5 min read

Judas Maccabeus Sent Two Men West to Find Rome

After reclaiming the Temple, Judas sent two men west to a republic that had broken kings. A treaty came back, inscribed in bronze at Rome.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Victory That Made Him Careful
  2. The Republic Judas Had Heard About
  3. The Two Men Who Crossed the Sea
  4. The Calculation Judas Made

The Victory That Made Him Careful

Judas Maccabeus had won. The Temple was purified. The altar was rededicated. The lamps were burning in a sanctuary that Antiochus's men had spent years trying to erase. By any measure of the previous three years, this was the ending.

Judas looked at the ending and saw the beginning of something harder.

The Seleucid crown had not been destroyed. It had been embarrassed, which is more dangerous. A defeated empire with the resources of the entire eastern Mediterranean behind it would eventually reassemble its armies, replace its humiliated generals, and return to Judea with a different strategy. The Temple's lamps could be extinguished again. The walls Judas had rebuilt could be torn down again. Victory in the hills against an overconfident column was not the same as security against the full weight of a determined empire.

Judas needed something his men's courage could not provide.

The Republic Judas Had Heard About

First Maccabees preserves the Hasmonean account of how Judas first heard about Rome. He had learned that the Romans were powerful. He had heard that they were valued as friends and feared as enemies. He had heard that they practiced government by senate rather than by king, and that this strange arrangement had proved stronger than monarchy after monarchy.

He had heard specifically what the Romans had done to the kingdoms they encountered. He had heard about the Gauls, defeated and contained. He had heard about the kings of Spain and their silver mines, brought under Roman control. He had heard about the Macedonian king Perseus, who had faced Rome at Pydna in 168 BCE, less than a decade before the Maccabean revolt, and been broken completely, not just defeated in battle but stripped of his kingdom, paraded through Rome, and imprisoned until he died.

That last detail was the one that mattered. The same empire that had armed and patronized Antiochus had itself been humbled by Rome. The superpower threatening Judea was afraid of something.

The Two Men Who Crossed the Sea

Judas chose two envoys, Eupolemus son of John and Jason son of Eleazar. He gave them authority to negotiate a treaty of friendship and mutual aid. They crossed the sea and came to Rome, arriving at the senate as representatives of a people who had just fought their way out of near-extinction against one of Rome's own client powers.

The senate received them. First Maccabees records the treaty that resulted, and it is surprisingly direct. The Romans would be friends of Judea. If war came against Judea from anyone, Rome would send support. If war came against Rome from anyone, Judea would send support as appropriate to their capacity. Neither side would enter into agreements with the enemies of the other.

It was a real treaty, registered in bronze tablets in Rome. Whether it had immediate practical effect is another question. Rome was not going to send legions to Judea the moment a Seleucid general crossed the border. But it was not nothing. It was a formal declaration that Judea existed as a political entity in Rome's accounting of the world, and that Rome had agreed on record to treat its enemies as enemies worth noticing.

The Calculation Judas Made

The treaty Judas negotiated was built on the recognition that Judea could not survive on heroism alone. The revolt had been won by men willing to die in the hills. The peace, if there was going to be one, would require something that men's willingness to die could not supply: the existence of a third party powerful enough to give the Seleucids pause.

Judas was not naive about Rome. First Maccabees presents him as a man who had studied what Rome did to the kingdoms it encountered. He chose the alliance anyway, because the alternative was isolation against an empire that had every reason to return. Better to be a small nation with a powerful treaty than a holy city that only its own fighters would defend.

The envoys came home with a document. Judas did not live long enough to see whether the document meant anything. He was killed the following year at Elasa, fighting a Seleucid army with less than a thousand men against several thousand. But the treaty existed. Jonathan would later use it. Simon would later use it. The policy of alliance with distant powers that Judas had established survived him.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

2 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

The Book of Maccabees I 8:20The Book of Maccabees I

The Book of Maccabees I turns to Rome, Kingdom of Judas Maccabeus.

Specifically, the story turns to 1 Maccabees 8. It's a passage where Judas Maccabeus, fresh off some incredible victories, is trying to figure out his next move. He’s looking around for allies, for someone to partner with. And his gaze falls upon… Rome.

Remember the context. Judas Maccabeus and his brothers had just led a revolt against the Seleucid Empire, these Greek overlords who were trying to Hellenize Judea. It was a desperate fight for religious freedom and national survival. So, why Rome?

Well, the author of 1 Maccabees paints a picture of Rome as this incredibly organized and powerful republic. It says they had a "senate house, wherein three hundred and twenty men sat in council daily, consulting alway for the people, to the end they might be well ordered." Can you imagine? Three hundred and twenty senators, day in, day out, focused on the well-being of the people. It's quite the image.

And it doesn't stop there. The text emphasizes their leadership structure. "They committed their government to one man every year, who ruled over all their country, and that all were obedient to that one, and that there was neither envy nor emulation among them." One leader, chosen annually, with everyone falling in line. No infighting, no power struggles. A picture of perfect unity and efficiency. Sounds almost too good to be true. What's interesting is how the author of 1 Maccabees seems to be selectively highlighting aspects of Roman society that would appeal to a Jewish audience. Order, stability, a focus on the common good – these were all values that resonated deeply within Jewish tradition. Perhaps the author is overstating the case, presenting an idealized version of Rome to justify the alliance. Or maybe, from a distance, that’s truly how it appeared.

So, what does Judas Maccabeus do? He decides to send envoys to Rome. The verse reads, "In consideration of these things, Judas chose Eupolemus the son of John, the son of Accos, and Jason the son of Eleazar, and sent them to Rome, to make a league of amity and confederacy with them." He sends Eupolemus and Jason as ambassadors. He sends them to forge a b’rit, a covenant, a binding agreement.

It’s a pivotal moment. This decision to seek an alliance with Rome would have huge ramifications for the future of Judea. It's a fascinating look at how ancient Jewish leaders navigated the complex world of international politics.

It makes you wonder, doesn't it? What did Eupolemus and Jason actually find when they arrived in Rome? Did the reality match the idealized image presented in 1 Maccabees? And how did this alliance ultimately shape the destiny of the Jewish people? The story continues… and it's a story worth pondering.

Full source
The Book of Maccabees I 8:30The Book of Maccabees I

It’s a fascinating moment, isn't it? A handshake across cultures, across empires, captured in ancient text.

Specifically, It's a short but powerful passage outlining a pact, a promise of mutual support. "Good success be to the Romans, and to the people of the Jews, by sea and by land for ever: the sword also and enemy be far from them." It's a bold declaration, a wish for prosperity and peace for both nations.

It goes deeper than just good wishes. This wasn't just a superficial agreement. It was a commitment to stand together, especially in times of war.

The text spells out the terms: "If there come first any war upon the Romans or any of their confederates throughout all their dominion, The people of the Jews shall help them, as the time shall be appointed, with all their heart." The Jews, a relatively small nation fighting for their religious freedom against the Seleucid Empire, were pledging to support the mighty Roman Empire, should it come under attack. That's a serious commitment!

And the commitment went both ways. The Jews wouldn't support Rome's enemies, either. "Neither shall they give any thing unto them that make war upon them, or aid them with victuals, weapons, money, or ships, as it hath seemed good unto the Romans; but they shall keep their covenants without taking any thing therefore."

It's a evidence of the strategic thinking of the Maccabees. They recognized the power of Rome and sought to align themselves with it, securing a powerful ally in their fight for survival.

Why would the Romans agree to this? Well, the Romans were masters of diplomacy and understood the value of alliances, especially in a region as volatile as the ancient Near East. Having the support of the Jewish people, with their control over key territories, was a strategic advantage.

What's truly remarkable is the spirit of reciprocity it suggests. It wasn't just about one side taking advantage of the other. It was about building a relationship based on mutual benefit and shared interests. "They shall keep their covenants without taking any thing therefore." It speaks to a sense of honor and commitment to the agreement.

Of course, history is complex, and the relationship between the Romans and the Jews wasn't always smooth sailing. But this passage in Maccabees I offers a glimpse into a moment of cooperation, a time when two seemingly disparate cultures found common ground and forged an alliance that would shape the course of history.

It makes you wonder, doesn't it? About the surprising connections that exist between different peoples, and the power of alliances in the face of adversity. And perhaps, it reminds us that even in the most unlikely of places, common ground can be found, and lasting partnerships can be built.

Full source