The Serpent in Eden Was a General With Siege Engines
A tenth-century midrash read a parable in Ecclesiastes as an allegory for Eden. The great king outside the walls is the serpent. The poor wise man is Adam.
Table of Contents
A Parable That Hurries Past Itself
Ecclesiastes drops a strange, small parable into the middle of its wisdom: a small city, few people inside, a great king outside building siege works, and a poor wise man whose wisdom could have delivered the city if anyone had remembered him (Ecclesiastes 9:14). The book rushes past the image without explaining it. The rabbis slowed down on it.
The Aggadat Bereshit, a tenth-century homiletical midrash compiled in Byzantine-era Palestine or southern Italy, recognized the parable as a description of Eden. The small city is Eden. The few people are Adam and Eve. The great king with the siege engines is the serpent. The poor wise man whose wisdom was ignored is Adam himself, who had been given the commandment, who knew the boundary of the tree, and whose wisdom went unheeded in the crisis.
Adam at the End of His Naming
The Midrash of Philo, a collection of interpretations associated with the Hellenistic Jewish tradition of Alexandria, sits with a quieter moment before the siege begins. God paraded every creature before Adam so that Adam could name them. Adam looked at each one and found what it was. He named them categorizing, understanding, seeing the essence of every creature that passed before him.
And then came the line that stopped the commentators: but for Adam there was not found a helper like to him (Genesis 2:20). What was Adam looking for? The question is not simply about loneliness. It is about the depth of what Adam could perceive. He had seen the inside of every animal. He had given them names from that seeing. He had looked through the parade of creation with complete comprehension and had found nothing that matched what he carried in himself.
Wisdom Departs and Adam Grieves
After the transgression, Adam did not simply feel shame. He experienced the loss of something specific. From the time I ate of the tree, he is recorded saying in the Legends of the Jews, wisdom departed from me, and I am a fool that knows nothing, an ignorant man that understands nothing. What he had at the moment of naming was gone. The capacity that had let him see through every animal to its essence had been taken from him, and he knew it because he could feel the absence where it had been.
He poured out his heart to God. He acknowledged the weight of what he had done, its reach into the future, the children he could not yet protect because he could no longer see what was coming. He begged for knowledge, for understanding, for a glimpse into what lay ahead for him and his descendants. And God sent the Book of Raziel, the angel bringing a text that could carry something of what had been lost.
The Poor Wise Man Nobody Remembered
Ecclesiastes does not identify the poor wise man, only notes that his wisdom was not remembered. The Aggadat Bereshit's identification of this figure with Adam carries a particular sting. Adam had possessed the deepest form of knowledge the tradition had a name for: the wisdom that could see into the nature of things and give them their true names. He had looked at the entire created order and found his way through it. And in the moment of siege, when the serpent came with its argument and its strategy, the city fell.
The parable is not a condemnation of Adam. It is a mourning of what was lost when wisdom went unheeded. The great king with the siege engines did not win because he was stronger. He won because the poor wise man who could have answered him was somehow not in the room where the decision was made. The tree stood in the center of the garden. The commandment had been given. The knowledge of what not to touch was there. And the city fell anyway.
← All myths