5 min read

Pharaoh's Own Mouth Undid Every Boast He Made

The tongue that refused to know the Lord later begged for flight, and the same mouth that cursed itself taught Israel how to bless.

Curated by Arthur · Told by Maggid ·
Table of Contents
  1. Arrogance That Slips Under Its Own Feet
  2. The King Who Walked at the Head
  3. Raised Hands and Unpaid Debts
  4. What the Sea Heard
  5. Blessing as the Opposite of Theft
Pharaoh's Own Mouth Undid Every Boast He Made Click for full size

Arrogance That Slips Under Its Own Feet

Hannah prayed that arrogance leave the mouth, and Rabbi Yehoshua of Sikhnin heard in the Hebrew word a second meaning: to move, to be dislodged. The proud tongue does not stay where it plants itself. Its words shift. Your speech, he said, will contradict your speech.

He proved the verb with Abraham, who moved from there toward the mountain. Then he turned the proof against Pharaoh. The mouth that said, I will not let Israel go, later said, I will let you go, and your little ones. The mouth that sneered, Who is the LORD that I should heed His voice, later cried at the sea, Let me flee. The mouth that declared, I do not know the LORD, confessed under the hail, The LORD is righteous. Three boasts. Three reversals. No enemy had to invent the defeat. The tongue undid itself.

The King Who Walked at the Head

Another teaching remembers a moment when Pharaoh still knew how to honor. When he went out, he walked at the head of his ministers. They protested. Kings usually follow their council. He answered, Am I going out to meet a king of flesh and blood? I go to meet the Presence of the King of kings. For that honor, the Holy One paid him honor in return, and later meted out the retribution Himself. The same court that can recognize glory can also become the stage where glory is refused.

The midrash does not need Pharaoh to be simple. It needs him to be audible. First the mouth bows. Later the mouth hardens. Later still the mouth breaks. The arc is not a stranger to any house that has ever spoken too loudly about its own strength.

Raised Hands and Unpaid Debts

Rabbi Yitzhak named three whom Scripture brands wicked: the one who raises a hand against his fellow, the one who borrows and never repays, and the one who stirs up strife. Moses already called the striker wicked while the blow was only rising. Intent stains before blood does. Korah's company taught the name of strife. And the borrower who never repays becomes, in the outward turn of the midrash, the nations who eat and drink and never bless.

Israel, by contrast, eats and then blesses. Resh Lakish adds that when God grants the righteous what they ask, they give back to Him from what is already His. The table becomes a ledger of gratitude instead of a theater of appetite. Pharaoh's table took labor and returned only boasts. Israel's table is meant to close the circle with a blessing.

What the Sea Heard

At the water, the old sentences collapsed in reverse order. The man who did not know the LORD discovered righteousness the hard way. The man who would not heed learned flight. The man who would not send Israel learned that the people would leave anyway, and that his chariots would not rewrite the decree. Speech that will not bend to truth will bend to panic.

The midrash's cruelty is precise and almost merciful. It does not invent a secret history. It quotes Pharaoh against Pharaoh. The archive of his own mouth is enough. That is the terror of arrogance: it leaves witnesses in the speaker's teeth.

Blessing as the Opposite of Theft

To eat without blessing is to borrow the world and skip the payment. To strike is to steal a body's safety. To stir strife is to steal a community's peace. Pharaoh did all three on a civilizational scale. Israel is trained, week after week, to do the reverse in miniature: raise hands only for mitzvot (commandments), repay the gift of bread with words, refuse the company of those who tear tents apart from within.

Hannah's prayer still hangs over every mouth. Let arrogance move out. Let the tongue stop dislodging itself. Let the words that leave the lips be words a person can still stand beside when the hail starts, when the sea splits, when the only honest sentence left is that the LORD is righteous.

Israel's counter-discipline is almost boring by comparison: bread, salt, a short blessing, a return of speech toward the Giver. No chariots. No hail. Only the refusal to let a meal end in mute taking. The midrash sets that small table-habit against the grand collapses of empire speech because the grand collapses begin as small refusals to bless. A mouth that will not thank becomes a mouth that will not know, and a mouth that will not know becomes a mouth that must flee.

Listen again to the three reversals in order and the camp can almost hear the sea wind between them. Refusal becomes permission. Contempt becomes flight. Denial becomes the confession that righteousness belongs to the LORD. The midrash needs no extra miracle for the punchline. The archive of imperial speech is already a comedy written in fear.


← All myths

From the tradition

Sources

3 sources

The texts behind this telling. Some cards carry a translation of the source; others are our own retelling of it, and each card says which. Every card links out to the original.

Midrash Shmuel 5:8Midrash Shmuel

Translation of the source text.Midrash Shmuel, Krakow 1893, Public Domain, on Sefaria · CC-BY-SA

"Let arrogance come out of your mouth" (1 Samuel 2:3). Rabbi Yehoshua of Sikhnin, in the name of Rabbi Levi: your words contradict your words. Just as you say, "And he moved from there to the mountain" (Genesis 12:8), the mouth that said, "Moreover, I will not let Israel go" (Exodus 5:2), is the mouth that said, "I will let you go (and your little ones)" (Exodus 8:24). The mouth that said, "Who is the LORD that I should heed His voice" (Exodus 5:2), is the mouth that said, "And Egypt said, 'Let me flee,' etc." (Exodus 14:25). The mouth that said, "I do not know the LORD" (Exodus 5:2), is the mouth that said, "The LORD is righteous, etc." (Exodus 9:27).

Full source
Avot DeRabbi Natan 27Avot DeRabbi Natan

Retold in our words. Read the original at the link below.The Minor Tractates of the Talmud, trans. A. Cohen, Soncino Press (1965) · CC-BY

R. JOSE SAID: HE WHO HONOURS THE TORAH IS HIMSELF HONOURED BY MANKIND, as it is stated, For them that honour Me I will honour, and they that despise Me shall be lightly esteemed.11 Sam. 2, 30. ‘Me’ is here identified with the Torah, a doctrine frequent in the Zohar and other mystical literature.Another interpretation2Omitted in V, but inserted by GRA. of For them that honour Me I will honour: this refers to Pharaoh king of Egypt who paid honour to Him Who spoke and the world came into being by going out at the head of his council of ministers. His servants said to him, ‘Usually kings go out behind their ministers, but you go out at their head!’ He replied, ‘Am I going out to meet a [28a] king of flesh and blood? No, I go to meet the Presence of the King of kings, the Holy One, blessed be He’. Therefore the Holy One, blessed be He, paid Pharaoh honour, and He Himself meted out retribution to him, as it is stated, I have compared thee, O my love, to a steed in Pharaoh’s chariots.3Cant. 1, 9. This verse in no wise proves the point that God Himself inflicted punishment upon Pharaoh. GRA substitutes for this verse Hab. 3, 15, quoted in the preceding paragraph. This latter verse suggests that God set forth on His horses in order to requite Pharaoh; cf. Sanh. 94b (Sonc. ed., p. 634).

R. Pappias said: The congregation of Israel praised the horses and chariots of Pharaoh, as it is stated, Thou hast trodden the sea with Thy horses.4Hab. ibid. This verse too offers no proof for R. Pappias’ statement, and it has been suggested that Cant. 1, 9 should be read here as indicating the high esteem in which Pharaoh’s steeds were held, since God likens His love for Israel to a highly prized mare among Pharaoh’s chariots. The text of the passage is evidently in disorder and Schechter gives it up as hopeless. [Bacher, Ag. d. Tannaiten I, p. 319, n. 3, thinks that the appropriate quotation is Hab. 3, 8.]R. Joshua b. Ḳorḥah said: When Pharaoh came to the Red Sea he was riding on a stallion, and the Holy One, blessed be He, appeared to him on a mare,5To lure Pharaoh’s stallion to follow headlong into the sea; cf. Midrash Rabbah, Song of Songs, on I, 9 (Sonc. ed., p. 71). as it is stated, To a steed in Pharaoh’s chariots. But did He not ride upon a cherub, as it is stated, And He rode upon a cherub, and did fly; yea, He did swoop down upon the wings of the wind?6Ps. 18, 11. The cherub appeared to the steeds of Pharaoh in the form of a mare, and they followed her into the sea.And they that despise Me shall be lightly esteemed: this refers to Sennacherib who behaved contemptuously before Him Who spoke and the world came into being, as it is stated, By thy servants hast thou taunted the Lord, and hast said: With the multitude of my chariots am I come up to the height of the mountains, to the innermost parts of Lebanon; and I have cut down the tall cedars thereof, and the choice cypress-trees thereof; and I have entered into his farthest height, the forest of his fruitful field. I have digged and drunk water, and with the sole of my feet have I dried up all the rivers of Egypt.7Is. 37, 24f. Therefore the Holy One, blessed be He, meted out punishment to him by an angel who shaved his head and beard,8Cf. Sanh. 96a (Sonc. ed., p. 646). so that he returned shamefacedly to his land.9In the MSS. quoted in Schechter’s edition the words ‘who shaved … land’ are omitted, and in their place is quoted the appropriate verse from Is. 37, 36, And the angel of the Lord went forth and smote in the camp of the Assyrians, etc.R. ISHMAEL THE SON OF R. JOḤANAN B. BEROKA SAID: HE WHO LEARNS IN ORDER TO TEACH, etc.10From Aboth 4:6 (Sonc. ed., IV, 5, p. 46). He used to say: It is not incumbent upon you to undertake to finish the whole of the Torah, yet you are not free to keep aloof from it.11An adaptation of R. Ṭarfon’s dictum in Aboth 2:21 (Sonc. ed., II, 16, p. 24). But he who greatly amasses [knowledge of the Torah] accumulates abundant reward.R. ELEAZAR B. ḤISMA SAID: THE LAWS CONCERNING BIRD-OFFERINGS AND THE PURIFICATION OF WOMEN ARE THE ESSENTIAL ORDINANCES.12From Aboth 3:23 (Sonc. ed., III, 18, p. 41). R. Joḥanan b. Nuri said: The halakoth, the laws of ritual purity and of menstrual women and bird-offerings are the essentials of the Torah. He used to say: The arranging of the table13To set out the Shewbread (cf. Lev. 24, 5ff). According to GRA, the provision of a large and lavish table to feed the scholars and the needy. and the establishment of a Beth Din14To administer justice and establish law and order in the community. as well as its upkeep bring welfare to the world.

R. Joḥanan b. Dehabai said: If a man says, ‘This law is not acceptable’,15Reading נראית for נבראת. The statement is a denial of the authenticity and Divine origin of the Torah; cf. Sanh. 99a (Sonc. ed., pp. 671f). he has no share in the world to come. He used to say: Keep not aloof from a pursuit which is limitless or from a task which is endless.16i.e. the study of the Torah. This is an exposition of R. Ṭarfon’s dictum in Aboth 2:21 (Sonc. ed., II, 16, p. 24). The author may well be R. Ṭarfon himself. [This may be illustrated by] a parable. To what is the matter like? To a man who was [hired] to carry away the waters from the sea and pour them out on the dry land. The sea did not grow less nor was the dry land filled up; so the man became dispirited. Whereupon people said to him, ‘You fool! why are you dispirited? Continue to draw your pay of one golden dinar daily’.

R. ELIEZER B. SHAMMUA‘ SAID: LET THE HONOUR OF YOUR DISCIPLE BE AS DEAR TO YOU AS YOUR OWN, AND THE HONOUR OF YOUR COLLEAGUE AS THE REVERENCE FOR YOUR TEACHER, AND THE REVERENCE FOR YOUR TEACHER AS THE REVERENCE OF HEAVEN. Whence do we know that the honour of a disciple should be as dear as one’s own honour?17As corrected by the Commentators. V. reads, ‘It teaches that … as the honour of his colleague’. All may derive it from Moses our teacher who said to Joshua, Choose for us men.18Ex. 17, 9. E.V., choose us out men. It is not stated, ‘Choose for me’ but Choose for us, proving that he regarded Joshua as an equal, although he was the master and Joshua his disciple.Whence do we know that the honour of a colleague should be as dear as [the reverence for] one’s teacher? As it is stated, And Aaron said unto Moses: Oh my lord.19Num. 12, 11. But was not Moses his younger brother? But he acknowledged Moses as his master.20By addressing him as my lord.And whence do we know that the reverence21The text has ‘honour’, but the intent is ‘reverence’ as set out at the beginning of the passage. for a teacher should be as dear to one as the reverence of Heaven? As it is stated, And Joshua the son of Nun, the minister of Moses from his youth up, answered and said: My lord Moses, shut them in.22ibid. XI, 28. He then considered his teacher’s honour as equal to that of the Divine.23Joshua regarded disobedience to his teacher Moses as disobedience to the Divine command.For24This word is deleted by GRA as the passage has no connection with what has gone before; but cf. the commentary of B.Y. at first they said, ‘Corn [is plentiful] in Judah, straw in Galilee, and chaff beyond the Jordan’. Later, however, they said, ‘In Judah there is no corn [only straw], in Galilee there is no straw but only chaff, and beyond the Jordan there is neither the one nor the other’.25The passage describes in metaphor the state of learning which prevailed in Judah and the provinces, and proceeds to contrast the attainments of the early generations with the later, showing how the standard had deteriorated in the course of the years. Cf. ‘Erub. 53a (Sonc. ed., pp. 370ff). Schechter considers this passage out of place here and suggests its transference to XXVIII, 2.

Full source
Pesikta DeRav Kahana 28:2Pesikta de-Rav Kahana

Translation of the source text.Pesikta de Rav Kahana according to an Oxford manuscript, Dov Mandelbaum ed., N.Y. 1987 · CC-BY

[2] "The wicked borrows and does not repay, etc." (Psalm 37:21). Rabbi Yitzchak said: There are three who are called wicked, and these are they: one who raises his hand against his fellow, one who borrows and does not repay, and one who is a man of contention. One who raises his hand against his fellow - how do we know? "And he said to the wicked one, Why do you strike your fellow?" (Exodus 2:13). Rabbi Ze'ura said: It is not only that he struck him; rather, even if he raised his hand to strike him and did not strike him, he is called wicked - this is what is written, "And he said to the wicked one, Why do you strike your fellow" (Exodus 2:13); it does not say "Why did you strike" but "Why do you strike" - he intends to strike him, and you have not yet struck. Rabbi Samuel bar Tanchum said it before Rabbi Tanchuma, and he said: Even when he is brazen-faced he is called wicked, as it is said, "A wicked man hardens (is brazen with) his face" (Proverbs 21:29). And one who borrows and does not repay - how do we know? "The wicked borrows and does not repay" (Psalm 37:21). And one who is a man of contention - how do we know? From the congregation of Korah: "Depart, I pray, from the tents of these wicked men" (Numbers 16:26). Rav Yehuda, when he would put a man under oath, would read over him, "Depart, I pray, from the tents of these wicked men, etc." (Numbers 16:26). Another interpretation: "The wicked borrows and does not repay" (Psalm 37:21) - these are the nations of the world, who eat and drink and do not bless. "But the righteous is gracious and gives" (Psalm 37:21) - these are Israel, who eat and bless. Reish Lakish said: You find that when the Holy One, blessed be He, gives the righteous one what he asks of Him, He then turns and bestows it upon him as a gift from His own - this is what is written, "But the righteous is gracious and gives" (Psalm 37:21) - the Righteous One of the world is gracious and gives. Rabbi Levi said: Thus it arose in the mind of the Holy One, blessed be He, to give Israel one pilgrimage festival in every month of the summer: in Nisan, Passover; in Iyar, the Lesser Passover; in Sivan, Shavuot (Atzeret). But on account of the transgressions and evil deeds that were in their hands, He took from them three - Tammuz, Av, and Elul. And Tishrei came and repaid the three of them: Rosh Hashanah (Resh Shatta, the head of the year) corresponding to Tammuz, the Great Fast (Yom Kippur) corresponding to Av, the seven days of the Festival (Sukkot) corresponding to Elul. The Holy One, blessed be He, said, "For others He repays, and for Himself He does not repay? Give Him of His own, and let Him come and take what is His." Therefore Scripture had to say, "On the eighth day a solemn assembly" (Numbers 29:35).

Full source