5 min read

Four Hundred Captives Choose the Sea Over Shame

Rome chains Zion's children to bed-feet as living idols of beauty. Four hundred boys and girls learn what waits, link hands, and walk into the sea.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. Gold That Went Dull
  2. Four Hundred and Four Hundred
  3. A Priest Who Would Not Bend in Chains
  4. Beauty as a Battlefield
  5. Study Under the Rope
Four Hundred Captives Choose the Sea Over Shame Click for full size

Gold That Went Dull

The ships left a broken city and carried children whose faces made precious metal look tired. Rome had measures of fine gold in the world, the school of Rabbi Sheila said, and even those measures lost their shine beside the sons and daughters of Zion. Captors did not dress them in jewelry. They used them as jewelry. Noble houses that once set painted images by the bed, hoping to conceive beautiful offspring, now dragged living captives to the foot of the frame and tied them there like icons that could breathe.

Two boys, chained in that darkness, did what Jewish children do when the world ends. They opened a page in their mouths. "Where is this affliction written?" one asked. The other answered with Deuteronomy: every sickness and every plague not written in the book of this Torah. The first child measured the distance of his unfinished study. One and a half columns. "Had I reached it," he said, "I would not have needed you to tell me." Horror became a study hall. The rope on their wrists did not stop the verse.

Four Hundred and Four Hundred

Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel, remembered through Shmuel and Rav Yehuda, counted the scale of the crime. Four hundred boys and four hundred girls were taken for the same purpose. When they understood what the noble houses intended, they did not wait for the beds. They walked to the water. Hands found hands. The sea that had once split for their ancestors closed over them as a last shelter.

This was not despair dressed as piety. It was a refusal to let Rome write the next chapter of their bodies. The precious sons of Zion, comparable to fine gold in the lament, chose the deep rather than a life made into furniture for someone else's lust. The Talmud does not linger on the foam. It lingers on the choice.

A Priest Who Would Not Bend in Chains

In another Roman room, Rabbi Zadok, a tanna of priestly stock remembered for his long fasts before the Temple fell, faced a different weapon. A Matrona sent a beautiful slave girl to break him by desire. Zadok refused. He named his line. He named the double disgrace that would fall on a high priest's house if he fell. Because he held, he was set free.

Rabbi Akiva, in a parallel night under a governor's order, endured two slave girls pressed against him without rest. Desire found no foothold. He said they appeared to him like impure and repugnant beings, not because his eyes failed, but because his will refused their meaning. Rome could own the cell. It could not own the eye that refused to become an accomplice.

Beauty as a Battlefield

The children and the sages stand on one line. Rome weaponized beauty. Against children it used beauty as bait for other men's houses. Against sages it used beauty as a key to unlock the commandment from the inside. In both cases the Jewish answer was the same shape. The body is not neutral property. It is a trust. When the trust cannot be kept under force, better the sea than the bed. When the trust can still be kept, better a cold cell than a warm sin.

Lamentations called those children fine gold. Fine gold does not choose its own melting. These captives did. They made a judgment about what a human face is for, and they enforced it with their last walk.

Study Under the Rope

Do not skip the conversation between the two boys. Before the mass of four hundred moved toward the water, two mouths still hunted a verse. That is the strangest courage in the tale. They located their suffering inside Scripture as if the Torah were still their true geography and Rome only a bad weather system passing over it. One and a half columns from the plague that named them, and the child was almost angry at his own unfinished learning.

Israel survives conquest in more than one way. Sometimes by the sage who will not touch what is offered. Sometimes by the child who will not live as an ornament. Sometimes by the mind that, even tied to a bedpost, still asks where the affliction is written. The sea took the four hundred. The question the two boys asked still walks on dry land.

Rome thought beauty was loot. The children made it a boundary. The sages made it a locked gate. Between the shoreline and the cell, a people taught its captors that not every body on a ship is cargo, and not every night in chains is an invitation. That lesson cost lives. It also left a trail of names that refused to become furniture.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

2 sources

The texts behind this telling. Some cards carry a translation of the source; others are our own retelling of it, and each card says which. Every card links out to the original.

Gittin 58aTalmud Bavli, Gittin

Translation of the source text.William Davidson Edition - Vocalized Aramaic + William Davidson Edition - English · CC-BY-NC

of phylactery boxes were found on the heads of those killed in Beitar. Rabbi Yannai, son of Rabbi Yishmael, says: There were found three large baskets each holding forty se’a of phylactery boxes. And it was taught in a baraita: There were forty large baskets each holding three se’a. The Gemara notes: And these Sages do not disagree: This Sage is referring to phylacteries of the head, whereas this Sage is referring to phylacteries of the arm, for owing to the different manners in which they are fashioned, they are also different in size.

Rabbi Asi says: Four kav of brains from children whose skulls were smashed were found on one stone. Ulla says: Nine kav. Rav Kahana said, and some say that it was Sheila bar Mari who said: What is the verse from which it is derived? “O daughter of Babylon, marked for devastation; happy is he who shall repay you your recompense for what you have done to us.

Happy is he who shall seize and dash your little ones against the rock” (Psalms 137:8–9). § The verse states: “The precious sons of Zion, comparable to fine gold” (Lamentations 4:2). What is the meaning of the expression “comparable to fine gold”? If we say that it means they were covered in fine gold [piza], this is difficult; but didn’t the school of Rabbi Sheila say: Two istira weights of fine gold came down into the world, one in Rome and one in all the rest of the world.

If so, it is certainly impossible to cover the inhabitants of Jerusalem with fine gold, as there is not enough of it in the entire world to do so. Rather, this means that they would be so attractive that they would disgrace fine gold because of their beauty. The Gemara relates that initially the noblemen of Rome would keep an image imprinted on a seal by their beds and engage in sexual intercourse opposite that image, so that they would beget children of similar beauty.

From this point forward, from the time of the Great Revolt, they would bring Jewish children, tie them to the foot of their beds, and engage in sexual intercourse across from them, because they were so handsome. It is related that it once happened that they did this to two children, and one of them said to the other: Where is this affliction written in the Torah? The other said to him: As it is written: “Also every sickness, and every plague, which is not written in the book of this Torah” (Deuteronomy 28:61).

The first one said: How far am I in my studies from this, i.e., how much more would I have had to learn in order to reach this verse? The other said: Had you gone on one and a half columns [pusta], you would have reached this. The first child said to the other: Had I reached this verse, I would not have needed you, as I would have known on my own that the verse was speaking about this. Rav Yehuda says that Shmuel says in the name of Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel: What is the meaning of that which is written: “My eye affects my soul because of all the daughters of my city” (Lamentations 3:51)?

There were four hundred synagogues in the city of Beitar, and in each and every one of them there were four hundred schoolteachers, and each and every one of these teachers had four hundred schoolchildren. And when the enemy entered there, these schoolchildren stabbed them with their pens [beḥotreihen]. And when the enemy prevailed and caught them, they wrapped the children in their scrolls and lit them on fire.

The Sages taught another baraita (Tosefta, Horayot 2:5) relating to the fate of the Jewish children: There was an incident involving Rabbi Yehoshua ben Ḥananya who once went to the great city of Rome, where they said to him: There is a child in prison with beautiful eyes and an attractive appearance, and his curly hair is arranged in locks. Rabbi Yehoshua went and stood by the entrance to the prison.

He said, as if speaking to himself: “Who gave Jacob for a spoil, and Israel to the robbers?” (Isaiah 42:24). That child answered by reciting the continuation of the verse: “Did not the Lord, He against Whom we have sinned, and in Whose ways they would not walk, neither were they obedient to His law?” Rabbi Yehoshua said: I am certain that, if given the opportunity, this child will issue halakhic rulings in Israel, as he is already exceedingly wise.

He said: I take an oath by the Temple service that I will not move from here until I ransom him for whatever sum of money they set for him. They said that he did not move from there until he ransomed him for a great sum of money, and not even a few days had passed when this child then issued halakhic rulings in Israel. And who was this child? This was Rabbi Yishmael ben Elisha.

Rav Yehuda says that Rav says: There was an incident involving the son and the daughter of Rabbi Yishmael ben Elisha the High Priest, who were taken captive and sold into slavery to two different masters. After some time the two masters met in a certain place. This master said: I have a male slave whose beauty is unmatched in all of the world, and that master said: I have a female slave whose beauty is unmatched in all of the world.

The two masters said: Come, let us marry these two slaves to one another and divide the children born to them between us, as they will certainly be very beautiful. They secluded them in a room. This one, the son, sat in one corner, and that one, the daughter, sat in the other corner. He said: I am a priest and the descendant of High Priests.

Shall I marry a female slave? And she said: I am the daughter of a priest and the descendant of High Priests. Shall I be married to a male slave? And they wept all through the night.

When dawn arrived they recognized each other and saw that they were brother and sister. They fell on each other and burst into tears until their souls departed due to their great distress. And with regard to them and others like them, Jeremiah lamented: “For these things I weep; my eye, my eye runs down with water” (Lamentations 1:16). Reish Lakish says: There was an incident involving a certain woman named Tzafenat bat Peniel.

And why was she called this? She was called Tzafenat because they would all gaze [tzofin] at her beauty, and she was called bat Peniel because she was the daughter [bat] of the High Priest who served in the innermost sanctum [lifnai velefnim] of the Temple. And it happened that she was taken captive and her captor abused and raped her all night. The next day he dressed her in seven garments and took her out to sell her.

A certain man who was especially ugly came and said to the man who was selling her: Show me her beauty. He said to him: Good-for-nothing, if you wish to buy her then buy her, for there is no beauty like hers in all of the world. The potential buyer said to the seller: Even so, I wish to see for myself. He removed the six outermost garments, and she herself tore the seventh, and rolled in ashes.

She said before God: Master of the Universe, even if You have shown no pity to us, and have allowed us to be disgraced in this way, why have You not shown pity to the sanctity of Your mighty name by which we are called? And with regard to her and others like her, Jeremiah lamented: “O daughter of My people, gird yourself with sackcloth and roll in ashes; make you mourning as for an only son, most bitter lamentation, for the spoiler shall suddenly come upon us” (Jeremiah 6:26).

It is not stated: Upon you, but rather “upon us,” for the spoiler shall come, as it were, both over Me and over you. God Himself shares this pain and His name is also disgraced. § Rav Yehuda says that Rav says: What is the meaning of that which is written: “And they covet fields, and take them by violence; and houses, and take them away; so they oppress a man and his house, even a man and his heritage” (Micah 2:2)?

There was an incident involving a certain man who set his eyes on his master’s wife, and he was a carpenter’s apprentice [shulya]. One time his master needed to borrow some money, and his apprentice said to him: Send your wife to me and I will lend her the money. He sent his wife to him, and the apprentice stayed with her for three days. He then went back to his master before she did, and the master said to him: Where is my wife whom I sent to you?

The apprentice said to him: I sent her back immediately, but I heard that the youth abused and raped her on the way. The master said to his apprentice: What shall I do? The apprentice said to him: If you listen to my advice, divorce her. He said to him: But her marriage contract is large and I do not have the money to pay it.

The apprentice said to him: I will lend you the money, and you will give her payment of her marriage contract. The master arose and divorced her, and the apprentice went and married her. When the time came that the debt was due, and he did not have the means with which to repay it, the apprentice said to his master: Come and work off your debt with me. And they, the apprentice and his wife, would sit and eat and drink, while he, the woman’s first husband, would stand over them and serve them their drinks.

And tears would drop from his eyes and fall into their cups, and at that time the Jewish people’s sentence was sealed, for remaining silent in the face of this injustice. And some say that the Jewish people were punished for two wicks in one lamp, a euphemism for the sin of adultery committed by this couple while the master was still married to the woman. § The Gemara returns to the mishna, which states: If one first purchased land from a Sicarius, and afterward returned and purchased the same field from the prior landowner, so that he will be considered the legal owner of the field, his purchase is void.

Rav says: They taught that the purchase is void only in a case where the prior owner says to the buyer when he came to acquire the field from him: Go, take possession of the field and thereby acquire it, as in such a case the prior owner can say that he did not actually mean to sell him the field. But if he sold it to him with a bill of sale, the buyer acquires the field. And Shmuel says: Even if he sold it to him with a bill of sale, the buyer does not acquire it unless the prior owner writes him a guarantee that if the field is repossessed by a creditor of the prior owner, the prior owner, who sold him the field, will compensate him for his loss, as by writing this guarantee he demonstrates that this is a true sale.

Full source
Exempla of the Rabbis, No. 34Exempla of the Rabbis (Gaster, 1924)

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.The Exempla of the Rabbis, Moses Gaster (1924) · Public Domain

This pair of exempla preserves two stories of sages who resisted sexual temptation while held in Roman hands. In the first, Rabbi Zadok, a tanna remembered for his long fasts in the years before the Temple's destruction, was a captive in Rome. A noblewoman, the Matrona, sent a beautiful slave girl to entice him into sin. Rabbi Zadok refused. He declared that he was a descendant of the noblest family of high priests, and that for a man of such lineage the consequence of this sin would be doubly heinous, a disgrace both to himself and to the priestly line from which he came. Because he held firm, he was set free.

The second account concerns Rabbi Akiva, the great master of the next generation. By order of the Hegemon, the Roman governor, two slave girls were sent to tempt him through a whole night, and they pressed against him without rest. Akiva too refused. He explained his self-control by saying that the women appeared to him like impure and repugnant beings, so that desire found no foothold in him. Both stories share a single point: even stripped of freedom and surrounded by the power of Rome, the sage guards his holiness, and the body remains subject to the discipline of a mind fixed on the commandments and on the honor of Israel.

Full source