Parshat Noach5 min read

Noah Warned the World and Still Entered Alone

Noah plants cedar trees and cuts them down for 120 years, warning a generation that watches, mocks, and drowns without surprise.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. Wickedness Grew Larger Every Morning
  2. Noah Built in Public for a Hundred and Twenty Years
  3. Strange Passengers Came Aboard Without Invitation
  4. Abraham's Body Was the New Covenant

Wickedness Grew Larger Every Morning

God saw that human wickedness was great. The word the Torah chose, raba, great, caught the attention of Rabbi Hanina, who heard in it not a fixed quantity but a direction. The wickedness was increasing. It was not simply present; it was growing. Each day's evil was larger than the day before, and the generation of the Flood was building toward a height that the earth itself could not sustain.

Bereshit Rabbah compared the Flood generation with Sodom. Both stories used the same word, great, for the scale of the offense. Sodom's cry is great. Humanity's wickedness is great. The verbal connection let the rabbis imagine the punishments as intentional parallels: water for the generation of the Flood, fire for Sodom. When violence fills the earth, the element that covers the earth responds. Water covered the world not because heaven was impatient but because injustice had become the texture of daily life, and the earth could no longer bear it.

Murder entered the midrash through Job. Job 24 contains some of the darkest language in Scripture, murderers who rise before dawn, adulterers who stalk the dusk, hands soaked in the work of killing. Bereshit Rabbah heard those verses as a description of what the Flood generation had become. They did not sin in ignorance. They had built a civilization around transgression. The flood, when it came, was not a surprise to heaven. It was a response to what the earth had been telling heaven for a century.

Noah Built in Public for a Hundred and Twenty Years

Noah was a righteous man. Bereshit Rabbah noticed the word ish, man. And said that wherever the Torah uses that word to describe someone, it signals a person who rebukes. Wherever you find ish in that sense, the person named is one who called others to account. Noah was not only righteous in his own conduct. He was righteous in his speech.

For 120 years, he planted cedar trees. When the trees had grown tall enough, he cut them down. When his neighbors asked what the lumber was for, he told them. He told them God was bringing a flood to destroy every living thing. He told them to repent. He told them this over and over, for more than a century, while the trees grew and were cut and the ark rose plank by plank in their sight.

They mocked him. They did not believe the rain would come. They did not change. The cutting and the building and the warning continued until the last boards were joined and the door was ready, and still no one turned.

Strange Passengers Came Aboard Without Invitation

God commanded Noah to bring two of every living thing aboard the ark. Bereshit Rabbah expanded the manifest. Rabbi Hoshaya read the verse, of every living being, of all flesh, as including beings for whom souls were created but bodies were not. The mischievous spirits, the mazikin, came aboard too. They arrived without bodies and left without bodies, but the verse that included every living thing was broad enough to cover them.

Nothing was left outside. The ark carried the violent and the innocent in the animal world, the clean and the unclean, the visible and the invisible. Noah had not asked for spirits as passengers. The Torah's language was simply wide enough to include them, and the rabbis followed the language wherever it led.

This was also where the midrash placed its observation about impurity and divine speech. God, the rabbis noted, extended the wording of the commandment about animals to avoid speaking the name of an unclean animal directly. Instead of saying impure animals, the Torah wrote from the animals that is not pure. It added words to protect the sanctity of what was being commanded. The Torah itself was practicing the care it asked of human beings.

Abraham's Body Was the New Covenant

After the Flood, after the rainbow, the story kept moving forward. Bereshit Rabbah did not stop at Ararat. It followed the chain of toledot forward to Abraham, who stood in a different relationship to the covenant than Noah had. Noah was preserved by an ark. Abraham was transformed in his flesh.

The rabbis heard Abraham reading Job 19 over his own circumcision: "from my flesh I will view God." He said, "had I not done this, on what basis would the Holy One have appeared to me?" The flesh was not incidental to the encounter. The covenant required a mark in the body, because the body was where the human being met the world, worked the land, suffered the cold, and finally returned to the ground from which it came. A covenant sealed only in memory could be forgotten. A covenant sealed in flesh traveled everywhere the person traveled.

Proselytes came to attach themselves to Abraham after his circumcision, the midrash said, and the Hebrew word for struck, nikfu, was related to mukaf, attached. The act of covenant-making attracted other people to the covenant. Abraham had gone first, alone, as Noah had entered the ark alone. But what Abraham did with his body opened a door that was still open to anyone willing to walk through it.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

4 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Bereshit Rabbah 27:3Bereshit Rabbah

The Torah tells us, in (Genesis 6:5), that God saw the wickedness of humankind was "great" – raba in Hebrew – before the Flood. But what kind of "great" was it? Rabbi Ḥanina suggests it was constantly increasing, always getting worse. A chilling thought, isn’t it?

Rabbi Berekhya, citing Rabbi Yoḥanan, makes a fascinating connection. We know the generation of the Flood was punished with water, and the people of Sodom, famously, with fire. But can we learn something more by comparing the two? Absolutely! By noting that the word "great" – raba – is used in both stories ("the wickedness of man was great" in (Genesis 6:5), and "the outcry of Sodom and Gomorrah is great" in (Genesis 18:2)0), the rabbis suggest a verbal analogy. It indicates that perhaps both punishments contained elements of both water and fire. A kind of reciprocal judgement, if you will.

The passage continues, focusing on the nature of the pre-Flood generation’s wickedness: "And every inclination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil all the day." Bereshit Rabbah states that from sunrise to sunset, there was no hope for them. A truly bleak picture.

To illustrate just how pervasive this evil was, the Rabbis turn to the Book of Job (24:14), "The murderer rises in daylight, kills the poor and indigent, and at night is like a thief." But wait, another verse in Job (24:16) seems to contradict this, saying, "In the dark they burrow under houses; during the day they remain sealed at home." So, were they thieves by night or by day?

The Rabbis reconcile this apparent contradiction with a rather ingenious interpretation. They describe a particularly brazen method of robbery. The wicked would smear balsam oil – a fragrant and valuable commodity – on the stone walls of houses they intended to rob. Then, under the cover of darkness, they would follow the scent to break in. So, in a way, they were involved in thievery both day and night! Plotting during the day, and executing at night.

Now, here’s the kicker. That Rabbi Ḥanina once shared this interpretation in a lecture in Tzippori, a town in the Galilee. And that very night, three hundred break-ins occurred! Apparently, some less-than-righteous individuals in the audience took the rabbi's explanation as a how-to guide. The text wryly notes that balsam wasn't readily available in Tzippori, so they used another method to mark the houses. But imagine, the Rabbis ponder, what would have happened if they had had balsam oil!

What does this tell us? It's a reminder of the power of words, the potential for misinterpretation, and the ever-present struggle between good and evil. It also highlights the rabbinic method of finding connections, parallels, and deeper meanings within the text. Even a single word, like raba, can unlock a wealth of understanding. And perhaps, a cautionary tale about being careful what you teach… you never know who might be listening.

Full source
Bereshit Rabbah 30:7Bereshit Rabbah

A reader can imagine everyone just carrying on, oblivious, but Jewish tradition suggests otherwise.

The Torah tells us, "Noah was a righteous man [ish]" (Genesis 6:9). But Bereshit Rabbah, that amazing collection of rabbinic interpretations of Genesis, sees something more in that word "ish" (man). It says that wherever you find "ish" used like this, it signifies a righteous person who rebukes others. Whoa.

So, how did Noah rebuke his generation? Well, the Bereshit Rabbah 30 elaborates. For 120 years – that's how long God gave humanity to repent before the Flood, as it says in (Genesis 6:3) – Noah was out there planting cedar trees and then… chopping them down. Can you picture it? People would ask him, "Noah, what in the world are you doing?"

He’d tell them, "The Master of the world has said He’s bringing a flood to destroy everything!"

And what was their reaction? Did they tremble in fear and start building arks of their own? Nope. They scoffed. "If He brings a flood," they said, "it'll only affect your house!"

Even when Methuselah, Noah's grandfather, died (at the end of those 120 years!), they still didn't get it. They just said, "See? Tragedy only strikes his family!" Ouch. Talk about missing the point.

The text then brings in a verse from Job (12:5): "A flame [lapid] of contempt for those of complacent thoughts [ashtut], destined to cause slippings of the foot." Rabbi Abba bar Kahana offers a powerful interpretation here. He sees Noah as God's "herald" – the lapid, the flame, the one trying to warn everyone. Because, as Rabbi Abba points out, if someone today "has an announcement" to make, people might say he has a lapid, drawing a parallel to Noah's role.

The people treated Noah with contempt, calling him a "contemptible old man." They were "of complacent thoughts [ashtut]" – as hard as blocks of metal [ashatot], completely stubborn in their ways. And they were "destined to cause slippings of the foot" – destined, says the Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary), for two disasters: one from above (the rain) and one from below ("the wellsprings of the great depth were breached," as (Genesis 7:11) tells us).

It's a pretty bleak picture, isn't it? Noah, the lone voice crying in the wilderness, trying to get people to listen, and being mocked for his efforts. Makes you wonder, doesn't it? How often do we ignore the warnings around us, blinded by our own complacency? How often do we dismiss those who are trying to tell us something important, simply because we don't want to hear it? Maybe Noah's story isn't just an ancient myth, but a timeless lesson about the dangers of ignoring the signs, and the courage it takes to speak truth to a world that doesn't want to listen.

Full source
Bereshit Rabbah 31:13Bereshit Rabbah

The familiar version gives us the classic story: two of every animal, safe from the flood. But what about the things that aren't exactly animals?

(Genesis 6:19) tells us, "And of every living being, of all flesh, two of each you shall bring to the ark, to keep alive with you; they shall be male and female." Seems straightforward. But the rabbis of the Bereshit Rabbah, that incredible collection of rabbinic interpretations of Genesis, weren't so sure. They dug deeper.

Rabbi Hoshaya, in the Bereshit Rabbah, offers a mind-bending idea: even disembodied spirits, the mischievous mazikin (harmful spirits), hitched a ride! How? Because the verse says "of every living being" – those beings "for whom souls were created, but bodies were not created for them." Imagine Noah dealing with those cabinmates!

Then there's the question of the re’em, a creature of legendary size and power. Think biblical unicorn… on steroids. Rabbi Yehuda said that the adult re’em was just too massive to fit inside the ark, but its offspring made the cut. Rabbi Nehemya, however, disagreed. He said that neither the adult nor the baby re’em could fit. Instead, Noah tied the giant beast to the ark, and as the ark sailed, the re’em plowed furrows in the ground. The Bereshit Rabbah illustrates how the ark travelled by referencing the distance from Tiberias to Susita, along the Sea of Galilee.

It's all based on a verse from (Job 39:10): "Can you bind the re’em with his rope to a furrow? Will he loosen the soil of valleys after you?” The story gets even better. We hear that in the days of Rabbi Ḥiyya bar Abba, a young re’em wandered into the Land of Israel and started wreaking havoc, uprooting trees left and right. The community declared a fast, and Rabbi Ḥiyya prayed for deliverance. Miraculously, the mother re’em bellowed from the wilderness, and the errant youngster, hearing its mother’s call, obediently returned. Talk about a powerful maternal bond!

Finally, the Bereshit Rabbah reflects on the phrase “they shall be male and female." The rabbis deduce a lesson about courtship. "If you see a male pursuing a female, accept it; a female pursuing a male, do not accept it." It's a little window into ancient social norms. The text suggests a divinely ordained order: the male should take the lead.

So, what do we make of all this? The story of Noah's Ark isn't just a simple tale of animal rescue. It's a canvas for exploring the boundaries of creation, the nature of the supernatural, and even the nuances of social behavior. It reminds us that even the most familiar stories can hold hidden depths, waiting to be uncovered. And that sometimes, the weirdest details are the most fascinating.

Full source
Bereshit Rabbah 48:3Bereshit Rabbah

" Now, Abraham takes center stage. He interprets this verse in light of his own life, specifically his circumcision. He says that after he circumcised himself, many proselytes, converts to Judaism, came to attach themselves to the covenant. Nikfu, the Hebrew word for "struck," is cleverly related to mukaf, meaning “attached.” It’s a beautiful play on words! And then comes the powerful question: “And from my flesh I will view God – had I not done this, on what basis would the Holy One blessed be He have appeared to me?” In other words, Abraham believed that his act of circumcision paved the way for divine revelation, for God appearing to him. “The Lord appeared to him.”

The rabbis don’t stop there. They continue exploring the theme of justice and how we treat others, especially those who are in a subordinate position to us.

Rabbi Isi begins by quoting Job again (31:13–14): “If I reject justice for my servant and my maidservant when they quarrel with me, what would I do when God arises, and when He makes His reckoning; what would I answer Him?” This is powerful stuff. It suggests that how we treat those under our care directly impacts our relationship with God.

There's even a story illustrating this point. Rabbi Yosei's wife was quarreling with her maidservant, and Rabbi Yosei sided with the maidservant. His wife was upset, asking why he would contradict her in front of the maid. Rabbi Yosei responded by quoting Job, emphasizing the importance of extending justice to all, regardless of their social standing.

The passage then offers another interpretation, linking the concept of mishpat (justice or law) to Abraham once again. “If I reject justice [mishpat]…” the text says, “this refers to Abraham.”: Abraham circumcised Ishmael, his son, and all those born in his house, as we read in (Genesis 17:23). Abraham didn’t withhold the mitzvah (commandment) of circumcision from Ishmael, who was considered Abraham's servant. It highlights the idea that Abraham applied the law equally to all, even those under his authority. And he asks, echoing his earlier sentiment, “Had I not done so, on what basis would the Holy One blessed be He have appeared to me?” The passage concludes with "The Lord appeared to him in the plains of Mamre, and he was sitting."

So, what can we take away from all of this? It seems that encountering the Divine isn't just about grand gestures or mystical experiences. It's also about the seemingly small acts of justice, kindness, and commitment to living ethically. It's about treating everyone with dignity and respect, recognizing that every human being is created b'tzelem Elohim, in the image of God. Abraham's example reminds us that our actions, our choices, can either open us up to God's presence or close us off. Are we creating space for the Divine in our lives through our actions? It's a question worth pondering.

Full source