Parshat Noach5 min read

Noah's Raven Argued Back and Elijah Needed It

Noah's raven refused the mission and argued for its species. God ordered it kept for Elijah. Wonders followed, and exile still came for unrepentant kings.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. A Species on Trial at the Window
  2. Bread and Meat on Black Wings
  3. Wonders in Life, Power After Death
  4. Hezekiah Cuts Rock While Prophets Burn

At the end of forty days Noah opened the window of the ark, the tzohar that Rabbi Abba bar Kahana reads as a window, and sent out the raven. The bird went back and forth. Rabbi Yudan, in the name of Rabbi Yehuda ben Rabbi Simon, hears not mere flight but argument. The raven began presenting answers to Noah, meshivo, turning the mission into a lawsuit on the wet air.

Noah's Raven Argued Back and Elijah Needed It Click for full size

Of all the animals, beasts, and birds here, why send only the raven? There are seven of the clean kinds. Of ravens there are two. Send this bird out and risk erasing its kind from the washed earth.

A Species on Trial at the Window

Noah answered without tenderness. What need does the world have for this bird? It is fit neither for food nor for offering. He did not want the raven back inside. The window that had let the dark bird out was ready to stay shut against it. Utility was the whole ethic of the passenger list in Noah's mouth.

Then the Holy One spoke. Accept it back into the ark, for the world will have a need for it in the future. Noah asked when. Until the drying of the water from upon the earth, came the answer that points past the Flood to another drying. A certain righteous man is destined to arise and dry the world with drought, and he will need this bird.

The useless creature is under sealed orders for a prophet not yet born. Noah's inventory of worth fails the test of providence.

Bread and Meat on Black Wings

That righteous man is Elijah. By the brook, when the land cracked under the word of drought, ravens brought him bread and meat morning and evening. The species Noah nearly erased from the passenger list became the courier service of a prophet who closed the sky.

Some sages still argue whether orevim means literal ravens or men of Aravi near Beit She'an. Rabbi Nehemiah insists on birds carrying food from royal tables. The midrash does not need the argument settled to keep its sting. What Noah called worthless, Heaven booked as logistics for the day the rain refuses to fall.

The Flood's survivor almost aborted the rescue plan for the drought's survivor. Mercy for a black bird is policy written centuries early. Morning bread and evening meat ride on the wings of a lawsuit that lost.

Wonders in Life, Power After Death

Ben Sira praises the same prophet in a tight line. In his life he did wonders, and in his death powerful deeds. Fire from heaven, rain restored, ascent in a storm, and after the body is gone, the deeds still work on the world. Influence does not retire when the chariot rises.

Then the praise collapses into verdict. With all this the people did not repent and did not cease from their sins until they were torn from their land and scattered in all the earth. Miracles without teshuvah (turning back to God) become scenery. Galut follows as geography written by refusal.

A few remained with Judah. A ruler from the house of David still sat. Among them some did right and some did evil. The remnant is not a pure choir. It is a mixed household still choosing under a thinned crown.

Hezekiah Cuts Rock While Prophets Burn

Beside that moral weather, Hezekiah strengthens his city with water, cutting through rock with bronze and damming mountains for a pool. Practical salvation runs beside spiritual failure. A king tunnels for life while a nation ignores the prophet the ravens once fed.

Return to Noah's window. The raven argues for its life. God argues for Elijah's breakfast. Ben Sira argues that even after wonders the people can still choose exile. The chain from ark to brook to scattering is one long refusal to waste what Heaven has already reserved.

A bird called useless keeps the file open on mercy until a prophet opens his mouth over a dry land. The Flood taught survival of pairs. The raven taught survival of purposes not yet visible to the captain of the ark.

Rabbi Akiva, preaching on the Flood generation, found hearers dry-eyed at mass death and weeping at Job. The midrash links that hardness to mercy forgotten among humans, so mercy was forgotten for them. Injustice breaks like a tree snapped rather than uprooted, never to be replanted. Against that background the spared raven is almost comic, a small black exception Heaven insisted on keeping for a better errand.

The argument at the window is comedy only until Elijah's hunger makes it law. Noah ranked creatures by altar and kitchen. Heaven ranked them by future errands. Between those rankings the Flood generation's cruelty, which forgot mercy among humans, meets a small black exception that proves not every life in the ark was measured by Noah's taste.

NoahRavenElijahFloodArkExile
← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

2 sources

The texts behind this telling. Some cards carry a translation of the source; others are our own retelling of it, and each card says which. Every card links out to the original.

Bereshit Rabbah 33:5Bereshit Rabbah

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.The Sefaria Midrash Rabbah, 2022 · CC-BY

Bereshit Rabbah turns to Noah and Creation of Abba.

“It was at the end of forty days, and Noah opened the window of the ark that he made” (Genesis 8:6). Remember that mysterious word tzohar (Genesis 6:15), used to describe the ark’s light source? Well, Rabbi Abba bar Kahana, as quoted in Bereshit Rabbah 31:11, interprets it as a window. This verse, “Noah opened the window,” backs up that idea. Makes sense. Then comes the raven. Noah sends it out, and “it went back and forth, until the drying of the water from upon the earth” (Genesis 8:7). But what does "back and forth" really mean?

Rabbi Yudan, in the name of Rabbi Yehuda ben Rabbi Simon, offers a striking image: The raven wasn’t just aimlessly flying around. It was arguing with Noah! "Of all the creatures here, why me?" the raven essentially squawked. "Why not send one of the animals where you have seven of them? You only have two ravens! Send me out, and you risk wiping out my entire species!"

Noah, according to this midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary), wasn’t thrilled. He retorted, “What good are you anyway? You’re neither fit for food nor for sacrifice!” Ouch. Noah basically told the raven it was useless.

But then, a surprising twist. Rabbi Berekhya, quoting Rabbi Abba bar Kahana, says that the Holy One, blessed be He, tells Noah: “Accept it back! The world will need it in the future." Noah asks, naturally, "When?" And the answer: “Until the drying of the water from upon the earth” – meaning, a righteous man will need it in the future. This righteous man, the tradition tells us, is Elijah the prophet.

The connection? As we know from I (Kings 17:6), “The ravens [orevim] would bring him bread and meat in the morning, and bread and meat in the evening.” So, God knew that even this seemingly "useless" creature would play a crucial role in sustaining a great prophet.

Now, Rabbi Yehuda and Rabbi Neḥemya have a little back-and-forth about those ravens. Rabbi Yehuda suggests that orevim refers to people from a city called Aravi, near Beit She’an. But Rabbi Neḥemya insists they were actual ravens, bringing food from Yehoshafat's table.

The text then veers into a powerful, almost jarring, direction. It recounts how Rabbi Akiva once delivered a homily in Ginzak about the generation of the Flood. Surprisingly, the people didn’t weep for the annihilation of an entire generation. But when he told them the story of Job, they broke down. Why?

Rabbi Akiva applies the verse from (Job 24:20) to the generation of the Flood: “The womb will forget him; he will be sweet for the maggots; he will no longer be remembered, and injustice will be broken like a tree.” The commentary unpacks this grim verse. “The womb [reḥem] will forget him” means they caused mercy [raḥamim] to be forgotten among mankind, so God, in turn, forgot His mercy for them. Their flesh would be food for maggots, and their injustice would be broken, never to regenerate.

Rabbi Abbahu emphasizes the word "broken" rather than "uprooted." A tree that's uprooted can be replanted. But one that's broken is beyond repair. The passage concludes by linking this brokenness to the generation of the Dispersion, who, after the Tower of Babel incident, never regained their unified language and speech (Genesis 11:1).

What does this all mean? It seems to be about the consequences of cruelty, the interconnectedness of all beings, and the enduring need for mercy and compassion. Even a seemingly insignificant raven has a purpose. And a society that forgets mercy is doomed to be forgotten itself. A reminder that our actions, both big and small, have lasting consequences.

Full source
Ben Sira 48:17Ben Sira

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.The Wisdom of Ben Sira, Cambridge University Press (1899) · CC-BY

It's short, but it packs a punch.

“In his life he did wonders, and in his death powerful deeds.” Who are we talking about here? Ben Sira doesn't explicitly say in this chapter, but reading it in context, many understand this to be about the prophet Elijah. for a second. Not just doing amazing things while alive, but continuing to have influence even after passing on. What does that even mean?

Then the mood shifts. It's like a cold splash of reality.

"With all this the people did not repent; and did not cease from their sins; until they were torn from their land, and scattered in all the earth."

Ouch. Talk about a harsh consequence. Despite the miracles, despite the potential for greatness, the people just… didn’t change. The result? Exile. Dispersion. Galut, as it's known in Hebrew. It’s a recurring theme in Jewish history – this idea of being scattered because of our own failings. It's a sobering thought. A stark warning, really.

The passage continues, painting a picture of what's left after the storm.

"And a few remained with Judah, and there still was a ruler from the house of David. And there were from among them who did right, and there were from among them who did evil."

So, even after everything, there's a remnant. A flicker of hope. A continuation of the Davidic line – a line that carries with it the promise of Mashiach, the Messiah. But it's not all sunshine and roses. The passage is brutally honest: even amongst those who remained, there was still good and evil. Human nature. It doesn't just vanish because of a national tragedy. We're complex beings, capable of both incredible kindness and terrible cruelty.

Then, almost out of nowhere, we get this:

"Yeḥizqiyahu strengthened his city by bringing into it water; and he cut through rock with bronze, and dammed the mountains for a pool."

Who is Yeḥizqiyahu? That’s King Hezekiah. But I think it’s important. It's a reminder that even amidst spiritual failings, there were still acts of leadership, of ingenuity, of protecting the community. Hezekiah, facing a potential siege by the Assyrians, secured Jerusalem's water supply. He literally carved a tunnel through solid rock to ensure the city's survival! It was a practical, tangible act of tikkun (spiritual repair) olam – repairing the world – in the face of looming disaster.

So, what do we take away from this little snippet of Ben Sira? It's a reminder that even the most awe-inspiring figures can't force people to be good. That actions have consequences, both individually and collectively. But also, that even in the darkest of times, there's always the potential for hope, for resilience, for acts of kindness and leadership that can make a real difference.

Full source