5 min read

Cain and Abel Argue About Justice in the Field

Before Cain raises his hand, he and Abel argue whether the world is governed justly at all. The post-flood law on murder closes the argument centuries later.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Field Where the Question Was Posed
  2. Two Positions in a Closed Field
  3. The Law That Answers from the Other Side of the Flood
  4. The Question Cain Asked, Finally Answered

The Field Where the Question Was Posed

The Torah says that Cain spoke to Abel. Then it says they went into the field. Then it says Cain rose up and killed him. What Cain said between the speaking and the killing, the Hebrew leaves completely blank.

The Targum fills the blank with an argument.

Cain speaks first. He has been thinking about what happened at the altar. His grain offering was rejected; Abel's firstling was accepted. The injustice of it has been turning in him, and now he names it. The world was created in goodness, he says. But it is not governed according to the fruit of good works. There is no real connection between what a man does and what he receives. There is favoritism in judgment. That, Cain insists, is the explanation for what happened: his offering was passed over not because of anything he did wrong but because the One who accepts offerings plays favorites.

Abel answers point for point. The world was created in goodness, he agrees. It is also governed according to the fruit of good works. There is no favoritism in judgment. The reason Abel's offering was preferred, Abel says, is simple: the fruits of Abel's works were better than the fruits of Cain's. The acceptance was earned. The rejection was deserved. The world is just.

Two Positions in a Closed Field

They have now stated their positions fully, and neither has moved the other. Cain believes the world is beautiful in origin and corrupt in governance. Abel believes the world is beautiful in origin and just in governance. These are not merely theological positions. They are each man's account of his own situation. Cain's account requires that the God who rejected his offering was wrong. Abel's account requires that Cain examine his own works.

The argument is unresolvable between the two of them. There is no third party in the field, no judge, no evidence that can be introduced. The dispute was never going to end in agreement. It ended the way it ended because Cain could not bear the alternative: that Abel's position was correct, and that what happened at the altar was fair.

The Targum does not moralize about this. It supplies the argument and then gives the Hebrew its plain conclusion. Cain rose up against Abel his brother, and killed him. The conversation that took place in the field before that sentence has now been heard. It changes nothing about the act. But it makes the act legible in a way the bare text cannot.

The Law That Answers from the Other Side of the Flood

Several chapters later, in a verse after the flood has reshaped the world, the same Targum addresses murder again. The verse is Genesis 9:6, and the Targum expands it into a two-part ruling that operates at different levels of jurisdiction.

Whoever sheds the blood of a man, the targumist writes, the judges by witnesses shall condemn him unto death. That is the first clause. Human court. Testimony. Due process. The murderer is brought before judges, witnesses speak, and if the case is proven, the penalty is death. This is ordinary criminal procedure.

But there is a second clause. He who sheds blood without witnesses: the Lord of the world will bring punishment on him in the day of the great judgment. The human court requires witnesses. The divine court requires nothing except the act itself, which has already been seen. A man who kills where no one can testify has not escaped. He has only escaped one jurisdiction. The other is still waiting.

The Question Cain Asked, Finally Answered

Cain killed Abel in a field. There were no witnesses. By the terms of the post-flood ruling, no human court could have convicted him. And in the time before that law existed, no human court was even constituted to try him. The only accountability available was the one God imposed directly: the curse, the mark, the exile.

Cain had argued in the field that there was no justice. The verse from Genesis 9 is the Targum's delayed rebuttal. Even without witnesses, the day of the great judgment is still coming. The argument Cain made in the field, that the world is ungoverned and the righteous are not rewarded, is answered not in the field where he made it but in the law that comes down from the mountain of the world's reconstruction.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

2 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Targum Pseudo-Jonathan on Genesis 4:8Targum Pseudo-Jonathan on Genesis

The Hebrew of (Genesis 4:8) is notoriously fragmentary: "Cain said to Abel his brother. And it came to pass, when they were in the field, Cain rose up against Abel his brother and killed him." What did Cain say? The Torah leaves a conspicuous silence. Targum Pseudo-Jonathan fills it with a full theological debate.

Cain's position: no justice, no judge

Cain speaks first. He says, "I perceive that the world was created in goodness, but it is not governed according to the fruit of good works, for there is respect to persons in judgment; therefore it is that thy offering was accepted, and mine not accepted with good will."

Cain's grief has hardened into philosophy. The universe looks rigged to him. God has favorites. Righteousness does not pay. His offering was rejected not because of its quality, but because God picks winners.

Abel's position: there is a Judge

Abel answers calmly: "In goodness was the world created, and according to the fruit of good works is it governed; and there is no respect of persons in judgment; but because the fruits of my works were better than thine, my oblation, before thine, hath been accepted with good will."

Abel concedes that his offering was better. He does not gloat. But he insists that God judged fairly, not capriciously. Acceptance tracks effort.

Cain's escalation

Cain will not be consoled. He pushes further: "There is neither judgment nor Judge, nor another world; nor will good reward be given to the righteous, nor vengeance be taken of the wicked."

This is Cain's real sin, not just jealousy, but the denial of the moral order of the universe itself. He becomes, in the Targumist's reading, history's first heretic. Abel answers with the affirmation: "There is a judgment, and there is a Judge; and there is another world, and a good reward given to the righteous, and vengeance taken of the wicked."

And then: "Because of these words they had contention upon the face of the field; and Kain arose against Habel his brother, and drave a stone into his forehead, and killed him."

Cain kills his brother over a theological argument. A stone to the forehead, to silence the voice that insisted the world made moral sense. The Targumist is showing us that murder is often, underneath, an argument about whether God is paying attention. And an attempt to prove He is not.

Full source
Targum Pseudo-Jonathan on Genesis 9:6Targum Pseudo-Jonathan on Genesis

Targum Pseudo-Jonathan on (Genesis 9:6) gives Torah's foundational teaching on the sanctity of human life a haunting expansion. Whoso sheddeth the blood of man, the judges, by witnesses, shall condemn him unto death; but he who sheddeth it without witnesses, the Lord of the world will bring punishment on him in the day of the great judgment; because in the image of the Lord He made man.

Listen to the two clauses. If there are witnesses, the human court handles it. Judges, testimony, due process. But what of the killer who slips away? The one who arranged it, bribed the witness, buried the body in a field where no one would look? The Targum raises its eyes. The Lord of the world will bring punishment on him in the day of the great judgment, yoma rabba, the great day of reckoning at the end of history.

Nothing escapes. The heavenly court has a docket the earthly court cannot see. Jewish tradition calls this the day of din, judgment, when every hidden deed is brought to light.

The reason? Because in the image of the Lord He made man. Every murder, the Targum says, is an attack on the image of God itself. That is why justice cannot simply expire when a human trial fails. The image of God is the plaintiff. The takeaway: no one is ever truly unseen. The universe is watching.

Full source