4 min read

The Hidden Arithmetic of God's Promises to the Patriarchs

The count of Jacob's family going to Egypt comes up wrong. The rabbis sit with the broken sum until it opens a secret about how God keeps promises.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. A Promise That Cannot Be Withdrawn
  2. Good Words Lock, Hard Words Bend
  3. What Counts as a Person
  4. The Deed That Changed Its Own Description

A Promise That Cannot Be Withdrawn

Rabbi Shmuel bar Nahman held up a verse from Numbers that should not be able to say what it says. God is not a man that He would lie, the first half reads. And will not perform what He says, the second half continues. Both halves cannot be true at once. Either God is reliable or God is not.

The rabbi's answer: the verse is not about reliability. It is about the asymmetry of divine speech. When God speaks a blessing, the word locks. When God speaks a punishment, the word breathes. A blessing issued from the mouth of God is iron. A decree of suffering is conditional, waiting for prayer, repentance, or simply time to bend it.

Good Words Lock, Hard Words Bend

He built the proof from Sarah. God told Abraham that Sarah would have a son at this season next year. Genesis reported the delivery exactly as promised. But the command to sacrifice that same son on the mountain did not result in a dead son. The decree of four hundred years in Egypt compacted itself into two hundred and ten when Israel's suffering became sufficient. Good words lock. Hard words can be argued down. The asymmetry is not inconsistency. It is how the system was designed.

What Counts as a Person

Then came the arithmetic problem. Genesis 46 lists the family members who went down to Egypt with Jacob. Count them and you get sixty-six. Add Joseph and his two sons already in Egypt, seventy. But the Torah says Jacob himself counts as one of the seventy, which makes the family sixty-six plus Jacob plus Joseph plus two grandsons. That is seventy. Except Jacob is already being counted somewhere in the sixty-six. The numbers do not resolve cleanly.

The rabbis did not try to smooth the problem. They asked instead: what is the missing person? Someone had to be the seventieth who was not in the counted family. Their answer stopped the conversation. The missing seventieth was the Shekhina herself. God's presence had gone down with Jacob into Egypt. The seventy was not complete without counting God among those who descended.

A family going into exile was not going alone. The divine presence was the unnumbered member, the one who made the count work when human arithmetic came up short.

The Deed That Changed Its Own Description

When Joseph asked Pharaoh for permission to bury Jacob in Canaan, he did not say his father had bought the cave at Machpelah. He said his father had made him dig the grave with his own hands. The rabbis noticed the substitution. The Torah had recorded a purchase. Joseph described a labor. Why?

Because in Egypt, they said, a king's word was law. A document meant nothing that a king had not authorized. If Joseph had said his father purchased the grave, Pharaoh could have challenged the title and kept the body in Egypt. But labor? A man who had personally cut a grave with his hands out of his love for a father? That was something no king could undo by reviewing a deed. Joseph was a diplomat, and he had learned in thirteen years of Egyptian court life exactly which kind of claim a Pharaoh could not confiscate.

The purchase was real. The document existed. Joseph simply described it in the language that would work in the room he was standing in. God's promise about the land had been made to Abraham. The grave was Abraham's. Jacob had always planned to go home. The arithmetic worked out, eventually, in a language Pharaoh could understand.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

3 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Bereshit Rabbah 53:4Bereshit Rabbah

(Psalm 119:89) declares, “Forever, Lord, Your word stands firm in the heavens.” But does this mean it doesn’t stand firm here, with us?

Our sages grappled with this, finding an answer in the story of Abraham and Sarah. What God promised Abraham – "At the prescribed time, I will return to you; at this very time next year, [Sarah will have a son]" (Genesis 18:14) – did come to pass.

Rabbi Naḥman of Yafo, quoting Rabbi Yaakov of Caesarea, beautifully connects this to (Psalm 80:15): “God of hosts, please return. Look from heaven and see, and remember this vine.” This "remembering," they suggest, is God fulfilling his promise to Abraham, looking down from the heavens and ensuring that the promise of descendants, as numerous as the stars (Genesis 15:5), comes to fruition. "Remember this vine," they say, alluding to the verse, "the Lord remembered Sarah." As Bereshit Rabbah 53 implies, the Psalmist was praying that God once again grant fertility and increase for Israel as He did for Abraham and Sarah.

What about those times when things don't go as planned? When God seems to change his mind? Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman dives into this apparent contradiction, using (Numbers 23:19) as his springboard: “God is not a man, that He would lie, or the son of man, that He would reconsider.” Rabbi Shmuel points out that the verse seems to contradict itself. How can God not lie, but also not perform what He says?

Here’s the nuance: Rabbi Shmuel explains that when God decrees something good, His word is absolute. "God is not a man, that He would lie." But when the decree is detrimental, there's room for…well, let's call it divine flexibility. "He will say and not perform, speak and not fulfill."

He illustrates this with examples ripped from the heart of our tradition. When God promises Abraham descendants through Isaac (Genesis 21:12), that's a promise set in stone. "God is not a man, that He would lie." But when God commands Abraham to sacrifice Isaac (Genesis 22:2)? "He will say and not perform."

Similarly, when God tells Moses, "I have remembered you [and what has been done to you in Egypt, and I said: I shall bring you up from the affliction of Egypt]" (Exodus 3:16–17) – that’s a promise. But when God says to Moses, "Let Me be, and I shall destroy them" (Deuteronomy 9:14) – that's a moment where prayer and repentance can change the course.

And what about the enslavement in Egypt? God tells Abraham, "And also that nation [whom they will serve, I shall judge]" (Genesis 15:14) – a promise of eventual justice. But the initial decree, "They will be enslaved to them and they will oppress them [four hundred years]" (Genesis 15:13)? According to Rabbi Shmuel, this is where the "not perform" comes in, as the actual enslavement lasted only two hundred and ten years. As the great commentator Rashi points out, the initial decree was conditional, dependent on the actions of future generations.

The story circles back to Sarah. When God says, "I will surely return to you […and, behold, a son for Sarah your wife]" (Genesis 18:10) – that’s a promise kept. "God is not a man, that He would lie." And as (Genesis 21:1) tells us, "the Lord remembered Sarah."

So, what does all of this mean for us? Perhaps it's this: God's promises of good are steadfast, a source of unwavering hope. And even when faced with hardship, even when things seem bleak, there’s always room for prayer, for change, for divine compassion to alter the course. The story of Abraham and Sarah, as understood by our sages in Bereshit Rabbah, is not just a tale of ancient times, but a timeless reminder of the enduring power of faith, promise, and the ever-present possibility of hope.

Full source
Bereshit Rabbah 94:9Bereshit Rabbah

The verses state, "All the people who were coming with Jacob to Egypt, the products of his loins, aside from the wives of Jacob's sons; all the people were sixty-six" (Genesis 46:26). Then, just a verse later, "And the sons of Joseph, who were born to him in Egypt, were two people; all the people of the house of Jacob, who came to Egypt, were seventy" (Genesis 46:27).

Sixty-six... plus two... equals seventy? Something seems amiss, doesn't it? Where do those extra two people come from? Well, the sages of the Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary), specifically Bereshit Rabbah, love to dig into these little inconsistencies. They see them as invitations to uncover deeper truths.

Rabbi Levi, in the name of Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman, poses a pretty direct question: "Have you ever in your days seen a person give another sixty-six cups, and then give him another three, and he counts them as seventy?" (Bereshit Rabbah 94). It's a rhetorical question, of course. The numbers just don't line up.

So, what's the explanation? According to this Midrash, the answer lies with Yokheved, who would later become the mother of Moses. The Midrash suggests that Yokheved completed the tally of Israel in Egypt. Even though the verses only list sixty-nine people explicitly, Yokheved, born as they arrived in Egypt, is counted in the final tally of seventy. She's the missing piece of the puzzle.

And it gets even more specific! Rabbi Levi, again citing Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman, tells us that Yokheved was conceived in the land of Canaan but born in Egypt. This idea is supported by the verse, "The name of Amram's wife was Yokheved, [daughter of Levi, who was born to Levi in Egypt]" (Numbers 26:59) - the Midrash interprets this to mean she was born right at the gates of Egypt.

This leads to another fascinating idea: that God is sometimes aware of and even counts individuals before they are even fully born. Rabbi Levi in the name of Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman tells us that The Holy One blessed be He is accustomed to count this tribe while it is still in its mother’s womb. That is what is written: “For Yedutun, the sons of Yedutun: Gedalyahu, and Tzeri, and Yeshayahu, Ḥashavyahu, and Matityahu, [six]” (I Chronicles 25:3) – they are five [who are mentioned] specifically, but a total of six. However, there is “Shimi” (I (Chronicles 25:1)7). The Holy One blessed be He counted him while he was still in his mother’s womb.

The Midrash continues exploring different ways to explain the number seventy. Some say that Jacob himself completes the tally. Others suggest that God Himself is included in the count, accompanying Jacob and his family into exile. There's even a suggestion that Ḥushim, the son of Dan, counted as two people because he had so many offspring!

And then we get to the story of Seraḥ, daughter of Asher. According to one tradition, she also completed the tally. The Midrash connects her to a story in II Samuel where a wise woman saves a city. This wise woman declares, "I am the one who completed [shehishlamti] the tally [minyanan] of Israel in Egypt." She's portrayed as a figure of peace and loyalty, even delivering Joseph's bones to Moses so they could be reburied in the Land of Israel (Sota 13a).

What does it all mean? Well, on one level, it's about resolving a numerical discrepancy in the Torah. But on a deeper level, it's about recognizing the importance of every single individual, even those who aren't explicitly named or counted. It's about the idea that God's presence and blessing can be found in the most unexpected places, even in the womb, even at the border between one land and another. It reminds us that even when we feel like something's missing, there's often a hidden piece of the puzzle waiting to be discovered, a hidden blessing waiting to be revealed.

Full source
Bereshit Rabbah 100:5Bereshit Rabbah

The familiar reading treats the Torah focusing on the big picture, but sometimes, it's in the details that we find the most fascinating human drama. Take the story of Jacob's death and burial in the book of Genesis.

(Genesis 50:5) recounts Joseph’s words to Pharaoh: "My father administered an oath to me, saying: Behold, I am dying; in my grave that I dug [kariti] for myself in the land of Canaan, bury me there. I will go up now and bury my father, and I will return.” Seems straightforward. A son fulfilling his father's last wish. But Bereshit Rabbah, that incredible collection of rabbinic interpretations on the book of Genesis, gives us a glimpse into a possible backstory.

The text zeros in on Jacob’s words, “that I dug [kariti] for myself.” Why that specific word? Why not "acquired" or "bought"? The Rabbis of the Bereshit Rabbah, in section 100, suggest a clever reading. They imagine a scene between Jacob and Esau, those eternally squabbling brothers, dividing up Isaac's inheritance.

In this midrashic (rabbinic interpretive commentary) interpretation, Jacob asks Esau what he wants: money or a burial plot. Esau, practical as ever, scoffs, "What would I do with a burial plot? Give me the money!" The text continues that Esau demands a hefty sum. So, when Jacob says "kariti," "I dug," it’s not about physically digging a grave. Instead, it means "I heaped up" [hikarti] a mountain of money in exchange for it. Jacob essentially bought his burial plot from Esau, paying a premium for the privilege of being buried in the Promised Land.

Isn't that a fascinating twist? It paints a picture of Jacob as a shrewd negotiator, securing his family's future even in death. It also highlights the enduring tension between the brothers and the lengths Jacob was willing to go to ensure his final resting place was in Canaan.

The story continues with Joseph's request to Pharaoh and the grand procession that follows. (Genesis 50:6-9) describes the impressive entourage accompanying Joseph to Canaan: Pharaoh's servants, the elders of Egypt, Joseph's entire household, chariots, and horsemen. It's quite the scene!

But the Rabbis see more than just a funeral procession. They perceive a potential for conflict. Bereshit Rabbah notes that initially, the journey was "for lament," but from a certain point onwards, it became "for battle." The implication, as commentators explain, is that Joseph anticipated a possible confrontation with Esau or his descendants, who might try to prevent the burial.

And then comes a truly remarkable interpretation. (Genesis 50:9) states, "He took up with him both [gam] chariots and [gam] horsemen..." Rabbi Yitzchak points out the repetition of gam, "also." What else was present, unstated? Rabbi Yitzchak says, "The great One of the world was there," or, as some say, "The glory of the One who lives forever." In other words, God Himself accompanied them! This echoes God's promise to Jacob in (Genesis 46:4), "I will go down with you to Egypt and I will also surely bring you up again."

The Bereshit Rabbah suggests that the Shekhinah, the Divine Presence, was visibly present during this journey.

So, what does this all mean? It's more than just a story about a burial. It's about family dynamics, shrewd deals, potential conflict, and ultimately, divine presence. It reminds us that even in moments of grief and loss, the possibility of redemption and divine accompaniment are always present. It urges us to look beyond the surface, to delve deeper into the text, and to find the hidden stories that enrich our understanding of ourselves and our tradition.

What other secrets might be hiding in plain sight, waiting for us to uncover them?

Full source