Parshat Vayakhel5 min read

The Temple Veil Woven on Seventy Two Strands

Three hundred priests carried one curtain to be washed. A handbreadth thick, woven on seventy-two strands, the parokhet guarded the holiest room.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Loom That Guarded the Innermost Room
  2. A Walk Through the Sanctuary Cubit by Cubit
  3. Seventy-Two Strands and Three Hundred Priests
  4. The Veil Built to Be Impossible
  5. What Stood Beyond Jerusalem
The Temple Veil Woven on Seventy Two Strands Click for full size

The Loom That Guarded the Innermost Room

Three hundred priests once carried a single curtain down to the river to wash it, and even three hundred men strained under the weight. One curtain. That was the parokhet, the veil that hung between the Holy Place and the Holy of Holies in the Jerusalem Temple, and the people who built it could not stop measuring it, weighing it, counting its threads, as if the only way to feel the presence hidden behind the cloth was to keep documenting the cloth itself.

Yalkut Shimoni, the great thirteenth-century anthology that gathered scattered midrash into one running commentary on the Torah, preserves the obsession with a builder's precision. Open it at the verses on the Tabernacle and you do not get a sermon. You get measurements.

A Walk Through the Sanctuary Cubit by Cubit

The veil came first in any account of the sanctuary's furnishings, because everything else could only be understood in relation to what it hid. Ten cubits square. Four panels. Hung lengthwise on hooks driven into the pillars with its width running vertical, not horizontal, so that it rose from floor to ceiling as one unbroken face of woven color. Behind it, in the permanent dark, sat the Ark of the Testimony. The jar of manna that never rotted. The flask of anointing oil. Aaron's staff, still budding, still carrying its almonds and blossoms centuries after any living wood would have crumbled to dust.

Into that dark room one man went, four times, on one day each year. The high priest on Yom Kippur crossed the parokhet's threshold carrying incense and blood, and the whole world's forgiveness depended on what happened in the seconds after the curtain fell behind him.

Seventy-Two Strands and Three Hundred Priests

The rabbis who measured the curtain were not merely cataloguing it. They were honoring it, running their fingers along a wall of cloth that held the holy apart from the common. The parokhet was a handbreadth thick. Not thin fabric, not ceremonial silk, but a woven wall. Each of its seventy-two strands was itself made of twenty-four separate threads twisted together, which means the finest weaver in Israel was not trying to make something beautiful. He was trying to make something impenetrable.

The three hundred priests who carried it to the water for washing were not performing a ritual. They were doing the impossible physical work of keeping the barrier between the holy and the common clean enough to serve its function.

The Veil Built to Be Impossible

Yalkut Shimoni also preserves what might be the earliest recorded instance of what a later age would call hyperbole, though the rabbis themselves would have resisted that word. They understood that the Mishnah's figures for the parokhet, the thickness of a handbreadth, the weight requiring three hundred men, the seventy-two twisted strands, were not meant as engineering specifications. They were meant as praise. The veil that separated the holy from the holy of holies had to be impossible. Anything less would be insufficient for what it was guarding.

The tradition also records where the parokhet went when the Temple fell. It was among the items Titus carried to Rome in his triumph. The veil that had guarded the innermost room of the world ended up paraded through a foreign city as a trophy, which is exactly the kind of reversal the prophets had been warning about for two hundred years.

What Stood Beyond Jerusalem

Beyond the Temple and the Tabernacle, the rabbis reached back to where the Shechinah (the Divine Presence) rested before Jerusalem was built. The answer the rabbis offer is Shiloh, the sanctuary that preceded the Temple by generations, where the ark rested after the conquest of Canaan. Shiloh was the inheritance. Jerusalem was the dwelling. The two words, menuchah and nachala, both pointing to the same holy center, are not the same word, and the sages insisted the difference mattered. Shiloh was where God rested. Jerusalem was where God was meant to be.

The parokhet, the three hundred priests, the seventy-two strands: these are the details of a people who measured what they could not touch and counted what they could not fully comprehend, because measurement was the only reverence their hands knew how to make.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

5 sources

The texts behind this telling. Some cards carry a translation of the source; others are our own retelling of it, and each card says which. Every card links out to the original.

Yalkut Shimoni on Torah 372:2Yalkut Shimoni on Torah

Translation of the source text.Torat Emet (Yalkut Shimoni) · CC-BY-NC

"And you shall make a veil" (Exodus 26:31-36). He would weave the veil [parokhet] ten cubits by ten, and make in it four panels, and hang its length on the hooks that are on the pillars, as it is said, "And you shall hang the veil under the clasps, and you shall bring there, within the veil, the Ark of the Testimony" (verse 33). And there were placed the jar of manna and the flask of anointing oil and Aaron's staff with its almonds and blossoms (and the priestly garments and the garments of the High Priest), and there Aaron would enter four times on the Day of Atonement.

Outside the veil stood the table and the lampstand, except that the table was in the north and the lampstand opposite it in the south, as it is said, "And you shall set the table" and so on, and it is written, "And the lampstand opposite the table" (verse 35). And just as they were placed in the Tent of Meeting, so were they placed in the eternal House [the Temple], except that the Tent of Meeting was thirty cubits long and ten cubits wide, while the eternal House was sixty cubits long and twenty cubits wide; from this you learn that the Tent of Meeting was a quarter of the eternal House.

Just as he wove the veil, so he wove the ephod and the breastplate, except that in these there was one additional thread of gold, as it is said, "And they beat the plates of gold" (Exodus 39:3). So too he wove the screen of the entrance, except that the veil was the work of a skilled weaver and the screen of the entrance the work of an embroiderer, as it is said, "And you shall make a screen for the entrance of the Tent," the words of Rabbi Nehemiah. For Rabbi Nehemiah used to say: wherever "the work of a skilled weaver" is stated, there are two faces, and "the work of an embroiderer" is only a single face.

The branches of the lampstand were aligned with the width of the golden table, and the golden table was placed opposite the entrance and divided the House from its midpoint inward, and it was aligned opposite the veil, as it is said, "And you shall place" and so on (Exodus 30:6). From the boards on the south to the branches of the lampstand was two and a half cubits; from the branches of the lampstand to the table, five cubits; from the table to the boards on the north, two and a half cubits; from this you learn that its width was ten cubits. From the boards on the west to the veil, ten cubits; from the veil to the branches of the lampstand, five cubits; from the golden altar to (the altar), ten cubits; from this you learn that its length was thirty cubits.

Full source
Yalkut Shimoni on Torah 375:3Yalkut Shimoni on Torah

Translation of the source text.Torat Emet (Yalkut Shimoni) · CC-BY-NC

Rabbi Shimon ben Gamliel says in the name of Rabbi Shimon the deputy [high priest]: The veil's thickness was a handbreadth, and it was woven on seventy-two strands, and on each and every strand were twenty-four threads. Its length was forty cubits and its breadth twenty cubits; it was made from eighty-two myriads, and they make two each and every year, and three hundred priests immerse it.

Shmuel said: In three places the sages spoke in the language of exaggeration: the apple-heap, the vine, and the veil. (Shmuel said this) to the exclusion of Rava's view, for we learned: they gave the daily-offering lamb to drink from a golden cup, and Rava said this was an exaggeration. We hold: these indeed are exaggerations, but there it is not so, for there is no poverty in a place of wealth.

The veil, this is what we said. The apple-heap, as we learned: they began to bring up ashes onto the apple-heap; an apple-shaped heap was in the middle of the altar; sometimes there were upon it about three hundred kor. Rava said: an exaggeration. The vine, as we learned: a vine of gold stood at the entrance of the Sanctuary, trained over poles, and whoever volunteered a leaf or a berry or a cluster would bring it and hang it on it. Rabbi Elazar bar Tzadok said: it once happened that three hundred priests were counted to clear it.

Full source
Yalkut Shimoni on Torah 881Yalkut Shimoni

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.Sefaria Community Translation · CC0

“For you have not yet come…” (Devarim 12:9) this was said in order to permit private altars between the ‘resting place’ and the ‘inheritance’, because the resting place refers to Shiloh and the inheritance is Jerusalem. Why did the verse mention them separately? To permit private altars between the two. Inheritance refers to Jerusalem, as its says “My inheritance was to Me like a lion in the forest…” (Yirmiyahu 12:8) and it says “Is My inheritance to Me a speckled bird of prey?” (Yirmiyahu 12:9) These are the words of R’ Yehudah. R’ Shimon says the resting place is Jerusalem and the inheritance is Shiloh, as it says “This is My resting place forever; here I shall dwell for I desired it,” (Tehillim132:14) and it says “For the Lord has chosen Zion; He desired it for His habitation.” (Tehillim 132:13) The opinion that the resting place is Shiloh makes sense, that is why the verse says ‘to the resting place and to the inheritance.’ But according to the opinion that says that the inheritance is Shiloh and the resting place Jerusalem, it should have said ‘to the inheritance and to the resting place’! That is a difficulty. The opinion that both refer to Shiloh makes sense, because ‘the resting place’ where they ceased from the conquest and ‘the inheritance’ is where they divided tribal portions, as it is written “And Yehoshua cast lots at Shiloh before the Lord; and there Yehoshua divided the land…” (Yehoshua 18:10) But according to the opinion that both refer to Jerusalem ‘the inheritance’ is the eternal inheritance, but ‘the resting place’…? What does the resting refer to? The resting of the ark, as it is written “And now, arise, O Lord God to Your resting place, You and the Ark of Your might…” (Divre HaYamim II 6:41) The opinion that both refer to Jerusalem makes sense, because while the Tabernacle was at Shiloh private altars were permitted, as it is written “And Manoah took the kid goat and the meal-offering, and offered it upon the rock to the Lord…” (Shoftim 13:19) But the according to the opinion that both refer to Shiloh, then private altars were forbidden while the Tabernacle was there and how do we understand Manoah’s act? It was a temporary injunction. The House of R’ Yishmael taught like the opinion of R’ Shimon bar Yochai that both refer to Jerusalem, and your sign is: one man pulled many to him…

Full source
Aggadat Bereshit 80Aggadat Bereshit

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.Sefaria Community Translation · CC0

When the offering was completed (1 Chronicles 18:26), the midrash reads it through Song of Songs: the thread of crimson, the image of the veil that separated the holy from the profane. There was no vessel in the Temple more praiseworthy than the veil, Rabbi Berachiah said, citing Tractate Middot: forty cubits long and twenty wide, woven as thick as a handbreadth, requiring three hundred priests to move it. The veil was both barrier and connection, the thing that kept the holy of holies separate was also the thing that acknowledged something worth separating from.

Israel is compared to the veil. As the veil separated holy from profane, God has separated Israel from all the nations. The separation is not rejection of the nations, it is a structural distinction, a set-apart-ness that serves the same function as the Temple's inner curtain. What is set apart is set apart for something. The veil did not merely divide space. It defined what was on the other side of it.

"We will do and we will listen", Israel's response at Sinai (Exodus 24:7) is the veil in time. The commitment to act before understanding, to accept the covenant terms before hearing all the terms, this is the moment of separation that echoes through history. The veil in the Temple, the vow at Sinai, the thread of crimson on Rahab's window (Joshua 2:18), the scarlet thread marking Zerah's wrist (Genesis 38:28), the rabbis kept finding the same red thread: the sign that something has been marked and will be remembered.

Full source
Midrash Tanchuma Buber, Vayakhel 10:1Midrash Tanchuma Buber, Vayakhel

Translation of the source text.Midrash Tanchuma (Buber), Public Domain, on Sefaria · CC-BY-SA

Our masters said: What is written above on the matter? "And he made the veil" (Exodus 36:35). Our masters said: The veil's thickness was a handbreadth, and it was woven upon seventy-two heddle-threads, and upon each and every strand were twenty-four threads. Its length was forty cubits, and its width was twenty cubits, and there was no knot in it. And they would make two of them each and every year, and three hundred priests would immerse it. And how would they immerse it? All the priests would go up and immerse it, and they would go up and spread it out upon the rampart. And once Moses had made the veil, which was set before the Ark, afterward he told Bezalel to make the Ark.

Full source