5 min read

Six Hundred Talents to Keep Them in Zion

One family in the holy city was starving. Their neighbors counted out six hundred talents of gold so the family would not have to move away.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. Poverty at the Gate of the Holy
  2. Bread That Cannot Return to the Oven
  3. May It Not Befall You
  4. Gold That Could Not Stop the Later Fire
  5. Two Memories of One City

They counted the gold in the courtyard until the light ran out of the stones. Six hundred talents. A weight that could have bought fields far from the walls. The community of Jerusalem did not hand it over so the Nevlatah family could leave. They handed it over so the family would not be forced to leave.

Six Hundred Talents to Keep Them in Zion Click for full size

Poverty at the Gate of the Holy

The Nevlatah were desperately poor inside the city that called itself holy. Hunger does not respect topography. A child can starve within sight of the Temple mount as easily as on a road to Egypt. The city answered with a fortune large enough to look absurd beside empty shelves.

Why so much? The tradition is blunt. They did not want to force the family out of Jerusalem. Communal responsibility meant keeping even the poorest inside the circuit of the walls, the festivals, the shared air of Zion. Gold became a chain of mercy, not a ticket out.

How a family could be so poor while near such a gift is a riddle the text leaves open. Perhaps the gold was held more than spent. The point that survives is the refusal to let poverty become exile while the walls still stood.

Bread That Cannot Return to the Oven

Years later, when exile did come for the many, Israel would invent a bakehouse word for the loss. They cried radnu, "we have broken loose." The sages heard the language of the oven. A baker who lifts a loaf from the oven wall knows it can never be pressed back to bake again.

"We dwelt in Jerusalem as bread within an oven," they said, "for the fire of the Holy One is in Zion and His furnace in Jerusalem" (Isaiah 31:9). Then the loaf was drawn out and sent to Babylon. What more can You ask of bread already removed once from the heat?

Rabbi Joshua still insisted that not one good word the Lord spoke to the house of Israel ever failed. Promise and ruin sat in the same mouth. Late-ripening wheat, the deep gloom Jeremiah named, was read as delay, not as a kindness withheld forever.

May It Not Befall You

On the day of enflamed wrath the congregation of Israel turned to the nations and said, "May it not befall you, all wayfarers. Look and see: is there any pain like my pain?" (Lamentations 1:12). Wayfarers were also heard as violators of the way of Torah. Look and see became a dare and a warning at once.

The midrash stacks sentences the way a mourner stacks years. The Flood's generation, twelve months. Egypt, twelve months. Job, twelve months. The wicked in Gehenna, twelve months. Nebuchadnezzar's siege, three and a half years. Vespasian's, three and a half. Israel's claim is not that others never suffered. It is that this pain has a particular shape.

Gold That Could Not Stop the Later Fire

The six hundred talents kept one family inside the walls for a time. They could not keep the walls standing when the furnace of Jerusalem became more than a metaphor. Still the earlier act remains. A city that pours gold to prevent a private exile teaches what it believed a public exile would cost.

On a quiet afternoon before the catastrophes, a Nevlatah child walked a street he might have lost. The coins were heavy somewhere in a chest. The bread of the city still baked in its oven. No one yet said radnu. The gold still meant stay, not flee.

Two Memories of One City

When the later fire came, memory kept both images: the courtyard of counted talents, and the loaf that could not return to the wall of heat. The Nevlatah elders had signed a stay. Children learned the alleys of Zion by heart instead of a foreign market's prices.

Some of those children lived long enough to carry both gifts into exile: the gold that meant remain, and the oven-word that meant we were pulled out too soon. Memory kept the contradiction without sanding it smooth.

Pressure did not leave the room when the voices softened. It only changed shape, settling into the bones of everyone who had watched the turn and would have to live with what they had seen.

The air after the choice tasted different. Someone swallowed. Someone looked away. The event had finished its visible work and begun its slower work in memory.

The air after the choice tasted different. Someone swallowed. Someone looked away. The event had finished its visible work and begun its slower work in memory.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

3 sources

The texts behind this telling. Some cards carry a translation of the source; others are our own retelling of it, and each card says which. Every card links out to the original.

Sifrei Devarim 111:1Sifrei Devarim

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.Sifrei by Rabbi Shraga Silverstein · CC-BY

The Sifrei Devarim, a collection of legal interpretations on the Book of Deuteronomy, tells us about this family, the Nevlatah. They were desperately poor. So poor, in fact, that the community of Jerusalem, in their immense generosity, decided to give them a whopping six hundred talents of gold. Now, a talent was a unit of weight, and Six hundred talents! That's a fortune, even by today’s standards.

Why so much?

The text makes it clear: they didn't want to force the Nevlatah family to leave Jerusalem. It was a matter of communal responsibility, ensuring that even the poorest could remain within the holy city.

It also raises a question: How could a family be so poor if they were entrusted with such wealth? Perhaps they weren’t allowed to actually use the gold, only safeguard it. Perhaps the gold was a communal fund managed by them. The text is silent on the details, leaving us to wonder about the intricacies of poverty and wealth, communal support, and the lengths people will go to stay connected to their home.

Now, let's shift gears slightly, still within the Sifrei Devarim, and tackle a tricky little point of legal interpretation related to the Shmita year, the sabbatical year.

(Deuteronomy 15:1) states, "From the end (ketz) of seven years you shall make shemitah (a release)." The shemitah year, observed every seventh year, involved the release of debts and allowing the land to lie fallow. A radical concept, even today.

But when exactly does this release begin? At the beginning of the seventh year, or at the end?

The text anticipates a potential misunderstanding. One might think the shemitah begins at the start of the seventh year. But the Sifrei Devarim argues otherwise. It employs a method of interpretation called gezerah shavah, a comparison of similar words or phrases in different biblical passages.

The word ketz, meaning "end," appears here and also in (Deuteronomy 31:10), which speaks of a gathering at the "end" (ketz) of the Shmita year itself. The text reasons that just as "ketz" in (Deuteronomy 31:10) refers to the end of the year, so too "ketz" in (Deuteronomy 15:1) must refer to the end of the seven-year cycle. The shemitah release, therefore, takes effect at the end of the seventh year, not its beginning.

It's a subtle point, but important for understanding the proper observance of the shemitah. And it shows how the rabbis of old meticulously parsed the scriptures, ensuring that God's word was understood with precision and care.

So, what do these two seemingly unrelated passages have in common? Perhaps it's a reminder that Judaism is a tradition that cares deeply about both material needs and precise legal interpretation. A tradition that wrestles with questions of poverty and wealth, debt and release, always striving for justice and understanding. It asks us to consider: what are we doing to support those in need, and how carefully are we examining the principles that guide our actions?

Full source
Midrash Tanchuma Buber, Bamidbar 2:2Midrash Tanchuma Buber, Bamidbar

Translation of the source text.Midrash Tanchuma (Buber), Public Domain, on Sefaria · CC-BY-SA

Another interpretation of "ma'aphelyah" (deep darkness): Did I ever say to you that I would bring a benefit and then delay it? "Ma'aphelyah" is nothing other than a term of late-ripening, as it is said (Exodus 9:32), "for they are late-ripening (aphilot)."

Rabbi Joshua said (Joshua 21:43), "Not one thing failed of all the good thing that the LORD spoke unto the house of Israel; it all came to pass." Then why did they say (Jeremiah 2:31), "Wherefore say My people: We have broken loose (radnu)"? This is a Mishnaic term: "one who removes (rodeh) a hot loaf." They said: When the bread is baked in the oven and is taken from it, can it be set in the oven again? And we were in Jerusalem as in an oven, as it is said (Isaiah 31:9), "saith the LORD, whose fire is in Zion, and His furnace in Jerusalem." And You exiled us to Babylon. What more do You seek from us? Wherefore say My people: "We have been removed (radnu)."

Full source
Eikhah Rabbah 1:40Eikhah Rabbah

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.The Sefaria Midrash Rabbah, 2022 · CC-BY

“May it not befall you, all wayfarers. Look and see: Is there any pain like my pain, which has been done to me, with which the Lord has tormented me on the day of His enflamed wrath?” (Lamentations 1:12).“May it not befall you,” the congregation of Israel says to the nations of the world: Let what befell us not befall you. Let what happened to me not happen to you; “all wayfarers [overei derekh],” all violators of [overei] the way [derekh] of Torah. “Look and see.” We learned there: The sentence of the generation of the Flood lasted twelve months, the sentence of the Egyptians lasted twelve months, the sentence of Job lasted twelve months, the sentence of Gog and Magog lasts twelve months, the sentence of the wicked in Gehenna lasts twelve months.148Mishna Eduyot 2:10. Nebuchadnezzar was three and a half years. Sennacherib was over three and a half years. Vespasian was three and a half years.149The respective sieges of Nebuchadnezzar, leading to the destruction of the first Temple, and Vespasian, leading to the destruction of the second Temple, lasted three and a half years each. This demonstrates how the suffering of the Jews during that time was unparalleled.“Look and see: Is there any pain like my pain, which has been done [olal] to me.” He was exacting with me and plucked my gleanings [olalti], just as it says: “When you harvest your vineyard [you shall not glean [teolel] behind you]” (Deuteronomy 24:21).150It is forbidden to pluck the grapes in clusters that are not fully formed, which must be left for the poor. However, the enemies of Jerusalem killed everyone and destroyed everything. “With which the Lord has tormented me on the day of His enflamed wrath.” Rabbi Aḥa said: The enflamed wrath of the Holy One blessed be He was one day. Had Israel repented, they would have cooled it.

Full source