5 min read

Miriam Bat Baitus Walked on Carpets to the Temple Mount

The richest woman in Jerusalem lays carpets from her door to the Temple so her feet never touch the ground, until one day they must.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. Carpets From the House to the Temple
  2. The Husband Who Was Not Enough Without Her Money
  3. The Petition and the Fig
  4. Jerusalem Falls and She Follows
  5. What the Sages Saw Coming

Carpets From the House to the Temple

She would not walk on the ground. That was the beginning of the story.

Miriam bat Baitus was the wealthiest woman in Jerusalem, the wife of a High Priest, the daughter of a family so prominent that her name appears in the Talmud as a standard of impossible luxury. When she wanted to go see her husband read the Torah on Yom Kippur, the holiest day of the year, she did not simply walk through the streets. Her servants laid carpets from the entrance of her house all the way to the entrance of the Temple Mount, so that her feet would not be irritated by the road.

From one set of gates to another, the city of Jerusalem became a carpet. She walked on it without her feet once touching stone.

The Husband Who Was Not Enough Without Her Money

Her husband, Yehoshua ben Gamla, had not become High Priest through scholarship or lineage alone. He had become High Priest because Miriam had purchased the appointment. The position was available for the right price, and she had paid it. She dressed him in the priestly garments with her own hands, and that act of dressing him was the last thing standing between her understanding of their marriage and the ruins it was about to become.

On the Yom Kippur she had laid the carpets for, something happened to Yehoshua. The text says he became disqualified. The precise nature of the disqualification is not spelled out in the Talmudic account, only that he was replaced at the last moment by a different priest who served in his place through the holiest day of the year.

Miriam's husband had not read the Torah on Yom Kippur. He had not stood in the place she had paid for him to occupy. She had laid carpets across Jerusalem for a ceremony her husband did not perform.

The Petition and the Fig

She went to the Sages with a petition. The Talmud does not record her exact words, only the phrase she used to describe her loss, and then the test they gave her.

The Sages told her: a fig. They sent word that she should be given a dried fig from their provisions, one ordinary dried fig, as a kind of symbolic share in their communal meal. The gesture was formal, a way of establishing that she had standing before them, that she was recognized as a member of the community whose complaint would be heard.

She refused it. A dried fig from the Sages. She had fed Jerusalem with her excess. She had bought a High Priesthood. She had carpeted the road to the Temple Mount. A dried fig was not what she had come for, and she said so in terms the text records as a woman who had not yet understood what she was about to lose.

The Sages gave her nothing more.

Jerusalem Falls and She Follows

When Rome came and Jerusalem burned, Miriam bat Baitus was still in the city. The Talmudic account records what happened to her then in terms that function as a deliberate reversal of everything the carpet story established. She went out and picked barley from between the hooves of horses. Not wheat. Not bread. Barley from the ground, from the dirt under animals, the lowest thing available in a starving city, gathered with her own hands on the same roads her servants had once carpeted so her feet would not be irritated.

Some versions of the account say she died from the shock of it. Not from hunger, not from the siege, but from the collision of who she had been and what she had become. The distance between the carpet and the barley was a distance her body could not cross.

What the Sages Saw Coming

The Talmud presents the account without moral commentary. It does not say Miriam deserved what happened to her. It does not say the fig was a warning she should have heeded. It places the two scenes side by side, the carpets and the barley, and leaves them there. The distance between them does the work of measuring itself.

But the fig carries something. When the Sages offered her that ordinary dried fig, they were offering her the same thing they offered everyone else: a portion of what there was. She had spent her life refusing to receive what other people received. She had made herself exceptional at every point, from the carpeted road to the purchased priesthood. The fig was the moment she could have stepped off the carpet and become something other than what she was. She refused it, and the carpet ended where it ended.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

2 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Eikhah Rabbah 1:47Eikhah Rabbah

There was an incident involving Miriam bat Baitus, whom Yehoshua ben Gamla betrothed [to him], and the king appointed him to be the High Priest.173He was appointed to this position because his wealthy wife paid an exorbitant sum to bribe the king to make the appointment. One time, she entered [the Temple] to observe, saying: ‘I will go and see him when he reads the Torah on Yom Kippur (the Day of Atonement) in the Temple.’ [Her servants] laid out carpets for her from the entrance of her house to the entrance of the Temple so that her feet would not become irritated. Nevertheless, her feet became irritated. When Yehoshua, her husband, died, the Sages alloted two se’a of wine each day for her.174This was part of her allotment from her husband’s estate. But did we not learn: One does not apportion wine to a woman? Rabbi Ḥiyya bar Abba said: [Because] it leads to licentiousness, just as it says: “Licentiousness, wine, and new wine will have captured the heart” (Hosea 4:11). Rabbi Yeḥizkiya and Rabbi Abahu said in the name of Rabbi Yoḥanan: For her cooked dishes.175It is permitted to allot wine for cooking, it is prohibited for drinking. They allotted this significant amount of wine daily for the cooked dishes of her household, which demonstrates her immense wealth. We learned: If she was nursing, one diminishes her handiwork and adds to her sustenance. Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi said: What does one add? Wine, because wine increases the milk.176This is another reason it is permitted to allot wine to a woman, and may have been the reason Miriam bat Baitus was allotted wine. Rabbi Elazar ben Rabbi Tzadok said: I will see the consolation,177This was an expression of an oath, short for ‘may I not see the consolation of Jerusalem if I did not see such-and-such.’ if I did not see that they tied her hair to the tails of Arabian horses, and they had them pull her from Jerusalem to Lod. I read in her regard: “The tender and delicate woman among you…” (Deuteronomy 28:56).

Full source
Eikhah Rabbah 1:46Eikhah Rabbah

There was an incident involving the two children of Tzadok the priest, who were taken captive, one male and one female. This one fell to a certain officer and that one fell to a certain officer. This one went to a prostitute and gave her the male, and this one went to a storekeeper and gave him the female in exchange for wine, to realize what is written: “They gave the boy for the prostitute and sold the girl for wine, and drank” (Joel 4:3).Days later, that prostitute brought that lad to the storekeeper. She said to him: ‘Since I have a lad who resembles that young woman, do you not wish to marry one to the other and what emerges from them will be divided between us?’ He said to her: ‘Yes.’ Immediately, they took them and placed them in a room. The young woman began weeping. He said to her: ‘Young woman, why are you weeping?’ She said to him: ‘How shall I not weep, when the daughter of the High Priest is going to marry a slave?’ He said to her: ‘Whose daughter are you?’ She said to him: ‘I am the daughter of Tzadok the priest.’ He said to her: ‘Where are you residing?’ She said to him: ‘In the upper marketplace.’ He said to her: ‘What mark is there on your residence?’ She said to him: ‘Such and such mark.’ He said to her: ‘Do you have a brother or a sister?’ She said: ‘I have one brother and he has a certain mole on his shoulder. When he would come from school, I would bare it and kiss it.’ He said to her: ‘If you would see him would you be able to identify him?’ She said to him: ‘Yes.’ He revealed himself and they recognized each other. They were hugging each other and kissing each other until their souls departed. The Divine Presence was crying out and saying: “For these I weep.”

Full source