As we learn in Bereshit Rabbah 60, it's a theme that runs through some pretty significant stories in our tradition.
The passage opens by quoting (Genesis 24:13-15), the story of Eliezer, Abraham's servant, seeking a wife for Isaac. He's standing by a well, praying for a sign. "May it be," he asks, "that the girl to whom I will say: Tilt your jug, please, and I will drink, and she will say: Drink, and I will also give your camels to drink; it is she You have confirmed for Your servant, for Isaac."
Now, the Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary) picks up on something interesting here. Was Eliezer's request really that well-considered? What if a mere servant girl had offered him water? Would he have presented her as a bride for Isaac? It seems a bit… risky, doesn't it?
But here’s the thing: the Holy One, Blessed be He, steps in. Before Eliezer even finishes his prayer, Rebecca arrives. The text emphasizes, "It was before he concluded to speak, and behold, Rebecca was coming out…" Talk about divine intervention!
This sets the stage for a broader discussion about people who make, shall we say, less than brilliant demands of God. The Midrash identifies four such individuals: Eliezer, Caleb, Saul, and Yiftach.
Let's look at Caleb. He declares that whoever conquers Kiryat Sefer will win his daughter Akhsa's hand in marriage (Judges 1:12). Again, the question is posed: what if a slave had accomplished this feat? Would Caleb really have given his daughter to him? Thankfully, Otniel, Caleb's kinsman, steps up. As the verse states, "Otniel son of Kenaz, Caleb’s…brother, captured it; and he gave him Akhsa his daughter as a wife” (Judges 1:13). Crisis averted!
Saul makes a similar proclamation regarding whoever defeats Goliath (1 (Samuel 17:2)5). The Midrash asks, what if a non-Israelite, or even a slave, had won? Would Saul have honored his pledge? Here, too, divine providence seems to intervene, as David, "the son of that nobleman" (1 (Samuel 17:1)2), emerges victorious.
But then there's Yiftach. Oh, Yiftach. He vows that whatever comes out of his house first to greet him upon his return from battle will be offered as a burnt offering (Judges 11:31). Now, think about this for a moment. What if a dog had greeted him? Would he have sacrificed it? According to the Midrash, this is where things go terribly wrong. "Yiftach came…and behold, his daughter came out to greet him" (Judges 11:34).
Unlike the previous cases, this time, the "appropriate arrangement" is… inappropriate.
The text delves into a debate between Rabbi Yoḥanan and Reish Lakish. Rabbi Yoḥanan suggests Yiftach was at least obligated to pay a monetary redemption for his daughter, as she was now considered consecrated property that couldn't be used. Reish Lakish, however, argues that Yiftach’s vow was null and void, like consecrating an impure animal. He draws on the mishna from Temura 5:6 to support his point.
The tragedy deepens. The Midrash tells us that Pinḥas, the high priest, wasn't there to annul Yiftach's vow. Each man thought the other should take the initiative. "Between the two of them," the text laments, "that young woman was lost."
There’s a chilling proverb cited here: "Between the midwife and the mother in childbirth, the son of the wretched woman is gone." It's a stark reminder of how, when people pass the buck, the innocent suffer.
Both Pinḥas and Yiftach were punished. Yiftach's limbs supposedly fell off one by one, and he was buried in separate cities, as hinted at in (Judges 12:7). As for Pinḥas, the Divine Spirit departed from him, as reflected in the shift from "is chief" to "had been chief" in (1 (Chronicles 9:2)0).
What are we to take away from this? Perhaps it’s a cautionary tale about the power of our words and the importance of thinking before we speak – especially when making promises, deals, or vows, with implications that extend beyond ourselves. The story of Yiftach serves as a stark reminder that sometimes, even with the best intentions, our actions can have devastating and unintended consequences. It’s a call for careful consideration, humility, and a willingness to seek guidance when we're in over our heads. After all, we're all just trying to navigate this complex world, and sometimes, we need a little help along the way.
“Behold, I am standing by the spring of water and the daughters of the men of the city come out to draw water” (Genesis 24:13). “May it be that the girl to whom I will say: Tilt your jug please, and I will drink, and she will say: Drink, and I will also give your camels to drink; it is she You have confirmed for Your servant, for Isaac, and through her I will know that You have shown kindness to my master” (Genesis 24:14). “It was before he concluded to speak, and behold, Rebecca was coming out, who was born to Betuel, son of Milka, wife of Nahor, brother of Abraham, and her jug is on her shoulder” (Genesis 24:15). “Behold, I am standing by the spring of water and the daughters of the men of the city…May it be that the girl to whom I will say: Tilt…” – there are four people who made inappropriate demands [of God], three were granted appropriate responses, one was granted an inappropriate response. They are: Abraham’s servant Eliezer, Caleb, Saul, and Yiftaḥ. Eliezer said: “May it be that the girl to whom I will say….” What if some maidservant would emerge and give him to drink, would he have taken her to marry his master’s son? That is a rhetorical question. Yet the Holy One blessed be He made an appropriate arrangement for him: “It was before he concluded to speak, and behold, Rebecca was coming out…” Caleb said: “Whoever smites Kiryat Sefer and captures it, I will give him Akhsa my daughter as a wife” (Judges 1:12). What if some slave would have conquered it, would he have given him his daughter? Yet the Holy One blessed be He made an appropriate arrangement for him, as it is stated: “Otniel son of Kenaz, Caleb’s…brother, captured it; and he gave him Akhsa his daughter as a wife” (Judges 1:13). Saul said: “It shall be, that whichever man smites him [Goliath], the king will enrich him with great wealth, and he will give him his daughter as a wife” (I Samuel 17:25). What if some Kushite or idolater or slave had emerged and smitten him, would he have given him his daughter? Yet the Holy One blessed be He made an appropriate arrangement for him, as it is written: “David, the son of that nobleman” (I Samuel 17:12). Yiftaḥ [said:] “It shall be that whatever emerges…I will offer it up as a burnt offering” (Judges 11:31). What if some dog or cat had emerged, would he have offered it up as a burnt offering? And the Holy One blessed be He made an inappropriate arrangement for him. That is what is written: “Yiftaḥ came…and behold, his daughter came out to greet him” (Judges 11:34). Rabbi Yoḥanan and Reish Lakish, Rabbi Yoḥanan said: He [Yiftaḥ] was obligated to pay for monetary consecration.8When his daughter came out to greet him, although he was of course not obliged to sacrifice her, he was obligated to redeem her with money, as one redeems consecrated property that cannot be used. Reish Lakish said: He was not even obligated to pay for monetary consecration, as we learn in a mishna:9Temura 5:6. If one said regarding an impure animal or a blemished animal: ‘These are hereby [consecrated as] a burnt offering, it is as if he has said nothing at all.’ [But if he said:] ‘These are hereby [consecrated] for use towards a burnt offering,’ they are to be sold, and he must bring a burnt offering with their money.10Yiftaḥ’s statement was analogous to the first case, so his declaration was null and void. Pinḥas [the high priest] was not there to abrogate his [Yiftaḥ’s] vow for him. Instead, Pinḥas said: ‘It is he who requires my services; shall I go to him?’ And Yiftaḥ said: ‘I am the head of the chieftains of Israel, shall I go to Pinḥas?’ Between the two of them, that young woman was lost.11Yiftaḥ did fulfill his vow through his daughter, although this was not in accordance with Torah law, as explained in the previous paragraph. This accords with [the saying] that people say: Between the midwife and the mother in childbirth, the son of the wretched woman is gone.12If the baby dies, each one blames the other. Both of them [Pinḥas and Yiftaḥ] were punished for the blood of the young woman. Yiftaḥ died as a result of his limbs falling off. Everywhere he would go, one of his limbs would fall off and they would bury it there. That is what is written: “Yiftaḥ died and he was buried in the cities of Gilad” (Judges 12:7) – “the city of Gilad” is not stated, but rather, “the cities of Gilad.”13Indicating that he was buried in several cities. As for Pinḥas, the Divine Spirit was stripped from him. That is what is written: “Pinḥas son of Elazar had been chief over them” (I Chronicles 9:20) – “is chief over them” is not written here, but rather, “had been chief.” “In earlier times the Lord had been with him” (I Chronicles 9:20).