiving God's Word at Sinai.

Our guide today is Shir HaShirim Rabbah, a rabbinic commentary on the Song of Songs. It uses the passionate language of the Song to explore the relationship between God and Israel. And in this particular passage, it unpacks the verse, "Let him kiss me with the kisses of his mouth."

Rabbi Yoḥanan pictures an angel acting as an intermediary. According to him, the angel would take each commandment directly from God, blessed be He, and present it to each Israelite. "Do you accept this commandment?" the angel would ask, detailing the laws, punishments, decrees, and rewards involved. If the Israelite said yes, accepting both the commandment and God's divinity, the angel would kiss them on the mouth. As (Deuteronomy 4:35) says, “You have been shown in order to know that the Lord, He is God.”

The rabbis offer a different, even more direct, interpretation. They suggest the commandment itself would circulate among the Israelites, making the same offer. Accept me, it would say, with all my complexities and rewards. And upon acceptance, the commandment would kiss the person, becoming a scholar and teaching them Torah! Think of it – the very word of God imprinting itself upon you, transforming you. "Lest you forget the matters that your eyes saw," says (Deuteronomy 4:9), highlighting how the dibur (utterance) itself would speak to you.

Now, a crucial question arises: how many commandments did the Israelites actually hear directly from God? Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi states that after the Ten Commandments were given, the people pleaded with Moses, "You speak with us, and we will hear" (Exodus 20:16). This implies that before that moment, God was speaking directly to them. But how many direct commandments were there?

Rabbi Azarya, citing Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi, offers a compelling answer: of the 613 mitzvot (commandments) in the Torah, Moses spoke 611. The first two – Anokhi (I am the Lord your God) and Lo Yihye Lekha (You shall have no other gods before me) – were heard directly from God. These initial commandments are thus the "kisses of His mouth" mentioned in the Song of Songs.

But how did these divine utterances actually emerge from God? Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai provides a powerful image. He describes the utterance leaving God's right side, encircling the massive Israelite camp (18 mil by 18 mil, a biblical measurement of distance), and then returning to God's left side. God would then receive it and inscribe it on the tablets, the sound echoing across the earth – "The voice of the Lord hews flames of fire" (Psalm 29:7).

The Rabbis, however, take issue with the idea of a "left side" to God. Isn't it written, "Your right, Lord, is glorious in strength; Your right hand, Lord"? (Exodus 15:6). Instead, they propose the utterance moved from God's right to Israel's right, encircled the camp, and returned to God's right side, before being inscribed.

Rabbi Berekhya adds another layer. He suggests the utterance inscribed itself, its sound reverberating across the world. When asked about the verse "Written with the finger of God" (Exodus 31:18), he responded that it was like a student writing with the master guiding their hand.

So, did Israel hear all the commandments from God directly, or just the first two? Rabbi Yehoshua says just two: "Let him kiss me with some of the kisses of his mouth." The Rabbis, however, insist they heard them all. Rabbi Yehoshua of Sikhnin, in the name of Rabbi Levi, reiterates that the statement "You speak to us and we will hear" came after all Ten Commandments were given.

This passage from Shir HaShirim Rabbah isn't just about the logistics of revelation. It's about the intimacy, the overwhelming power, and the profound responsibility that comes with receiving God's word. It invites us to imagine ourselves at Sinai, not just as observers, but as active participants in a divine encounter. What would it have been like to be kissed by a commandment? And how does that kiss continue to resonate in our lives today?

Full source
Shir HaShirim Rabbah 4:1Shir HaShirim Rabbah

It's filled with poetic imagery, and One thousand bucklers are hung upon it, all the shields of the mighty." What does it all mean?

Well, Shir HaShirim Rabbah, a classic Midrashic (rabbinic interpretive commentary) commentary on the Song of Songs, offers some fascinating interpretations. The verse compares the beloved's neck to the Tower of David, and the Midrash asks: In what way did David elevate this "neck," or Israel, in his book, the Book of Psalms?

The answer, according to the Midrash, lies in verses like (Psalms 136:13), "Who split the Red Sea asunder, [His mercy endures forever. He led Israel through its midst]." The miracle of the Red Sea, a defining moment in Jewish history, is a evidence of Israel's merit. It's as if David, through his Psalms, is reminding us of this incredible act of divine grace.

What about the phrase "built magnificently [letalpiyot]"? The Midrash cleverly connects letalpiyot to "mouths [piyot]." It suggests that this refers to the Book of Psalms itself, which, according to tradition, was composed by many voices, many mouths. Who were these psalmists?

The Midrash identifies ten individuals: Adam, Abraham, Moses, David, and Solomon. There's no debate about these five. But who are the other five? This is where it gets interesting. Rav and Rabbi Yoḥanan, two prominent Talmudic sages, offer differing opinions. Rav says: Asaf, Heiman, Yedutun, the three sons of Koraḥ, and Ezra. Rabbi Yoḥanan says: Asaf, Heiman, and Yedutun are one, each of the three sons of Koraḥ, and Ezra.

It's a bit like a theological version of "Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon," isn't it? Trying to connect all these figures and their contributions to the Book of Psalms. The discussion even explores whether Asaf, mentioned as a psalmist, is the same Asaf who was a son of Koraḥ. Rav believes they are different, citing I (Chronicles 25:2), which mentions an Asaf who prophesied during King David's time.

And what about Yedutun? Was he a prophet, or is "to Yedutun" a reference to punishments and decrees, as some suggest? The Rabbis are diving deep into the text to find the most authentic meaning.

But here’s the really beautiful part. Rabbi Huna, in the name of Rabbi Aḥa, shares a powerful parable. Even though ten people contributed to the Book of Psalms, it's ultimately attributed to David. Why? Because, as the parable suggests, the king chose David to recite the hymn on behalf of everyone, because "his voice is sweet." David, "the sweet singer of Israel" (II Samuel 23:1), becomes the unifying voice of the Psalms.

Now, back to our original verse: "One thousand bucklers are hung upon it." The Midrash interprets this as a reference to the thousands upon thousands who stood at the Red Sea and were defended by God. This defense, however, wasn't just for that moment. It was also thanks to the merit of what would come a thousand generations later – the giving of the Torah.

And "all the shields of the mighty"? These are the individuals who control their inclinations, who overcome their desires, like Moses, David, and Ezra. These figures, through their strength and righteousness, have an impact on entire generations. It was through the merit of "your two breasts" (Song of Songs 4:5) – interpreted as Moses and Aaron – that the Torah was given.

The Midrash then shifts its focus to the Israelites at Mount Sinai. They didn't stand there with "lightheartedness," but with fear, trembling, and agitation. They were humbled and united. Rabbi Abba bar Kahana, citing Rabbi Yoḥanan, connects this to (Isaiah 60:12): "And the nations will be destroyed [ḥarov yeḥeravu]." He interprets this as "from Ḥorev (Sinai) they will be destroyed," implying that those who didn't accept the Torah received their death sentence.

The Israelites, on the other hand, were cleansed of iniquity. Rabbi Aḥa and Rabbi Mesharshiya point out that unlike other offerings, the Shavuot (the Festival of Weeks) offering doesn't include a sin offering, implying that the Israelites were without sin at that moment.

Rabbi Yoḥanan adds that on the day the Lord descended onto Mount Sinai, six hundred thousand ministering angels descended with him, each carrying a crown for an Israelite. Rabbi Abba bar Kahana says that a million two hundred thousand angels descended: one to crown each Israelite, and another to gird them with a zoni, a belt, symbolizing strength and commitment.

So, what does all of this tell us? The Song of Songs, through the lens of the Midrash, becomes a tradition of historical events, theological insights, and moral lessons. It reminds us of the importance of remembering our history, of striving for righteousness, and of appreciating the power of unity and humility. It's not just a love poem; it's a reflection on the relationship between God and Israel, a relationship forged in fire and sustained by faith. And like David's sweet voice echoing through the Psalms, these stories continue to resonate with us today.

Full source
Shir HaShirim Rabbah 9:4Shir HaShirim Rabbah

The ancient rabbis certainly did. And they found ways to see even the most epic struggles, like the Exodus from Egypt, through a deeply human lens. They weren't just interested in the historical events; they wanted to understand the spiritual and moral lessons embedded within.

Take this passage from Shir HaShirim Rabbah, a collection of rabbinic interpretations on the Song of Songs. It grapples with a seemingly simple verse: "To a mare in Pharaoh's chariots" (Song of Songs 1:9). Now, what could a mare possibly have to do with spiritual growth and understanding God?

Rabbi Papis, in his interpretation, plays with the Hebrew word for "mare," lesusati. He points out that it's written without a vav, a Hebrew letter that often functions as a vowel. This allows it to also be read as lesisati, which sounds like "I was gladdened" (sasti). So, Rabbi Papis suggests, God is saying, "Just as I was gladdened to eliminate the Egyptians at the sea, so I would have been gladdened to eliminate the enemies of Israel."

Who caused Israel to be saved? According to Rabbi Papis, it was the merit of the Torah they were destined to receive, symbolized by God's right hand, "From His right, a fiery law to them" (Deuteronomy 33:2). And on their left? The mezuza, that small parchment scroll containing verses from the Torah, affixed to the doorpost. It's a constant reminder of God's presence as we enter and leave our homes. Alternatively, he suggests the right is reciting the Shema prayer and the left is the Amidah prayer.

However, Rabbi Akiva, ever the astute scholar, wasn't entirely convinced by Rabbi Papis's interpretation. He pointed out that the word for "gladness" (sisa) is usually spelled with a sin, not a samekh, the letter used in this verse. So, he challenges Rabbi Papis: how do you interpret "to a mare in Pharaoh's chariots"?

Rabbi Akiva then offers a powerful and visually striking interpretation. He suggests that just as Pharaoh rode on stallions, God, too, revealed Himself on a stallion – "He mounted a cherub and flew" (Psalms 18:11). Pharaoh, fearing the aggression of stallions, opted for mares. But God, in a way, mirrors Pharaoh's actions, meeting him on his own terms.

The midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary) continues, drawing parallels between Pharaoh's war preparations and God's actions. Pharaoh brought armor, and God "donned righteousness like armor" (Isaiah 59:17). Pharaoh brought naphtha (a flammable liquid), and God sent "hail and coals of fire" (Psalms 18:13). The text meticulously compares Pharaoh’s arsenal to God’s, emphasizing that while Pharaoh relies on earthly weapons, God's power is cosmic and absolute.

Rabbi Levi adds that God's arrows didn't just strike the Egyptians; they scattered and confused them, dismantling their entire formation.

The climax arrives with Rabbi Berekhya's statement in the name of Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman: after Pharaoh exhausted all his weapons, God began to exalt Himself over him. "Wicked one, do you have wind, do you have a cherub, do you have wings?" God asks, rhetorically highlighting the limitations of Pharaoh's power compared to His own.

Where did God cause these elements to fly from? Rabbi Yudan suggests they were taken from between the wheels of the Divine Chariot. Rabbi Ḥanina bar Pappa adds a profound idea: humans ride on things that carry them, but God carries what He rides upon. "He mounted a cherub and flew, and He soared on wings of wind" (Psalms 18:11).

Rabbi Aḥa concludes with a breathtaking thought: God has many worlds, and He reveals Himself in each of them. This suggests that the Exodus, while a pivotal event in Jewish history, is just one manifestation of God's ongoing engagement with creation.

What does all this mean for us today? Perhaps it's a reminder that even in the face of overwhelming challenges, we can find strength and hope in our traditions. We can see God's presence in the everyday – in the mezuza on our doorpost, in the words of the Shema, and in the power of prayer. And maybe, just maybe, we can find a little bit of gladness, sisa, in the midst of it all.

Full source
Shir HaShirim Rabbah 1:2Shir HaShirim Rabbah

Why do you keep dying for Him?" As it says in (Psalms 44:23), "For we are killed for Your sake all day." They continue, "Why do you do acts of kindness for Him when He repays you with harshness? Come join us! We'll make you dukes, governors, generals! You'll be the center of attention, the focus of the world [meḥezyatei]!" The implication is clear: abandon your faith, and you'll be rewarded handsomely.

The nations say, "And we will gaze [veneḥezeh] upon you," suggesting that Israel will become the focal point of the world's admiration. This is connected to the verse in (Exodus 18:21), "You shall discern [teḥezeh] from among the entire people capable men…". The nations are offering Israel leadership and prominence if they abandon their faith.

How does Israel respond to this tempting offer? They reply, "Why will you gaze at the Shulamite like at a dance of two companies?" It's a rhetorical question, a challenge. "Do you think we'd ever abandon the path of our ancestors?" They argue, "Have you ever heard of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob engaging in idol worship? Our ancestors didn't, and neither will we!"

The text then explores what kind of "dance" the nations could offer Israel. Could they create a celebration like the one for Jacob when he left Lavan's house? Rabbi Berekhya, in the name of Rabbi Levi, says that six hundred thousand angels danced before Jacob (or, according to the Rabbis, one million two hundred thousand!). (Genesis 32:3) tells us, "Jacob said when he saw them: This is the camp [maḥaneh] of God," which is interpreted as representing six hundred thousand. "Maḥanayim," the name of the place, literally means "two camps," implying one million two hundred thousand. Can the nations match that divine celebration?

Or perhaps they could recreate the miracle at the sea, when the angel of God traveled with the Israelites (Exodus 14:19). Or conjure up the protective forces surrounding Elisha, as described in II (Kings 6:15-17), when the mountain was filled with horses and chariots of fire.

The passage culminates with a vision of the future, a dance led by the Holy One, blessed be He, for the righteous. Rabbi Ḥanina says that in the future, God will lead a dance for the righteous, as it is stated in (Psalms 48:14), "Pay attention to its ramparts [leḥeila]” – which is interpreted as "to the dance [leḥola]". And the righteous will point to Him, saying, "For this is God, our God, forever and ever, He will guide us beyond death [al mut]" (Psalms 48:15), like young women [alamot], like the dance of the righteous.

This passage from Shir HaShirim Rabbah reminds us of the enduring power of faith and the importance of staying true to our values, even when faced with tempting alternatives. It asks us: what kind of "dance" are we chasing? And are we willing to compromise our integrity for a fleeting moment in the spotlight?

Full source