7 min read

When God Turned Kings Like Wheels at Sinai

Shemot Rabbah places Moses, David, and Solomon before a God who lifts and lowers like a wheel, then demands that Torah and mercy govern the throne.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. The Mountain Made Kings Tremble
  2. The Torah Arrived in Terror
  3. Shittim Faced Judgment
  4. Torah Turned at Once to the Poor
  5. God Lifts and Lowers Like a Wheel
  6. Torah as God's Own Presence

The Mountain Made Kings Tremble

Three kings met God from different heights. Moses stood at Sinai in fire and cloud. David met him in song and battle, with a harp in one hand and blood on the other. Solomon met him at the peak of everything: a Temple built, a throne established, wisdom so famous that foreign rulers traveled weeks to test it.

Shemot Rabbah put these three together not to compare their greatness but to establish what they had in common. None of them owned their position. Moses could split seas and still plead for mercy. David could rule a kingdom and still collapse into grief before the ark. Solomon could gather wisdom from every direction and still watch it drain away from him when he turned his attention from the source of wisdom to its substitutes. The greatest men in Israel borrowed their greatness.

This is the specific theology of Shemot Rabbah: Egypt is gone. Pharaoh is gone. The people have arrived at Sinai. Now the harder education begins. Freedom requires a people who can live with a God who descends in fire and then stays, not departing after the dramatic moment but remaining in the daily terms of how courts are run and poor people are treated and Torah is taught and the Tabernacle is tended.

The Torah Arrived in Terror

The revelation at Sinai was not comfortable. The thunder, the lightning, the trumpet blast growing louder, the mountain smoking, the people trembling and standing far off, asking Moses to speak to them directly because if God spoke any more they would die. The fear was physical and appropriate.

Shemot Rabbah read that terror as the honest response to what was happening. A God who could unmake Pharaoh's army overnight was now proposing to bind himself to a small people through law. That binding was not a reduction of divine power. It was an expression of it. The same power that had split the sea was now saying: here is what I require of you, stated in specific terms, applicable in daily life, enforceable, recallable, permanent.

The people should have been terrified. They were. The rabbis were not troubled by the fear. They were troubled when the fear wore off too quickly, when the thunder at Sinai became a distant memory before the instructions had been properly absorbed. The terror was the appropriate size for the event. What the people did with it afterward was the question Shemot Rabbah keeps returning to.

Shittim Faced Judgment

Before the Jordan crossing, Israel encamped at Shittim and the men began to go after the daughters of Moab. The women invited the men to the sacrifices of their gods. The men went and bowed down to Baal Peor. God's anger burned against Israel. A plague began. Twenty-four thousand people died.

Shemot Rabbah read Shittim as the permanent demonstration that the distance between Sinai and apostasy is shorter than anyone wants to admit. A people that had stood at the mountain could be prostrating itself before Baal Peor within a generation. The fire at Sinai had not immunized them. It had given them a standard by which their failures were now legible as failures.

The rabbinic reading did not treat this as a counsel of despair. Shittim ended. The plague stopped. The covenant continued. But the covenant did not make Israel incapable of failure. It made failure visible and the return from failure possible, which is different from preventing the failure in the first place.

Torah Turned at Once to the Poor

Torah came down from Sinai and almost immediately turned its attention to the treatment of the poor. The laws in Exodus following the Ten Commandments are full of practical requirements: do not oppress a stranger, do not take a widow's garment as a pledge, do not charge interest to the poor, do not delay the wages of the hired worker.

Shemot Rabbah read these laws as a direct extension of the Sinai theophany, not as separate domestic legislation but as the same fire that descended on the mountain now burning in the marketplace. A God who split the sea to free slaves and then allowed his covenant people to treat the poor as exploitable material had contradicted himself at the most fundamental level. The laws about the poor were not afterthoughts attached to the covenant. They were the covenant specified in the terms of everyday life.

This is the rabbinic claim about Torah's unity: the fire of Sinai and the prohibition against taking a widow's cloak as collateral are one statement. The God who descended in thunder is the same God who hears the cry of the widow and the orphan and says explicitly that when they cry to me, I will hear them, for I am compassionate.

God Lifts and Lowers Like a Wheel

Psalm 75 says: God is the judge who puts down one and lifts up another. Shemot Rabbah imagined this as a wheel turning in God's hand. No position on the wheel is permanent. The person at the top is moving toward the bottom. The person at the bottom is moving toward the top. What determines the movement is not human strategy or merit alone. It is the will of the one whose hand holds the wheel.

This image applied to Moses, David, and Solomon simultaneously and equally. Moses was lifted beyond any human precedent and then forbidden from entering the land. David was lifted to the throne and then devastated by the catastrophe within his own family. Solomon was lifted to the highest expression of wisdom and wealth Israel had ever seen and then watched it begin to crack from within his own household. The wheel turned for each of them.

The rabbis were not teaching fatalism. The wheel image is meant to produce a specific kind of humility in the person who is currently at the top. If you are on the wheel, do not confuse your present height with a permanent condition. Act accordingly. What you do with the position while you hold it is what will be remembered when the wheel turns and you are no longer at the top.

Torah as God's Own Presence

The Tabernacle was built to be a dwelling place. But what exactly was dwelling there? Shemot Rabbah worked carefully around this question. The Tabernacle mirrored the structure of creation: the curtains like the sky, the laver like the sea, the menorah like the sun, the showbread like the produce of the land. Everything in it was a correspondence to something in the world God had made. The building was a miniature cosmos, and at its center was not an object but a meeting.

Torah was the presence. When God told Moses: take me as a gift, Shemot Rabbah read take me as the key phrase. Not take my Torah as a gift. Take me. Torah was not a body of law God was handing over as an independent document. Torah was God's own self-disclosure, the form in which the divine presence could be received and studied and lived with by mortal beings in a material world. The Tabernacle housed the tablets. The tablets were not about God. The tablets were God, in the form Israel could hold.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

7 sources

The texts this telling draws on, in full. Open a card to read inline, or expand it for a wider, quieter read.

Shemot Rabbah 29:4Shemot Rabbah

The Shemot Rabbah, a collection of rabbinic homilies on the Book of Exodus, offers some fascinating insights. Rabbi Aḥa ben Rabbi Ḥanina kicks things off with a quote from (Psalms 50:7), "Hear, My people, and I will speak." This verse serves as a launching pad for a deeper exploration of the special relationship between God and Israel.

Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai takes it a step further. He imagines God saying to Israel, "I am the God over all of humanity, but I associated My name only with you. I am not called the God of idolaters, but rather, the God of Israel." for a second. It's a powerful statement about chosenness, not in the sense of superiority, but of a unique covenantal bond.

What did Israel actually experience at Sinai? Rabbi Levi paints a vivid, almost overwhelming picture. He says that Israel asked to see God's glory and hear his voice. And they did! As it says in (Deuteronomy 5:21), "You said: Behold, the Lord our God has shown us His glory and His greatness. And His voice we heard from the midst of the fire."

Here's the thing: it was almost too much to bear. Rabbi Levi continues, saying that when God revealed Himself, their souls departed! The Song of Songs (5:6) echoes this, "My soul departed as He spoke." Can you imagine the sheer intensity of that moment?

So, what saved them? According to Rabbi Levi, the Torah itself interceded! The Torah pleaded before God, "Is there a king who marries his daughter and kills the members of his household? The entire world is rejoicing and Your children are dying?" It's a striking image, isn't it? The Torah reminds God of the love and promise inherent in the covenant. Immediately, their souls were restored, mirroring the words of (Psalms 19:8): "The Torah of the Lord is perfect, restoring the soul."

Now, Rabbi Levi poses a critical question. Did God not know that revealing His glory and voice would be overwhelming? Of course, He did! So, why do it? Here’s where it gets really interesting. Rabbi Levi suggests that God foresaw Israel's future inclination towards idol worship. By revealing Himself so powerfully at Sinai, He preemptively silenced any future excuse: "Had He shown us His glory and His greatness and let us hear His voice, we would not have engaged in idol worship." Thus, as it is stated, "Hear, My people, and I will speak.”

It's a profound thought. The revelation at Sinai wasn't just about a moment of divine encounter; it was about forging an unshakeable foundation for the future, a bulwark against doubt and denial. It ensures that Israel remains accountable to the covenant, forever bound by the memory of that earth-shattering experience. So, the next time you hear the words "I am the Lord your God," remember the fire, the fear, and the enduring love that binds God and Israel together.

Full source
Shemot Rabbah 29:9Shemot Rabbah

The familiar picture has a grand, almost theatrical event. But the ancient texts hint at something far more profound, and even a little terrifying.

The Shemot Rabbah, a classic collection of rabbinic interpretations on the Book of Exodus, grapples with this very idea. It explores the immense power and awe-inspiring nature of God's presence, particularly during pivotal moments like the giving of the Torah.

One striking passage contrasts how earthly kings behave versus how God acts. When a human king issues a simple proclamation, he goes out alone. But when he wages war, he's accompanied by countless soldiers. The text then contrasts this with God. "When He goes out to war He goes out alone," as we see in (Exodus 15:3), "The Lord is a warrior." Yet, when God gave the Torah at Sinai, "myriads upon myriads went out with him," as (Psalm 68:18) states, "The chariots of God are myriads, thousands of angels."

Why this difference? It seems to emphasize the unparalleled significance of the Torah. It wasn't just another decree; it was a cosmic event, a revelation of divine proportions.

The Shemot Rabbah then dives into the phrase, "I am the Lord your God." It connects this to the verse in (Amos 3:8), "A lion has roared; who will not fear?" and (Jeremiah 10:7), "Who would not fear You, King of the nations? For it befits You." Why "King of the Nations" and not King of Israel? The text offers a compelling answer. The prophet Jeremiah heard from God, "I appointed you a prophet for the nations" (Jeremiah 1:5). Therefore, Jeremiah used this title to emphasize that if God doesn't spare even His own children, will He spare anyone else?

The text paints a vivid picture of the scene at Sinai. It states, "The earth quaked, the heavens rained," (Psalm 68:9), and "The mountains flowed before the Lord," (Judges 5:8). Even "The pillars of the heavens sagged," (Job 26:11). And not only that, but "all the people…trembled" (Exodus 19:16), and "The entire mountain trembled greatly" (Exodus 19:18). This wasn't just a gentle breeze; it was a seismic shift in reality. All because, as the verse says, He spoke commandments of life.

Rabbi Yirmeya goes even further: if the earth quaked when God gave life to the world, imagine when He exacts retribution against the wicked. "Who can stand before His fury?" (Nahum 1:6), "Who can endure the day of His coming?" (Malachi 3:2). It's a sobering thought.

Rabbi Simon uses a powerful analogy. Imagine a king entering his palace. His queen, upon hearing him, makes room for him and trembles. If the queen is afraid, what of the servants? Similarly, when God revealed Himself at Sinai, the Israelites heard the sounds and died, as (Song of Songs 5:6) says, "My soul departed as He spoke." If this was the effect on Israel, how much more so for the idolaters?

Another interpretation, attributed to Rabbi Hoshaya, tells of Baltza asking Rabbi Akiva about the source of the noise at Sinai. Rabbi Akiva explains that God, seeing the serenity of idol worship while His Temple lies in ruins, roars in jealousy. This roar shakes the heavens and the earth, as (Joel 4:16) describes, "The Lord will roar from Zion, and from Jerusalem He will project His voice."

The text further connects this roar to various symbols: the Temple itself (referred to as arye, or lion, in Isaiah 29:1), the royal house of David, and even the people of Israel. Even Nebuchadnezzar, the destroyer of the Temple, is called a lion. God laments, "Where is the lions' den?" (Nahum 2:12). "Where are My children?"

The Shemot Rabbah also explores the Israelites' acceptance of the Ten Commandments. They accepted them, as hinted in (Psalm 92:4), "With a ten-stringed lute [alei asor] and with harp," implying "It is incumbent upon me [alai] to accept the Ten [eser] Commandments."

Then comes a truly astonishing image. Rabbi Abbahu, citing Rabbi Yoḥanan, describes the moment of revelation: "When the Holy One blessed be He gave the Torah, no bird tweeted, no fowl flew, no bull lowed.the sea did not tremble, people did not speak, but rather, the entire world was quiet and silent." The voice of God, unlike any human voice, had no echo. It filled all of existence. To illustrate this, the text refers to Elijah on Mount Carmel (I (Kings 18:27-2)9). God muted the world to show that there is no other.

The Shemot Rabbah isn't just recounting a historical event. It's inviting us to contemplate the sheer magnitude of God's presence and the profound responsibility that comes with accepting His Torah. It makes you wonder, doesn't it? If we truly understood the power and silence of that moment at Sinai, how would we live our lives differently today?

Full source
Shemot Rabbah 30:21Shemot Rabbah

Shemot Rabbah 30 begins by stating that "the punishment that is prepared for the wicked is plentiful," drawing on the fiery imagery of (Psalms 11:6), "He will rain burning coal upon the wicked…" But it quickly adds a crucial nuance: the severity of punishment isn't just about the act itself, but also about when the sin occurs. Those who violate the mitzvot, the commandments, and the laws of the Torah after they were given are held to a higher standard, and therefore, face a more severe reckoning. once we know better, aren’t we more responsible?

The Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary) doesn't stop there. It introduces another layer of complexity: sins against other people carry more weight than sins against God. Which, The first reading, might seem counterintuitive. Isn't God the ultimate authority?

The explanation lies in the nature of relationship itself. The Midrash uses the verse "these are the ordinances" (Exodus 21:1) as its springboard because the laws introduced in this section of Exodus primarily deal with interpersonal relations – how we treat each other.

To illustrate this point, the Midrash contrasts two pivotal moments in the Israelites' history. First, their transgression of “You shall not have other gods before Me” (Exodus 20:3). They worshipped idols. And yet, God forgave them. The Midrash suggests that idol worship, in a sense, is a "lighter" offense because idols are ultimately empty. As (Psalm 115:8) says, "May their makers be like them", powerless and insubstantial. Idol worship, the Midrash argues, primarily arouses God's "zealotry," as (Deuteronomy 32:16) puts it: "They would arouse His zealotry with strangers."

Then comes the story of Shittim (Numbers 25:1-9), where the Israelites engaged in licentiousness with Moabite women. This sin resulted in a plague that killed twenty-four thousand people. A seemingly disproportionate punishment?

The Midrash uses a striking analogy: a princess who flirts with a eunuch. The king is furious, not because the eunuch poses a genuine threat, but because the princess is "accustomed herself to flirting and licentiousness." The act itself isn't the only issue; it's the underlying disposition, the slippery slope it represents. As the Rabbis taught, "Lightheartedness and frivolity accustom a person to licentiousness."

So, while idol worship might be seen as a flirtation with the insubstantial, licentiousness is a tangible violation, a breach of trust and a corruption of relationships. This is why, according to the Midrash, the punishment for the sin at Shittim was so severe. It had "substance."

The Midrash concludes with a powerful reminder: "Observe mitzvot and live" (Proverbs 7:2) and "Inscribe them on the tablet of your heart" (Proverbs 7:3). It's not just about following rules; it's about internalizing the values, about shaping our hearts and minds to act with kindness, justice, and integrity in our interactions with others.

Shemot Rabbah 30 isn't about a simple calculus of sin and punishment. It's about the profound responsibility we have to each other, and the lasting impact our actions have on the world around us. It's a reminder that our relationships are sacred, and that how we treat one another truly matters.

Full source
Shemot Rabbah 31:13Shemot Rabbah

In Shemot Rabbah, a collection of rabbinic homilies on the Book of Exodus, we find a fascinating interpretation of the verse, "If you lend money to My people, to the poor who is with you" (Exodus 22:24). The Rabbis cleverly play on the Hebrew word for "My people" (ami), suggesting it can also be read as "with Me" (imi). The implication? The poor aren't just with you; they are with God. It completely flips the script.

The text goes on to contrast God's attitude toward the poor with that of human beings. How often do we, as the Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary) observes, turn away from those less fortunate, even family members, because their poverty makes us uncomfortable? As Solomon laments in Proverbs, "All the brethren of the poor hate him" (Proverbs 19:7), and "The poor is hated even by his friend" (Proverbs 14:20). Ouch. It’s a harsh truth, isn't it?

The Holy One, blessed be He, isn't like that. Isaiah (66:1-2) says, "The heavens are My throne…But to this I will look, to the poor…" God's gaze is drawn to the marginalized, the overlooked. And when God finally reconciles with Zion, as (Isaiah 14:32) promises, who will be sheltered first? "The poor of His people." God has mercy on the poor (Isaiah 49:13).

This brings us to the warning against charging interest (neshekh) on loans to the poor. The Rabbis don't pull any punches here. They compare it to a serpent's bite, poisoning the relationship and ultimately uprooting the person's livelihood. To take advantage of someone's vulnerability is a form of violence.

The text says not to "bite" (tinshokh) the poor man like the serpent bit Adam, uprooting him and his descendants. In other words, don't exploit their desperation for your own gain. Don't be like a cunning serpent, always seeking an opportunity to do evil.

(Leviticus 25:36) says, "Do not take from him usury or interest; you shall fear your God." The Midrash emphasizes that taking interest is tantamount to denying God's presence, as if you aren't scared of divine punishment. Taking interest from an Israelite is like committing all the evil and transgressions in the world, as (Ezekiel 18:13) warns. Pretty strong language. The analogy used is chilling. It's like a murderer brought before a governor. "Is he still alive?" the governor exclaims upon reading the indictment. Shouldn't such a criminal already be dead? Likewise, one who takes interest is considered so morally bankrupt that the question is asked: "Shall he live?" The answer, according to Ezekiel, is a resounding no. "He shall not live. All these abominations he performed, he shall be put to death, his blood shall be upon him" (Ezekiel 18:13).

But there's a flip side, a path to redemption. According to (Psalm 15:5), lending without interest is considered as though you performed all the mitzvot, all the good deeds.

So, what does all this mean for us today? It's a call to action, a reminder that our treatment of the poor is a direct reflection of our relationship with God. It challenges us to see the divine spark in every human being, especially those who are struggling. It compels us to act with compassion, generosity, and a profound sense of responsibility for the well-being of our community.

Perhaps, the next time we encounter someone in need, we can remember that we're not just helping an individual; we're connecting with the Divine. And in doing so, we elevate not only their lives but also our own.

Full source
Shemot Rabbah 31:14Shemot Rabbah

Sometimes you're on top, sometimes you're on the bottom. It's a powerful image, and one that resonates deeply in Jewish tradition.

Shemot Rabbah, a classic collection of Midrashic (rabbinic interpretive commentary) interpretations on the Book of Exodus, uses this very image to illustrate a profound truth about wealth, poverty, and divine justice. It starts with the verse, "to the poor who is with you" and connects it to the idea that God "humbles this one and elevates that one" (Psalms 75:8).

This teaching paints a picture: Imagine a water wheel in a garden. The clay pots at the bottom rise up full, while the ones at the top descend empty. That's life, it says. Today's wealthy person might be tomorrow's poor one, and vice versa. Why? Because, as Rabbi Aḥa explains, the world is a galgal, a wheel. He connects this to (Proverbs 20:26), "A wise king scatters the wicked, and he turns an ofan upon them," noting that ofan simply means wheel, just as we see in (Exodus 14:25), "He removed the ofan of his chariots."

The text then takes a sharp turn, focusing on the harshness of poverty. It asserts that there is no harsher attribute than poverty. Someone suffering from it experiences all the suffering in the world, as though all the curses in Deuteronomy have befallen them. Our Rabbis even said that if you put all forms of suffering on one side of a scale and poverty on the other, poverty would outweigh them all.

This leads to a discussion about lending and interest. "You shall not be as a creditor to him," the Torah commands. Shemot Rabbah emphasizes the severity of charging interest on loans. Anyone who does so, it says, violates all the transgressions in the Torah and finds no one to defend them in judgment. When a person sins and stands before God, angels argue for and against them, as described in II (Chronicles 18:18). But for someone who lends to another Israelite with interest, none will speak in their defense, citing (Ezekiel 18:13): "He gave with usury and took interest, shall he live? He shall not live."

Conversely, an Israelite who lends without taking interest is seen as fulfilling all the mitzvot, all the commandments. David says in Psalm 15, "Lord, who will reside in Your tent?" and answers, "He does not give his money with usury..." (Psalm 15:5).

What does it all mean? The world turns. Fortunes rise and fall. Poverty is a profound hardship. And our actions toward the vulnerable – particularly in matters of lending and interest – carry immense weight. It’s a call to remember our shared humanity, to act with compassion, and to recognize that we are all, in some way, on that spinning wheel together. The Holy One wants us to act justly, with an eye toward the suffering of others, and to remember that our choices have consequences, both in this world and the World to Come.

Full source
Shemot Rabbah 33:1Shemot Rabbah

It all starts with the verse, "Speak to the children of Israel, and they shall take Me a gift; from every man whose heart pledges, you shall collect My gift" (Exodus 25:2). But instead of reading "take for Me a gift," the Midrash (rabbinic commentary) cleverly interprets it as "they shall take Me as a gift." Mind. Blown.

The text immediately connects this idea of a gift with Torah, quoting (Proverbs 4:2): "For a good lesson [lekaḥ] I have given you: My Torah, do not forsake it." The Midrash then makes a playful association between lekah (lesson) and mikah (acquisition). It's saying: don't forsake the acquisition I gave you.

What kind of acquisition is the Torah? It’s not like buying gold or silver, fields or orchards. You know, you might acquire something that has gold but no silver, or silver but no gold. But the Torah? It has both! "The sayings of the Lord are pure sayings, like silver purified" (Psalms 12:7), and "They are more desirable than gold, than quantities of fine gold" (Psalms 19:11).

Unlike acquiring fields without orchards, or vice versa, the Torah has it all. "Your irrigated fields are an orchard of pomegranates" (Song of Songs 4:13). It’s a complete package, a flourishing landscape for the soul. this way. Sometimes you get something, but you're not really sure what it's worth until you see the rewards it brings. The Midrash argues that we know the value of Torah by the reward Moses received: "Moses did not know that the skin of his face was radiant as He spoke with him" (Exodus 34:29). His very being shone with the wisdom and connection he gained.

Then comes the most striking idea of all: "You have an acquisition that the one who sold it is sold with it." The Holy One, blessed be He, says to Israel: "I sold you the Torah; as it were, I was sold with it." Wow.

The Midrash beautifully illustrates this point with a parable of a king who has an only daughter. When she marries another king, the father can't bear to be separated from her. He says "I can't tell you not to take her, because she’s your wife. But wherever you go, build a small bedroom for me, so I can live with you."

Similarly, God says to Israel, "I gave you the Torah. To leave it, I am unable. To say to you do not take it, I am unable. Rather, every place you go, build a house for Me so I may reside in it," as it is stated: "They shall craft a Sanctuary for Me, [and I will dwell among them]" (Exodus 25:8).

So, the Torah isn't just a set of rules or stories. It's a profound connection, a way to carry the Divine presence with us wherever we go. It's an invitation to build a sanctuary, not just of brick and mortar, but within our hearts and lives. It's about recognizing that when we embrace the Torah, we're not just receiving a gift; we're inviting the Giver to dwell within us. What could be more precious than that?

Full source
Shemot Rabbah 52:5Shemot Rabbah

Shemot Rabbah sees the Tabernacle not only as a sanctuary, but as a mirror of creation itself.

The passage starts with a seemingly simple statement: "They brought the Tabernacle." But then it immediately leaps to a verse from the Song of Songs (3:11): "Emerge, daughters of Zion, and look at King Solomon, with the crown with which his mother crowned him on the day of his wedding, and on the day of the rejoicing of his heart." What does this have to do with the Tabernacle? That's the question the Midrash (rabbinic interpretive commentary) sets out to answer.

The key is recognizing that these ancient texts aren't always literal. As we find here, often they’re speaking on multiple levels. The "daughters of Zion," Think of it: a people set apart, identifiable by their actions and commitments. The text highlights that they are hametzuyanim, conspicuous.

What about the "crown" that Solomon's mother placed upon him? Rabbi Yitzchak makes a crucial observation: we can search the entire Bible, but we won't find anywhere that Batsheva actually crafted a crown for Solomon. So, what gives? It's not meant to be taken literally! The crown, according to this interpretation, is the Tabernacle. Why? Because, like a crown, the Tabernacle was exquisitely crafted, a evidence of human artistry dedicated to the Divine. The text references (Exodus 35:35), highlighting the intricate embroidery and skilled craftsmanship that went into its creation.

Then comes a beautiful and insightful dialogue between Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai and Rabbi Elazar ben Rabbi Yosei. Rabbi Shimon asks about the meaning of the “crown” and Rabbi Elazar responds with an analogy: a king who loves his daughter so much that he eventually calls her not only "daughter," but also "sister," and finally, "mother." The relationship deepens with each title. A daughter is subservient, a sister is an equal, and a mother is owed honor and respect. So too, explains Rabbi Elazar, God's love for Israel has grown over time. Initially, God calls Israel "daughter," as we see in (Psalms 45:11): "Listen, daughter, and take note; incline your ear." Then, the relationship deepens, and God calls them "sister," as in (Song of Songs 5:2): "Open for me, my sister, my love, my faultless dove." And finally, the ultimate expression of love: God calls them "mother," drawing on a fascinating interpretation of (Isaiah 51:4). The word uleumi ("My nation") is expounded as ule'imi – "to My mother." Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai is so moved by this explanation that he kisses Rabbi Elazar on the head!

The Midrash then explores the different "days of rejoicing" mentioned in the Song of Songs verse. These are interpreted in multiple ways: Sinai, the sea, the Tent of Meeting, the Tabernacle, and the Temple in Jerusalem. Each represents a moment of profound connection between God and Israel.

The passage concludes with a discussion of Jerusalem, described as "joy of the entire world" (Psalms 48:3). Rabbi Yonatan ben Elazar shares a story about a merchant who initially doubts Jerusalem's reputation, only to later experience its blessings firsthand. Rabbi Yoḥanan speaks of a "dome of accounting" outside Jerusalem, a place where people could reflect on their finances without bringing sorrow into the holy city.

But the Midrash doesn't shy away from the difficult truth: "when it was destroyed: 'All joy is negated [arva], gladness of the land is exiled' (Isaiah 24:11)." The word arva is linked to the word erev, meaning "evening" or "darkness," suggesting a time of profound loss.

Yet, even in this darkness, there is hope. The passage ends with a promise: "when the Holy One blessed be He will rebuild Jerusalem, He will restore all the joy to its midst." Quoting (Isaiah 51:3), it envisions a future where "gladness and joy will be found in it, thanksgiving and the sound of music."

So, what do we take away from this intricate and many-sided Midrash? It's a reminder that sacred texts are not static pronouncements, but living conversations. They invite us to delve deeper, to find hidden connections, and to understand the enduring relationship between God and Israel – a relationship that evolves from daughter to sister to mother, and ultimately, promises a future filled with joy and restoration. It suggests that even in times of darkness, the promise of joy remains, waiting to be rekindled with the rebuilding of Jerusalem.

Full source