The story of Lot and the destruction of Sodom, as explored in Bereshit Rabbah 50, is a stark reminder of how attachment to material possessions can cloud our judgment and even endanger our lives.
The Torah tells us in (Genesis 19:16) that Lot "hesitated" as the angels urged him to flee the doomed city. But the Hebrew word used, vayitmama, suggests something more than simple hesitation. The Rabbis, in Bereshit Rabbah, see it as "wonderment after wonderment," a kind of stunned disbelief at the prospect of losing his wealth. He was thinking, “What a great loss of silver, gold, gems, and jewels!"
Isn't it ironic? Lot's "great wealth caused him to hesitate to leave the city, thus endangering his life," the text explains. And it leads to a powerful statement: “Wealth is accrued for its owner to his detriment” (Ecclesiastes 5:12).
Bereshit Rabbah doesn't stop there. Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi applies this to Lot, but then Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman extends it to Korah, whose wealth led to arrogance and rebellion against Moses (Numbers 16). Rabbi Yehuda bar Simon sees it in Navot, who died rather than part with his inherited land (I Kings 21). Rabbi Levi even applies it to Haman, whose pride, fueled by wealth, ultimately led to his downfall. And Rabbi Yitzḥak connects it to the tribes of Reuben and Gad (Numbers 32), whose focus on their cattle led them to choose a territory that resulted in their exile. Some even say it applies to Job, who lost his wealth only to have it restored!
It's a recurring theme: the danger of clinging too tightly to earthly possessions.
But the story doesn't just dwell on Lot's hesitation. (Genesis 19:16) tells us, "the men grasped his hand, and the hand of his wife, and the hand of his two daughters; out of the compassion of the Lord for him, they took him out, and placed him outside the city.” Who were these "men"? The Rabbis suggest it was Refael, an angel. But hold on – the verse uses plural language. How can one angel be "they"? The answer lies in the subsequent verse, they say, which uses the singular "he said," indicating that one angel was leading the rescue.
And then there's the instruction: "Flee to the mountain." But why the mountain? Bereshit Rabbah offers a beautiful interpretation: the mountain represents the merit of Abraham. The angels were telling Lot to flee to the protection of Abraham's righteousness! This is why the verse uses mountains as a metaphor for Israel's three patriarchs: “Leaping on the mountains” (Song of Songs 2:8)
Interestingly, Lot resists. "Please, no, my lords," he pleads (Genesis 19:18). He argues that he can't flee to the mountain. Why? Rabbi Berekhya and Rabbi Levi, in the name of Rabbi Ḥama bar Ḥanina, offer a profound insight: Lot felt that in the presence of someone as righteous as Abraham, his own merits would pale in comparison. It's like the woman from Tzarefat telling Elijah, "Did you come to me to evoke my sin and to kill my son?" (I (Kings 17:1)8). Before, she was the most righteous in her city, but next to Elijah, her deeds seemed insignificant. Lot felt the same way about Abraham.
Rabbi Berekhya makes another keen observation: "Just as a bad locale is challenging, so a good locale can be challenging." Lot was used to the valley, to Sodom. The mountain, though a place of safety and righteousness, was unfamiliar and therefore daunting. Even moving from a bad situation to a good one can present its own set of difficulties.
Finally, Lot proposes an alternative: a small, nearby city. "Here now, this city is near to flee there, and it is small; please, I will escape there. Is it not small, and my life will be saved" (Genesis 19:20). And God grants his request. Rabbi Ḥalafta of Caesarea sees in this a powerful message: if Lot, merely for hosting an angel, received such favor, how much more favor will God show to Israel because of their ancestors' merits? “the Lord will show you favor” (Numbers 6:26).
So, what can we take away from Lot's story? Perhaps it's a reminder to examine our own attachments. What are we clinging to that might be hindering our growth, our safety, our ability to embrace a better future? And are we willing to step outside our comfort zones, even when that means facing the daunting prospect of change, or feeling inadequate in the presence of greatness? It’s a lot to think about, isn't it?
“He hesitated and the men grasped his hand, and the hand of his wife, and the hand of his two daughters; out of the compassion of the Lord for him, they took him out, and placed him outside the city” (Genesis 19:16). “It was as they took them out, he said: Flee for your life; do not look behind and do not stay in the entire plain; flee to the mountain, lest you be destroyed” (Genesis 19:17). “He hesitated [vayitmama]” (Genesis 19:16) – [he expressed] wonderment [timahon] after wonderment;50This is expounded from the fact that it says vayitmama and not vayitma. he said: ‘What a great a loss of silver, gold, gems, and jewels.’ That is what is written: “Wealth is accrued for its owner to his detriment” (Ecclesiastes 5:12)51Lot’s great wealth caused him to hesitate to leave the city, thus endangering his life. – Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi said: This refers to Lot. Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman said: It refers to Koraḥ.52See Numbers 16. Koraḥ’s wealth led him to become haughty and to challenge Moses, which led to his downfall. Rabbi Yehuda bar Simon said: This is Navot.53See I Kings 21. Navot’s refusal to part with his inherited property led to his death. Rabbi Levi said: This is Haman.54His wealth led him to haughtiness and, ultimately, death. Rabbi Yitzḥak said: This is the tribe of Reuben and Gad.55See Numbers 32. Their great cattle holdings caused them to choose a remote, outlying area as their territory, and they ended up being exiled before the other tribes. The Rabbis said: This is Job, who was wealthy, became poor,56His wealth was lost as an atonement for his sins. and was restored to what he had been. “The men grasped his hand, and the hand of his wife and the hand of his two daughters…” (Genesis 19:16) – who was this? It was Refael. They raised an objection: Is it not written: “They took him out, and they placed him outside the city” (Genesis 19:16), and it is written: “It was as they took them out”? (Genesis 19:17).57These are all stated in the plural. How can you say that the verse speaks of one angel? He said to them: Read what is written thereafter: “They said: Flee for your life” is not written, but rather, “he said: Flee for your life.” “Flee to the mountain, lest you be destroyed” – [“to the mountain” means] by the merit of Abraham,58The angels told Lot to flee to Abraham, whose merit would protect him. who is called a mountain: “Leaping on the mountains” (Song of Songs 2:8),59In this verse and the next, the mountains are a metaphor for Israel’s three patriarchs. and it says: “Hear, mountains…” (Micah 6:2). “Lot said to them: Please, no, my lords” (Genesis 19:18). “Please, behold, your servant has found favor in your eyes, and you have increased your kindness that you have done with me to save my life, but I will not be able to flee to the mountain, lest the evil overtake me, and I will die” (Genesis 19:19). “Lot said to them: Please, no, my lords. Please, behold, your servant has found favor in your eyes…” – Rabbi Berekhya and Rabbi Levi in the name of Rabbi Ḥama bar Ḥanina:60In explaining why Lot refused to go to the mountain, which was a metaphor for Abraham. Two people expressed the same idea – Lot and the woman from Tzarefat. The woman from Tzarefat said [to Elijah]: ‘Until you came to me, the Holy One blessed be He would see my deeds and the deeds of the residents of my city. My deeds were greater than those of the residents of my city, and I was considered a righteous woman in their midst. Now that you have come to me, [and my good deeds are nothing compared to yours]: “Did you come to me to evoke my sin and to kill my son?”’ (I Kings 17:18). Lot said [as well]: ‘Before I go to Abraham, the Holy One blessed be He would see my deeds and the deeds of the residents of my city, and I was considered a righteous man in their midst. Now, if I would go to Abraham, whose good actions are greater than my own, I would not be able to survive in his environs.’ “But I will not be able” – Rabbi Berekhya in the name of Rabbi Levi: From where do we learn: Just as a bad locale61Where the weather and other conditions are not comfortable. is challenging, so a good locale can be challenging? It is from here: “But I will not be able to flee to the mountain, lest [the evil] overtake me.” Sodom is located in the valley, and that is why he says: “But I will not be able to flee to the mountain.” He was living in the valley and they said to him: ‘Go to the mountain,’62Where the air is better than in the valley. and yet this is what he said. This teaches that even when going from a bad locale to a good locale, the good locale can be challenging.63Even though mountain air is healthier and more pleasant, the change from the atmosphere to which one is accustomed can endanger one’s health. “Here now, this city is near to flee there, and it is small; please, I will escape there. Is it not small, and my life will be saved” (Genesis 19:20). “He said to him: Behold, I have shown you favor for this matter as well, not to overturn the city of which you spoke” (Genesis 19:21). “Here now, this city is near to flee there…He said to him: Behold, I have shown you favor for this matter as well” – Rabbi Ḥalafta of Caesarea said: [God said:] ‘If Lot, because he [merely] hosted the angel, was shown favor by him, shall I not show you [Israel] favor because of you and because of your ancestors’ – “the Lord will show you favor” (Numbers 6:26).