4 min read

Moses Built a Holy of Holies Twice the Size of Solomon's

A portable tent in the desert held a sanctuary twice as large as the one Solomon built in Jerusalem. The rabbis argued about why for a thousand years.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Two Houses and What Was Inside Them
  2. Why the Smaller Room Was the Greater One
  3. The Prophet and the King Who Both Went Up
  4. The Census and the Ark

The Two Houses and What Was Inside Them

There is a number problem in the Torah that most readers pass over without stopping. Moses built the Tabernacle's innermost chamber at twenty cubits by twenty cubits. Solomon built the Temple's innermost chamber, the Holy of Holies where the Ark would rest in a permanent stone house in Jerusalem, at ten cubits by ten cubits.

A portable tent in the Sinai desert had a sacred inner room four times the floor area of the permanent Temple in Jerusalem. The wandering had a bigger heart than the settlement.

The rabbis who noticed this were not people who let numbers pass without interrogation. They sat with it for centuries.

Why the Smaller Room Was the Greater One

A third-century rabbi named Huna, whose saying was collected in the medieval Midrash Tehillim, gave an answer that sounds almost like it belongs to a different tradition entirely. He said that the Holy of Holies is not defined by its dimensions in the created world. It is the presence that enters it. A room of ten cubits filled with the Shekhinah is not a smaller room than a room of twenty cubits. The Shekhinah has no dimensions. It either fills a space or it does not.

Solomon's chamber was half the physical size, but that was not because Solomon's house was lesser. It was because Solomon's house was more complete. The presence that had spread into every corner of the Tabernacle, making even the outer courts charged with holiness, had condensed. Not diminished, but refined.

The Prophet and the King Who Both Went Up

Midrash Tehillim also places Moses and Solomon in direct comparison as the two men who crossed the normal boundary between heaven and earth. Moses went up to receive the Torah. Solomon, the tradition says, had his own ascent, not on a mountain but in the mind, in the depth of wisdom, in the construction of the Temple itself as a kind of cosmological map.

The Song of Songs, which Solomon wrote, was read by the rabbis as a record of the encounter between Israel and God at Sinai, which placed Solomon's greatest poem in Moses's greatest moment. This was not coincidence, the midrash said. The two men had been reaching for the same thing from opposite ends of history.

Moses had the larger room. Solomon had the more permanent one. Moses had the miraculous fire descending. Solomon had the cedar and the gold and the carved cherubim. Moses had the desert. Solomon had the city. Together, the rabbis said, they bracketed everything Israel was supposed to be.

The Census and the Ark

Shemot Rabbah, the rabbinic commentary on Exodus compiled in the ninth century CE, preserved a tradition that connected the half-shekel census to the dimensions of the Tabernacle. Every man counted contributed equally, because inside the Tabernacle there was no greater and lesser. The Ark held the Torah. The Torah was given to all of them at once. No piece of the camp was outside the domain of what had happened at Sinai.

Solomon built to scale and built for permanence. He built a house that would stand for four centuries before Babylon burned it. But the Tabernacle, which was just goat hair and acacia and brass fittings, could be folded up and carried on poles, and the presence had agreed to travel inside it. Solomon knew this. The speech he gave at the Temple's dedication acknowledges it plainly: "will God truly dwell on the earth? The heavens and the heavens of heavens cannot contain you. How much less this house which I have built."

The smaller room in Jerusalem was Solomon's honest acknowledgment that he was not Moses. The larger room in the desert was God's acknowledgment that Moses was moving.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

5 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Midrash Tehillim 91:1Midrash Tehillim

The mystics certainly did. to a fascinating passage from Midrash Tehillim (a collection of homiletic interpretations of the Book of Psalms) that explores just that, focusing on Psalm 91, a powerful declaration of faith and divine protection.

The verse "Sitting in the highest secrecy..." – what does it really mean? The Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary) tells us it's referring to God. After all, as it says in (1 (Kings 8:2)7), "Behold, will God dwell on earth? The heavens and the heavens of heavens cannot contain You." God is beyond our comprehension, beyond our ability to contain or define.

Rabbi Huna, in the name of Rabbi Idi, connects this idea to (Psalm 92:11), "And You have exalted my horn like that of a wild ox." According to this interpretation, when David was a shepherd and encountered a sleeping wild ox, he was inspired to compose this very psalm.

This psalm, in turn, is understood to be about the Temple that Solomon built. But wait, there's a twist! Moses originally spoke of the Holy of Holies – the innermost sanctum of the Tabernacle – as being twenty cubits by twenty cubits. Yet, the one Solomon built was only ten cubits by ten cubits. So, what's going on?

The Midrash explains that this discrepancy was addressed when Moses saw the completed work on the Tabernacle. (Exodus 39:43) tells us, "And Moses saw all the work, and behold, they had done it as the Lord had commanded, so had they done it; and Moses blessed them." What was this blessing? It was a prayer that the Divine Presence would rest on their work. And they, in turn, responded with (Psalm 90:17), "And may the graciousness of the Lord our God be upon us, and the work of our hands may He establish upon us; yea, the work of our hands, may He establish it."

Even if it isn't explicit in the Torah, the Midrash points out, it's alluded to in the Writings, in (Psalms 90:16): "Let Your work appear to Your servants, and Your majesty upon their children." Moses begins by saying, "Sitting in the highest secrecy, in the shadow of the Almighty, he shall lodge."

Now, Rabbi Judah, son of Rabbi Simon, adds another layer. He says that Moses was stunned by three things he learned directly from God.

First, when God commanded him to take a census of the Israelites (Exodus 30:12), Moses was shocked. He questioned, referencing (Proverbs 13:8), "A man's ransom is his life." Who can deny their own soul? Rabbi Meir elaborates, saying that God showed Moses a fiery, coin-like object, instructing him that this should be given as an offering (Exodus 30:13).

Second, when God instructed Moses (Numbers 28:2) to command the Israelites to offer bread, Moses wondered how they could possibly provide enough sheep and offerings. God's reply? "I do not seek as much as you think. Just offer one lamb each morning."

Finally, and perhaps most relevant to our original question, when God commanded Moses (Exodus 25:8) to build a sanctuary, Moses questioned how anyone could construct a sanctuary capable of housing the Divine Presence. God responded, echoing (1 (Kings 8:2)7), that even the heavens and the highest heavens could not contain Him. God then explained that while asking for the whole world doesn't truly honor Him, asking for just a little does. God wasn't asking for much from Moses – just ten cubits to the north, south, and west.

The Midrash concludes with a powerful image: God is the Supreme Being who sees without being seen. But even in the shade that Bezalel, the artisan of the Tabernacle, created, the Divine complained. Moses, witnessing this, would then sing the song of distress, "Sitting in the highest secret place."

So, what does it all mean? Perhaps it's about the paradox of faith. God is immense, beyond comprehension, yet also present in the smallest details of our lives. The "highest secrecy" isn't about a physical place, but a state of being – a recognition of God's presence, even in the midst of our own limitations and anxieties. And maybe, just maybe, that's where we find true protection and solace.

Full source
Tikkunei Zohar 48:9Tikkunei Zohar

Jewish mysticism certainly thinks so. a passage from Tikkunei (spiritual repair) Zohar 48, a section of the Tikkunei Zohar, a companion volume to the Zohar, the central text of Kabbalah. It's a dense, poetic, and deeply symbolic text. So, together.

The passage starts with a song, specifically saying "this song with azthen ascends in the mouth." The text even has a variant that calls it "the 'song of El'," referring to God. But what does it all mean?

The Tikkunei Zohar makes a fascinating connection. It equates the word "song" – shir in Hebrew – with "the wisdom of Solomon". King Solomon, renowned for his wisdom, was also a poet, a songwriter, a master of language. That connection takes us to the Book of Kings (1 (Kings 5:1)0), which tells us "And the wisdom of Solomon was greater." Greater than what? Greater than anything, really. And the text links this to (Isaiah 11:9): "...and the earth shall be full of knowledge of Ha-Shem," the Name, referring to God. So, wisdom, song, and the knowledge of God are all intertwined.

Here's where it gets truly intriguing: who is it that raises "Her" to "Her place?" The text declares it is Moses.

Whoa.

And the mystery of it all lies in the word "az," meaning "then." "Az shall Moses sing..." (Exodus 15:1), referring to the Song at the Sea, one of the most powerful moments in the Torah.

So, with what, precisely, does Moses raise "Her?"

With the cantillation note called te-lisha. Cantillation refers to the traditional chanting of the Torah. Each word has a specific melody, a musical notation that guides the reader. And te-lisha is one of those notations, a little flourish, a nuance in the sound. The text gets even more specific, saying that this "crownlet" of the te-lisha is the Yod, the smallest letter of the Hebrew alphabet (י), found in the word YaShYR, meaning "he will sing."

Now, who is "Her?" While the text doesn't explicitly state it, in Kabbalah, "Her" often refers to the Shekhinah, the Divine Presence, the feminine aspect of God. Moses, through his song, his connection to the Divine, elevates the Shekhinah, bringing wholeness and harmony to the cosmos.

It's a complex image, isn't it? A single note, a tiny letter, carrying such immense power. It suggests that even the smallest act, the subtlest intention, can have profound consequences. That even a song, sung with the right heart, can elevate not just ourselves, but the very fabric of reality.

So, what song will you sing today? And what will it elevate?

Full source
Bamidbar Rabbah 16:5Bamidbar Rabbah

The verse from Proverbs (26:6) sets the stage: “One who sends things by the hand of a fool cuts off his feet and drinks rancor.” Ouch. But here's the puzzle: were the spies really fools? The text challenges us on this point. After all, didn't God tell Moses to send "anashim" (Numbers 13:2)? And isn't anashim, the plural of ish (man), typically used to describe righteous individuals? We see it elsewhere. "Moses said to Joshua: Select anashim for us" (Exodus 17:9). Or in Samuel, the text mentions, "The man in the days of Saul was elderly and would come among anashim" (I (Samuel 17:1)2). And even Hannah's prayer asks for "a male (anashim) offspring" (I (Samuel 1:1)1), and that child was none other than the prophet Samuel!

So, the Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary) asks, do we really think these are examples of fools?

The answer, according to Bamidbar Rabbah, is both yes and no. These men weren't inherently foolish. They were called fools, however, because they disseminated slander – lashon hara – about the Land. As (Proverbs 10:18) tells us, “The disseminator of slander is a fool.” They were great men who, in this instance, rendered themselves fools through their actions.

Moses himself lamented their betrayal, calling them "a contrary generation; children in whom there is no loyalty" (Deuteronomy 32:20). Imagine the disappointment!

The text emphasizes just how carefully these men were selected. They weren't just some random group. They were chosen from all of Israel by God and Moses. (Deuteronomy 1:23) states, "The matter was good in my eyes and I took from you twelve men." This tells us they were considered righteous in the eyes of the people and in the eyes of Moses.

And here's a crucial point: Moses didn't just pick them on his own. He consulted with God about each one, tribe by tribe. God Himself affirmed that they were worthy! Where do we see this? "Moses sent them from the wilderness of Paran according to the directive of the Lord" (Numbers 13:3).

So, what went wrong?

The Midrash tells us that after forty days, these men, initially deemed righteous, became "contrary." They caused that entire generation to suffer a devastating blow. They were "evaluated as righteous and reversed." That's why the Torah emphasizes, "Send you anashim; these are the names of the anashim" (Numbers 13:16) – highlighting their initial status, which makes their subsequent failure all the more tragic.

What are we to take away from this? Perhaps it's a reminder that even the most promising individuals can falter. That even with divine approval, free will allows for choices that can lead to devastating consequences. It's a cautionary tale about the power of words, the dangers of negativity, and the fragility of even the most carefully constructed plans.

The story of the spies in Bamidbar Rabbah isn't just a historical account; it's a mirror reflecting our own potential for both greatness and failure. It challenges us to examine our own choices, our own words, and our own loyalties. And to remember that even those who start on a path of righteousness can, through their own actions, stray far, far away.

Full source
Shir HaShirim Rabbah 4:1Shir HaShirim Rabbah

The mystics of old certainly did. They saw this feeling echoed in the Song of Songs, that passionate and enigmatic book we call Shir HaShirim in Hebrew. Specifically, in the verse: "I had almost passed them when I found the one whom my soul loves; I held him and would not release him until I brought him to my mother's house, and to the chamber of the one who conceived me” (Song of Songs 3:4).

Who is the "one whom my soul loves"? Well, Shir HaShirim Rabbah, a classic collection of rabbinic interpretations of the Song of Songs, offers a stunning answer: it's Moses.

Yes, Moses, the lawgiver, the prophet, the leader who brought the Israelites out of Egypt. But why is he almost missed? What does it all mean?

The Rabbis see the whole verse as an allegory, a beautiful tapestry woven with hidden meanings. "I held him and would not release him until I brought him to my mother's house," the text continues. And "my mother's house," according to this interpretation? That's Sinai. Moses ascends Sinai, receives the Torah, and in a sense, brings the Divine presence down to the mountain. He clings to that connection, refusing to let go. It's a powerful image of dedication and unwavering commitment.

But the verse doesn't end there. "And to the chamber of the one who conceived me," it concludes. And this, according to Shir HaShirim Rabbah, is the Ohel Mo'ed – the Tent of Meeting. This was the portable sanctuary, the dwelling place of the Shekhinah (Divine Presence), that accompanied the Israelites on their journey through the desert.

Now, here’s where it gets really interesting. It is from the Tent of Meeting that Israel became liable for teachings. Wait, what? Didn’t they receive the mitzvot (commandments) at Sinai? Yes, but according to this understanding, the responsibility for those commandments, the accountability for transgression, that began with the construction and dedication of the Tent of Meeting.

It's a subtle but profound point. Receiving a gift is one thing. Truly integrating it into your life, taking responsibility for it – that's something else entirely. Sinai was the moment of revelation, the grand, earth-shattering encounter. The Tent of Meeting, on the other hand, represents the ongoing, day-to-day work of living a life guided by those principles.

So, what can we take away from this rich interpretation? Perhaps it's a reminder that encountering the Divine, or finding that "one whom our soul loves," is just the beginning. The real journey lies in holding on tight, bringing that connection into our daily lives, and taking responsibility for the gifts we've been given. It is the day-to-day striving that makes the initial moment of revelation truly meaningful.

Full source
Shemot Rabbah 39:1Shemot Rabbah

In Jewish tradition, a census wasn't just a matter of logistics. It was a delicate, even potentially dangerous, undertaking.

Shemot Rabbah, a rich collection of midrashic (rabbinic interpretive commentary) interpretations on the Book of Exodus, illuminates this very issue. It all starts with the verse: "When you take a census of the children of Israel, according to their count, each man shall give a ransom for himself to the Lord upon their counting, and there will not be a plague against them upon their counting" (Exodus 30:12). Why the ransom? Why the concern about a plague?

Rabbi Tanhuma bar Abba opens with a surprising analogy, quoting the Song of Songs: "Your navel is a moon-shaped goblet, may it not lack mixed wine; your belly is a pile of wheat hedged with lilies" (Song of Songs 7:3). What's the connection? Well, wheat is precious, so we measure it carefully. Similarly, Israel is precious, so it is counted. The very act of counting highlights their value. But there’s more to it than that.

In Midrash, counting Israel is linked to owing a debt. God says to Moses, "Israel owes me what they borrowed from Me." This is tied to the sin of the Golden Calf. Remember that? A colossal mistake! So, the census becomes a way for them to repay that debt, to offer a kind of atonement. The text draws a parallel between "When you take a census" (ki tisa) and "When you lend" (ki tashe) from (Deuteronomy 24:10). It’s a clever play on words, highlighting the idea of repayment.

This notion of debt is significant. The people deserve to die because of their sin. The "ransom" they pay is a way to avert divine punishment. By each individual offering something, they collectively redeem themselves. It's a fascinating blend of accounting, theology, and communal responsibility!

And here's a beautiful twist. God doesn't just take; God also gives. The Midrash concludes by stating, "And I will pay them, as it is stated: 'The number of the children of Israel will be like the sand of the sea' (Hosea 2:1)." Even though they owe a debt, God promises to bless them with countless descendants.

So, what does this all mean? Perhaps it's a reminder that even in moments of accounting, of acknowledging our shortcomings and debts, there is always the promise of redemption and boundless blessing. It highlights the delicate balance between divine judgment and divine grace. And it makes you think twice about the simple act of counting, doesn't it?

Full source