6 min read

Israel Brought Thirteen Gifts and Heaven Answered

Adam receives commandments in a garden, Abraham becomes myrrh through fire, pillars of cloud guide the wilderness, and the Mishkan gifts complete the courtship.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. Adam Received the First Cup in a Garden
  2. Sinai Released Fragrance or Shame
  3. Abraham Became Myrrh Only Through Fire
  4. The Pillars of Fire and Cloud Led the Way Forward
  5. The Mishkan Gifts Were an Orchard of Pomegranates

Adam Received the First Cup in a Garden

Before Israel brought gold, silver, wool, skins, and acacia wood for the Mishkan, the world had already been learning how to receive commands. In the garden, God addressed Adam directly. Shir HaShirim Rabbah finds in the words of Genesis 2:16, the Lord commanded the man, a royal metaphor. A king invites guests into his cellar. Each guest receives a cup. His own son receives the whole storehouse. Adam was the son who received the storehouse: seven laws pressed into the opening verses of his instruction, covering idolatry, blasphemy, courts, bloodshed, forbidden relations, theft, and the prohibition on eating a living animal's limb. The storehouse was generous, but the gift came with knowledge of what was expected. Love was not lawlessness in the garden. The most intimate relationship in creation came with a boundary and a trust: here is everything, here is what you do not take. The cellar was opened. The door remained.

Sinai Released Fragrance or Shame

The Song's verse speaks of a bundle of myrrh resting between the breasts. Shir HaShirim Rabbah offers two readings side by side, each attributed to a different sage. Rabbi Mikhael says the myrrh is the fragrance of Torah given at Sinai, the sweetness of commandment placed between Israel's collective chest. The other reading says the myrrh recalls the Golden Calf: the stain of shame carried in the memory of what Israel did before the Torah had even left Moses's hands. Both readings are preserved because both are true. Israel carried Sinai in the same breath as the Calf. The Torah that made Israel distinct was given immediately before Israel's worst betrayal of it. The fragrance and the shame were inseparable. The Song does not let Israel read its own story with the difficult parts removed. Even the bundle of myrrh between the breasts contains both the gift and its violation.

Abraham Became Myrrh Only Through Fire

The Song says the beloved is like a bundle of myrrh, and myrrh, the Midrash explains, must be burned before it releases its fragrance. Rabbi Hanina applies this to Abraham. Abraham had to pass through fire before the covenant became complete. Nimrod's furnace. The binding of Isaac. The long years of waiting for an heir. The migration from Ur. The exile from one country to another. Each passage through fire released something that would not have been accessible otherwise. The patriarch who became the father of nations was not born into that title. He was refined into it. Shir HaShirim Rabbah places Abraham in the Song's image of myrrh to say: blessing that passes through fire has a fragrance that blessing untested does not carry. The covenant was not made with someone who had never been burned. It was made with someone who had been to the fire and come back holding the same faith he started with.

The Pillars of Fire and Cloud Led the Way Forward

In the wilderness, Israel moved when the cloud moved and rested when the cloud rested. The pillar of cloud went before them in the day and the pillar of fire went before them in the night. Neither one left its place. The Midrash reads the pillars as covenant presence made visible. God had descended into the thornbush to speak to Moses. Now God descended into the pillars to lead the whole community. The protection was not only navigational. It was relational. Israel moved inside the cloud's guidance the way a beloved moves inside a trusted presence. The wilderness was not safe, it had scorpions, thirst, and enemies, but Israel moved through it inside a sign of the same one who had promised to come up with them from Egypt. The pillar of fire at night meant that God was ahead of Israel in the dark. The covenant did not ask Israel to navigate darkness alone.

The Mishkan Gifts Were an Orchard of Pomegranates

When the list of Mishkan offerings was read out, gold, silver, bronze, blue wool, purple wool, crimson wool, linen, goat hair, reddened ram skins, tachash skins, acacia wood, oil, spices, precious stones, Shir HaShirim Rabbah heard the Song's garden. Your branches are an orchard of pomegranates together with all precious fruits. The thirteen materials brought to the Mishkan were the thirteen kinds of fruit in the beloved's garden. Israel's offering was not an administrative tax. It was the covenant community giving back to its beloved with every material category the wilderness had available. Each substance was chosen. Each color of wool meant something. Each wood and oil and stone had its role in the structure being built. The Song called it an orchard. The Torah called it a dwelling. The Midrash said it was both, a garden of offerings where the beloved would finally agree to be present in something with walls.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

5 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Shir HaShirim Rabbah 2:5Shir HaShirim Rabbah

It's like overhearing a conversation in the beit midrash, the study hall, centuries ago.

Rabbi Azarya, or perhaps Rabbi Elazar, along with Rabbi Yosei ben Rabbi Ḥanina, and other Rabbis weigh in. Rabbi Elazar starts us off with a parable: Imagine a king with a magnificent wine cellar. He offers a cup to the first guest, another to the second. But when his own son arrives? He gives him the entire cellar! Similarly, Adam, the first man, was given seven commandments, or perhaps six, depending on how you count, as the commentaries note discrepancies with the listing that follows.

What were these initial commandments? Well, "The Lord God commanded the man, saying: From all the trees in the Garden you shall eat" (Genesis 2:16). The Rabbis unpack this verse, finding layers of meaning. "Vaytzav" – "He commanded" – represents the prohibition against idol worship, just as Hosea (5:11) says, "Because he willingly followed an order [tzav]". "The Lord" signifies the prohibition against blaspheming the name, as Leviticus (24:16) states, "One who blasphemes the name of the Lord shall surely die." "God [Elohim]" refers to the commandment to appoint judges, based on Exodus (22:8): "The statement of the two of them shall come to the judges [elohim]". And so it goes, each word revealing another layer of divine instruction. "The man" is the prohibition against bloodshed, "Saying" refers to forbidden sexual relations, and "From all the trees in the Garden" alludes to the prohibition against robbery.

Then comes Noah, with an additional commandment: the prohibition against eating a limb torn from a living animal, as Genesis (9:4) makes clear: "But flesh with its life, its blood [you shall not eat]". Abraham is commanded regarding circumcision, which Isaac fulfills perfectly on the eighth day after his birth. Jacob is associated with the prohibition against eating the sciatic nerve, and Judah with levirate marriage, the practice of marrying a childless brother’s widow. Finally, the children of Israel receive all the positive and negative commandments of the Torah.

Rabbi Yosei ben Rabbi Ḥanina offers another comparison: A king who distributes provisions to his troops through intermediaries. But to his son? He gives directly. It's a powerful image of intimacy and direct connection. Other Rabbis add to the metaphor: A king sharing fine pastry directly with his son. All these images emphasize the special, direct relationship between God and Israel, particularly in the giving of the Torah.

Then, the conversation shifts. Rabbi Abahu, or perhaps Rabbi Yehuda, with Rabbi Neḥemya, speak of two friends debating a point of halakha, Jewish law. Each offering sources and arguments. And the Holy One, blessed be He, says: "Their passion comes from Me." It's a reminder that the pursuit of truth, the dedication to understanding God's will, is itself a divine gift. Rabbi Neḥemya connects this passion to the verse, "Let him kiss me [yishakeni] with the kisses of his mouth."

Rabbi Yehuda even suggests that even mistaken claims made during halakhic debate still come from God! Imagine that. Even our errors can be part of the divine plan.

The Rabbis then connect this idea of a "kiss" to the departure of the soul. Rabbi Azarya notes that Aaron’s soul was taken with a kiss, as Numbers (33:38) implies: "Aaron the priest ascended Mount Hor at the command of [al pi] God and he died there." The phrase "al pi," literally "by the mouth of," is interpreted as a divine kiss. The same is said of Moses. And even Miriam, though it is not explicitly stated, the Rabbis infer that she also died with a kiss, because the Torah uses the word "there" to describe her death, the same word used for Moses' death.

The ultimate reward for those who engage with Torah, the Rabbis suggest, is a divine kiss at the end of life. It's a beautiful and intimate image of God's love and acceptance.

But the word "yishakeni" – "let him kiss me" – holds even more meaning. It also means "He will arm me," based on the word "noshekei" – "armed." Rabbi Shimon bar Naḥman says that Torah is like a weapon, protecting us in times of war. It also means "He will purify me," like joining two pools of water to create a mikveh, a ritual bath. And finally, it means "He will cleave to me," a powerful image of closeness and connection.

Through parables, interpretations, and layers of meaning, Shir HaShirim Rabbah opens a window into the complex and beautiful relationship between God and humanity. It's a relationship built on commandments, yes, but also on intimacy, love, and the passionate pursuit of truth. It leaves you wondering, what kind of relationship are we building? And how can we draw closer to that divine kiss?

Full source
Shir HaShirim Rabbah 12:1Shir HaShirim Rabbah

A fascinating interpretation of a verse from the Song of Songs – Shir HaShirim – that explores just this idea: the contrast between foul odor and sweet fragrance, and what it reveals about our relationship with the Divine.

The verse in question is (Song of Songs 1:12): "While the king was at his feast, my nard released its fragrance." Now, the Shir HaShirim Rabbah, a collection of rabbinic interpretations of Song of Songs, unpacks this verse in some truly surprising ways. It's a classic example of midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary), where the Rabbis find layers of meaning within the text, connecting it to other parts of the Torah and to Jewish history.

The discussion starts with a debate between Rabbi Meir and Rabbi Yehuda. Rabbi Meir takes a rather…unflattering view. He suggests that "While the king was at his feast" – meaning while the King of Kings was at His feast in the heavens – Israel released a foul odor by worshipping the Golden Calf. Ouch. He connects it to the verse in (Exodus 32:4): "This is your god, Israel!" It's a harsh assessment, painting a picture of betrayal and spiritual corruption.

Rabbi Yehuda pushes back. "Enough, Meir," he says, "one does not expound Song of Songs disparagingly!" He insists that Song of Songs is meant to praise Israel. Instead, Rabbi Yehuda suggests that the "fine fragrance" refers to the moment before Mount Sinai, when Israel declared, "Everything that the Lord has spoken we will perform and we will obey" (Exodus 24:7). So, instead of a stench, we have a sweet aroma of commitment and faith.

It's a powerful contrast, isn't it? The same verse, interpreted in two radically different ways, highlighting the potential for both spiritual failure and profound connection with God.

The midrash then takes an interesting turn. It suggests that a "treatise" – an ancient tradition recorded in a text from Babylon – reveals that God actually skipped the story of the Golden Calf in the Torah's narrative order. That is, the building of the Tabernacle (Mishkan) is described before the sin of the Golden Calf. Why? To show that even when Israel stumbled, they were still beloved in God's eyes. This is why, the midrash suggests, the verse speaks of fragrance rather than stench. It's a beautiful idea – divine love and forgiveness prevailing even in the face of human failing.

The discussion continues with Rabbi Eliezer, Rabbi Akiva, and Rabbi Berekhya offering their own interpretations. Rabbi Eliezer connects the verse to the fiery revelation at Mount Sinai, citing (Deuteronomy 4:11): "The mountain was burning with fire." Rabbi Akiva sees it as referring to the moment "the glory of the Lord rested on Mount Sinai" (Exodus 24:16). Rabbi Berekhya even suggests it refers to Moses himself, while he was still on Mount Sinai, as he is called King in (Deuteronomy 33:5). Each interpretation adds another layer to the richness of the verse.

And it doesn't stop there! Rabbi Eliezer ben Yaakov and the Rabbis debate whether the angel Mikhael or God Himself rescued Abraham from the fiery furnace. Rabbi Tavyomei connects the "feast" to Jacob's deathbed, where the Divine Spirit shone upon him as he blessed his sons. Each interpretation weaves together different moments in Jewish history, finding echoes of the Song of Songs verse in unexpected places.

Finally, the midrash explores practical details. Rav Nahman asks where Jacob got the cedar wood he used to build things in Egypt. Rabbi Levi reveals that the long wooden bars needed for the Tabernacle (Mishkan) were hidden away since the time of Jacob! These details bring the story down to earth, reminding us that even the most sacred moments are grounded in the everyday. He even tells us that the acacia trees in Magdala were forbidden to use due to their sanctity, as they were used to create the Ark.

What I find so compelling about this passage is how it demonstrates the power of interpretation. The Rabbis weren't afraid to confront difficult questions, to offer competing perspectives, and to find meaning in even the smallest details. They saw the Torah not as a static text, but as a living conversation, a source of endless wisdom and inspiration.

So, the next time you encounter a seemingly simple verse, remember the Rabbis of the Shir HaShirim Rabbah. Ask yourself: what other layers of meaning might be hidden within? What connections can I make to my own life and experiences? And how can I find the fragrance of the Divine even in the midst of the… well, let's just say, less fragrant moments?

Full source
Shir HaShirim Rabbah 7:1Shir HaShirim Rabbah

In Shir HaShirim Rabbah 7, the Rabbis unpack a seemingly simple verse – (Song of Songs 2:7): “I administer an oath to you, daughters of Jerusalem, by the gazelles, and by the hinds of the field, that you will not awaken, and you will not rouse love, until it pleases.” What’s this oath all about? What are we not supposed to awaken?

Rabbi Eliezer kicks things off by suggesting the oath is sworn by the very foundations of existence: the heavens and the earth. Just as they consistently follow God's plan, so too should Israel uphold its oath, explains Etz Yosef. Then the verse shifts, "by the gazelles [bitzvaot]…and by the hinds of the field.” The word bitzvaot sounds like tzava, meaning "host," so it’s interpreted as a reference to the hosts of heaven and earth. And the "hinds of the field"? Those are the wild beasts, just as it says in (Job 5:23), "For your covenant will be with the rocks of the field, and the beasts of the field will be at peace with you.”

Hold on, Rabbi Hanina bar Pappa and Rabbi Yehuda ben Rabbi Simon offer a different perspective. Rabbi Hanina says the oath is sworn by the patriarchs and matriarchs – Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Sarah, Rebecca, Rachel, and Leah. Again, bitzvaot, is reinterpreted, this time as the avot, the patriarchs, who "established My stature [tzivyoni]," and in whom God imbued His stature. And the "hinds of the field" become the tribes of Israel, echoing (Genesis 49:21): “Naphtali is a hind let loose.”

Rabbi Yehuda ben Rabbi Simon chimes in: maybe the oath is about circumcision, that visible sign – ot – of the covenant. So bitzvaot becomes connected to mitzvah, a commandment that has a sign [ot]. The "hinds of the field" are those who shed their blood, just like the gazelle and the hind, in this sacred ritual.

Then we get to the Rabbis' collective interpretation: the oath is sworn by the generation of persecution – a time of immense suffering, like the era of Rabbi Akiva and his colleagues. They see bitzvaot as those who "established My stature [tzivyoni] in the world," even as God imbued His stature in them. And the "hinds of the field" are those who gave their lives to sanctify God's name, echoing (Psalm 44:23): “For we are killed all day over You.”

Rabbi Hiyya bar Abba paints a stark picture of the generation of persecution. He admits he would be willing to give his life for God, as long as it was quick. But in that time, the Romans would torture their victims to death, slowly and deliberately, with hot iron balls or slivers of reeds under fingernails. A gruesome reminder of the cost of faith. This is what David meant when he said "To You, Lord, I lift [esa] my soul" (Psalms 25:1), which the midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary) interprets as "I will give up [asi]," because they would give their lives for the sanctification of God’s name.

Rabbi Oshaya adds that God tells Israel to wait for Him, and He will render them like the host of the heavens. Rabbi Yudan, quoting Rabbi Meir, elaborates: if you fulfill My oath, you will be like the heavenly host; if not, like the earthly host. Big difference!

Rabbi Yosei bar Hanina believes there are actually two oaths here: one for Israel, not to rebel against the kingdoms of the world, and one for the nations, not to oppress Israel too harshly. If they do, they risk hastening the end of days before its time. Rabbi Levi adds that God only allows wicked kings to rule over Israel to settle accounts, to punish them for their sins.

Rabbi Helbo goes even further, suggesting there are four oaths, based on the four times the expression "I administer an oath to you" appears in Song of Songs. These oaths are: not to rebel against the kingdoms, not to force the end of days, not to reveal Jewish secrets to the world, and not to ascend en masse to the Land of Israel.

Rabbi Onya connects these four oaths to four failed attempts to hasten the Messiah’s arrival: during the times of Amram, Deinai, ben Kozeva (Shimon Bar Kokhba), and Shutelaḥ ben Ephraim. He points to (Psalms 78:9-10), about the sons of Ephraim who "turned back on the day of battle. They did not keep the covenant of God.”

The story of Shutelaḥ ben Ephraim is particularly poignant. They mistakenly calculated the 400-year exile prophesied to Abraham as beginning when God spoke to him, rather than 30 years later with the birth of Isaac (Genesis 15:13). Impatient, they went to war and suffered terrible losses. Why? Because, the text says, "they did not believe in the Lord and did not trust His salvation." They tried to force redemption and violated the oath.

Finally, we come back to the core of the verse: “That you will not awaken, and you will not rouse [love, until it pleases].” Rabbi Yudan interprets this in the context of Isaac’s love for Esau (Genesis 25:28). "Until it pleases" means until it becomes the wish of the elder, meaning until Esau’s merit is used up and no longer stands as a barrier to Israel's redemption.

Rabbi Berekhya offers a different perspective. He sees it as the love God has for Israel (Malachi 1:2). "Until it pleases" means until the heavenly kingdom desires it – until the attribute of justice itself demands it. Then, God will bring redemption with a loud voice and without delay. Therefore, it says: "Until it pleases."

So, what does it all mean? Maybe it's a reminder that love, in all its forms – human and divine – is a powerful force. Maybe it's a lesson in patience, in trusting the divine timing, even when we desperately want something to happen now. Maybe it's about understanding that true redemption comes not through force or impatience, but through faith, righteousness, and waiting until the time is right, until… it pleases.

Full source
Shir HaShirim Rabbah 6:2Shir HaShirim Rabbah

Forget the sanitized Sunday school version. The Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary), that incredible collection of rabbinic interpretations, offers a glimpse into a world of fiery miracles and profound symbolism. to Shir HaShirim Rabbah, a commentary on the Song of Songs, and see what it reveals. The verse Rabbi Elazar, quoting Rabbi Yosei ben Zimra, paints a vivid picture: as Israel journeyed, the pillar of cloud would descend, the pillar of fire would ascend, and the smoke from the altar would rise like two fiery sparks. Imagine the scene!

It gets wilder. According to this tradition, from the two altars – the copper one for sacrifices and the golden one for incense – fire would erupt from between the staves of the Ark and burn away snakes, scorpions, and those dreaded "fiery serpents." The surrounding nations, witnessing this spectacle, were terrified, exclaiming, "They are gods, and all their actions are performed with fire!" This terror,

"Perfumed with myrrh," the text says, "this is our patriarch Abraham." Just as myrrh is the finest of spices (as we see in (Exodus 30:2)3), Abraham was the first of the righteous. The comparison goes deeper: just as harvesting myrrh leaves a bitter residue on the hands, Abraham "embittered and tormented himself with suffering." And like myrrh, which only releases its fragrance when burned, Abraham’s good deeds were revealed in the fiery furnace – a reference to the famous story of him being thrown into the fire for rejecting idolatry, found in Bereshit Rabbah 38:13.

Next, "and frankincense, this is our patriarch Isaac, who was sacrificed like a handful of frankincense on the altar." This directly references the Akeidah, the binding of Isaac, where Isaac's willingness to be offered as a sacrifice is likened to the purest incense.

Finally, "with all the powders of the merchant, this is Jacob our patriarch, whose bed was unflawed and no waste was found among them." This is a more subtle image, referring to the idea that all of Jacob's sons were righteous, unlike the earlier generations. Rabbi Tanhuma explains that Jacob is like a peddler's box filled with all kinds of spices, because from him came the priesthood, the Levites, and royalty.

The Midrash goes on to make a fascinating point about inheritance. Isaac received everything from Abraham, as (Genesis 25:5) states: "Abraham gave everything that was his to Isaac." But Jacob? According to Rabbi Yudan, Jacob's "wares" – his success and prosperity – came from the "dust beneath his feet." This alludes to Jacob's struggle with Esau's angel, where he literally wrestled in the dust. As the verse states: "A man wrestled [vaye’avek] with him there" (Genesis 32:25). Rabbi Azarya adds that all of Israel's wars and their success in Torah study are also due to the merit of this "dust of Jacob."

Rabbi Berekhya and Rabbi Simon, quoting Rabbi Abahu, offer a stunning image: God took that dust and placed it under His throne of glory. As it says in (Nahum 1:3): "The Lord, his way is in the tempest and in the storm, and clouds are the dust of his feet."

So, what does it all mean? This passage from Shir HaShirim Rabbah isn't just a history lesson. It's a powerful reminder of the enduring legacy of our ancestors, their struggles, and their unwavering faith. It suggests that even the humblest beginnings, represented by the "dust of Jacob," can be elevated to the highest realms. And perhaps, it hints that our own struggles, our own "dust," can also contribute to something greater than ourselves.

Full source
Shir HaShirim Rabbah 12:2Shir HaShirim Rabbah

The verse we're unpacking is "Your branches are an orchard of pomegranates" (Song of Songs 4:13). The Midrash cleverly interprets "your branches" (shelaḥayikh in Hebrew) as "your gifts" (shiluḥayikh). It's like asking, "What did so-and-so send to their beloved?" This sets the stage for an elaborate allegory, comparing God's relationship with Israel to that of a man and his fiancée.

What are the gifts in this divine courtship? Pomegranates, it turns out, are the key!

Rabbi Ḥanina and Rabbi Simon offer different takes. One says that Israel brought God thirteen gifts, and God brought Israel thirteen in return.

Israel's thirteen gifts, according to this interpretation, are explicitly listed in the Book of Exodus (25:3-5, 7) as the materials for building the Mishkan, the Tabernacle: gold, silver, bronze, blue, purple, and scarlet wool, linen, goat hair, rams' hides dyed red, taḥash hides (what exactly these were is debated!), acacia wood, onyx stones, and stones for setting. Quite a generous dowry!

But what did God give back? The prophet Ezekiel (16:10-12) describes God adorning Jerusalem (representing Israel) with magnificent garments and jewels. "I clad you in embroidery," Ezekiel says, which Rabbi Simi identifies as a purple woolen garment. Akilas translates the embroidery as a multi-colored garment. “I shod you with taḥash,” corresponding to the taḥash hides. “I wrapped you in linen,” corresponding to the linen and goat hair. “I covered you with silk [meshi]." Rabbi Aivu beautifully suggests that God rendered them substantial (mamash) in the world. Rabbi Yehuda ben Rabbi Simon adds a poetic touch, saying God enveloped them in clouds of glory, referencing the pillar of cloud that guided the Israelites in the desert (Exodus 13:22).

The list goes on: weapons (which Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai says had the ineffable name of God etched upon them until Israel sinned and it was peeled off – either by an angel or on its own!); bracelets representing the Tablets of the Covenant, with the Ten Commandments engraved on them (Exodus 32:16); a chain symbolizing the words of Torah (Proverbs 6:21); a ring signifying the crown of sanctity; earrings representing the frontplate (tzitz) of the High Priest's head covering (Sukka 5a), and a crown of splendor symbolizing the Shekhinah, the Divine Presence (Isaiah 62:3, (Micah 2:1)3).

What about the final three gifts to make thirteen? “You were decked with gold and silver.… your renown emerged among the nations” (Ezekiel 16:13–14), and “henna with nard.”

But the rabbis weren't done there! Rabbi Huna takes it a step further, arguing that God actually brought twenty-six gifts, doubling Israel's thirteen, because that's what a proper bridegroom does! Rabbi Aḥa adds another layer, suggesting that Israel brought vessels and spices (referring to the vessels of the Tabernacle and the incense), and God reciprocated with vessels and spices – vessels through Moses and spices through Solomon, referencing the Queen of Sheba's extravagant gifts to King Solomon (I (Kings 10:1)0). Rabbi Simon, however, clarifies that what Israel brought was a limited quantity of vessels and spices, but what God brought was limitless.

It all culminates in the verse, "Henna with nard," a fragrant conclusion to this exchange of divine gifts.

So, what do we take away from this? It's not just about the literal gifts, is it? It’s about the reciprocal love and commitment between God and Israel. It's about the way they adorn and cherish each other, each giving and receiving in a dance of devotion. These gifts, whether tangible or symbolic, represent the ongoing covenant, the unbreakable bond between a people and their God. And perhaps, it’s a reminder that the most meaningful gifts are those that express love, commitment, and a deep connection to something greater than ourselves.

Full source